"شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

Testimony is considered one of the most important and commonest means of giving proof in the criminal matters, because it is applied to the accidental occurrences suddenly taking place;while no prior preparation of facts is made by the concerned parties for establishing evidence. The problem of this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad M. Moh'd Alghlailat
Format: Thesis
Language:other
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c2a0afb8-cbb0-4b9a-9906-76bd36c36de0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3ae7d21c-ae55-4797-8c25-9d030a4c05a0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/81c5c6bb-fc15-4a1e-b9b9-9525da97f619/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a694ccd8-ae37-4e31-9e7a-e25c32dc6181/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/55a306ad-fd17-48bf-a2a9-f6828ac402f0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/8d77ab00-bd1a-4d5c-b1c0-f7ef2f613c3b/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/058995b7-ced4-4916-8fc9-99280e6c7439/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ea56f84b-1f93-4525-96c9-1846005dd5bc/download
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-usim-ddms-13017
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
collection USIM Institutional Repository
language other
topic Perjury -- Comparative law
Examination of witnesses
White collar crimes
spellingShingle Perjury -- Comparative law
Examination of witnesses
White collar crimes
Mohammad M. Moh'd Alghlailat
"شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
description Testimony is considered one of the most important and commonest means of giving proof in the criminal matters, because it is applied to the accidental occurrences suddenly taking place;while no prior preparation of facts is made by the concerned parties for establishing evidence. The problem of this research is that the Jordanian legislator did not state as a condition the occurrence of perjury before the court only,but it can also take place before the prosecutor , in addition to the possibility of taking place before an officer or a body that has the power to listen to witnesses put to oath.The Jordanian legislator does not consider oath taking as one of the elements of perjury as a crime, unlike what obtains in the Egyptian legislation, in which oath taking is considered one of the elements of the crime of perjury. It is also observed that the Jordanian legislator does not consider the insistence on the false testimony, both before the prosecutor or the court, as one of the elements of the crime of perjury,contrary to what the Egyptian legislation stipulates by considering the insistence on the false testimony as one of the elements of that crime. Thus, the provisions of the crime of perjury in the Egyptian penal code commensurate with the provisions of Islamic law. The researcher adopted the comparative and analytical method while carrying out his study in order to accomplish his goal- that is to answer the problem of the study that has been identified. Meanwhile, this study has come out with a number of results which include that testimony, generally , is one of the topics considered of paramount importance in criminal matters, because it is one of the most important evidences relied upon by the court in deciding the fate of the accused, and it is a condition to be fulfilled before punishing the witness for the offence of perjury committed in his testimony before a judiciary, whether it is before the prosecutor or the court, and whether it is preceded by oath taking or not. This study also urged the Jordanian legislator to consider the crime of perjury as a crime against the religion and not tampering with justice. That would be through the nullification of Article of the Penal Code(If the testimony takes place without oath taken by the witness, the punishment is cut half), which means that oath taking is considered one of the elements of the crime of perjury.
