الفرق اليهودية عند كتاب المقالات والمؤرخين الإسلاميين : دراسة تحليلية ومقارنة /

This study analyses the account given by Muslim heresiographers about Pharisees, Sadducees, Karaites and Samaritans and compare these with those found in Jewish literature. The study is historical and it relies on the primary and secondary sources dealing with the Jewish Sects using both Islamic and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Razali Musa (Author)
Other Authors: رزالي موسى
Format: Thesis
Language:Arabic
Published: Kuala Lumpur : Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/9477
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 030000000a22003370004500
008 200826s1998 my f m 000 0 ara d
040 |a UIAM  |b eng  |e rda 
041 |a ara 
043 |a a-my--- 
084 |a BPA487 
100 1 |a Razali Musa,  |e author 
242 1 3 |a al-Farq al-Yahudiyah 'inda kitab al-maqalat wa-al-mu'arikhin al-Islamiyyin :  |b dirasah tahliliyah wa-al-muqaranah 
245 1 2 |a الفرق اليهودية عند كتاب المقالات والمؤرخين الإسلاميين :  |b دراسة تحليلية ومقارنة /  |c رزالي بن موسى 
264 1 |a Kuala Lumpur :  |b Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia,   |c 1998 
300 |a [xii], 87 leaves :  |c 30cm 
336 |2 rdacontent  |a text 
347 |2 rdaft  |a text file  |b PDF 
502 |a Thesis (MIRKH)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 1998. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-88) 
520 |a This study analyses the account given by Muslim heresiographers about Pharisees, Sadducees, Karaites and Samaritans and compare these with those found in Jewish literature. The study is historical and it relies on the primary and secondary sources dealing with the Jewish Sects using both Islamic and Jewish sources. The study found that the majority of the Jews in Muslim heresiographers' perceptive are Pharisees who accepted the interpretations of Jewish priest. The Sadducees accept the meaning of scriptures literally and assumed Uzair is the son of God. The Karaites are those who believe firmly in the doctrines and justice of Judaism but denied equality between God and His creation. Their Anan is Resh Galuta. The Samaritans are those who believe in Moses and Joshua but deny prophethood to other prophets. The modern Jewish heresiographers assume that the Pharisees were the dominant sect, after the disaster of 70 CE. They believed in the tradition of Moses. The Sadducees are aristocrats who followed the scriptures for religious rites but not for daily living. The Karaites believe in the Written Torah, accept its literal meanings and assume that the Samaritans who believe in the sanctity of Mount Gerizim, do not belong to the Jewish community. 
596 |a 1 
655 7 |a Theses, IIUM local 
690 |a Dissertations, Academic  |x Department of Usul al-Din and Comparative Religion  |z IIUM 
691 |a Islam  |x Relations Yahudiyah 
700 0 |a رزالي موسى 
710 2 |a International Islamic University Malaysia.  |b Department of Usul al-Din and Comparative Religion 
856 4 |u http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/9477 
900 |a mza-naw-syl-sn 
999 |c 437726  |d 467796 
952 |0 0  |6 T BPA 487 R39 1998  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 758944  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o t BPA 487 R39 1998  |p 00011275477  |r 2020-10-02  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESIS 
952 |0 0  |6 TS CDF BPA 487 R39 1998  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 850838  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o ts cdf BPA 487 R39 1998  |p 11100412635  |r 2020-10-02  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESISDIG