The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure

In this study, the performance of polypropylene honeycomb structure with different thickness, filled and unfilled was investigated. The density of the specimen was measured and subjected to flexural test, indentation test, compression and the low velocity impact test. After each test, the specimen w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad, Mohamad Ibrahim
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/46776/1/The%20Velocity%20Impact%20Response%20Of%20Filled%20And%20Unfilled%20Polypropylene%20Honeycomb%20Core%20Sandwich%20Structure.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-usm-ep.46776
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-usm-ep.467762021-11-17T03:42:18Z The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure 2016-08-01 Ahmad, Mohamad Ibrahim T Technology TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials In this study, the performance of polypropylene honeycomb structure with different thickness, filled and unfilled was investigated. The density of the specimen was measured and subjected to flexural test, indentation test, compression and the low velocity impact test. After each test, the specimen was scanned under ultrasonic C-scan to investigate the effect of energy on the honeycomb panel structure. Introducing reinforced material into honeycomb cell increases the density of the panel structure up to 30 - 34% of initial density. Based on the flexural study, the percentage of energy increment for structure to collapse is around 15 to 38 percent for 30 mm core thickness and 6 to 17 percent for 40 mm core thickness. In indentation test, the n value is between 1.52 to 1.87 for 30 mm core thickness and 0.33 to 1.27 for core thickness 40 mm; 1.5 is the value for an acceptant for composite. The stiffness C was found to depend on the plastic collapse strength of the polyurethane foam and the properties of the skin. The value is between (0.90 to 1.56) x106 N/mn. In compression test, reinforced Polypropylene honeycomb filled sandwich structure has better energy absorption characteristic rather than Polypropylene honeycomb unfilled sandwich structure. In low velocity impact test, the reinforced effect increased the energy absorbtion efficienty about 10 to 30 percentage for both 30 mm and 40 mm core thickness. The damage area for all specimens for the Polypropylene honeycomb unfilled sandwich structure much higher compared to reinforce structure. The reinforced material acted to reduce the stress on the facing skin of the honeycomb structure. 2016-08 Thesis http://eprints.usm.my/46776/ http://eprints.usm.my/46776/1/The%20Velocity%20Impact%20Response%20Of%20Filled%20And%20Unfilled%20Polypropylene%20Honeycomb%20Core%20Sandwich%20Structure.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Sains Malaysia Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Bahan & Sumber Mineral
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
collection USM Institutional Repository
language English
topic T Technology
T Technology
spellingShingle T Technology
T Technology
Ahmad, Mohamad Ibrahim
The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
description In this study, the performance of polypropylene honeycomb structure with different thickness, filled and unfilled was investigated. The density of the specimen was measured and subjected to flexural test, indentation test, compression and the low velocity impact test. After each test, the specimen was scanned under ultrasonic C-scan to investigate the effect of energy on the honeycomb panel structure. Introducing reinforced material into honeycomb cell increases the density of the panel structure up to 30 - 34% of initial density. Based on the flexural study, the percentage of energy increment for structure to collapse is around 15 to 38 percent for 30 mm core thickness and 6 to 17 percent for 40 mm core thickness. In indentation test, the n value is between 1.52 to 1.87 for 30 mm core thickness and 0.33 to 1.27 for core thickness 40 mm; 1.5 is the value for an acceptant for composite. The stiffness C was found to depend on the plastic collapse strength of the polyurethane foam and the properties of the skin. The value is between (0.90 to 1.56) x106 N/mn. In compression test, reinforced Polypropylene honeycomb filled sandwich structure has better energy absorption characteristic rather than Polypropylene honeycomb unfilled sandwich structure. In low velocity impact test, the reinforced effect increased the energy absorbtion efficienty about 10 to 30 percentage for both 30 mm and 40 mm core thickness. The damage area for all specimens for the Polypropylene honeycomb unfilled sandwich structure much higher compared to reinforce structure. The reinforced material acted to reduce the stress on the facing skin of the honeycomb structure.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ahmad, Mohamad Ibrahim
author_facet Ahmad, Mohamad Ibrahim
author_sort Ahmad, Mohamad Ibrahim
title The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
title_short The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
title_full The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
title_fullStr The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
title_full_unstemmed The Velocity Impact Response Of Filled And Unfilled Polypropylene Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
title_sort velocity impact response of filled and unfilled polypropylene honeycomb core sandwich structure
granting_institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
granting_department Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Bahan & Sumber Mineral
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.usm.my/46776/1/The%20Velocity%20Impact%20Response%20Of%20Filled%20And%20Unfilled%20Polypropylene%20Honeycomb%20Core%20Sandwich%20Structure.pdf
_version_ 1747821726791630848