rdf-syntax-grammar
mods:
  schema location: http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd
  title info:
    title: اتجاهات العلماء في قضية التصوير
    sub title: دراسة مقارنة في ضوء السنة النبوية
  title info:
    title: Ittijahat al-'ulama' fi qadiyat al-taswir
    sub title: dirasat muqaranah fi daw' al-sunnah al-nabawiyah
  name:
    name part: Muhammad Akmalludin bin Mohd Hamdan
    role:
      role term: creator
    role:
      role term: author
  name:
    name part: محمد أكمل الدين بن محمد حمدان
  name:
    name part: International Islamic University Malaysia
    name part: Department of Qur'an and Sunnah Studies
  genre: Theses, IIUM local
  origin info:
    place:
      place term: my
    date issued: 2017
  language:
    language term: ara
  physical description:
    extent: [x], 83 leaves ; 30cm.
  abstract: This research is concerned with the issues encircling photography while aiming to understand the islamic scholars' bearings on the aforementioned subject and the reasons underpinning their differences likewise. The divergence of opinions between scholars since the early era until today substantiates the significance of this particular research. The discourse that first revolved around the concern on the crafting of sculptures and statues began to include several other related matters, particularly those that recently emerged in this modern age, such as photography and others. Principally, three distinct approaches were relied upon in conducting this research: the inductive method, analytical method and comparative method. For the first method, the researcher started by searching and collecting related hadith and extracted them through the common hadith extraction principles. The second approach was utilized to analyse the contradiction of opinions between scholars and the reasons for the differences, as well as to criticize the chain of the narrators and the text of the hadith with an explanation on the status of the narrations. On the other hand, the final method was used by the researcher in comparing the position of the scholars in this particular matter, with some academic appraisals on their respective stance. The researcher came to the conclusion that the divergence of the scholars in this matter is not grounded by the status of the hadith; authentic, weak or fabricated. Yet, the contradiction is because of their differences in understanding the hadith and the reasoning method underwent by them. This difference in understanding of the hadith is, likewise, based upon several other reasons, mentioned in this thesis.
  note: أعداد، محمد أكمل الدين بن محمد حمدان
  note: Thesis (MAIRKQS)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2017.
  note: Includes bibliographical references (leaves 74-83).
  subject:
    geographic code: a-my---
  classification: BPN310
  identifier: http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/8314
  record info:
    record content source: UIAM
    record creation date: 180219
    language of cataloging:
      language term: eng