Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh

A manufacturing company has the need to improve productivity in fabrication. The improvement in production technology will not effectively increase productivity unless the efficiency in material handling, preparation, assembly, application of tooling and welding deposition is optimized. To improving...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mat Deraseh, Mohd Zukarnan
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/35788/1/35788.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uitm-ir.35788
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-uitm-ir.357882020-10-28T01:20:54Z Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh 2010 Mat Deraseh, Mohd Zukarnan Machine shops and machine shop practice Manufacturing processes. Lean manufacturing Metal manufactures. Metalworking A manufacturing company has the need to improve productivity in fabrication. The improvement in production technology will not effectively increase productivity unless the efficiency in material handling, preparation, assembly, application of tooling and welding deposition is optimized. To improving the productivity, Work Study analysis was applied, incorporating Method Study and Work Measurement to determine the critical path, to optimize the assembly line and to eliminate activities that reduce the productivity. The study began by selection one of the process line (fabrication of structure frame), video of the entire process or activities such as design of the structure frame with Catia software(structure details, gusset details, welding details, bolting details)welding training, structure members(search material, handling material, measurement of material preparation of cutting process, replace material, drilling), gusset plate(search, handling, cutting, replace, drilling material), assembly(assembly the fixture, assembly the structure members, assembly the gusset plate, tack welding/bolting) and welding(preparation of welding machine, preparation of frame before welding, NDT testing, inspecting of welding) was recorded and data were analyzed in Microsoft project software. Through replay of the video, the duration of every operation step in every work station can be measured. Based on the production flow, a new flow chart was developed in Microsoft Project software, a planned project schedule or new flow chart will then be compared to actual fabrication performance. 2010 Thesis https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/35788/ https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/35788/1/35788.pdf text en public degree Universiti Teknologi MARA Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Tham, Ghalib
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
collection UiTM Institutional Repository
language English
advisor Tham, Ghalib
topic Machine shops and machine shop practice
Machine shops and machine shop practice
Machine shops and machine shop practice
spellingShingle Machine shops and machine shop practice
Machine shops and machine shop practice
Machine shops and machine shop practice
Mat Deraseh, Mohd Zukarnan
Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh
description A manufacturing company has the need to improve productivity in fabrication. The improvement in production technology will not effectively increase productivity unless the efficiency in material handling, preparation, assembly, application of tooling and welding deposition is optimized. To improving the productivity, Work Study analysis was applied, incorporating Method Study and Work Measurement to determine the critical path, to optimize the assembly line and to eliminate activities that reduce the productivity. The study began by selection one of the process line (fabrication of structure frame), video of the entire process or activities such as design of the structure frame with Catia software(structure details, gusset details, welding details, bolting details)welding training, structure members(search material, handling material, measurement of material preparation of cutting process, replace material, drilling), gusset plate(search, handling, cutting, replace, drilling material), assembly(assembly the fixture, assembly the structure members, assembly the gusset plate, tack welding/bolting) and welding(preparation of welding machine, preparation of frame before welding, NDT testing, inspecting of welding) was recorded and data were analyzed in Microsoft project software. Through replay of the video, the duration of every operation step in every work station can be measured. Based on the production flow, a new flow chart was developed in Microsoft Project software, a planned project schedule or new flow chart will then be compared to actual fabrication performance.
format Thesis
qualification_level Bachelor degree
author Mat Deraseh, Mohd Zukarnan
author_facet Mat Deraseh, Mohd Zukarnan
author_sort Mat Deraseh, Mohd Zukarnan
title Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh
title_short Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh
title_full Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh
title_fullStr Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / Mohd Zukarnan Mat Deraseh
title_sort comparison between the estimated and actual productivity for the fabrication of a steel framework / mohd zukarnan mat deraseh
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
granting_department Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate 2010
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/35788/1/35788.pdf
_version_ 1783734315602935808