الفرق اليهودية عند كتاب المقالات والمؤرخين الإسلاميين : دراسة تحليلية ومقارنة /
This study analyses the account given by Muslim heresiographers about Pharisees, Sadducees, Karaites and Samaritans and compare these with those found in Jewish literature. The study is historical and it relies on the primary and secondary sources dealing with the Jewish Sects using both Islamic and...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Kuala Lumpur :
Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia,
1998
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/9477 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study analyses the account given by Muslim heresiographers about Pharisees, Sadducees, Karaites and Samaritans and compare these with those found in Jewish literature. The study is historical and it relies on the primary and secondary sources dealing with the Jewish Sects using both Islamic and Jewish sources. The study found that the majority of the Jews in Muslim heresiographers' perceptive are Pharisees who accepted the interpretations of Jewish priest. The Sadducees accept the meaning of scriptures literally and assumed Uzair is the son of God. The Karaites are those who believe firmly in the doctrines and justice of Judaism but denied equality between God and His creation. Their Anan is Resh Galuta. The Samaritans are those who believe in Moses and Joshua but deny prophethood to other prophets. The modern Jewish heresiographers assume that the Pharisees were the dominant sect, after the disaster of 70 CE. They believed in the tradition of Moses. The Sadducees are aristocrats who followed the scriptures for religious rites but not for daily living. The Karaites believe in the Written Torah, accept its literal meanings and assume that the Samaritans who believe in the sanctity of Mount Gerizim, do not belong to the Jewish community. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | [xii], 87 leaves : 30cm |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-88) |