The pedagogy of philosophical inquiry (PI) as an approach to develop critical thinking and self-confidence : a case study of undergraduate students in IIUM /

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the pedagogy of Philosophical Inquiry (PI) in enhancing critical thinking and self-confidence among the undergraduate students of the Kulliyyah (Faculty) of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences (IRKHS), International Islamic Unive...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Norillah bt Abdullah
格式: Thesis
語言:English
出版: Kuala Lumpur : Institute of Education, 2009
主題:
在線閱讀:http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/4183
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
LEADER 054610000a22004690004500
001 494624
005 20231012165248.0
008 110512t2009 my g m 0 0 eng d
035 |a (Sirsi) 494624 
040 |a UIAM  |b eng  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
043 |a a-my--- 
050 0 0 |a LB2395.35 
100 0 |a Norillah bt Abdullah  |9 71327 
245 1 4 |a The pedagogy of philosophical inquiry (PI) as an approach to develop critical thinking and self-confidence :  |b  a case study of undergraduate students in IIUM /  |c by Norillah Bt Abdullah 
264 1 |a Kuala Lumpur :  |b Institute of Education,   |c 2009 
300 |a xiv, 262 leaves ;  |c 30 cm. 
336 |2 rdacontent  |a text 
337 |2 rdamedia  |a unmediated 
337 |2 rdamedia  |a computer 
338 |2 rdacarrier  |a volume 
338 |2 rdacarrier  |a online resource 
347 |2 rdaft  |a text file  |b PDF 
500 |a "A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education"--On t.p. 
502 |a Thesis (Ph.D.)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2009. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 213-224). 
520 |a The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the pedagogy of Philosophical Inquiry (PI) in enhancing critical thinking and self-confidence among the undergraduate students of the Kulliyyah (Faculty) of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences (IRKHS), International Islamic University, Malaysia (IIUM). Besides that, it also aimed to find out how students view the approach. This study employed a quasi-experimental research design and a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative approaches. In the treatment group, students were taught using the PI approach, while in the control group, students were offered the regular formal criticalthinking skill course. Quantitative analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the pre and post-test on critical thinking for both the treatment and control groups. This means, both PI and the formal course did not help to improve critical thinking skills. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the pre and post-test self-confidence score of the treatment group but not for the control group. This means, PI helped to enhance students' selfconfidence in contrast to the formal course. With regard to the students' home works, quantitative analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in terms of the students' score between the treatment and control groups. This means, even though the treatment group was not taught the critical thinking skills formally, they were still able to get the same score as the control group who was taught the skills directly. Findings from the survey indicate that, students perceived that the pedagogy of PI has improved their language, communication and interpersonal skills, self-confidence, and also helped them to manage their own group discussion independently. Qualitative analysis from the assignments showed that the treatment group was able to apply more critical thinking skills in their answers as compared to the control group. In addition, the treatment group was inclined to raise more philosophical questions or higher order questions while the control group was inclined to raise more factual questions or lower order questions. In fact, analysis of the sixth session of the treatment group which was videotaped, revealed that the questions raised by the students were all philosophical questions. Findings from the interviews and journal entries of the treatment group, showed that through the process of dialogue and discussion among students, they felt that a change had occurred in their way of thinking. They learned how to express their views and how to support their arguments with good reasons and examples and at the same time they learned to organise their arguments more systematically. They were exposed to different perspectives given by others and consequently, they became more open. It improved their self-confidence especially in expressing their ideas openly in front of others. 
610 2 |a International Islamic University Malaysia  |v Case studies  |x Students  |9 71328 
650 0 |a Education  |v Case studies  |x Study and teaching  |z Malaysia  |9 71329 
650 0 |a Critical thinking  |v Case studies  |z Malaysia  |9 71330 
650 0 |a Self-confidence  |v Case studies  |9 71331 
650 0 |a Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)  |9 41478 
655 0 7 |a Theses, IIUM local 
690 |a Dissertations, Academic  |x Institute of Education  |z IIUM  |9 15729 
710 2 |a International Islamic University Malaysia.  |b Institute of Education  |9 15730 
856 4 |u http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/4183 
900 |a hj-smab-mrm-his-hab-zhmn-rmb-nbm 
942 |2 lcc  |n 0  |c THESIS 
999 |c 434006  |d 464853 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |2 lcc  |4 0  |6 T L B 02395.00035 N00841P 02009  |7 3  |8 IIUMTHESIS  |9 751740  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c THESIS  |d 2023-10-12  |g 0.00  |o t LB 2395.35 N841P 2009  |p 00011274887  |r 2017-10-19  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESIS 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |2 lcc  |4 0  |6 LU T L B 02395.00035 N00841P 02009  |7 3  |8 IIUMTHESIS  |9 753411  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c CLOSEACCES  |d 2023-10-12  |g 0.00  |o lu t LB 2395.35 N841P 2009  |p 00011171622  |r 2017-10-25  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESIS 
952 |0 0  |1 0  |2 lcc  |4 0  |6 TS C D F LB 02395.00035 N00841P 02009  |7 3  |8 IIUMTHESIS  |9 838865  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |d 2023-10-12  |g 0.00  |o ts cdf LB 2395.35 N841P 2009  |p 00011106273  |r 2017-10-27  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESISDIG