Rhetorical style across cultures : an analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic writing of Thai and Malaysian students /
The theory of Intercultural Rhetoric (IR) fundamentally highlights the interrelation of language and culture. It is believed that each community has its own preferred rhetorical style of interaction which is deemed different from one culture to another. In writing, such distinctive preference is usu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kuala Lumpur :
Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia,
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Click here to view 1st 24 pages of the thesis. Members can view fulltext at the specified PCs in the library. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| LEADER | 034810000a22002770004500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 161226t2015 my a g m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a UIAM |b eng | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 043 | |a a-my--- | ||
| 050 | |a P301.5.A27 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hayisama, Faridah | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Rhetorical style across cultures : |b an analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic writing of Thai and Malaysian students / |c by Faridah Hayisama | |
| 260 | |a Kuala Lumpur : |b Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, |c 2015 | ||
| 300 | |a xiii, 90 leaves : |b ill. ; |c 30cm. | ||
| 502 | |a Thesis (MHSAL)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2015. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 84-87). | ||
| 520 | |a The theory of Intercultural Rhetoric (IR) fundamentally highlights the interrelation of language and culture. It is believed that each community has its own preferred rhetorical style of interaction which is deemed different from one culture to another. In writing, such distinctive preference is usually exhibited through the use of linguistic features, of which metadiscourse (MD) markers are considered as one of the signposts to the interpretation of writing style preferences. This study aims to investigate the use of interactional metadiscourse (MD) features and its relevance to the rhetorical style preferences in academic writing of Thai and Malaysian masters students. Using Hyland's (2005) taxonomy, thesis discussions were manually analysed in terms of interactional MD markers to determine their frequency of occurrence and to relate the results to the rhetorical styles of writing preferred by each group of students. The analysis revealed that of all five types of interactional MD features, hedges were the most frequently used device followed respectively by boosters, attitude markers, engagement marker and self-mention. In terms of the rhetorical style of writing, the frequency of MD features suggests that tentative and indirect statements, reader-responsibility, distant-relationship between writer and readers, and less writer-involvement in the texts were the preferred rhetorical styles of interaction of both Thai and Malaysian students. The writing conventions and rhetorical styles of the students can be explained from a sociocultural point of view that they are relevant to the oriental style of interaction from which both groups of students originated. The study draw attention to the pedagogical implications that students in Thai and Malaysian contexts should be given more instructional focus on how to utilize MD features in making academic writing more persuasive and interactive. | ||
| 596 | |a 1 | ||
| 655 | |a Theses, IIUM local | ||
| 690 | |a Dissertations, Academic |x Department of English Language and Literature |z IIUM | ||
| 710 | |a International Islamic University Malaysia. |b Department of English Language and Literature | ||
| 856 | |u http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/6815 |z Click here to view 1st 24 pages of the thesis. Members can view fulltext at the specified PCs in the library. | ||
| 900 | |a sbh-lfr-naw | ||
| 999 | |c 436383 |d 469743 | ||
| 952 | |0 0 |6 T P 000301.5 A27 H419R 2015 |7 0 |8 THESES |9 760543 |a IIUM |b IIUM |c MULTIMEDIA |g 0.00 |o t P 301.5 A27 H419R 2015 |p 11100341305 |r 2017-10-19 |t 1 |v 0.00 |y THESIS | ||
| 952 | |0 0 |6 TS CDF P 301.5 A27 H419R 2015 |7 0 |8 THESES |9 853695 |a IIUM |b IIUM |c MULTIMEDIA |g 0.00 |o ts cdf P 301.5 A27 H419R 2015 |p 11100341306 |r 2017-10-26 |t 1 |v 0.00 |y THESISDIG | ||