Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study
Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab are the Quranic interpreters in Southeast Asia that have produced Quranic interpretation books in Malay which are Tafsir al-Azhar and Tafsir al- Misbah respectively. Both scholars have their way of thinking and approach in Quranic interpretation. There are many studies th...
Saved in:
| id |
my-usim-ddms-12571 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| collection |
USIM Institutional Repository |
| language |
en_US |
| topic |
Qur'an -- Criticism interpretation etc. Qur'anic Studies, |
| spellingShingle |
Qur'an -- Criticism interpretation etc. Qur'anic Studies, Nur Zaiumi Yasmin Binti Zakaria Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study |
| description |
Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab are the Quranic interpreters in Southeast Asia that have produced Quranic interpretation books in Malay which are Tafsir al-Azhar and Tafsir al- Misbah respectively. Both scholars have their way of thinking and approach in Quranic interpretation. There are many studies that have been conducted on these two interpretation books, but the focus of studies on the Quranic plant interpretation is still lacking. The purpose of the study is to discuss the similarities and differences between the methodology of Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab in interpreting plants in the Quran. The document analysis method is applied to this study by comparing the methodology used by both scholars for plant interpretation through Tafsir al-Azhar and Tafsir al-Misbah. Every word that indicates the plants in the Quran is extracted and 42 verses are examined based on five selected topics. The results suggest that they have similarities in using the methods of socio-cultural-based explanation, historical narratives, describing the characteristics of plants, referencing to other Quranic verses, stating the scholars’ opinions, and explaining the benefits of the plants. However, Hamka has wrongly applied the explanation of the sociocultural aspects of verse 17 of surah al-Insān in his tafsir, by citing a new Arab tradition that did not coincide at all with Arab culture when the Quran was revealed. In terms of differences, M. Quraish Shihab practices the elaboration of plant terms based on the perspective of Arabic linguistic, hadith referencing, and constantly citing the scientific fact from the book of al-Muntakhab fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Karīm published by Wizarat al-Awqaf al-Majlis al-A`la lil-Shu'un al-Islamiyah Egypt while Hamka does not do all these things. The methodology used by the two scholars in interpreting the plants in the Quran shows the development of a distinctive style among Indonesian interpreters. Therefore, a standard system is needed to check and ensure that the interpretations made by the Quranic interpreters in the Malay Archipelago are in accordance with the true context of the Quran to preserve the glory of the holy scripture. |
| format |
Thesis |
| author |
Nur Zaiumi Yasmin Binti Zakaria |
| author_facet |
Nur Zaiumi Yasmin Binti Zakaria |
| author_sort |
Nur Zaiumi Yasmin Binti Zakaria |
| title |
Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study |
| title_short |
Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study |
| title_full |
Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study |
| title_fullStr |
Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study |
| title_sort |
methodology of hamka and m.quraish shihab in interpreting plants in the quran: a comparative study |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| url |
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/39ba84c6-fcdf-401e-b32d-25be386adc1a/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/5e4315f2-6836-49fa-a15b-0a36defb1eb1/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/dd6be432-fbf8-4aa5-8346-3894dc4c3ae8/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/760d18cd-5032-4ed4-9fb8-a3607e6415d6/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1c25ae84-816e-4dc8-ad61-28838a4a6abe/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ef5c1005-9111-4663-9be8-67d4c68ed39e/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/17cc5a4a-6aa7-483c-8836-9e6de10e86a9/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a96ad266-7428-4973-8750-78cbce831fa3/download |
| _version_ |
1812444840887058432 |
| spelling |
