Mediating effect of institutions and moderating effect of culture on the relationship between IFRS adoption strategies and accounting quality
In recent years, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has highlighted the importance of full adoption more than just convergence of accounting standards. While full adoption of IFRS eliminates accounting differences by allowing only the IFRS standards’ applications, convergence con...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/91367/1/GSM%202020%207%20-%20IR.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In recent years, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has highlighted
the importance of full adoption more than just convergence of accounting standards.
While full adoption of IFRS eliminates accounting differences by allowing only the
IFRS standards’ applications, convergence concentrates on certain major differences
within the standards and differences in the enforcement levels. These differences,
despite small ones, lead to significant impact on reported performance that hinders the
objective of having globalized uniform standards. Examining the variations in IFRS
adoption as reported by the IASB in its jurisdiction profiles has proven to be a
paramount important since jurisdictions are described by the IASB to have employed
different IFRS implementations which falls within the so-called enforcement strategy
and modification strategy. Given the lack of research in this area, the present research
attempts to address the gap by examining the relationship between IFRS enforcement
and modification strategies and accounting quality across different jurisdictions
around the world. Besides, the diversities in institutional settings such as the quality
of institutional and cultural dimension, lead the study to further investigate the
mediating effect of institutional quality on the relationship as well as the conditional
effect of culture on the relationship between the different IFRS adoption strategies and
accounting quality. Using the dynamic system of Generalised Method of Moments
(GMM) estimation technique as the primary method of analysis, the study converts
firm-level data on accounting quality which is based on 8836 listed firms in 35
developed and developing countries that adopted IFRS, into country-level data to
reduce heterogeneity. The sample covers a period of 2013 to 2017, representing the
stable years following the world global financial crisis and reflecting the years in
which IFRS jurisdiction profiles are available. The findings suggest that IFRS
enforcement and modification strategies are statistically significant in reducing
discretionary accruals. Similarly, the adoption of IFRS with enforcement and
modification has been found to be positively associated with timely loss recognition and value relevance. The results also show that both strategies have given significant
positive impact on accounting quality by reducing the discretionary accruals at a
higher magnitude, more than the increasing effect of timely loss recognition and value
relevance. It is worth noting that the efforts made for IFRS enforcement strategy affect
discretionary accruals and timely loss recognition more than the IFRS modification
strategy. In terms of the indirect effects, the study reveals that institutional variables,
especially the voice and accountability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality
and control of corruption mediate the relationship between IFRS adoption strategies
and the quality of accounting across countries, corroborating previous expectations.
Furthermore, the effects of IFRS enforcement and modification on accounting quality
vary with power distance, uncertainty avoidance, institutional collectivism, and future
orientation. These indicate complementarities in which the effect of IFRS adoption
strategies on the quality of accounting information depends positively on cultural
variables. The current research involves numerous implications for policymakers,
investors, and managers. It provides insightful information to understand the
variations in IFRS enforcement and modification and their effects on accounting and
the rule of the institutional environment and cultural dimensions within this
relationship. |
---|