Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman

This paper presents the performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code. To calculate the bit error rate, different types of error correcting code were used through an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel. Three error controls types; Bose- Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH), Cycli...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2009
Subjects:	Electronic data processing Computer-aided engineering Telecommunication
Online Access:	https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/1/67695.PDF
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uitm-ir.67695
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-uitm-ir.676952022-10-21T00:17:00Z Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman 2009 Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Electronic data processing. Computer-aided engineering Telecommunication This paper presents the performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code. To calculate the bit error rate, different types of error correcting code were used through an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel. Three error controls types; Bose- Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH), Cyclic code and hamming code were used as the encoder/decoder technique. Basically, the performance was determined in term of bit rate error (BER) and signal energy to noise power density ratio (Eb/No). Both BPSK and QPSK were also being compared in the symbol error capability known as t in which expected that the performance is graded in response to the increasing of value oft. The maximum codeword length (n) used in the hamming code is 63 and the message length (k) is 57. For BCH code, the maximum N is 63, K is 36 and error-correction capability, t is 5. For cyclic code, the maximum N is 31, K is 21 and error correction capability, t is 5. All simulations were done using MATLAB R2007b software. The results show that the best performance occurs when the communication system uses a BCH code with N=31, K=l 1 and t=5 with BPSK modulator/demodulator. The higher the values of N, K and t, the better the performance of the system using BPSK and QPSK. In general BCH codes are better than Hamming code and Cyclic code for both BPSK and QPSK. 2009 Thesis https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/ https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/1/67695.PDF text en public degree Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Faculty of Electrical Engineering Khadri, Norasimah
institution	Universiti Teknologi MARA
collection	UiTM Institutional Repository
language	English
advisor	Khadri, Norasimah
topic	Electronic data processing Computer-aided engineering Telecommunication
spellingShingle	Electronic data processing Computer-aided engineering Telecommunication Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
description	This paper presents the performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code. To calculate the bit error rate, different types of error correcting code were used through an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel. Three error controls types; Bose- Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH), Cyclic code and hamming code were used as the encoder/decoder technique. Basically, the performance was determined in term of bit rate error (BER) and signal energy to noise power density ratio (Eb/No). Both BPSK and QPSK were also being compared in the symbol error capability known as t in which expected that the performance is graded in response to the increasing of value oft. The maximum codeword length (n) used in the hamming code is 63 and the message length (k) is 57. For BCH code, the maximum N is 63, K is 36 and error-correction capability, t is 5. For cyclic code, the maximum N is 31, K is 21 and error correction capability, t is 5. All simulations were done using MATLAB R2007b software. The results show that the best performance occurs when the communication system uses a BCH code with N=31, K=l 1 and t=5 with BPSK modulator/demodulator. The higher the values of N, K and t, the better the performance of the system using BPSK and QPSK. In general BCH codes are better than Hamming code and Cyclic code for both BPSK and QPSK.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Bachelor degree
author	Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
author_facet	Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
author_sort	Othman, Mohd Hayyul Dltizam
title	Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_short	Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_full	Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_fullStr	Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_full_unstemmed	Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman
title_sort	performance analysis of bpsk and qpsk using error correcting code through awgn / mohd hayyul dltizam othman
granting_institution	Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)
granting_department	Faculty of Electrical Engineering
publishDate	2009
url	https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/67695/1/67695.PDF
_version_	1783735718775881728

Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN / Mohd Hayyul Dltizam Othman

Similar Items