my-usim-ddms-125712024-05-29T19:45:11Z Methodology Of Hamka And M.Quraish Shihab In Interpreting Plants In The Quran: A Comparative Study Nur Zaiumi Yasmin Binti Zakaria Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab are the Quranic interpreters in Southeast Asia that have produced Quranic interpretation books in Malay which are Tafsir al-Azhar and Tafsir al- Misbah respectively. Both scholars have their way of thinking and approach in Quranic interpretation. There are many studies that have been conducted on these two interpretation books, but the focus of studies on the Quranic plant interpretation is still lacking. The purpose of the study is to discuss the similarities and differences between the methodology of Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab in interpreting plants in the Quran. The document analysis method is applied to this study by comparing the methodology used by both scholars for plant interpretation through Tafsir al-Azhar and Tafsir al-Misbah. Every word that indicates the plants in the Quran is extracted and 42 verses are examined based on five selected topics. The results suggest that they have similarities in using the methods of socio-cultural-based explanation, historical narratives, describing the characteristics of plants, referencing to other Quranic verses, stating the scholars’ opinions, and explaining the benefits of the plants. However, Hamka has wrongly applied the explanation of the sociocultural aspects of verse 17 of surah al-Insān in his tafsir, by citing a new Arab tradition that did not coincide at all with Arab culture when the Quran was revealed. In terms of differences, M. Quraish Shihab practices the elaboration of plant terms based on the perspective of Arabic linguistic, hadith referencing, and constantly citing the scientific fact from the book of al-Muntakhab fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Karīm published by Wizarat al-Awqaf al-Majlis al-A`la lil-Shu'un al-Islamiyah Egypt while Hamka does not do all these things. The methodology used by the two scholars in interpreting the plants in the Quran shows the development of a distinctive style among Indonesian interpreters. Therefore, a standard system is needed to check and ensure that the interpretations made by the Quranic interpreters in the Malay Archipelago are in accordance with the true context of the Quran to preserve the glory of the holy scripture. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia 2022-06 Thesis en_US https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/12571 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/0aa06599-a12a-4936-a433-0ba511f7f340/download 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/39ba84c6-fcdf-401e-b32d-25be386adc1a/download dd02af38c24436327eb319ff362a9af1 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/5e4315f2-6836-49fa-a15b-0a36defb1eb1/download 4a4056454aa1b099d23a8aef20a4e4bf https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/dd6be432-fbf8-4aa5-8346-3894dc4c3ae8/download 045e8cda296ebf77c046e4f26cf74a07 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/760d18cd-5032-4ed4-9fb8-a3607e6415d6/download d745b60387284813ba807f78bde79f4d https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1c25ae84-816e-4dc8-ad61-28838a4a6abe/download 4dea99bb6987adaecfaba35544ad5655 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ef5c1005-9111-4663-9be8-67d4c68ed39e/download 3559ee8091b17e5f6b6997840ded5b70 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/17cc5a4a-6aa7-483c-8836-9e6de10e86a9/download 99e51d6457b4242799a8a7538378a1cc https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a96ad266-7428-4973-8750-78cbce831fa3/download 017e31a6ca9c6412a4ae124b29626145 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/911a4200-6024-47e8-ad86-c67e933d6294/download 68b329da9893e34099c7d8ad5cb9c940 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/e8db0a10-be54-4150-a1f4-46b62fced704/download 5a800e497e4ac570e9a584a42990b724 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/0a8dcd14-2f58-4f26-9f56-635798b775d9/download 6d2aba41d6775c8a4a5e8cd35ab039eb https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a54887f0-3846-4124-87ab-365e484964f4/download 3462c6900b093a784c7003de5647790b https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/20372737-a71b-47e8-b0ef-dca207041845/download a367a3ef6b6d862b6118cf627d508d15 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1b388e48-31aa-41d4-bd0b-5147cf3691d4/download 583c394038dcbdc5a984aab65b830756 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ef379ea9-eeba-4cd8-91a1-a65cd1bf0ca8/download b4d1ac11cde9aef1217d36e0c752501d https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/f855a53d-506d-4d4b-8fe4-2ba0118d0c50/download 3f39227a61d72e640d94b2b71d6812b6 Qur'an -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. Qur'anic Studies, |