Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants

INTRODUCTION: The optimal placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in ventilated neonates is essential but birth weight (BW) may be not the best parameter to predict it. A previous study suggested that shoulder umbilical length (SUL) might be superior. The aim of this study is a direct comparison...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali, Adam Al-Anas Mat
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/49409/1/Adam%20Al-Anas%20Mat%20Ali-24%20pages.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-usm-ep.49409
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-usm-ep.494092021-07-11T02:41:11Z Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants 2020 Ali, Adam Al-Anas Mat R Medicine INTRODUCTION: The optimal placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in ventilated neonates is essential but birth weight (BW) may be not the best parameter to predict it. A previous study suggested that shoulder umbilical length (SUL) might be superior. The aim of this study is a direct comparison between SUL vs. BW as predictor of optimal ETT placement in Malaysian ventilated neonates. METHODS: All neonates requiring ventilation in the NICU of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia during the 5 months study period were eligible to enter this randomized controlled trial. Babies included in this study were randomized in two groups: the tube depth was determined based on the SUL for the intervention group and based on the BW for the control group. The main outcome measure was mal-positioning of the ETT as seen on the chest x-ray performed within 1 hour after intubation. Tube placement was assessed by two neonatologists, blinded to the allocation. Data were analysed using SPSS, version 24. RESULTS: One hundred and ten (110) babies were randomized, 55 in each group. The ETT was mal-positioned (requiring adjustment in 13/55 babies (23%) for the SUL group and 22/55 babies (40%) in the BW group (p=0.06) CONCLUSION: In the SUL group, less babies showed a need for tube adjustment than in the BW group. The difference did not reach statistical significance. While, a larger study may be necessary to show statistical significance, the difference shown in this study may be large enough to be of clinical significance. 2020 Thesis http://eprints.usm.my/49409/ http://eprints.usm.my/49409/1/Adam%20Al-Anas%20Mat%20Ali-24%20pages.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Sains Malaysia Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
collection USM Institutional Repository
language English
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Ali, Adam Al-Anas Mat
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in ventilated neonates is essential but birth weight (BW) may be not the best parameter to predict it. A previous study suggested that shoulder umbilical length (SUL) might be superior. The aim of this study is a direct comparison between SUL vs. BW as predictor of optimal ETT placement in Malaysian ventilated neonates. METHODS: All neonates requiring ventilation in the NICU of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia during the 5 months study period were eligible to enter this randomized controlled trial. Babies included in this study were randomized in two groups: the tube depth was determined based on the SUL for the intervention group and based on the BW for the control group. The main outcome measure was mal-positioning of the ETT as seen on the chest x-ray performed within 1 hour after intubation. Tube placement was assessed by two neonatologists, blinded to the allocation. Data were analysed using SPSS, version 24. RESULTS: One hundred and ten (110) babies were randomized, 55 in each group. The ETT was mal-positioned (requiring adjustment in 13/55 babies (23%) for the SUL group and 22/55 babies (40%) in the BW group (p=0.06) CONCLUSION: In the SUL group, less babies showed a need for tube adjustment than in the BW group. The difference did not reach statistical significance. While, a larger study may be necessary to show statistical significance, the difference shown in this study may be large enough to be of clinical significance.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ali, Adam Al-Anas Mat
author_facet Ali, Adam Al-Anas Mat
author_sort Ali, Adam Al-Anas Mat
title Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants
title_short Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants
title_full Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in ventilated infants
title_sort randomized controlled trial (rct) comparing between shoulder umbilicus length versus body weight measurement for optimal endotracheal tube (ett) depth in ventilated infants
granting_institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
granting_department Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.usm.my/49409/1/Adam%20Al-Anas%20Mat%20Ali-24%20pages.pdf
_version_ 1747821997890469888