English modifier system : a semiotic analysis /

This study is an effort to investigate English modifiers that are referred to by different names: adjectives, adverbs and rhetorical features, but work in the same way, i.e. to modify another word class such as nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs or adjectives. Underlying this study is an assumption tha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alam, Tasdiq Nomaira
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Gombak, Selangor : Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Social Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/6426
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 036120000a22002770004500
008 150908t2016 my a g m 000 0 eng d
040 |a UIAM  |b eng 
041 |a eng 
043 |a a-my--- 
050 |a P99.3 
100 1 |a Alam, Tasdiq Nomaira 
245 1 |a English modifier system :  |b a semiotic analysis /  |c by Tasdiq Nomaira Alam 
260 |a Gombak, Selangor :  |b Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Social Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia,  |c 2016 
300 |a xii, 93 leaves :  |b ill. ;  |c 30cm. 
502 |a Thesis (MHSAL)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2016. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 78-81). 
520 |a This study is an effort to investigate English modifiers that are referred to by different names: adjectives, adverbs and rhetorical features, but work in the same way, i.e. to modify another word class such as nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs or adjectives. Underlying this study is an assumption that the rules of English modifiers are not comprehensive enough as it is often confusing especially for ESL learners to understand whether or not the modifier is an adverb or adjective or a rhetorical feature. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis of the sign –ly utilizing the meaning based framework advocated by Tobin (1990), Govindasamy (2005), Stern (2006) and Reid (2011), all exponents of the Columbia School of Linguistics. The objectives of this study necessitate the use of a textual analysis format. Fifty feature articles written by native speakers of English from The Economist between 2014 and 2015 were selected and analysed using simple descriptive statistics. The objectives of the study are to investigate whether or not –ly is primarily used as an adverb, and the study also aims to find out the semantic value of the sign –ly by discovering its core meaning. The results of the study revealed that although a majority of the –ly modifiers are adverbs (79.10%), considerable number of adjectives and rhetorical feature that end in –ly (10.79% and 10.10% respectively) are present in English language. Furthermore, and more importantly the findings illustrate that –ly inflection consistently intensifies the modified either positively or negatively irrespective of context. Among 462 –ly adverbs, 94.15% positively intensify and 5.85% negatively intensify their modified. 82.53% –ly adjectives positively intensify and 17.47% negatively intensify the modified amongst 63 adjectives. The lowest quantity of –ly modifiers are found as rhetorical features, 59, and 93.22% positively intensify and 6.77% negatively intensify their respective modified. Thus, it can be summed up that the sign –ly has a core meaning for all the modifiers. Consequently, it is needless to classify the –ly modifiers as belonging to distinct word classes; in fact, it should just be treated as a meaningful sign. 
596 |a 1 
655 7 |a Theses, IIUM local 
690 |a Dissertations, Academic  |x Department of English Language and Literature  |z IIUM 
710 2 |a International Islamic University Malaysia.  |b Department of English Language and Literature 
856 4 |u http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/6426 
900 |a sbh-lfr 
999 |c 436648  |d 470409 
952 |0 0  |6 T P 000099.3 A318E 2016  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 761276  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o t P 99.3 A318E 2016  |p 11100350463  |r 2017-10-19  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESIS 
952 |0 0  |6 TS CDF P 99.3 A318E 2016  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 854932  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o ts cdf P 99.3 A318E 2016  |p 11100350464  |r 2017-10-26  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESISDIG