Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery

The purpose of our study is to assess whether the new Proseal Laryngeal Mask airway (PLMA) can be a suitable alternative to the standard use of Endotracheal Tube (ETT) as an airway adjunct to deliver positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgeries. We compared haemodynamic changes (by...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Othman, Marini
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2007
Subjects:	RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Online Access:	http://eprints.usm.my/59421/1/DR.%20MARINI%20OTHMAN%20-%20eprints.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-usm-ep.59421
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-usm-ep.594212023-11-14T08:15:22Z Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery 2007-05 Othman, Marini RG Gynecology and obstetrics The purpose of our study is to assess whether the new Proseal Laryngeal Mask airway (PLMA) can be a suitable alternative to the standard use of Endotracheal Tube (ETT) as an airway adjunct to deliver positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgeries. We compared haemodynamic changes (by measuring heart rates, systolic blood pressures, diastolic blood pressures and mean arterial pressures at different time intervals) throughout the surgery, the quality of airway maintenance by measuring Sp02 and ETC02 and recorded intra operative as well as post operative complications related to use of both airway devices. We performed a prospective single blinded study on 64 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgical procedures. These patients were randomized using block randomization and divided into two groups; PLMA and ETT group. Both groups have 32 patients. After standardized induction of anaesthesia, PLMA or ETT was inserted and the patient was connected to ventilator that delivered positive pressure ventilation at set tidal volume and rate. Anaesthesia was maintained with Nitrous oxide, Oxygen and Isoflurane. Both airway devices were removed at the end of surgery with the patients fully awake. The haemodynamic changes were recorded at different time intervals, together with Sp02 and ETC02 changes. The incidences of intra operative complications (coughing, regurgitation, bronchospasm, desaturation and gas leaking) were recorded if present. The presence of blood upon airway device removal that indicates airway trauma was also recorded. Then we recorded post operative complications if present (persistent cough, vomiting and sore throat). We found that there were no statistical differences in HR changes measured at different time intervals between PLMA and ETT. However there were statistically significant decrease in systolic blood pressures and mean arterial pressures for PLMA group at 1 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute and 15 minute post intubation. For diastolic blood pressures, the lower values in PLMA group were only significant at 10 and 15 minutes post intubations. Comparing Sp02 and ETC02 monitoring, generally there were no significant statistical differences for both groups studied. Our findings on intra operative complications were that both groups have no statistical difference in the incidence of coughing, regurgitation, desaturation, bronchospasm and gas leaking. For presence of blood upon airway devices removal, we found no statistical difference between PLMA and ETT groups. The incidence of post operative persistent coughing and vomiting were also found to be statistically insignificant for both groups, however incidence of post operative sore throat was significantly higher in ETT group compared to PLMA with p value ofO.OOl. Therefore we concluded that for laparoscopic surgery with positive pressure ventilation, PLMA is a suitable alternative to standard ETI use and may offer advantages in terms of haemodynamic changes, with lower incidences or no statistically significant peri operative complications related to its use. 2007-05 Thesis http://eprints.usm.my/59421/ http://eprints.usm.my/59421/1/DR.%20MARINI%20OTHMAN%20-%20eprints.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Sains Malaysia Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan
institution	Universiti Sains Malaysia
collection	USM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	RG Gynecology and obstetrics
spellingShingle	RG Gynecology and obstetrics Othman, Marini Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery
description	The purpose of our study is to assess whether the new Proseal Laryngeal Mask airway (PLMA) can be a suitable alternative to the standard use of Endotracheal Tube (ETT) as an airway adjunct to deliver positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgeries. We compared haemodynamic changes (by measuring heart rates, systolic blood pressures, diastolic blood pressures and mean arterial pressures at different time intervals) throughout the surgery, the quality of airway maintenance by measuring Sp02 and ETC02 and recorded intra operative as well as post operative complications related to use of both airway devices. We performed a prospective single blinded study on 64 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgical procedures. These patients were randomized using block randomization and divided into two groups; PLMA and ETT group. Both groups have 32 patients. After standardized induction of anaesthesia, PLMA or ETT was inserted and the patient was connected to ventilator that delivered positive pressure ventilation at set tidal volume and rate. Anaesthesia was maintained with Nitrous oxide, Oxygen and Isoflurane. Both airway devices were removed at the end of surgery with the patients fully awake. The haemodynamic changes were recorded at different time intervals, together with Sp02 and ETC02 changes. The incidences of intra operative complications (coughing, regurgitation, bronchospasm, desaturation and gas leaking) were recorded if present. The presence of blood upon airway device removal that indicates airway trauma was also recorded. Then we recorded post operative complications if present (persistent cough, vomiting and sore throat). We found that there were no statistical differences in HR changes measured at different time intervals between PLMA and ETT. However there were statistically significant decrease in systolic blood pressures and mean arterial pressures for PLMA group at 1 minute, 5 minute, 10 minute and 15 minute post intubation. For diastolic blood pressures, the lower values in PLMA group were only significant at 10 and 15 minutes post intubations. Comparing Sp02 and ETC02 monitoring, generally there were no significant statistical differences for both groups studied. Our findings on intra operative complications were that both groups have no statistical difference in the incidence of coughing, regurgitation, desaturation, bronchospasm and gas leaking. For presence of blood upon airway devices removal, we found no statistical difference between PLMA and ETT groups. The incidence of post operative persistent coughing and vomiting were also found to be statistically insignificant for both groups, however incidence of post operative sore throat was significantly higher in ETT group compared to PLMA with p value ofO.OOl. Therefore we concluded that for laparoscopic surgery with positive pressure ventilation, PLMA is a suitable alternative to standard ETI use and may offer advantages in terms of haemodynamic changes, with lower incidences or no statistically significant peri operative complications related to its use.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Othman, Marini
author_facet	Othman, Marini
author_sort	Othman, Marini
title	Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery
title_short	Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery
title_full	Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery
title_fullStr	Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery
title_full_unstemmed	Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery
title_sort	proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery
granting_institution	Universiti Sains Malaysia
granting_department	Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan
publishDate	2007
url	http://eprints.usm.my/59421/1/DR.%20MARINI%20OTHMAN%20-%20eprints.pdf
_version_	1794024024110530560

Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for delivering positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic surgery

Similar Items