Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats

Rice straw is seldom used as goat feed despite reports of higher intake and digestibility of poor quality roughage by this species . Studies were conducted to evaluate local rice straw , define its limitation and investigate means to improve its utilization by goats. Compositional and degradabi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew, Alek Tuen
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/12298/1/FPV_1992_2_A.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-upm-ir.12298
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-upm-ir.122982011-09-13T03:07:57Z Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats 1998-06 Andrew, Alek Tuen Rice straw is seldom used as goat feed despite reports of higher intake and digestibility of poor quality roughage by this species . Studies were conducted to evaluate local rice straw , define its limitation and investigate means to improve its utilization by goats. Compositional and degradability studies showed that untreated rice straw is deficient in N and several minerals and is poorly degraded . Calcium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide treatment increased degradability but the treated material was less acceptable to goats compared to rice straw treated with urea or ammonium hydroxide which has relatively lower degradability. Treatment with nitric acid removed all the hemicellulose and was totally unacceptable to goats. The ad libitum intake and in vivo digestibility of urea-treated straw was higher than that of urea supplemented straw and untreated straw . 1998-06 Thesis http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/12298/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/12298/1/FPV_1992_2_A.pdf application/pdf en public phd doctoral Universiti Putra Malaysia Faculty of Veterinary medicine English
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
collection PSAS Institutional Repository
language English
English
topic


spellingShingle


Andrew, Alek Tuen
Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats
description Rice straw is seldom used as goat feed despite reports of higher intake and digestibility of poor quality roughage by this species . Studies were conducted to evaluate local rice straw , define its limitation and investigate means to improve its utilization by goats. Compositional and degradability studies showed that untreated rice straw is deficient in N and several minerals and is poorly degraded . Calcium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide treatment increased degradability but the treated material was less acceptable to goats compared to rice straw treated with urea or ammonium hydroxide which has relatively lower degradability. Treatment with nitric acid removed all the hemicellulose and was totally unacceptable to goats. The ad libitum intake and in vivo digestibility of urea-treated straw was higher than that of urea supplemented straw and untreated straw .
format Thesis
qualification_name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.)
qualification_level Doctorate
author Andrew, Alek Tuen
author_facet Andrew, Alek Tuen
author_sort Andrew, Alek Tuen
title Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats
title_short Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats
title_full Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats
title_fullStr Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional Evaluation Of Untreated And Ureatreated Rice Straw For Improved Utilization By Goats
title_sort nutritional evaluation of untreated and ureatreated rice straw for improved utilization by goats
granting_institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
granting_department Faculty of Veterinary medicine
publishDate 1998
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/12298/1/FPV_1992_2_A.pdf
_version_ 1747811345306222592