Higher order thinking skills : an analysis of reading tasks in a Malaysian year four English textbook /

Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in language learning is the key to creating proficient and skilled readers. Hence, HOTS questions are regarded as a powerful tool to develop learners' ability to engage in divergent thinking. Richards and Rogers' Approach-Design-Procedure (1986) was empl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siti Sarah binti Sukor (Author)
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Kuala Lumpur : Kulliyyah of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/3879
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 037130000a22002890004500
008 190410s2019 my a f m 000 0 eng d
040 |a UIAM  |b eng  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
043 |a a-my--- 
100 0 |a Siti Sarah binti Sukor,  |e author 
245 1 0 |a Higher order thinking skills :  |b an analysis of reading tasks in a Malaysian year four English textbook /  |c by Siti Sarah binti Sukor 
264 1 |a Kuala Lumpur :  |b Kulliyyah of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia,  |c 2019 
300 |a xiv, 136 leaves :  |b illustrations ;  |c 30cm. 
336 |2 rdacontent  |a text 
347 |2 rdaft  |a text file  |b PDF 
502 |a Thesis (MED)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2019. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 105-117). 
520 |a Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in language learning is the key to creating proficient and skilled readers. Hence, HOTS questions are regarded as a powerful tool to develop learners' ability to engage in divergent thinking. Richards and Rogers' Approach-Design-Procedure (1986) was employed as the underlying theoretical framework to guide this mixed-method study in analysing an English textbook. A textbook analysis was conducted to look at to which extent HOTS were presented in the reading tasks in the English Year Four textbook. The focus of the study was on HOTS such as applying, analysing, evaluating and creating according to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy (2001), which has been used widely by instructors to classify the learning objectives, standards, and questions for assessments to improve critical thinking skills among students. Questions from the reading tasks were analysed and categorised using analysis sheets constructed according to six Revised Bloom's Taxonomy levels. The analysis sheets were piloted, and two experts validated the usefulness of the instrument to categorise the questions in the reading tasks. Two experts validated the data from the textbook analysis, and upon discussion, .83 agreement was attained. Another part of the mixed-method design in this study utilised semi-structured interviews. The interviews were carried out to capture English teachers' perceptions on how HOTS were treated in the reading tasks. The three teachers were selected using purposive sampling procedures. Results from the textbook analysis and interviews revealed that HOTS were not covered adequately in the reading tasks. The teachers' interviews transcriptions analysis procedures deployed thematic analysis and two themes emerged namely; internal and external factors, which describes the teachers' perceptions on the treatment of HOTS in the reading tasks. The teachers highlighted that they stumbled in the reading lessons when dealing with students of different English proficiency and literacy issues as the external factors. While positive perception towards HOTS was the internal factor that is significant and contributed to the inculcation of HOTS. This study proposed that teaching and learning materials' revision are needed to support teachers in inculcating HOTS in the reading lessons. 
596 |a 1 
655 7 |a Theses, IIUM local 
690 |a Dissertations, Academic  |x Department of Language and Literacy  |z IIUM 
710 2 |a International Islamic University Malaysia.  |b Department of Language and Literacy 
856 4 |u http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/3879 
900 |a sbh to aaz 
999 |c 440710  |d 471901 
952 |0 0  |6 XX(555013.1)  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 763104  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o XX(555013.1)  |p 11100404765  |r 1900-01-02  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESIS 
952 |0 0  |6 XX(555013.1) CD  |7 5  |8 THESES  |9 858180  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o XX(555013.1) CD  |p 11100404766  |r 1900-01-02  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESISDIG