Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network

By considering on the competitive market today, managing inventory becomes one factor that affected in improving business performance. This encouraged most industries to manage it efficiently by determining effective decision for inventory replenishment. For instance, mostly, industries decide next...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dzakiyullah, Raden Nur Rachman
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/15868/1/Raden%20Nur%20Rachman%20Dzakiyullah.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/15868/2/Production%20quantity%20estimation%20using%20an%20improved%20artificial%20neural%20network.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.15868
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
advisor Hussin, Burairah

topic QA Mathematics
QA76 Computer software
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
QA76 Computer software
Dzakiyullah, Raden Nur Rachman
Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network
description By considering on the competitive market today, managing inventory becomes one factor that affected in improving business performance. This encouraged most industries to manage it efficiently by determining effective decision for inventory replenishment. For instance, mostly, industries decide next inventory replenishment by considering on their last historical production. However, this decision cannot be implemented on the next production due to uncertainty/fluctuated condition. Therefore, poor decision on producing product will influence the business’ costs. Hence, this research proposes model based on Neural Network Back Propagation (NNBP) to estimate production quantity. This model is designed based on input variables that affect the determination of production quantity which include demand, setup costs, production, material costs, holding costs, transportation costs. The performance of NNBP can be analyzed using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). In order to increase the performance of NNBP, optimization techniques such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are being hybrid with the ANN model to become Hybrid Neural Network Genetic Algorithm (HNNGA) model and Hybrid Neural Network Particle Swarm Optimization (HNNPSO) model respectively. These techniques were used to optimize attribute weighting on NNBP model. The proposed models were examined using private dataset that collected from Iron Casting Manufacturing in Klaten, Indonesia. Moreover, validation is conducted for all proposed models through both Cross-Validation and statistical analysis. The cross-validation is common technique used to prevent over fitting problem by dividing the data into two categories namely data training and data test. Meanwhile, statistical analysis considers normality test on error estimation and the significant difference among the proposed models. Experimental result shows that HNNGA and HNNPSO provide smaller measurement error that concurrently improves the performance of NNBP model. In this work, the proposed model contributes not only to update the original instrument, but also applicable and beneficial for industry, particularly in deciding effective inventory replenishment decision on production quantity.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Dzakiyullah, Raden Nur Rachman
author_facet Dzakiyullah, Raden Nur Rachman
author_sort Dzakiyullah, Raden Nur Rachman
title Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network
title_short Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network
title_full Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network
title_fullStr Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network
title_full_unstemmed Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network
title_sort production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Information and Communication Technology
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/15868/1/Raden%20Nur%20Rachman%20Dzakiyullah.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/15868/2/Production%20quantity%20estimation%20using%20an%20improved%20artificial%20neural%20network.pdf
_version_ 1747833878559588352
spelling my-utem-ep.158682022-05-17T16:08:46Z Production quantity estimation using an improved artificial neural network 2015 Dzakiyullah, Raden Nur Rachman QA Mathematics QA76 Computer software By considering on the competitive market today, managing inventory becomes one factor that affected in improving business performance. This encouraged most industries to manage it efficiently by determining effective decision for inventory replenishment. For instance, mostly, industries decide next inventory replenishment by considering on their last historical production. However, this decision cannot be implemented on the next production due to uncertainty/fluctuated condition. Therefore, poor decision on producing product will influence the business’ costs. Hence, this research proposes model based on Neural Network Back Propagation (NNBP) to estimate production quantity. This model is designed based on input variables that affect the determination of production quantity which include demand, setup costs, production, material costs, holding costs, transportation costs. The performance of NNBP can be analyzed using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). In order to increase the performance of NNBP, optimization techniques such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are being hybrid with the ANN model to become Hybrid Neural Network Genetic Algorithm (HNNGA) model and Hybrid Neural Network Particle Swarm Optimization (HNNPSO) model respectively. These techniques were used to optimize attribute weighting on NNBP model. The proposed models were examined using private dataset that collected from Iron Casting Manufacturing in Klaten, Indonesia. Moreover, validation is conducted for all proposed models through both Cross-Validation and statistical analysis. The cross-validation is common technique used to prevent over fitting problem by dividing the data into two categories namely data training and data test. Meanwhile, statistical analysis considers normality test on error estimation and the significant difference among the proposed models. Experimental result shows that HNNGA and HNNPSO provide smaller measurement error that concurrently improves the performance of NNBP model. In this work, the proposed model contributes not only to update the original instrument, but also applicable and beneficial for industry, particularly in deciding effective inventory replenishment decision on production quantity. 2015 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/15868/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/15868/1/Raden%20Nur%20Rachman%20Dzakiyullah.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/15868/2/Production%20quantity%20estimation%20using%20an%20improved%20artificial%20neural%20network.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=96083 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Information and Communication Technology Hussin, Burairah 1. Adineh, V.R., Aghanajafi, C., Dehghan, G.H. and Jelvani, S., 2008. Optimization of the operational parameters in a fast axial flow CW CO2 laser using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Optics & Laser Technology 40(8), pp. 1000–1007002E 2. Ali, S., Paul, S., Ahsan, K. and Azeem, A., 2011. Forecasting of optimum raw material inventory level using artificial neural network. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 17(4), 333-348. 3. Al-kazemi, B. and Mohan, C., 2000. Multi-phase Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Paper 54 4. Alpaydın, E., 2010. Introduction to Machine Learning. Second Edition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 5. Amin, A. E., 2013. A novel classification model for cotton yarn quality based on trained neural network using genetic algorithm. Knowledge-Based Systems 39, pp. 124–132. 6. Andersson, H., Hoff, A., Christiansen, M., Hasle, G. and Løkketangen, A., 2010. Computers & Operations Research Industrial aspects and literature survey : Combined inventory management and routing. Computers and Operation Research 37(9), pp. 1515–1536. 7. Arif, F., 2013. Cascade Quality Prediction Method Using Multiple PCA+ ID3 for Multi-Stage Manufacturing System. University Technical Malaysia Melaka. [Unpublished] 8. Azadeh, A., Saberi, M. and Anvari, M., 2011. Computers & Industrial Engineering An Integrated Artificial Neural Network Fuzzy C-Means-Normalization Algorithm for performance assessment of decision-making units : The cases of auto industry and power plant q. Computers & Industrial Engineering 60(2), pp. 328–340. 9. Baykasoğlu, A., & Göçken, T., 2007. Solution of a fully fuzzy multi-item economic order quantity problem by using fuzzy ranking functions. Engineering Optimization, 39(8), 919-939. 10. Bohanec, M., 2009. Decision making: A computer-science and information-technology viewpoint. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 7(2), pp. 22–37. 11. Bonney, M.C., Zhang, Z., Head, M.A., Tien, C.C. and Barson, R.J., 1999. Are push and pull systems really so different ? International Journal of Production Economics, 59(1), 53-64. 12. Cai, X., Zhang, N., Venayagamoorthy, G.K. and Wunsch, D.C., 2007. Time series prediction with recurrent neural networks trained by a hybrid PSO–EA algorithm. Neurocomputing 70(13-15), pp. 2342–2353. 13. Cárdenas-Barrón, L.E., 2010. A simple method to compute economic order quantities: Some observations. Applied Mathematical Modelling 34(6), pp. 1684–1688. 14. Carlisle, A. and Dozier, G., 2000. Adapting particle swarm optimization to dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 429–434. 15. Chau, K.W., 2007. Application of a PSO-based neural network in analysis of outcomes of construction claims. Automation in Construction 16(5), pp. 642–646. 16. Chen, S.-L. and Liu, C.-L., 2008. The optimal consignment policy for the manufacturer under supply chain co-ordination. International Journal of Production Research 46(18), pp. 5121–143. 17. Chen, Z. and Sarker, B., 2010. Multi-vendor integrated procurement-production system under shared transportation and just-in-time delivery system. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(11), 1654-1666. 18. Chiu, Y.-S.P. and Ting, C.-K., 2010. A note on “Determining the optimal run time for EPQ model with scrap, rework, and stochastic breakdowns.” European Journal of Operational Research 201(2), pp. 641–643. 19. Chung, K.-J., 2013. The EOQ model with defective items and partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity derived analytically in the supply chain management. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37(4), pp. 2317–2326. 20. Choudhary, K. and Wadhwa, S., 2014. Glaucoma Detection using Cross Validation Algorithm : A comparitive evaluation on Rapid Miner. In Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW), IEEE Conference. pp. 1-5. 21. Darwish, M., 2008. EPQ models with varying setup cost. International Journal of Production Economics 113(1), pp. 297–306. 22. Das, M.T. and Dulger, L.C., 2009. Signature verification (SV) toolbox: Application of PSO-NN. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 22(4-5), pp. 688–694. 23. Dawson, C.W., 2009. Projects in Computing and Information Systems. Pearson Education Limited. 24. Deng, Z.H., Zhang, X.H., Liu, W. and Cao, H., 2009. A hybrid model using genetic algorithm and neural network for process parameters optimization in NC camshaft grinding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 45(9-10), pp. 859–866. 25. Draxler, R.R., 2014. Interactive comment on “Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?” by T. Chai and R. R. Draxler. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 7, C463–C472. 26. Eberhart, R. and Shi, Y., 2001. Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources. In Evolutionary Computation, 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on (Vol. 1, pp. 81-86). IEEE., pp. 81–86. 27. Eberhart, R., Kennedy, J., 1995. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. A New Optimizer using Particle Swarm Theory. In: Proceedings of Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, pp. 39–43. 28. Efendigil, T. and Önüt, S., 2012. An integration methodology based on fuzzy inference systems and neural approaches for multi-stage supply-chains. Computers & Industrial Engineering 62(2), pp. 554–569. 29. Efendigil, T., Önüt, S. and Kahraman, C., 2009. A decision support system for demand forecasting with artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy models: A comparative analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 36(3), pp. 6697–6707. 30. Elsayed, A.E. and Boucher, T.O., 1985. Analysis and Control Of Production Systems. Prentice-Hall. 31. Engelbrecht, A.P., 2007. Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons. 32. Gaafar, L.K. and Choueiki, M.H., 2000. A neural network model for solving the lot-sizing problem. Omega 28(2), pp. 175–184. 33. Gen, M. and Cheng, R., 1997. Genetic algorithms and engineering design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 34. Ghaffari, a, Abdollahi, H., Khoshayand, M.R., Bozchalooi, I.S., Dadgar, .A and Rafiee-Tehrani, M., 2006. Performance comparison of neural network training algorithms in modeling of bimodal drug delivery. International journal of pharmaceutics 327(1-2), pp. 126–38. 35. Giannoccaro, I., Pontrandolfo, P. and Scozzi, B., 2003. A fuzzy echelon approach for inventory management in supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research 149(1), pp. 185–196. 36. Gnana, S.K. and Deepa, D., 2011. Analysis of Computing Algorithm using Momentum in Neural Networks. Journal of computing 3(6), pp. 163–166. 37. Gołda, A., 2005. Introduction to neural networks [Online]. Available at: http://home.agh.edu.pl/~vlsi/AI/intro/. [Accessed on 20 December 2013] 38. Goren, H. G., Tunali, S., & Jans, R, 2010. A review of applications of genetic algorithms in lot sizing. , Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(4), 575-590 39. Guresen, E., Kayakutlu, G. and Daim, T.U., 2011. Using artificial neural network models in stock market index prediction. Expert Systems with Applications 38(8), pp. 10389–10397. 40. Gutierrez, R.S., Solis, A.O. and Mukhopadhyay, S., 2008. Lumpy demand forecasting using neural networks. International Journal of Production Economics 111(2), pp. 409–420. 