ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة

The study aims to identify the principles of fair trial in Islamic law; to identify the extent to which the Palestinian law is committed to provide guarantees for the accused in obtaining a fair trial compared to Islamic law; to explain the adequacy of the available guarantees in achieving a fair...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: رمضان محمد عبد الله عوض, Ramadan Mohamad Abdullah Awad
Format: Thesis
Language:other
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/186e7042-8214-4e00-8ed6-0ff764d09d98/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/978f2a3f-153c-40ef-bde0-f98bdc544631/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1e19e4d8-fb97-4fbb-b46c-7b1191eae26e/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/bc67f914-edb1-421a-a755-eaa888cb2c15/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c4242111-79ce-460a-b99b-6f3dfc1b651c/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/9b86c1a0-3025-4b88-9808-7cc673dd1787/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/6de1d136-37e2-4fbe-baff-7761f264ecf3/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c64b622e-073d-4685-bab0-e8cd037778e0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/6c44afaa-35e8-424c-b785-35d3f7d801e1/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/70eb39a6-218a-4390-bbe8-b6654ce34cd5/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/9fc317ef-c753-438d-88f0-4a68224ef850/download
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-usim-ddms-13399
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
collection USIM Institutional Repository
language other
topic fair trial
Islamic law
Palestinian law
Palestinian judicial system
judicial system.
spellingShingle fair trial
Islamic law
Palestinian law
Palestinian judicial system
judicial system.
رمضان محمد عبد الله عوض
Ramadan Mohamad Abdullah Awad
ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة
description The study aims to identify the principles of fair trial in Islamic law; to identify the extent to which the Palestinian law is committed to provide guarantees for the accused in obtaining a fair trial compared to Islamic law; to explain the adequacy of the available guarantees in achieving a fair trial for the accused in the Palestinian Penal Procedure Law compared to Islamic law; and to identify the extent to which the employees of the Palestinian police force and judiciary adhere to the provisions of the law to ensure the right of the accused to a fair trial. This study sought to determine the guarantees of the accused in the trial stage. The study used the comparative approach and the analytical descriptive method that integrated quantitative and qualitative. It is the appropriate method for studies that employ fieldwork, such as an interview or a questionnaire. The study concluded that the level of application of the guarantees from the point of view of the accused was moderate, as it was found that there is delay experienced by the accused in obtaining the decision for his conviction or release. This delay is caused by the court from the point of view of the accused. It was also found that there was failure from the Public Prosecution to examine witnesses without pressure in accordance with the law; failure in the judge’s assurance that the confession was not extracted from the accused by force and with regard to the judge’s assurance that the accused was not subjected to torture before the trial; as well as with regard to the right of the accused not to postpone the trial more than once. The results of this study, according to a survey of Palestinian lawyers in Palestinian courts, showed that the percentage of fairness achievement was moderate. They have some objections to achieving fairness, represented in the fact that the judge does not put the interest of the accused first in all procedures, and the judge does not usually stand by the accused until proven otherwise. The results showed that the lawyers’ survey shows that the achievement of fairness in the Islamic system in the past is better than the system in the courts of today in terms of achieving fairness and ensuring that the accused obtains fairness during the trial. They also see that putting the accused in a cage is a violation of his right, a procedure that was not used in the Islamic judiciary in the past. Likewise, they do not believe that the principles of trial in courts today are derived from Islamic law. The results of the study showed that the Public Prosecution sees that fairness is achieved by the court, and that the Palestinian judicial system is impartial and achieves a high level of fairness in dealing with the accused. They believe that the judicial system is impartial and takes into account all the rights of the accused and seeks to implement them. The results also showed that the judges see fairness and legal integrity in dealing with the accused, guaranteeing his rights in all stages of the trial until the verdict is issued, and that there are some mistakes that must be addressed.
format Thesis
author رمضان محمد عبد الله عوض
Ramadan Mohamad Abdullah Awad
author_facet رمضان محمد عبد الله عوض
Ramadan Mohamad Abdullah Awad
author_sort رمضان محمد عبد الله عوض
title ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة
title_short ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة
title_full ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة
title_fullStr ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة
title_full_unstemmed ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة
title_sort ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة
granting_institution Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
url https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/186e7042-8214-4e00-8ed6-0ff764d09d98/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/978f2a3f-153c-40ef-bde0-f98bdc544631/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1e19e4d8-fb97-4fbb-b46c-7b1191eae26e/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/bc67f914-edb1-421a-a755-eaa888cb2c15/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c4242111-79ce-460a-b99b-6f3dfc1b651c/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/9b86c1a0-3025-4b88-9808-7cc673dd1787/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/6de1d136-37e2-4fbe-baff-7761f264ecf3/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c64b622e-073d-4685-bab0-e8cd037778e0/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/6c44afaa-35e8-424c-b785-35d3f7d801e1/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/70eb39a6-218a-4390-bbe8-b6654ce34cd5/download
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/9fc317ef-c753-438d-88f0-4a68224ef850/download
