Growth effect of foreign direct investment and innovative activity in developing countries
This dissertation focuses on three important issues which are related to growth performance and innovative activity in developing countries. This study is strongly driven by recent literature which reveals ambiguous findings on the factors which influence economic performance across countries. Th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/70860/1/FEP%202017%2025%20-%20IR.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This dissertation focuses on three important issues which are related to growth
performance and innovative activity in developing countries. This study is
strongly driven by recent literature which reveals ambiguous findings on the
factors which influence economic performance across countries. The first
objective of this study is to analyse the role of labour mobility in moderating the
impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on economic growth. It tests whether
countries with high level of labour market flexibility can benefit from FDI inflows
more efficiently. It uses panel observations from 80 developing countries
spanning over the 2000-2012 period. Threshold regression was employed to
examine the influence of labour market flexibility on the impact of FDI on output
growth. This methodological approach is chosen because it is flexible enough
to accommodate the possibility that the impact of FDI “kicks in” only after host
countries have achieved a certain level of labour market flexibility. The result
suggest that there is a threshold effect in the FDI-growth relationship such that
the positive impact of FDI kick in only after host countries achieve a certain
level of quality in term of labour market flexibility. This finding is consistent with
the view that host countries must have absorptive capacity in order to benefit
from FDI inflows. Therefore, policymakers should weigh the cost of policies
aimed at attracting FDI versus those that seek to improve the flexibility of
labour market. The second objective of this study is to examine factors that
influence innovation in developing countries. To evaluate this objective, a
sample of 52 developing countries is used over the 2000-2010 period. The
generalized method of moments (GMM) panel estimator is employed to test
this objective. Generally, there are six factors examined in this study namely,
human capital, regulation, trade openness, trademarks, patents and stock
market. The empirical results reveal that trade openness, patent and human
capital are important in influencing innovation activity in developing countries.
Among these factors, trade openness appears to be the most important
determinant. This suggests that developing countries are able to further enhance their innovation activity with more trade. Thus, the government should
focus on promoting trade liberalization because it is expected to bring
tremendous benefits for innovation community. Moreover, investments in
human capital development by providing education and training and also
improvement in patent protection will also benefit domestic innovation. Finally,
the third objective of this study is to examine the role economic freedom plays
in R&D spillovers (i.e. the impact of research and development activity (R&D)
on total factor productivity (TFP) for the ASEAN-5 countries. The dynamic
ordinary least square (DOLS) panel estimator is employed using data from
1996 to 2012. There are three important conclusions that can be drawn from
the reported results. First, foreign R&D is more important for productivity
improvements than domestic R&D. Second, import is the main channel for
international R&D spillovers. Third, economic freedom plays an important role
in moderating both domestic and foreign R&D spillovers. Therefore,
policymakers and government should play an important role in promoting trade
liberalization and other policies that enhance freedom of economic activities as
both are expected to boost domestic productivity. |
|---|