41. Hammami, R., Frein, Y. and Hadj-Alouane, A.B., 2012. An international supplier selection model with inventory and transportation management decisions. Flexible services and manufacturing journal 24(1), pp. 4–27. 42. Hamzaçebi, C., Akay, D. and Kutay, F., 2009. Comparison of direct and iterative artificial neural network forecast approaches in multi-periodic time series forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications 36(2), pp. 3839–3844. 43. Han, J., Kamber, M. and Pei, J., 2012. Data Mining Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier Inc. 44. Harris, F.W., 1913. How Many Parts to Make at Once. Operations Research 38(6), pp. 947–950. 45. Heizer, J. and Render, B., 2010. Operations Management. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 46. Hirakawa, Y., 1996. Production Economics Performance of A Multistage Hybrid Push / Pull Production System. International journal of production economics, 44(1), 129-135. 47. Hou, K.-L., 2007. An EPQ model with setup cost and process quality as functions of capital expenditure. Applied Mathematical Modelling 31(1), pp. 10–17. 48. Hsu, J.-T. and Hsu, L.-F., 2013. Two EPQ models with imperfect production processes, inspection errors, planned backorders, and sales returns. Computers & Industrial Engineering 64(1), pp. 389–402. 49. Irani, R. and Nasimi, R., 2011. Evolving neural network using real coded genetic algorithm for permeability estimation of the reservoir. Expert Systems with Applications 38(8), pp. 9862–9866. 50. Ismail, a., Jeng, D.-S. and Zhang, L.L., 2013. An optimised product-unit neural network with a novel PSO–BP hybrid training algorithm: Applications to load–deformation analysis of axially loaded piles. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26(10), pp. 2305–2314. 51. Jaggi, C.K., Kapur, P.K., Goyal, S.K. and Goel, S.K., 2012. Optimal replenishment and credit policy in EOQ model under two-levels of trade credit policy when demand is influenced by credit period. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 3(4), pp. 352–359. 52. Jiang, L. and Wu, J., 2013. Hybrid PSO and GA for Neural Network Evolutionary in Monthly Rainfall Forecasting. In Intelligent Information and Database Systems (pp. 79-88). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 53. Jin, C., Jin, S.-W. and Qin, L.-N., 2012. Attribute selection method based on a hybrid BPNN and PSO algorithms. Applied Soft Computing 12(8), pp. 2147–2155. 54. Kara, Y., Acar Boyacioglu, M. and Baykan, Ö.K., 2011. Predicting direction of stock price index movement using artificial neural networks and support vector machines: The sample of the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Expert Systems with Applications 38(5), pp. 5311–5319. 55. Karim, A. and Arif-Uz-Zaman, K., 2013. A methodology for effective implementation of lean strategies and its performance evaluation in manufacturing organizations. Business Process Management Journal 19(1), pp. 169–196. 56. Karim, M. a., Smith, A.J.R., Halgamuge, S.K. and Islam, M.M., 2008. A comparative study of manufacturing practices and performance variables. International Journal of Production Economics 112(2), pp. 841–859. 57. Karray, F.O. and Silva, C. de , 2004. Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems Design. Pearson Education Limited. 58. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C., 2001. Swarm Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA. 59. Khayet, M., Cojocaru, C. and Essalhi, M., 2011. Artificial neural network modeling and response surface methodology of desalination by reverse osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 368(1-2), pp. 202–214. 60. Ko, M., Tiwari, A. and Mehnen, J., 2010. A review of soft computing applications in supply chain management. Applied Soft Computing 10(3), pp. 661–674. 61. Kreng, V.B. and Tan, S.-J., 2011. Optimal replenishment decision in an EPQ model with defective items under supply chain trade credit policy. Expert Systems with Applications 38(8), pp. 9888–9899. 62. Larose, D.T., 2005. Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 63. Lee, C.-M. and Ko, C.-N., 2009. Time series prediction using RBF neural networks with a nonlinear time-varying evolution PSO algorithm. Neurocomputing 73(1-3), pp. 449–460. 64. Leung, S.Y.S., Tang, Y. and Wong, W.K., 2012. A hybrid particle swarm optimization and its application in neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications 39(1), pp. 395–405. 65. Leuveano, A. C., Bin Jafar, F. A., & Bin Muhamad, M. R., 2012. Development of genetic algorithm on multi-vendor integrated procurement-production system under shared transportation and just-in-time delivery system. In Uncertainty Reasoning and Knowledge Engineering (URKE), 2012 2nd International Conference on (pp. 78-81). IEEE. 66. Lewis, F. L., Yesildirek, A., & Liu, K., 1996. Multilayer neural-net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 7(2), 388-399. 