اختيارات ابن الجوزي وابن عطية في تفسيريهما دراسة مقارنة: سورتا النساء والمائدة نموذجا
This comparative descriptive research discussed; Interpretive increased the path of Ibn al-Jawzi and editor al-Wajeez by Ibn Attia. The research problem crystallized in the lack of comparative studies in interpretation between the schools of the East and the Maghreb, although each interpreter has...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | other |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/47bf68ad-7547-4ba9-a3a1-2156d62b703b/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/7ad17eb3-0745-4af5-a2f8-33942ff5c94d/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3db95e83-cfcb-4380-a138-16da642fcc11/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/fef3f4ea-92e9-488a-8df6-3992f77104bd/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/087b11a5-1ed7-4819-acd7-7c51aaaf73aa/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/fc404f19-2fe4-4701-8b98-11cf38f7bdb6/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/5a110995-dc2f-4300-998c-362d7bbdfd8e/download |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This comparative descriptive research discussed; Interpretive increased the path of Ibn
al-Jawzi and editor al-Wajeez by Ibn Attia. The research problem crystallized in the
lack of comparative studies in interpretation between the schools of the East and the
Maghreb, although each interpreter has a method and choices, so that the comparison
is useful in developing a comprehensive interpretation of the two schools, which
contributes to understanding the Book of God Almighty. Therefore, the aim of the
research is to analyze the origins and methods of comparative interpretation, and to
discuss its importance in contemporary studies, diagnose the parameters of the
interpretation of the path increased and the interpretation of the brief editor. Finally, a
comparison of the aspects of agreement and disagreement among the commentators in
Surat An-Nisa and Al-Ma’idah. The researcher adopted the descriptive, inductive,
analytical, and comparative method. The search findings showed: The abundance of
knowledge of the commentators Ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Attia, according to the testimony
of many scholars. Imam Ibn Attiyah was influenced by those who preceded him in the
interpretation, but he often contradicted and criticized, so he singled out the method
that he had set for himself, which combines investigation, accuracy and brevity. Ibn
Attia was one of the Maliki imams and a jurist of their greatest jurists. The two
approaches to interpretation were similar to the maxim when they relied on the texts of
revelation and the news of the companions and followers in the interpretation of the
meanings of the verses. Ibn al-Jawzi combined the aphorism and the opinion. As for
Ibn Attia, he used to multiply the possibilities on which the verse could be carried,
resorting to language a lot. Ibn al-Jawzi dealt with rhetorical and rhetorical methods in
his interpretation, and his citation of poetry. Ibn Attia was interested in language,
grammar, vocabulary meanings, articulation of words, and derivation of derivatives.
Ibn al-Jawzi believes that restricting oneself to the ten readings is more appropriate,
On the other hand, Ibn Atiyah paid special attention to the readings, as he deliberately
included all the readings, so his interpretation came as a collection of readings of all
kinds. Ibn Al-Jawzi has emerged in his discussion of the jurisprudence rulings
contained in the verses, while Ibn Atiyah narrated in his interpretation the sayings of
Maliki scholars on jurisprudential issues, and he also presented the jurisprudence of
jurists from other schools of thought. |
|---|