A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin

Writing skill is one of the important skills for learners in mastering the English language especially when they enter tertiary education. They are required to write the written assignments academically. Moreover, the learners are also encouraged to portray their critical thinking ability when writi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khairuddin, Zulaikha
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/102191/1/102191.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uitm-ir.102191
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
collection UiTM Institutional Repository
language English
advisor Rahmat, Noor Hanim
topic Language
Linguistic theory
Comparative grammar
Language
Linguistic theory
Comparative grammar
Language and education
spellingShingle Language
Linguistic theory
Comparative grammar
Language
Linguistic theory
Comparative grammar
Language and education
Khairuddin, Zulaikha
A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin
description Writing skill is one of the important skills for learners in mastering the English language especially when they enter tertiary education. They are required to write the written assignments academically. Moreover, the learners are also encouraged to portray their critical thinking ability when writing argumentative essays. However, these are a few issues and challenges that are faced by the learners when writing argumentative essays. The learners experienced difficulties to write argumentative essays due to a few reasons such as learners might not be familiar with the structure of the argumentative essays, have a low level of proficiency, might be unfamiliar with how to write argumentative essays and lack of emphasis on the suitable strategies needed when writing argumentative essays. Therefore, this study would like to investigate the argumentative elements used in argumentative essays by skilled and less-skilled writers, examine the composing processes done during the writing of argumentative essays by skilled and less-skilled writers, and determine rhetorical strategies used during the writing of argumentative essays by skilled and less-skilled writers. To obtain the data, the study employed a qualitative method where the data was collected via Think-Aloud Protocol (TAP). There were seven participants who volunteered to be involved in this research, and they were from Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam. The data was later analysed using discourse and content analyses. The findings show that for composing processes, most of the sub-processes in the Translating process were used by both skilled and less-skilled writers while the majority of the subprocesses in the Reviewing process were not utilised by both skilled and less skilled writers. Moreover, for argumentative elements, both skilled and less-skilled writers did not utilise most of the sub-elements under the Self-regulation element. Furthermore, the rhetorical strategies that were not employed by both skilled and less-skilled writers were from Ethos strategies where writers should focus on credibility of the writers. Nonetheless, both skilled and less-skilled writers managed to use all Pathos rhetorical strategies. From the analyses, it can be inferred that there were constructs used by both skilled and less-skilled writers, used only by skilled writers and there were also constructs that both writers did not utilise. The study also revealed that both writers used the constructs differently. Based on the findings, the implications for educators are they may teach and expose students/writers with the knowledge of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies in order to write argumentative essays and students/writers themselves need to know and equip themselves with all three constructs and utilise them when composing argumentative essays. On top of that, this research contributes theoretically and pedagogically where it suggests a framework for students/writers to use when composing argumentative essays and the framework could also be translated as rubrics which can be used to assess argumentative essays. This research also contributes in terms of methodology where TAP is used as a data collection tool instead of an intervention in a research. Thus, it can be assumed and concluded that all three constructs (argumentative elements, composing processes, rhetorical strategies) are crucial for the learners to learn and for the educators to expose them to the learners in the classroom.
format Thesis
qualification_name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.)
qualification_level Doctorate
author Khairuddin, Zulaikha
author_facet Khairuddin, Zulaikha
author_sort Khairuddin, Zulaikha
title A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin
title_short A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin
title_full A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin
title_fullStr A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin
title_sort qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / zulaikha khairuddin
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)
granting_department Academy of Language Studies
publishDate 2024
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/102191/1/102191.pdf
_version_ 1818588033469906944
spelling my-uitm-ir.1021912024-11-12T06:13:55Z A qualitative analysis of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies employed by skilled and less-skilled writers in argumentative essays / Zulaikha Khairuddin 2024 Khairuddin, Zulaikha Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar Style. Composition. Rhetoric Language and education Writing skill is one of the important skills for learners in mastering the English language especially when they enter tertiary education. They are required to write the written assignments academically. Moreover, the learners are also encouraged to portray their critical thinking ability when writing argumentative essays. However, these are a few issues and challenges that are faced by the learners when writing argumentative essays. The learners experienced difficulties to write argumentative essays due to a few reasons such as learners might not be familiar with the structure of the argumentative essays, have a low level of proficiency, might be unfamiliar with how to write argumentative essays and lack of emphasis on the suitable strategies needed when writing argumentative essays. Therefore, this study would like to investigate the argumentative elements used in argumentative essays by skilled and less-skilled writers, examine the composing processes done during the writing of argumentative essays by skilled and less-skilled writers, and determine rhetorical strategies used during the writing of argumentative essays by skilled and less-skilled writers. To obtain the data, the study employed a qualitative method where the data was collected via Think-Aloud Protocol (TAP). There were seven participants who volunteered to be involved in this research, and they were from Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam. The data was later analysed using discourse and content analyses. The findings show that for composing processes, most of the sub-processes in the Translating process were used by both skilled and less-skilled writers while the majority of the subprocesses in the Reviewing process were not utilised by both skilled and less skilled writers. Moreover, for argumentative elements, both skilled and less-skilled writers did not utilise most of the sub-elements under the Self-regulation element. Furthermore, the rhetorical strategies that were not employed by both skilled and less-skilled writers were from Ethos strategies where writers should focus on credibility of the writers. Nonetheless, both skilled and less-skilled writers managed to use all Pathos rhetorical strategies. From the analyses, it can be inferred that there were constructs used by both skilled and less-skilled writers, used only by skilled writers and there were also constructs that both writers did not utilise. The study also revealed that both writers used the constructs differently. Based on the findings, the implications for educators are they may teach and expose students/writers with the knowledge of composing processes, argumentative elements and rhetorical strategies in order to write argumentative essays and students/writers themselves need to know and equip themselves with all three constructs and utilise them when composing argumentative essays. On top of that, this research contributes theoretically and pedagogically where it suggests a framework for students/writers to use when composing argumentative essays and the framework could also be translated as rubrics which can be used to assess argumentative essays. This research also contributes in terms of methodology where TAP is used as a data collection tool instead of an intervention in a research. Thus, it can be assumed and concluded that all three constructs (argumentative elements, composing processes, rhetorical strategies) are crucial for the learners to learn and for the educators to expose them to the learners in the classroom. 2024 Thesis https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/102191/ https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/102191/1/102191.pdf text en public phd doctoral Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Academy of Language Studies Rahmat, Noor Hanim