The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.]

This research is carried out to discover the reality of the practice of the right to legal representation of an accused person in Malaysia and to compare with the United States of America. The main objective is to know in reality whether this right is given absolutely and is there any limitation by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Din, Dalira, Leman, Shahidah Nafisah, Abdul Rahim, Salwa Asmary, Ismail, Wan Muhammad Faizal
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33280/1/33280.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uitm-ir.33280
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-uitm-ir.332802020-10-30T14:03:23Z The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.] 2006-04 Din, Dalira Leman, Shahidah Nafisah Abdul Rahim, Salwa Asmary Ismail, Wan Muhammad Faizal Comparative law. International uniform Law This research is carried out to discover the reality of the practice of the right to legal representation of an accused person in Malaysia and to compare with the United States of America. The main objective is to know in reality whether this right is given absolutely and is there any limitation by the authority in any cases. The accused person has the right under Article 5 of the Federal Constitution. The problem here is that when the accused person being detain without the aid of counsel. The detainee often being humiliated and abuse by the police so that the accused will confess or plead guilty thus, there is no use to proceed to the court as statement had been made and the accused had plead guilty. In contrast, this right must be subject to certain necessary limitations in order to prevent any undue interference with the course of investigation. The police must support and prove that their action is in good faith. The United States government provides the right to counsel in most cases and to deny it will make the court to loss its right and jurisdiction to proceed with the case. The right to legal representation will remain unless the accused himself waived the rights. As a conclusion, the application in Malaysia and the United States is diverse although the law is quite same. One similarity is that this right will be given subject to the court and the police discretion. 2006-04 Thesis https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33280/ https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33280/1/33280.pdf text en public degree Universiti Teknologi MARA Faculty of Law Mohd. Bajury, Mimi Sintia
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
collection UiTM Institutional Repository
language English
advisor Mohd. Bajury, Mimi Sintia
topic Comparative law
International uniform Law
spellingShingle Comparative law
International uniform Law
Din, Dalira
Leman, Shahidah Nafisah
Abdul Rahim, Salwa Asmary
Ismail, Wan Muhammad Faizal
The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.]
description This research is carried out to discover the reality of the practice of the right to legal representation of an accused person in Malaysia and to compare with the United States of America. The main objective is to know in reality whether this right is given absolutely and is there any limitation by the authority in any cases. The accused person has the right under Article 5 of the Federal Constitution. The problem here is that when the accused person being detain without the aid of counsel. The detainee often being humiliated and abuse by the police so that the accused will confess or plead guilty thus, there is no use to proceed to the court as statement had been made and the accused had plead guilty. In contrast, this right must be subject to certain necessary limitations in order to prevent any undue interference with the course of investigation. The police must support and prove that their action is in good faith. The United States government provides the right to counsel in most cases and to deny it will make the court to loss its right and jurisdiction to proceed with the case. The right to legal representation will remain unless the accused himself waived the rights. As a conclusion, the application in Malaysia and the United States is diverse although the law is quite same. One similarity is that this right will be given subject to the court and the police discretion.
format Thesis
qualification_level Bachelor degree
author Din, Dalira
Leman, Shahidah Nafisah
Abdul Rahim, Salwa Asmary
Ismail, Wan Muhammad Faizal
author_facet Din, Dalira
Leman, Shahidah Nafisah
Abdul Rahim, Salwa Asmary
Ismail, Wan Muhammad Faizal
author_sort Din, Dalira
title The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.]
title_short The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.]
title_full The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.]
title_fullStr The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.]
title_full_unstemmed The right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between Malaysia and The United States / Dalira Din ...[et al.]
title_sort right to legal representation of an accused person; existence, application and limitation: a comparison study between malaysia and the united states / dalira din ...[et al.]
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
granting_department Faculty of Law
publishDate 2006
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/33280/1/33280.pdf
_version_ 1783734230970269696