format Thesis
author Mohammad M. Moh'd Alghlailat
author_facet Mohammad M. Moh'd Alghlailat
author_sort Mohammad M. Moh'd Alghlailat
title "شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
title_short "شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
title_full "شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
title_fullStr "شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
title_full_unstemmed "شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
title_sort "شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
granting_institution Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
url https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c2a0afb8-cbb0-4b9a-9906-76bd36c36de0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3ae7d21c-ae55-4797-8c25-9d030a4c05a0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/81c5c6bb-fc15-4a1e-b9b9-9525da97f619/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a694ccd8-ae37-4e31-9e7a-e25c32dc6181/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/55a306ad-fd17-48bf-a2a9-f6828ac402f0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/8d77ab00-bd1a-4d5c-b1c0-f7ef2f613c3b/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/058995b7-ced4-4916-8fc9-99280e6c7439/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ea56f84b-1f93-4525-96c9-1846005dd5bc/download
_version_ 1812444922966441984
spelling my-usim-ddms-130172024-05-29T20:29:24Z "شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني والمصري : "دراسة تحليلية مقارنة "Perjury in the Jordanian and Egyptian Penal Code: "Comparative analytical study Mohammad M. Moh'd Alghlailat Testimony is considered one of the most important and commonest means of giving proof in the criminal matters, because it is applied to the accidental occurrences suddenly taking place;while no prior preparation of facts is made by the concerned parties for establishing evidence. The problem of this research is that the Jordanian legislator did not state as a condition the occurrence of perjury before the court only,but it can also take place before the prosecutor , in addition to the possibility of taking place before an officer or a body that has the power to listen to witnesses put to oath.The Jordanian legislator does not consider oath taking as one of the elements of perjury as a crime, unlike what obtains in the Egyptian legislation, in which oath taking is considered one of the elements of the crime of perjury. It is also observed that the Jordanian legislator does not consider the insistence on the false testimony, both before the prosecutor or the court, as one of the elements of the crime of perjury,contrary to what the Egyptian legislation stipulates by considering the insistence on the false testimony as one of the elements of that crime. Thus, the provisions of the crime of perjury in the Egyptian penal code commensurate with the provisions of Islamic law. The researcher adopted the comparative and analytical method while carrying out his study in order to accomplish his goal- that is to answer the problem of the study that has been identified. Meanwhile, this study has come out with a number of results which include that testimony, generally , is one of the topics considered of paramount importance in criminal matters, because it is one of the most important evidences relied upon by the court in deciding the fate of the accused, and it is a condition to be fulfilled before punishing the witness for the offence of perjury committed in his testimony before a judiciary, whether it is before the prosecutor or the court, and whether it is preceded by oath taking or not. This study also urged the Jordanian legislator to consider the crime of perjury as a crime against the religion and not tampering with justice. That would be through the nullification of Article of the Penal Code(If the testimony takes place without oath taken by the witness, the punishment is cut half), which means that oath taking is considered one of the elements of the crime of perjury. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia 2015 Thesis other https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/13017 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3694c6f3-5ad5-46b5-997f-30d5c2dd76f3/download 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c2a0afb8-cbb0-4b9a-9906-76bd36c36de0/download 8a885e6262b5badd5838ad1e79bdcf93 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3ae7d21c-ae55-4797-8c25-9d030a4c05a0/download 6fb75351236b1e0df10fca5b0c1c37f7 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/81c5c6bb-fc15-4a1e-b9b9-9525da97f619/download 07b5dd8e2f304cc4dcc5eabf168c1713 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a694ccd8-ae37-4e31-9e7a-e25c32dc6181/download 02b3ad7c4b1a89dba4f3eddfd7e44a8a https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/55a306ad-fd17-48bf-a2a9-f6828ac402f0/download 83f082ec04959321723c394fd308cf4f https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/8d77ab00-bd1a-4d5c-b1c0-f7ef2f613c3b/download 1a06a1ec3d1f356b0328f32be3a7a403 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/058995b7-ced4-4916-8fc9-99280e6c7439/download 8b8dc63a8d0e14092c28476e6cb44ddd https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ea56f84b-1f93-4525-96c9-1846005dd5bc/download 1c5ef1ffaa168637c2c7969d272344fb https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/62eeb0ea-6c4d-4e13-8f5f-d46a9fe4f2bd/download 68b329da9893e34099c7d8ad5cb9c940 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/2b78ad18-3259-4de2-ba8b-279665cf01ed/download 24e648839aa31918bceb936aff170ec0 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/52e5bc0c-6754-40ec-b22f-086fe9033da6/download 429079e52f342c49301a02e207bfde06 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/da0b4c3a-d6f3-476a-bf32-eeee0556d4e3/download 34c28c8d63cc2a1d8ea05dfa01f52895 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/e3e91a92-8048-4cdc-84a6-b76665ec770c/download 3b176f4d8377d6d81fa41c3fdcef32a4 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/678e07de-4f32-4210-b271-c74f9fd4fd26/download d9e7b13e29e970f8165021c61dd26d84 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/299fc448-2c12-4181-9727-9d2fd696c696/download 82cb4069a222e4c0dd5616b30fbf2f9b https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/014c2675-060d-4e74-b642-8bdb624309e3/download 24d68299ae13852334a122ea657bbaaa Perjury -- Comparative law Examination of witnesses White collar crimes