Community awareness of ecological benefits of mangrove forest in Sibuti, Sarawak, Malaysia
Mangrove forest is highly productive and plays an important role to the coastal ecosystem functions including livelihoods of the adjacent coastal communities. Like other ecosystems, mangrove provides enormous tangible and intangible benefits to both the local communities and ecology. Millions of...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/78357/1/FSPM%202015%207%20ir.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Mangrove forest is highly productive and plays an important role to the coastal
ecosystem functions including livelihoods of the adjacent coastal communities. Like
other ecosystems, mangrove provides enormous tangible and intangible benefits to
both the local communities and ecology. Millions of people are dependent on
mangroves for their livelihoods around the world including Malaysia. Malaysia is
gifted with numerous natural resources and nearly 580,000 ha of mangrove forests
grow scattered countrywide, whereas, the state of Sarawak contributes 26% to the total.
Many researchers in Malaysia have been focused on ecological and environmental
aspects of mangroves; however very few research work are documented on social
linkage aspect to this unique characteristic of forest particularly in Sarawak. Hence,
this study was focused on the mangroves and its benefits to the local community and
their awareness level with regard to the mangrove forest of Sibuti, Sarawak. Ethnoecological
approach was adopted during the study. For social aspect, data was recorded
from 60 respondents using simple random sampling techniques in three villages
surrounding Sibuti mangrove forest through structured and semi-structured interview
schedule. While, field survey was conducted through transect line method for species
composition and diversity of mangroves in three transects randomly by establishing (10
×10 m) plots perpendicular from shoreline to inland.
At this current stage, the coastal community was not depended on Sibuti mangroves
forest in terms of direct benefits, like; energy fuel wood 52 (87%), timber 58 (97%),
grasses/fodder leaves 53 (88%), construction pole/material 58 (97%), livestock grazing
48 (80%), wildlife hunting 43 (72%), Medicinal Plants/NWFPs 55 (92%) and thatching
material 57 (95%). However, low dependency was recorded on mangrove forest in
term of crabs and mollusk collection 33 (55%), Nypa fruits collection 21 (35%) and
Nypa leaves collection 19 (32%). Fishing was the only direct benefit, which was highly
getting by the community 29 (48%) from Sibuti mangrove forest. The community
believed that mangrove forest provide them in-direct benefits such as breeding ground
of fish 43 (72%), protecting their land from soil erosion 36 (60%), contributing towards
land formation 44 (73%), filtering the water resource 39 (65%), increasing scenic view
43 (72%), providing food to the fish 48 (80%), working as nutrients hub for fishes 45 (75%), wildlife habitat 43 (72%), protection from floods 41 (68%), protection from
cyclones/storms/tornados 45 (75%) and protecting them from Tsunami 34 (57%).
Interest of paying visit to the forest was casually found in 27 (45%). Majority i.e., 36
(60%) viewed Sibuti mangroves as benefited in terms of eco-tourism. Most of the
people i.e., 46 (77%) were always willing to play role in the development of Sibuti
mangroves, 40 (67%) interested in learning about conservation and protection
practices, while 37 (62%) were ready for volunteer role in conservation and protection
if assign to them. Most of them i.e., 36 (60%) were ready play role as volunteer and 46
(77%) was ready to work as facilitator. Majority 32 (53%) were willing to pay
donations. The educational, research and training program were welcomed by 58
(98%) of the respondents. The people believed that forestry resource could be managed
through community involvement. Similar observation was found for fishery, wildlife
and eco-tourism development. Joint forest management approach was supported by 47
(78%) and 35 (58%) were satisfied about government efforts for protection,
development and conservation of the forest. Majority i.e., 44 (73%) of the people
viewed that Sibuti mangrove forest was not facing human pressure on the resource.
Survey on mangrove species composition found that nine true mangroves species were
recorded and Rhizophora apiculata was recorded as dominated species. The stand
density was recorded as 1938 trees ha-1, 1722 saplings ha-1 and 6222 seedlings ha-1.
The average diameter of tree in the stand was 21 cm, 13 m for height and 202 m2 ha-1
for basal area. The average diameter of dominant species (R. apiculata) was 24 cm,
height 15 m and basal area 176 m2 ha-1. The Importance Value Index (IVI) of R.
apiculata was 202 followed by 64 for Xylocarpus granatum. Shannon diversity indices
(H´), Margalef richness (D) and Peilou evenness (J´) were calculated to be 1.18, 1.41
and 0.54, respectively. Similarity of species diversity showed two major clusters for the
whole forest stand.
The findings of this study suggest that Sibuti mangrove forest was undisturbed and
healthy. The people were mostly benefited from indirect uses rather than direct uses
and they were well aware of the mangrove forest resources. The forest could be
managed and conserved in a better way for multi-sectoral uses like eco-tourism,
biodiversity, research and education and community people should be considered as
primary stakeholder. Integrated resource management approach should be adopted
rather than managing the resource as a wildlife sanctuary only. |
|---|