An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet

This qualitative descriptive research examined perceived severity, susceptibility, and barriers towards nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) before and after reading an NPC health pamphlet produced by the Ministry of Health, Malaysia. The study involved interviews with 65 NPC-free participants from the Ku...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: JIA YIING, HO
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46383/1/An%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Language%20and%20Risk%20Perceptions%20towards%20Nasopharyngeal%20Cancer%20Pamphlet.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-unimas-ir.46383
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-unimas-ir.463832024-10-21T02:37:32Z An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet 2024-09-27 JIA YIING, HO P Philology. Linguistics This qualitative descriptive research examined perceived severity, susceptibility, and barriers towards nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) before and after reading an NPC health pamphlet produced by the Ministry of Health, Malaysia. The study involved interviews with 65 NPC-free participants from the Kuching and Samarahan divisions of Sarawak, Malaysia, using an interview guide to elicit in-depth responses. Findings indicated that affective language – specifically words associated with anxiety and curiosity, such as “bleeding discharge,” “double vision,” “lump on neck,” and “Epstein-Barr Virus” – was the most influential attitudinal resource. An analysis framework based on the Appraisal Theory was employed to analyse the attitudinal and affective language used in the pamphlet. Thematic analysis revealed that the majority of participants perceived NPC as a severe disease, associating it with death, frightening symptoms, and disruptions to quality of life, while only a minority felt at risk of contracting NPC after reading the pamphlet. Commonly perceived risk factors included smoking, environmental pollution, preserved food, and high incidence rates in Malaysia. The study demonstrated a strong link between affective language and changes in perceived susceptibility and severity, suggesting that both Appraisal Theory and Health Belief Model (HBM) are valuable frameworks for developing effective cancer education materials in Malaysia. This research provides insights that could enhance public health communication and NPC risk reduction efforts. Keywords: Nasopharyngeal cancer, textual analysis, health beliefs, appraisal theory, cancer risk messages, affective language UNIMAS 2024-09 Thesis http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46383/ http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46383/1/An%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Language%20and%20Risk%20Perceptions%20towards%20Nasopharyngeal%20Cancer%20Pamphlet.pdf text en public phd doctoral University Malaysia Sarawak Faculty of Education, Language and Communication
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
collection UNIMAS Institutional Repository
language English
topic P Philology
Linguistics
spellingShingle P Philology
Linguistics
JIA YIING, HO
An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet
description This qualitative descriptive research examined perceived severity, susceptibility, and barriers towards nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) before and after reading an NPC health pamphlet produced by the Ministry of Health, Malaysia. The study involved interviews with 65 NPC-free participants from the Kuching and Samarahan divisions of Sarawak, Malaysia, using an interview guide to elicit in-depth responses. Findings indicated that affective language – specifically words associated with anxiety and curiosity, such as “bleeding discharge,” “double vision,” “lump on neck,” and “Epstein-Barr Virus” – was the most influential attitudinal resource. An analysis framework based on the Appraisal Theory was employed to analyse the attitudinal and affective language used in the pamphlet. Thematic analysis revealed that the majority of participants perceived NPC as a severe disease, associating it with death, frightening symptoms, and disruptions to quality of life, while only a minority felt at risk of contracting NPC after reading the pamphlet. Commonly perceived risk factors included smoking, environmental pollution, preserved food, and high incidence rates in Malaysia. The study demonstrated a strong link between affective language and changes in perceived susceptibility and severity, suggesting that both Appraisal Theory and Health Belief Model (HBM) are valuable frameworks for developing effective cancer education materials in Malaysia. This research provides insights that could enhance public health communication and NPC risk reduction efforts. Keywords: Nasopharyngeal cancer, textual analysis, health beliefs, appraisal theory, cancer risk messages, affective language
format Thesis
qualification_name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.)
qualification_level Doctorate
author JIA YIING, HO
author_facet JIA YIING, HO
author_sort JIA YIING, HO
title An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet
title_short An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet
title_full An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet
title_fullStr An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of the Language and Risk Perceptions towards a Nasopharyngeal Cancer Pamphlet
title_sort analysis of the language and risk perceptions towards a nasopharyngeal cancer pamphlet
granting_institution University Malaysia Sarawak
granting_department Faculty of Education, Language and Communication
publishDate 2024
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46383/1/An%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Language%20and%20Risk%20Perceptions%20towards%20Nasopharyngeal%20Cancer%20Pamphlet.pdf
_version_ 1818611692821544960