Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo

Species richness, diversity, similarity and shared species are basic measurements that are needed in quantifying abundances of animal in their natural habitat. Specifically, species richness, species diversity, species similarity and shared species of non-volant small mammal abundances in Gunung...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mathew, Jenang
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10925/1/MATHEW.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-unimas-ir.10925
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-unimas-ir.109252023-05-15T08:00:56Z Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo 2015 Mathew, Jenang QL Zoology Species richness, diversity, similarity and shared species are basic measurements that are needed in quantifying abundances of animal in their natural habitat. Specifically, species richness, species diversity, species similarity and shared species of non-volant small mammal abundances in Gunung Gading National Park is reported here by comparing line transect and grid sampling which were conducted with ten sampling occasions within January 2012 to December 2012. A total of 19 species were captured in line transect and 14 species were captured from grid with 396 and 295 number of individuals respectively. Five families represented by four orders, which comprises of 691 individuals were observed in total. Shannon index for line transect was slightly higher than for grid sampling with value of 2.48 and 2.13, respectively. Diversity t test also concludes that there is a significant difference between line transect and grid, thus, the null hypothesis is rejected. Program EstimateS Version 9.1.0 (Colwell, 2013) was used to evaluate ACE, Chao1 and Jack1 species richness with our data sets. For line transect arrangement, estimated about 20 to 23 species are to be expected while for grid sampling, an estimated 15 to 16 species of non-volant small mammals are to be expected. This means that both study designs have at least average of two unseen species during these ten sampling occasions. Morisita similarity index estimated that transect and grid were 92% similar in terms of species. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) 2015 Thesis http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10925/ http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10925/1/MATHEW.pdf text en validuser masters Universiti Malaysia Sarawak Faculty of Resources Science and Technology
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
collection UNIMAS Institutional Repository
language English
topic QL Zoology
spellingShingle QL Zoology
Mathew, Jenang
Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo
description Species richness, diversity, similarity and shared species are basic measurements that are needed in quantifying abundances of animal in their natural habitat. Specifically, species richness, species diversity, species similarity and shared species of non-volant small mammal abundances in Gunung Gading National Park is reported here by comparing line transect and grid sampling which were conducted with ten sampling occasions within January 2012 to December 2012. A total of 19 species were captured in line transect and 14 species were captured from grid with 396 and 295 number of individuals respectively. Five families represented by four orders, which comprises of 691 individuals were observed in total. Shannon index for line transect was slightly higher than for grid sampling with value of 2.48 and 2.13, respectively. Diversity t test also concludes that there is a significant difference between line transect and grid, thus, the null hypothesis is rejected. Program EstimateS Version 9.1.0 (Colwell, 2013) was used to evaluate ACE, Chao1 and Jack1 species richness with our data sets. For line transect arrangement, estimated about 20 to 23 species are to be expected while for grid sampling, an estimated 15 to 16 species of non-volant small mammals are to be expected. This means that both study designs have at least average of two unseen species during these ten sampling occasions. Morisita similarity index estimated that transect and grid were 92% similar in terms of species.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mathew, Jenang
author_facet Mathew, Jenang
author_sort Mathew, Jenang
title Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo
title_short Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo
title_full Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo
title_fullStr Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo
title_full_unstemmed Comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak, Borneo
title_sort comparing line transect and grid sampling designs to quantify species richness, abundance, diversity and similarity of non-volant small mammals in gunung gading national park, sarawak, borneo
granting_institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
granting_department Faculty of Resources Science and Technology
publishDate 2015
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10925/1/MATHEW.pdf
_version_ 1783728087954882560