أوجه الخلاف النحوي في قراءتي أبي عمرو بن العلاء والكسائي /
This study attempts to examine the grammatical differences in the readings of the two Qur’anic reciters: Abu 'Amr ibn al-'Ala’ (d. 154 AH), the head of the grammatical school of Basrah, and 'Ali ibn Hamzah al-Kisa’i (d. 189 AH), the founder of the grammatical school of Kufah. It inten...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Kuala Lumpur :
al-Jami'ah al-Islamiyah al-'Alamiyah bi- Maliziya,
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Click here to view 1st 24 pages of the thesis. Members can view fulltext at the specified PCs in the library. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study attempts to examine the grammatical differences in the readings of the two
Qur’anic reciters: Abu 'Amr ibn al-'Ala’ (d. 154 AH), the head of the grammatical
school of Basrah, and 'Ali ibn Hamzah al-Kisa’i (d. 189 AH), the founder of the
grammatical school of Kufah. It intends to clarify the aspects of grammatical
differences in their two readings, and the conformity of these readings with their
schools: Basrah and Kufah. The study adopts a descriptive-inductive method, by
collecting the Qur’anic verses that contain the grammatical differences between the
two reciters, of which there are about 200 verses. It then classifies these verses into
various categories with reference to the aspects of their differences, and analyzes them
in line with the books of the Qur’anic readings (al-qira’at) and commentaries (altafasir). The study concludes that the grammatical differences in the readings of the
two reciters occur in all parts of the word: letter, noun and verb, with more differences
in the verbs compared to the other two parts. It also proves that the two reciters do not
follow a particular grammatical form in their readings, but in the case of gender, Abu
'Amr is consistent in using the feminine form while al-Kisa’i in using the masculine
form, and from this perspective, their readings do not completely resemble their
linguistic environment. It furthermore demonstrates their harmony in the meaning
despite the reading differences, because the arguments are based on the grammatical
assumptions and interpretations (al-ta’wilat). The study also reveals that the two
reciters are not completely bound by their grammatical schools or individual choice,
but in some cases, one of the readings adopts the grammatical choice of another
reader. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "Bahth takmili li-nayl darajat Dukturah al-'Ulum al-Insaniyah fi al-Lughah al-'Arabiyah wa-Adabiha (al-Dirasat al-Lughawiyah)."--On. t.p. Abstracts in English and Arabic. |
| Physical Description: | [xi], 217 leaves ; 30 cm. Also available on [3 1/2 in. computer disk converted into 4 3/4 in. computer optical disc] or [4 3/4 computer optical disc] |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 175-193). |