rdf-syntax-grammar
mods:
  schema location: http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
  title info:
    non sort: ال
    title: تداخل التطبيقي بين القياس والمصلحة المرسلة والاستحسان
    sub title: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
  title info:
    title: al-Tadakhul al-tatbiqi bayn al-qiyas wa al-maslahat al-mursalah wa al-istihsan
    sub title: dirasat tahliliyah muqaranah
  name:
    name part: حسين، فرحت
    role:
      role term: creator
  name:
    name part: Husayn, Farhat
    role:
      role term: author
  name:
    name part: International Islamic University Malaysia
    name part: Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences
  genre: Theses, IIUM local
  origin info:
    place:
      place term: my
    date issued: 2018
  language:
    language term: ara
  physical description:
    extent: [xii], 243 leaves : illustrations ; 30cm.
  abstract: Qiyas (juristic analogy), Maṣlaḥah mursalah (unrestricted public interest) and Istihsan (juristic preference) are considered important principles among the adillah taba'iyyah (dependent evidences) for ruling on new issues that are subject to ijtihad (juristic reasoning). Although majority of scholars agreed that from the evidential viewpoint Qiyas is stronger than Maṣlaḥah mursalah and Istihsan, disagreement occurred among the schools of Islamic law on whether maṣlaḥah mursalah and Istihsan can be considered as evidences of Shari'ah or not. Meanwhile, the forms of interference emerge between these three evidences, which results lack of clarity in disagreement between scholars and disorder in terms of evidences. However, the scope for further research and review on the issue is still there. At this very juncture, this research focuses on gathering scholars' opinions from schools of Islamic law regarding the interference between Qiyas, maṣlaḥah mursalah and Istihsan, studying them in order to understand the views and interpretations. Besides, this is an analytical and comparative study for explaining the interference between these three evidences, in terms of their theories and practical applications. The researcher has used inductive, analytical and comparative approaches in order to achieve the objectives of this study. The major findings of the study include the proof of theoretical interference between Qiyas and Maṣlaḥah mursalah which is shown in considering maṣlaḥah mursalah as an evidence for deriving ruling of the Shari'ah under Qiyas and in specifying the general rulings by maṣlaḥah mursalah. The proof of theoretical interference between Qiyas and Istihsan is shown in al-Qiyas al-khafī (hidden analogy) and in Istihsan which specifies the general rulings of Qiyas. The proof of theoretical interference between maṣlaḥah mursalah and Istihsan is shown in Istihsan al-maṣlaḥah (juristic preference based on public interest) and in comparison of scholars' standings a…
  note: أعداد، فرحت حسين
  note: Thesis (Ph.D)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2018.
  note: Includes bibliographical references (leaves 222-243).
  subject:
    geographic code: a-my---
  classification: BPK110
  identifier: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/8443
  record info:
    record content source: UIAM
    record creation date: 180301
    language of cataloging:
      language term: eng