The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis

Moral judgement is one of many practice or method of historians in writing history. A philosophical attitude in perceiving the practice of moral judgement in historiography is by questioning the validity of this practice in historical method; whether it should be adopted by historians or not. In lig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abd Rahim, Mohammad Umair
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/52313/1/Pages%20from%20ABU%20HAFIZ%20BIN%20SALLEH%20HUDIN%20-%20TESIS.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-usm-ep.52313
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-usm-ep.523132022-04-13T06:53:05Z The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis 2020-11 Abd Rahim, Mohammad Umair P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General) Moral judgement is one of many practice or method of historians in writing history. A philosophical attitude in perceiving the practice of moral judgement in historiography is by questioning the validity of this practice in historical method; whether it should be adopted by historians or not. In light of this, historians since the Early Modern Age have laid down arguments challenging the intellectual foundation of the practice of moral judgement in historiography. Departing from the previous era of Western historiography, the Rankean method which disavowed moral judgement in historiography had become the mainstream historical method. Notwithstanding, not few historians have stood up to defend the practice of moral judgement in historiography with intellectual arguments and justifications. 2020-11 Thesis http://eprints.usm.my/52313/ http://eprints.usm.my/52313/1/Pages%20from%20ABU%20HAFIZ%20BIN%20SALLEH%20HUDIN%20-%20TESIS.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Sains Malaysia Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Kemanusiaan
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
collection USM Institutional Repository
language English
topic P1-1091 Philology
Linguistics(General)
spellingShingle P1-1091 Philology
Linguistics(General)
Abd Rahim, Mohammad Umair
The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis
description Moral judgement is one of many practice or method of historians in writing history. A philosophical attitude in perceiving the practice of moral judgement in historiography is by questioning the validity of this practice in historical method; whether it should be adopted by historians or not. In light of this, historians since the Early Modern Age have laid down arguments challenging the intellectual foundation of the practice of moral judgement in historiography. Departing from the previous era of Western historiography, the Rankean method which disavowed moral judgement in historiography had become the mainstream historical method. Notwithstanding, not few historians have stood up to defend the practice of moral judgement in historiography with intellectual arguments and justifications.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Abd Rahim, Mohammad Umair
author_facet Abd Rahim, Mohammad Umair
author_sort Abd Rahim, Mohammad Umair
title The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis
title_short The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis
title_full The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis
title_fullStr The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Fundamental Arguments For Moral Judgement In Historiography: A Philosophical Analysis
title_sort fundamental arguments for moral judgement in historiography: a philosophical analysis
granting_institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
granting_department Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Kemanusiaan
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.usm.my/52313/1/Pages%20from%20ABU%20HAFIZ%20BIN%20SALLEH%20HUDIN%20-%20TESIS.pdf
_version_ 1747822161061478400