Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification

In Land Cover Mapping (LCM) studies, non-parametric classifiers are more accurate than parametric classifiers. However, its precision affected by numerous factors like data set type, spatial resolution, number of variables, etc. The overall objective of this study...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Myaser, Jwan
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2020
Subjects:	Nonparametric statistics Landsat satellites Remote-sensing images - Data processing
Online Access:	http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/85694/1/FK%202020%2084%20-%20ir.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-upm-ir.85694
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-upm-ir.856942021-12-08T02:50:13Z Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification 2020-01 Myaser, Jwan In Land Cover Mapping (LCM) studies, non-parametric classifiers are more accurate than parametric classifiers. However, its precision affected by numerous factors like data set type, spatial resolution, number of variables, etc. The overall objective of this study is to explore some factors affecting non- parametric LCM classification techniques in terms of accuracy assessment and to compare their performance with a well-established classification technique by implementing Landsat 8 and Sentinel satellites. The methodology carried out in five main phases using Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 imageries with different test areas located in Kelantan state, Malaysia. In the first phase, the behavior of Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Decision Tree classifiers (DTC), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) and effect of some factors including training selection method, training sample size, input variables and various user-defined parameters on LCM accuracy were investigated using Landsat 8 data. The results indicated that good classification performance depends on these factors. All algorithms showed more stability and accuracy when training size applied is more than 6% by the Equal Sample Rate (ESR) method with six variables. Furthermore, using SVM requires the user to set certain parameters values, including kernel type and kernel parameters, since these parameters own a significant effect on the effectiveness of SVM. The second stage involved assessing the spatial resolution effect through utilizing Landsat 8 (30 m) and Sentinel (10 m) data on LCM accuracy using SVM, K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Random Forest (RF), and Neural Network (NN) algorithms. Based on the concluding overall analysis, the classification accuracy derived from Sentinel 2 imagery utilizing SVM and RF, Landsat 8 applying SVM donated higher than other methods of classification. In addition, LCM derived from Sentinel 2 imagery is more accurate almost about 12% than Landsat 8 by using the same classification technique. This implied that when spatial resolution increase from 30m to 10m, LCM improved by 12%. The third phase studied the reaction of the Radial Base Function-based SVM classifier to Modified Sun-Canopy-Sensor Correction (SCS+C) as a Topographic Correction (TC) technique for Landsat 8 data. The result showed that the Modified SCS+C method improved LCM's accuracies from 86.22% to 90.11% for the test area. Thus, TC suggested being the main step in data pre-processing for mountainous terrain before the RBF-based SVM classification process. At the fourth phase, a combination of Atmospheric Correction (AC) and four fusion techniques; Brovey, Hue-Saturation-Value (HSV), Hue-Saturation-Value (HSV), Principal Components (PC), and Gram– Schmidt (GS) spectral sharpening was evaluated. Results revealed that the GS-sharpening method is more precise than other techniques and fusion techniques play significant roles in LCM accuracy than AC. Nevertheless, AC is not required for LCM if the original multi-spectral image is used. The last phase involves developing a new fusion algorithm using SVM and Fuzzy K-Means Clustering (FKM) algorithms for Sentinel 2 data to enhance LCM accuracy. The highest LCM accuracy generated by a new approach with an improvement of 8%, 14 %, and 22% compared to SVM, MLC, and S2+LS8-fused image-based classifiers. Nonparametric statistics Landsat satellites Remote-sensing images - Data processing 2020-01 Thesis http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/85694/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/85694/1/FK%202020%2084%20-%20ir.pdf text en public doctoral Universiti Putra Malaysia Nonparametric statistics Landsat satellites Remote-sensing images - Data processing Mansor, Shattri
institution	Universiti Putra Malaysia
collection	PSAS Institutional Repository
language	English
advisor	Mansor, Shattri
topic	Nonparametric statistics Landsat satellites Remote-sensing images - Data processing
spellingShingle	Nonparametric statistics Landsat satellites Remote-sensing images - Data processing Myaser, Jwan Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification
description	In Land Cover Mapping (LCM) studies, non-parametric classifiers are more accurate than parametric classifiers. However, its precision affected by numerous factors like data set type, spatial resolution, number of variables, etc. The overall objective of this study is to explore some factors affecting non- parametric LCM classification techniques in terms of accuracy assessment and to compare their performance with a well-established classification technique by implementing Landsat 8 and Sentinel satellites. The methodology carried out in five main phases using Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 imageries with different test areas located in Kelantan state, Malaysia. In the first phase, the behavior of Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Decision Tree classifiers (DTC), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) and effect of some factors including training selection method, training sample size, input variables and various user-defined parameters on LCM accuracy were investigated using Landsat 8 data. The results indicated that good classification performance depends on these factors. All algorithms showed more stability and accuracy when training size applied is more than 6% by the Equal Sample Rate (ESR) method with six variables. Furthermore, using SVM requires the user to set certain parameters values, including kernel type and kernel parameters, since these parameters own a significant effect on the effectiveness of SVM. The second stage involved assessing the spatial resolution effect through utilizing Landsat 8 (30 m) and Sentinel (10 m) data on LCM accuracy using SVM, K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Random Forest (RF), and Neural Network (NN) algorithms. Based on the concluding overall analysis, the classification accuracy derived from Sentinel 2 imagery utilizing SVM and RF, Landsat 8 applying SVM donated higher than other methods of classification. In addition, LCM derived from Sentinel 2 imagery is more accurate almost about 12% than Landsat 8 by using the same classification technique. This implied that when spatial resolution increase from 30m to 10m, LCM improved by 12%. The third phase studied the reaction of the Radial Base Function-based SVM classifier to Modified Sun-Canopy-Sensor Correction (SCS+C) as a Topographic Correction (TC) technique for Landsat 8 data. The result showed that the Modified SCS+C method improved LCM's accuracies from 86.22% to 90.11% for the test area. Thus, TC suggested being the main step in data pre-processing for mountainous terrain before the RBF-based SVM classification process. At the fourth phase, a combination of Atmospheric Correction (AC) and four fusion techniques; Brovey, Hue-Saturation-Value (HSV), Hue-Saturation-Value (HSV), Principal Components (PC), and Gram– Schmidt (GS) spectral sharpening was evaluated. Results revealed that the GS-sharpening method is more precise than other techniques and fusion techniques play significant roles in LCM accuracy than AC. Nevertheless, AC is not required for LCM if the original multi-spectral image is used. The last phase involves developing a new fusion algorithm using SVM and Fuzzy K-Means Clustering (FKM) algorithms for Sentinel 2 data to enhance LCM accuracy. The highest LCM accuracy generated by a new approach with an improvement of 8%, 14 %, and 22% compared to SVM, MLC, and S2+LS8-fused image-based classifiers.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Myaser, Jwan
author_facet	Myaser, Jwan
author_sort	Myaser, Jwan
title	Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification
title_short	Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification
title_full	Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification
title_fullStr	Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification
title_full_unstemmed	Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification
title_sort	improvement of land cover mapping using sentinel 2 and landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification
granting_institution	Universiti Putra Malaysia
publishDate	2020
url	http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/85694/1/FK%202020%2084%20-%20ir.pdf
_version_	1747813575011860480

Improvement of land cover mapping using Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 imageries via non-parametric classification

Similar Items