الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة
This study aims at recognizing the methods of evaluation used by the Arabic language professors in Libyan and Malaysian universities. The researcher has chosen four universities in both countries. The four universities chosen from Malaysia are University of Putra Malaysia, International Islamic Univ...
Saved in:
| id |
my-usim-ddms-13342 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| collection |
USIM Institutional Repository |
| language |
other |
| topic |
ِArabic language |
| spellingShingle |
ِArabic language Ibrahem Mohamed Soud Hamton الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة |
| description |
This study aims at recognizing the methods of evaluation used by the Arabic language professors in Libyan and Malaysian universities. The researcher has chosen four universities in both countries. The four universities chosen from Malaysia are University of Putra Malaysia, International Islamic University, National University of
Malaysia and University of Malaya. Similarly, the four universities chosen from Libya are Tripoli University (formerly known as al-Fateh University), (University of Sebha, Sirte University (formerly known as al-Tahaddi University), and University of Benghazi (formerly known as Qaryounis University). The researcher has used the Analytic, descriptive and comparative approaches. All the Arabic language professors in Libyan and Malaysian universities have comprised the population of the study where they were ٣٤٣professors-١١١ professors in Malaysian universities and the rest (٢٣٢) in Libyan universities. Due to the small size of the study sample, the researcher has conducted a comprehensive survey for all the study population. The researcher has used the closed questionnaire which consisted of ٨٣ items distributed among the six aspects of the study. The study results showed that the methods of evaluation: projects, assignments, and extra-curricular activities, have been the most important methods used by the Arabic language professors in Malaysian and Libyan
universities. However, while "group discussions, participation and professor notetaking"( as methods of evaluation, were the least used by those professors of Arabic language in the Malaysian universities, the least used methods of evaluation used by the professors of Arabic language, in the Libyan universities were oral and listening tests. The researcher recommends, among other things, that it is necessary to widely activate the "group discussions, class participations and professor note-taking" as well as "oral and listening tests" as methods of evaluation in Malaysian and Libyan universities by the professors of Arabic language. He also recommends the necessity of re-adjusting the teaching class to just accommodate less than twenty students for
better evaluation. |
| format |
Thesis |
| author |
Ibrahem Mohamed Soud Hamton |
| author_facet |
Ibrahem Mohamed Soud Hamton |
| author_sort |
Ibrahem Mohamed Soud Hamton |
| title |
الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة |
| title_short |
الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة |
| title_full |
الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة |
| title_fullStr |
الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة |
| title_full_unstemmed |
الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة |
| title_sort |
الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| url |
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/4c85bc3e-7fda-4fab-84a2-638893e8b3ad/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3f6e40ae-f29c-4ede-bcaa-7bb124719c5a/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/f5283cdd-1936-44e8-a4ff-127142240f2f/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1798c32e-b3c5-4d46-a668-ca4d2330826f/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/e9c27c40-bf83-4fd1-b9c7-3f52d0e57fc6/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/0eafa77a-c205-475c-a87b-52b93d9b0b1e/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/506235db-4e3e-4090-88d5-608ba9292216/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/fa7fda7f-d07b-4dda-a63e-6f2dc0c663af/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1c2d030d-f280-481a-ba39-0b41f8fdfa80/download |
| _version_ |
1812444906413621248 |
| spelling |
