ORGANISASI SOSIAL DAN PEMBANGUNAN DI KABUPATEN PONTIANAK, PROVINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT, INDONESIA
The findings in this research indicate that the policies issued by the government of Pontianak regency related to the law number 32 of 2004 (UU No 32 Tahun 2004) on local governments and the Government Rule Number 72 of 2005 (peraturan Pemerintah No 72 Tahun 2005) on villages have not been aimed to...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/36846/2/Thamrin.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The findings in this research indicate that the policies issued by the government of Pontianak regency related to the law number 32 of 2004 (UU No 32 Tahun 2004) on local governments and the Government Rule Number 72 of 2005
(peraturan Pemerintah No 72 Tahun 2005) on villages have not been aimed to: (a) strengthen villages autonomy; (b) increase villages financial ability; (c) perform
wider devolutive and autonomy authority decentralization of the heads of village; and (d) implement transparent and accountable democracy. In addition, the empowerment patterns of villages social organizations by Pontianak regency
government use structural approach. As for factor obstruct the villages' social organizations to function maximally
are: internal and external factors. The external factors include (1) Government Policy, (2) Fund Sources, (3) Patterns of Empowerment. Internal factors include;
Human Resources; (2) Social Organization Structure; (3) Work Facilities. Regarding the case of social organization development in Pontianak regency, it is concluded that the AGIL theory of parsons does not suit for communities on the
level of villages. Villages structurally are under regency social system. In this case is the Government of Pontianak regency. Therefore, the AGIL theory which includes
Adaptation, Goal attainment, Integration, and Latency, needs to be added Autonomy as the fifth value. State hegemony in the villages does not applied voluntarily by the elements
of villages. In fact, the hegemony is maintained through threats for those who cannot function as expected by the system. Therefore, adaptation process is put into practice
by strict supervising method of Pontianak regency over the villages. The IU implementation of agreement category which according to Gramsci is focused on consensus, in practice, blocks democracy process in those villages. Considering all
the facts mention above, the study rejects the hegemony theory. In the case of villages social organization development In the area of Pontianak regency, its inability in developing process is more because of the villages
does not have enough autonomy and authority. Related to the situation, it can be said that the statement of Nordlinger and Donald K. Crone on state autonomy is verified. |
|---|