_version_ 1812444682155720704
spelling my-usim-ddms-133992024-05-29T18:07:08Z ضمانات حصول المتَّهم على المحاكمة العادلة وتطبيقاتها دراسة ميدانية تحليلية على ضوء القانون الفلسطيني والشَّريعة الإسلاميّة Damanat husul al-muttaham ila al-muhakama al-‘adilah wa-tatbiqatuha dirasah maydaniy tahliliyah ila daw’ al-qanun al-Filastini wa-al-shari’ah al-islamiyah رمضان محمد عبد الله عوض Ramadan Mohamad Abdullah Awad The study aims to identify the principles of fair trial in Islamic law; to identify the extent to which the Palestinian law is committed to provide guarantees for the accused in obtaining a fair trial compared to Islamic law; to explain the adequacy of the available guarantees in achieving a fair trial for the accused in the Palestinian Penal Procedure Law compared to Islamic law; and to identify the extent to which the employees of the Palestinian police force and judiciary adhere to the provisions of the law to ensure the right of the accused to a fair trial. This study sought to determine the guarantees of the accused in the trial stage. The study used the comparative approach and the analytical descriptive method that integrated quantitative and qualitative. It is the appropriate method for studies that employ fieldwork, such as an interview or a questionnaire. The study concluded that the level of application of the guarantees from the point of view of the accused was moderate, as it was found that there is delay experienced by the accused in obtaining the decision for his conviction or release. This delay is caused by the court from the point of view of the accused. It was also found that there was failure from the Public Prosecution to examine witnesses without pressure in accordance with the law; failure in the judge’s assurance that the confession was not extracted from the accused by force and with regard to the judge’s assurance that the accused was not subjected to torture before the trial; as well as with regard to the right of the accused not to postpone the trial more than once. The results of this study, according to a survey of Palestinian lawyers in Palestinian courts, showed that the percentage of fairness achievement was moderate. They have some objections to achieving fairness, represented in the fact that the judge does not put the interest of the accused first in all procedures, and the judge does not usually stand by the accused until proven otherwise. The results showed that the lawyers’ survey shows that the achievement of fairness in the Islamic system in the past is better than the system in the courts of today in terms of achieving fairness and ensuring that the accused obtains fairness during the trial. They also see that putting the accused in a cage is a violation of his right, a procedure that was not used in the Islamic judiciary in the past. Likewise, they do not believe that the principles of trial in courts today are derived from Islamic law. The results of the study showed that the Public Prosecution sees that fairness is achieved by the court, and that the Palestinian judicial system is impartial and achieves a high level of fairness in dealing with the accused. They believe that the judicial system is impartial and takes into account all the rights of the accused and seeks to implement them. The results also showed that the judges see fairness and legal integrity in dealing with the accused, guaranteeing his rights in all stages of the trial until the verdict is issued, and that there are some mistakes that must be addressed. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia 2024-01 Thesis other https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/13399 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/186e7042-8214-4e00-8ed6-0ff764d09d98/download 40a21264c17880b5215ee3ef200ecd4e https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/978f2a3f-153c-40ef-bde0-f98bdc544631/download b86065bcab294c9f47911b74aaf8cb97 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/1e19e4d8-fb97-4fbb-b46c-7b1191eae26e/download 625b22dc56f41a1ea7b9c951ce47ee04 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/bc67f914-edb1-421a-a755-eaa888cb2c15/download 4179d5302d81e6f2b6cf67bb626b3e81 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c4242111-79ce-460a-b99b-6f3dfc1b651c/download fd2c03a4f7155de07e7a5468da001876 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/9b86c1a0-3025-4b88-9808-7cc673dd1787/download cda0cefe2592ed19d17b2bdcb90e3acb https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/6de1d136-37e2-4fbe-baff-7761f264ecf3/download 54f6642a430c7383429ec964b88e199a https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c64b622e-073d-4685-bab0-e8cd037778e0/download b7290d14b35a92f436f4cf0903012642 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/6c44afaa-35e8-424c-b785-35d3f7d801e1/download a26d63ca67b469e867799304c6ab12f5 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/70eb39a6-218a-4390-bbe8-b6654ce34cd5/download 0898933d265a6fbb8726853de696d8da https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/9fc317ef-c753-438d-88f0-4a68224ef850/download 7243433f00735a2d75c87ccac77c6ef2 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/fa02a76b-9550-4c7b-b2cc-675c51051123/download 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/6348713c-5fc7-4f41-8a44-2222eddf9e20/download 68b329da9893e34099c7d8ad5cb9c940 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/af8898cc-fc47-4122-87f6-1efa07d8514a/download b204e593559b9c32cb441338cf5fbfd0 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/71acb08e-5ad7-4fa2-93d3-f62abbe479c1/download a7a8cd15dbb7bc154c51cfce6508f1c5 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a85869d4-01d6-4b26-bd3a-0fca97ec503e/download 34ce6930552a81f56e523de54d38b83e https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/221e1f57-112b-4c73-91a6-22cb4ce61e59/download f7de23a00026bc5f4dcc6d17df844269 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/5b3c7b98-2614-4a8d-a1e0-8ba6d01ebf2b/download ad541395c12c219566a5c24c8ddcd8fa https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/100e3ab5-416c-4419-85f2-11054f9bfb13/download 12c3b5a399035805def082c2f6b35e30 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c68fdb39-7c92-4081-a930-e5416a28ec45/download ca548e90d1bb9a994941c9f3e96b6beb https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/438c757e-e9c7-4563-8e3f-7ac0353e94d9/download 5d128cb14b559df736e564a7c7f124c9 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c95cfebf-246c-4ab6-b583-6d1313e0e851/download f558acc233a1a32f270f891d1ed77f2f https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/492d3524-9c95-4115-be25-0ec7c6fe0257/download 32bc0424e864f326af7a7f0a96382e28 fair trial, Islamic law, Palestinian law, Palestinian judicial system, judicial system.