مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية
The reason behind conducting of this comparable and feasible study is to find out the Maqasid al-Shari'ah (Purposes of Islamic Law) from Al Qasimi, Al Maragi and Ibn 'Ashur' s viewpoints and to illustrate the great feature and the wide horizon of Islamic Law through selected Qurani...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | other |
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my-usim-ddms-13080 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| spelling |
my-usim-ddms-130802024-05-29T05:31:19Z مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية Maqasid al-syari’ah lada al-qasimi wa-al-maraghi wa-ibn 'ashur dirasah muqaranah tahliliyyah زيد ثابت عبد الرحمن Zayd Thabit 'Abd Al-Rahman The reason behind conducting of this comparable and feasible study is to find out the Maqasid al-Shari'ah (Purposes of Islamic Law) from Al Qasimi, Al Maragi and Ibn 'Ashur' s viewpoints and to illustrate the great feature and the wide horizon of Islamic Law through selected Quranic commentaries and interpretations. which were written by contemporary scholars who encountered the same cultural challenges and faced accelerated circumstances and changes. At the present. Muslim nation is influenced especially by the destructive ideologies. perverted philosophical trends and deceptive practices. The problem statement of this study lies in the complexity of the present time issues and some Muslims people follow the literal meaning of the interpretation test. ignoring the purposes of the Islamic law led to devising a clear impact in the dissemination of fanatic views, unproductive concepts and immature opinions. Therefore, those people attempted to overturn principles. change goals and objectives. and manipulate and fraud the means and mechanism of Maqasid al-Shari'ah (Purposes of Islamic Law). Thus, it is necessary to refer to the great and virtue scholars who sought to reconcile the words of the Islamic texts and their meanings and goals. This study aims to compare the similarities and differences between the three approaches of interpreters and the methods of their purposeful work. with the diagnosis of the relationship between the purposes, evidence and provisions. To extract and investigate the impact of their realization of the necessary. needy and improvement purposes in terms of achieving the basic interests that have been spoken and instigated by Islamic law. The descriptive approach is used in this study and the researcher collected. documented, analyzed, and criticized the librarian scientific material via partial extrapolation of the views of the three scholars within their interpretations depending on the comparative approach to view and evaluate the right and the more correct sayings and compare the intentional deductions and methodological explanations in order to come up with an integrated overview of multifaceted and interlaced issues. The results of this study showed the necessity of adopting the Islamic purposeful thought as an intellectual and applicable approach. They indicated also the necessity of absorbing emergency and renewable problems. The study recommended encouraging the researchers to carry out more comparative studies in terms of interpretations and pay more attention to the issues that hits of Islamic nations. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia 2020-11 Thesis other https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/13080 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/95e47ab1-4d52-4beb-8c46-5f2cd159fdca/download 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 Islamic law -- Interpretation and construction Islamic law -- Philosophy |
| institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| collection |
USIM Institutional Repository |
| language |
other |
| topic |
Islamic law -- Interpretation and construction Islamic law -- Philosophy |
| spellingShingle |
Islamic law -- Interpretation and construction Islamic law -- Philosophy زيد ثابت عبد الرحمن Zayd Thabit 'Abd Al-Rahman مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية |
| description |
The reason behind conducting of this comparable and feasible study is to find out the
Maqasid al-Shari'ah (Purposes of Islamic Law) from Al Qasimi, Al Maragi and Ibn
'Ashur' s viewpoints and to illustrate the great feature and the wide horizon of Islamic
Law through selected Quranic commentaries and interpretations. which were written by
contemporary scholars who encountered the same cultural challenges and faced
accelerated circumstances and changes. At the present. Muslim nation is influenced
especially by the destructive ideologies. perverted philosophical trends and deceptive
practices. The problem statement of this study lies in the complexity of the present time
issues and some Muslims people follow the literal meaning of the interpretation test.
ignoring the purposes of the Islamic law led to devising a clear impact in the
dissemination of fanatic views, unproductive concepts and immature opinions.
Therefore, those people attempted to overturn principles. change goals and objectives.
and manipulate and fraud the means and mechanism of Maqasid al-Shari'ah (Purposes
of Islamic Law). Thus, it is necessary to refer to the great and virtue scholars who sought
to reconcile the words of the Islamic texts and their meanings and goals. This study
aims to compare the similarities and differences between the three approaches of
interpreters and the methods of their purposeful work. with the diagnosis of the
relationship between the purposes, evidence and provisions. To extract and investigate
the impact of their realization of the necessary. needy and improvement purposes in
terms of achieving the basic interests that have been spoken and instigated by Islamic
law. The descriptive approach is used in this study and the researcher collected.
documented, analyzed, and criticized the librarian scientific material via partial
extrapolation of the views of the three scholars within their interpretations depending
on the comparative approach to view and evaluate the right and the more correct
sayings and compare the intentional deductions and methodological explanations in
order to come up with an integrated overview of multifaceted and interlaced issues. The
results of this study showed the necessity of adopting the Islamic purposeful thought as
an intellectual and applicable approach. They indicated also the necessity of absorbing
emergency and renewable problems. The study recommended encouraging the
researchers to carry out more comparative studies in terms of interpretations and pay
more attention to the issues that hits of Islamic nations. |
| format |
Thesis |
| author |
زيد ثابت عبد الرحمن Zayd Thabit 'Abd Al-Rahman |
| author_facet |
زيد ثابت عبد الرحمن Zayd Thabit 'Abd Al-Rahman |
| author_sort |
زيد ثابت عبد الرحمن |
| title |
مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية |
| title_short |
مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية |
| title_full |
مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية |
| title_fullStr |
مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية |
| title_full_unstemmed |
مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية |
| title_sort |
مقاصد الشريعة لدى القاسمي والمراغي وابن عاشور دراسة مقارنة تحليلية |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| _version_ |
1812444700046524416 |