my-usim-ddms-133422024-05-29T19:57:48Z الأساليب المستخدمة لدى محاضري اللغة العربية في تقويم الطلبة في الجامعات الليبية والماليزية :دراسة ميدانية مقارنة Ibrahem Mohamed Soud Hamton This study aims at recognizing the methods of evaluation used by the Arabic language professors in Libyan and Malaysian universities. The researcher has chosen four universities in both countries. The four universities chosen from Malaysia are University of Putra Malaysia, International Islamic University, National University of Malaysia and University of Malaya. Similarly, the four universities chosen from Libya are Tripoli University (formerly known as al-Fateh University), (University of Sebha, Sirte University (formerly known as al-Tahaddi University), and University of Benghazi (formerly known as Qaryounis University). The researcher has used the Analytic, descriptive and comparative approaches. All the Arabic language professors in Libyan and Malaysian universities have comprised the population of the study where they were ٣٤٣professors-١١١ professors in Malaysian universities and the rest (٢٣٢) in Libyan universities. Due to the small size of the study sample, the researcher has conducted a comprehensive survey for all the study population. The researcher has used the closed questionnaire which consisted of ٨٣ items distributed among the six aspects of the study. The study results showed that the methods of evaluation: projects, assignments, and extra-curricular activities, have been the most important methods used by the Arabic language professors in Malaysian and Libyan universities. However, while "group discussions, participation and professor notetaking"( as methods of evaluation, were the least used by those professors of Arabic language in the Malaysian universities, the least used methods of evaluation used by the professors of Arabic language, in the Libyan universities were oral and listening tests. The researcher recommends, among other things, that it is necessary to widely activate the "group discussions, class participations and professor note-taking" as well as "oral and listening tests" as methods of evaluation in Malaysian and Libyan universities by the professors of Arabic language. He also recommends the necessity of re-adjusting the teaching class to just accommodate less than twenty students for better evaluation. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia 2013-01 Thesis other https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/13342 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/70157b68-1c6b-4876-b5a9-a6abb38138e2/download 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/4c85bc3e-7fda-4fab-84a2-638893e8b3ad/download 026511cf11a11e84212987727dae0500 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3f6e40ae-f29c-4ede-bcaa-7bb124719c5a/download d34e6e32c7faec49438fc013d1c34c17 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/f5283cdd-1936-44e8-a4ff-127142240f2f/download 6b3b64a28b2bde47d030bd87dbb1e20a https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1798c32e-b3c5-4d46-a668-ca4d2330826f/download 91dafde651aa708e4439bb48c3b49607 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/e9c27c40-bf83-4fd1-b9c7-3f52d0e57fc6/download f2e0f921e8291149d99e863a848d765c https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/0eafa77a-c205-475c-a87b-52b93d9b0b1e/download c5ef1ee8afa6c1dfdf27fa28d7ab7cf0 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/506235db-4e3e-4090-88d5-608ba9292216/download fe13a3e991de622e3256c08550789b9d https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/fa7fda7f-d07b-4dda-a63e-6f2dc0c663af/download b2113a61d8e948565d10fdbd04a0178d https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1c2d030d-f280-481a-ba39-0b41f8fdfa80/download edd75d9bdac6570ca7ddf13e604edf12 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/adc124ba-f903-40de-b507-2812642f5687/download 68b329da9893e34099c7d8ad5cb9c940 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c4a7f4aa-fa5a-497b-bee2-b5211559a263/download 46dab46279ab4ecb929adb971a632731 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/9b4838e4-0ebf-46d9-b5bd-d89acccc515c/download 7f5b903a193cc66524e06d8c0458e34a https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/4a55d2e2-d9d0-433a-b0bc-b6740f777e71/download c17fb3fd6d8844b2eba5af6c66b1377d https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/4cac1d82-0743-45bd-aba7-fe7e7bd0df06/download 70cf152f5dddabbf3e3e3a8bc23d0095 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/3892b99a-c3eb-4c3f-8fb4-c85a60363d16/download e14e3b0192b3305205ba6736170435d0 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ed8d9466-7bb4-4c2a-a44c-31a540f89a2e/download 67e866c735744ec6037b77b623ee022d https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/58638cfb-838b-42da-9f9d-14b28496a842/download 392b92377d3166969ac79cc37a0ba5fb https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/fa0ae643-d458-4482-bfb8-9e1213f13399/download 85feea28f98c2c0579d46de97c4adc99 ِArabic language |