The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage

"Extra- amniotic saline infusion" (EASI) bukanlah satu agen pengguguran yang baru, tetapi sebagaimana yang dilaporkan, ia adalah satu kaedah yang selamat digunakan. Di sebaliknya, Gemeprost merupakan kaedah yang popular dan kerap digunakan tetapi mahal. Pada ketika ini, perbelanjaan rawata...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ibrahim, Adibah
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2002
Subjects:	RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Online Access:	http://eprints.usm.my/36263/1/Dr_Adibah_Ibrahim_-_TNM_%28NN24%29.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-usm-ep.36263
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-usm-ep.362632017-08-23T00:33:47Z The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage 2002-05 Ibrahim, Adibah RG Gynecology and obstetrics "Extra- amniotic saline infusion" (EASI) bukanlah satu agen pengguguran yang baru, tetapi sebagaimana yang dilaporkan, ia adalah satu kaedah yang selamat digunakan. Di sebaliknya, Gemeprost merupakan kaedah yang popular dan kerap digunakan tetapi mahal. Pada ketika ini, perbelanjaan rawatan adalah tinggi. Dengan sebab itu, sesetengah hospital mencari altematifbagi menggugurkan kandungan. Berrnu1a dari 1hb. Mac 2001 sehingga 28hb. Februari 2002, seramai 91 pesakit "silent miscarriage" telah dipilih secara rawak untuk kedua- dua kaedah pengguguran ini, iaitu kaedah EASI atau Gemeprost. Keberkesanan kedua-dua kaedah ini dibandingkan dari segi kesempumaan pengguguran, jangkamasa yang diambil untuk mengalami keguguran, jangkamasa berada di hospital, kos rawatan, kesan sampingan dan akhimya penerimaan pesakit terhadap kaedah tersebut. Extra- amniotic saline infusion (EASI) as abortifacient is not new, however it is still a safe abortifacient as quoted in the literatures. Gemeprost on the other hand is a popular abortifacient used widely however at exhorbitant cost. In this day and age when the price of health care is escalating some countries are considering cheaper altematjves. We at Hospital Kota Bharu wished to evaluate EASI as an alternative method of abortifacient. From 1st March 2000 till 28th February 2001 , 91 patients were randomly selected to two methods of abortifacient, Gemeprost 1 mg daily (wruch is the standard protocol in HKB) and EASI. Both methods were analysed and compared for effectiveness in terms of completeness of abortion and inductionabortion interval, adverse effects, duration of hospital stay and the cost of treatment and finally the patients' satisfaction of the treatment. 2002-05 Thesis http://eprints.usm.my/36263/ http://eprints.usm.my/36263/1/Dr_Adibah_Ibrahim_-_TNM_%28NN24%29.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Sains Malaysia Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan (School of Medical Sciences)
institution	Universiti Sains Malaysia
collection	USM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	RG Gynecology and obstetrics
spellingShingle	RG Gynecology and obstetrics Ibrahim, Adibah The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage
description	"Extra- amniotic saline infusion" (EASI) bukanlah satu agen pengguguran yang baru, tetapi sebagaimana yang dilaporkan, ia adalah satu kaedah yang selamat digunakan. Di sebaliknya, Gemeprost merupakan kaedah yang popular dan kerap digunakan tetapi mahal. Pada ketika ini, perbelanjaan rawatan adalah tinggi. Dengan sebab itu, sesetengah hospital mencari altematifbagi menggugurkan kandungan. Berrnu1a dari 1hb. Mac 2001 sehingga 28hb. Februari 2002, seramai 91 pesakit "silent miscarriage" telah dipilih secara rawak untuk kedua- dua kaedah pengguguran ini, iaitu kaedah EASI atau Gemeprost. Keberkesanan kedua-dua kaedah ini dibandingkan dari segi kesempumaan pengguguran, jangkamasa yang diambil untuk mengalami keguguran, jangkamasa berada di hospital, kos rawatan, kesan sampingan dan akhimya penerimaan pesakit terhadap kaedah tersebut. Extra- amniotic saline infusion (EASI) as abortifacient is not new, however it is still a safe abortifacient as quoted in the literatures. Gemeprost on the other hand is a popular abortifacient used widely however at exhorbitant cost. In this day and age when the price of health care is escalating some countries are considering cheaper altematjves. We at Hospital Kota Bharu wished to evaluate EASI as an alternative method of abortifacient. From 1st March 2000 till 28th February 2001 , 91 patients were randomly selected to two methods of abortifacient, Gemeprost 1 mg daily (wruch is the standard protocol in HKB) and EASI. Both methods were analysed and compared for effectiveness in terms of completeness of abortion and inductionabortion interval, adverse effects, duration of hospital stay and the cost of treatment and finally the patients' satisfaction of the treatment.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Ibrahim, Adibah
author_facet	Ibrahim, Adibah
author_sort	Ibrahim, Adibah
title	The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage
title_short	The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage
title_full	The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage
title_fullStr	The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage
title_full_unstemmed	The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage
title_sort	comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage
granting_institution	Universiti Sains Malaysia
granting_department	Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan (School of Medical Sciences)
publishDate	2002
url	http://eprints.usm.my/36263/1/Dr_Adibah_Ibrahim_-_TNM_%28NN24%29.pdf
_version_	1747820625154539520

The comparison between extra-amniotic saline infusion and gemeprost as abortificient in mid-trimester silent miscarriage

Similar Items