A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure

To compare the effecti veness of cyanoacrylate ti ssue adhes ive vv ith convent ional suture in closing laparoscopic abdominal incision. Design: Prospecti ve, randomized controlled study Setting: Gynaecology ward of Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan. Kuantan from April 2005 ti ll November 2006. Part...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ali, Nor Huda Mat
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2007
Subjects:	R Medicine (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.usm.my/48524/1/Dr%20Nor%20Huda%20Ali%20-%2024%20pages.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-usm-ep.48524
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-usm-ep.485242021-03-03T04:28:40Z A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure 2007-05 Ali, Nor Huda Mat R Medicine (General) To compare the effecti veness of cyanoacrylate ti ssue adhes ive vv ith convent ional suture in closing laparoscopic abdominal incision. Design: Prospecti ve, randomized controlled study Setting: Gynaecology ward of Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan. Kuantan from April 2005 ti ll November 2006. Participants: 64 patients for laparoscopi c abdominal procedure Methodology: Pati ents were chosen based on inclusion and exclusion criteria . They were then randomly assigned to recci\"C either ti ssue adhesi\·e or suture. Main outcome measure: Time taken for skin closure. Post operative day one. Complications such as haematoma formation, wound infection .wound dehiscence as well as patient" s satisfaction. Result: Sixty four patients were recruited into the study: 32 m suture group and 32 in tissue adhesive group. Both groups were comparable with respect to age. parity. education level. type of occupation and number of hol es. There was a significant difference in the time taken for skin clos ure (suture: 7.0±4.2 . ti ssue aclhesivc:4.3± 1.0, p=0.002). No difference in Day I post operative pain (suture:3.8±2.0. ti ssue adhesive:4.3± 1.7.p=0.344). No patients were reported to have any haematoma at either day 7 and clay 21 . No significant difference in wound in fect ion and wound dehiscence at day 7 and clay 21 in each groups. Patients sati sfa ction was also comparable in either group (suture: 8.4± 1.5, tissue adhesive:8.0± 1.8 p=0.26 ). There was a sioniticant difference in skin apposi tion at day 7 (suture:8. 1±0.7. tissue acl hesive:7.3± 1.2 0 p=O.OO 1 ). However no eli fference in skin apposit ion at clay 2 1. 2007-05 Thesis http://eprints.usm.my/48524/ http://eprints.usm.my/48524/1/Dr%20Nor%20Huda%20Ali%20-%2024%20pages.pdf application/pdf en public other Universiti Sains Malaysia Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan
institution	Universiti Sains Malaysia
collection	USM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	R Medicine (General)
spellingShingle	R Medicine (General) Ali, Nor Huda Mat A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure
description	To compare the effecti veness of cyanoacrylate ti ssue adhes ive vv ith convent ional suture in closing laparoscopic abdominal incision. Design: Prospecti ve, randomized controlled study Setting: Gynaecology ward of Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan. Kuantan from April 2005 ti ll November 2006. Participants: 64 patients for laparoscopi c abdominal procedure Methodology: Pati ents were chosen based on inclusion and exclusion criteria . They were then randomly assigned to recci\"C either ti ssue adhesi\·e or suture. Main outcome measure: Time taken for skin closure. Post operative day one. Complications such as haematoma formation, wound infection .wound dehiscence as well as patient" s satisfaction. Result: Sixty four patients were recruited into the study: 32 m suture group and 32 in tissue adhesive group. Both groups were comparable with respect to age. parity. education level. type of occupation and number of hol es. There was a significant difference in the time taken for skin clos ure (suture: 7.0±4.2 . ti ssue aclhesivc:4.3± 1.0, p=0.002). No difference in Day I post operative pain (suture:3.8±2.0. ti ssue adhesive:4.3± 1.7.p=0.344). No patients were reported to have any haematoma at either day 7 and clay 21 . No significant difference in wound in fect ion and wound dehiscence at day 7 and clay 21 in each groups. Patients sati sfa ction was also comparable in either group (suture: 8.4± 1.5, tissue adhesive:8.0± 1.8 p=0.26 ). There was a sioniticant difference in skin apposi tion at day 7 (suture:8. 1±0.7. tissue acl hesive:7.3± 1.2 0 p=O.OO 1 ). However no eli fference in skin apposit ion at clay 2 1.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	other
author	Ali, Nor Huda Mat
author_facet	Ali, Nor Huda Mat
author_sort	Ali, Nor Huda Mat
title	A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure
title_short	A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure
title_full	A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure
title_fullStr	A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure
title_full_unstemmed	A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure
title_sort	prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive versus standard wound closure technique for laparoscopic abdominal procedure
granting_institution	Universiti Sains Malaysia
granting_department	Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan
publishDate	2007
url	http://eprints.usm.my/48524/1/Dr%20Nor%20Huda%20Ali%20-%2024%20pages.pdf
_version_	1747821939876954112

A prospective, randomized study of tissue adhesive Versus standard wound closure technique for Laparoscopic abdominal procedure

Similar Items