نقد متن الحديث فى ضوء نتائج العلوم التجريبية : دراسة نظرية /
This study deals with the issue of how to solve contradictions between the Prophetic sayings and the outcomes of the Natural Sciences, answering the following questions: (1) Is it possible that the early scholars of ×adith may have made mistakes in their classification of some ×adiths that are withi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Gombak, Selangor :
al-Jami'ah al-Islamiyah al-'Alamiyah bi- Maliziya,
2006.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/8302 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study deals with the issue of how to solve contradictions between the Prophetic
sayings and the outcomes of the Natural Sciences, answering the following questions: (1) Is it
possible that the early scholars of ×adith may have made mistakes in their classification of some
×adiths that are within the field of Natural Sciences? (2) To what extent does the Shari'ah recognize
the outcomes of the Natural Sciences? (3)What are the levels of information inferred from different
categories of accepted ×adiths? (4) What is the position of the so-called "The Consensually
Accepted ×adiths" and ×adiths of the two authentic collections (al-ØaÍiÍayn) on the issue? (5)
What are the levels of information provided by different scientific concepts? (6) What is the correct
method to solve assumed contradictions between the Prophetic sayings and the outcomes of the
Natural Sciences? The researcher used inductive and critical analytic methods in an attempt to
produce an accurate scientific method to solve the contradictions between the various levels of
information that different categories of the Prophetic sayings produce and the different levels of the
outcomes of the Natural Sciences. The research has affirmed that the Shari'ah relies on the
outcomes of the Natural Sciences as much as it does on the different categories of the Prophetic
sayings. It also found that it is possible that the early scholars of ×adith may have made mistakes in
their classification of some ×adiths that are within the field of the Natural Sciences because what
they have done was IjtihÉd which is open to error and because of their limited knowledge of these
things, due to the fact that the Natural Sciences of those days did not provide sufficient information.
The study defined different levels of information provided by every category and concept of ×adith
and the Natural Sciences, which led to wade into difficult issues such as defining what levels of
information "The Consensually Accepted ×adiths" and ×adiths of al-SaÍiÍayn produce. The
research reached the conclusion that none of the scientific outcomes or categories of ×adith produce
certainty of the knowledge and absolute truth except for al-MutawÉtir, although the level of
uncertainty differs from one to another. It also affirmed that the allegation about the total acceptance
of al- SaÍiÍayn by the Ummah is inaccurate, and these ×adiths and "The Consensually Accepted
×adiths" do not produce more than a strong assumption. Finally, the research devised a method to
solve assumed contradictions between the two sources of knowledge, as a solution to revolving the
contradictions between two uncertain pieces of evidence. This method consists of four stages;
firstly, to verify the existence of the a contradiction, secondly, to reconcile it if possible, thirdly, to
give preponderance to the stronger over the weaker if the reconciliation is impossible and fourthly to
impose the status quo pending further development, if both opponent parties are of equal status. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Abstracts in Arabic and English |
| Physical Description: | 307 leaves ; 30 cm. Also available on [3 1/2 in. computer disk converted into 4 3/4 in. computer optical disc] or [4 3/4 in. computer optical disc] |