مكانة أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه في رواية الحديث عند محمود أبي رية : دراسة نقدية /

This research examines the status of Abu Hurairah in the Riwayah of Hadith from the perspective of Mahmoud Abu Rayya. This research revolves around the criticism of Abu Rayya of Abu Hurairah where he said that Abu Hurairah did not sincerely embrace Islam because his conversion was merely a way to ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ناسوتيون، الحافظ
Format: Thesis
Language:Arabic
Published: Kuala Lumpur : Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/10180
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This research examines the status of Abu Hurairah in the Riwayah of Hadith from the perspective of Mahmoud Abu Rayya. This research revolves around the criticism of Abu Rayya of Abu Hurairah where he said that Abu Hurairah did not sincerely embrace Islam because his conversion was merely a way to make a living where he served under the Ummayad dynasty after the Prophet's death. The research employs three approaches in this study: the inductive approach, analytical approach, and critical approach. The research deals with information about the personality of Mahmoud Abu Rayya and his ideas about the Sunnah and its narrative. The research came to these conclusions: Abu Rayah claimed that he wrote his book through scientific inquiries but evidence showed otherwise. It was discovered that Abu Hurairah was mudalīs in the hadith, although al Muhadith agreed with Abu Hurairah. The research hopes that it would, once and for all, end whatever speculations against Abu Hurairah and his invaluable contribution to the science of the Hadith
Item Description:Abstracts in English and Arabic.
"بحث تكميلي مقدم لنيل درجة الماجستير في معارف الوحي والتراث (القرآن والسنة)."--On title page.
Physical Description:[xi], 164 leaves : illustrations ; 30cm.
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references (leaves 152-164).