67. Li, B., Wang, H.-W., Yang, J.-B., Guo, M. and Qi, C., 2011. A belief-rule-based inventory control method under nonstationary and uncertain demand. Expert Systems with Applications 38(12), pp. 14997–15008. 68. Lin, S.-W., Chen, S.-C., Wu, W.-J. and Chen, C.-H., 2009. Parameter determination and feature selection for back-propagation network by particle swarm optimization. Knowledge and Information Systems 21(2), pp. 249–266. 69. Lin, Y.-H., Shie, J.-R. and Tsai, C.-H., 2009. Using an artificial neural network prediction model to optimize work-in-process inventory level for wafer fabrication. Expert Systems with Applications 36(2), pp. 3421–3427. 70. Lin, H.-C., Su, C.-T., Wang, C.-C., Chang, B.-H. and Juang, R.-C., 2012. Parameter optimization of continuous sputtering process based on Taguchi methods, neural networks, desirability function, and genetic algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications 39(17), pp. 12918–12925. 71. Liu, J.Y.-C. and Hsieh, J.-C. 2015. A hybrid selection algorithm for time series modeling. Soft Computing 19(1), pp. 121–131. 72. Mahata, G.C., 2012. An EPQ-based inventory model for exponentially deteriorating items under retailer partial trade credit policy in supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 39(3), pp. 3537–3550. 73. Mantzaris, D., Anastassopoulos, G. and Adamopoulos, A., 2011. Genetic algorithm pruning of probabilistic neural networks in medical disease estimation. Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society 24(8), pp. 831–5. 74. Martins, V.L.M. and Werner, L., 2012. Forecast combination in industrial series: A comparison between individual forecasts and its combinations with and without correlated errors. Expert Systems with Applications 39(13), pp. 11479–11486. 75. Masiero, L. and Hensher, D., 2012. Freight transport distance and weight as utility conditioning effects on a stated choice experiment. Journal of Choice Modelling 5(1), pp. 64–76. 76. Mendoza, A. and Ventura, J. A., 2009. Estimating freight rates in inventory replenishment and supplier selection decisions. Logistics Research 1(3-4), pp. 185–196. 77. Mirjalili, S., Mohd Hashim, S.Z. and Moradian Sardroudi, H., 2012. Training feed forward neural networks using hybrid particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation 218(22), pp. 11125–11137. 78. Mitroff, I., Betz, F., Pondy, L. and Sagasti, F., 1974. On managing science in the systems age: two schemas for the study of science as a whole systems phenomenon. Interfaces 4(3), pp. 46–59. 79. Monirul Kabir, M., Monirul Islam, M. and Murase, K., 2010. A new wrapper feature selection approach using neural network. Neurocomputing 73(16-18), pp. 3273–3283. 80. Mullins, C.S., 2010. What is Production Data? [Online]. Available at: http://datatechnologytoday.wordpress.com/2010/12/08/what-is-production-data/ [Accessed: 26 November 2014]. 81. Negnevitsky, M., 2005. Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems. Pearson Education. 82. Noorollahi, E., Karimi-Nasab, M. and Aryanezhad, M.B., 2012. An economic production quantity model with random yield subject to process compressibility. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 56(3-4), pp. 80–96. 83. Ntuen, C.A., 1991. A neural network model for a holistic inventory system. In: Proceedings of the International Industrial Engineering Conference. pp. 435–444. 84. Ouyang, L.-Y. and Chang, C.-T., 2013. Optimal production lot with imperfect production process under permissible delay in payments and complete backlogging. International Journal of Production Economics 144(2), pp. 610–617. 85. Pal, B., Sana, S.S. and Chaudhuri, K., 2013. A mathematical model on EPQ for stochastic demand in an imperfect production system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 32(1), pp. 260–270. 86. Paliwal, M. and Kumar, U. A., 2009. Neural networks and statistical techniques: A review of applications. Expert Systems with Applications 36(1), pp. 2–17. 87. Partovi, F.Y. and Anandarajan, M., 2002. Classifying inventory using an artificial neural network approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41(4), 389-404. 88. Pattnaik, M., 2013. Optimization in an instantaneous economic order quantity (EOQ) model incorporated with promotional effort cost, variable ordering cost and units lost due to deterioration. Uncertain Supply Chain Management 1(2), pp. 57–66. 89. Paul, S.K. and Azaeem, A., 2011. An artificial neural network model for optimization of finished goods inventory. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 2(2), pp. 431–438. 90. Pentico, D., Drake, M. and Toews, C., 2009. The deterministic EPQ with partial backordering: A new approach. Omega 37(3), pp. 624–636. 91. Pentico, D.W. and Drake, M.J., 2011. A survey of deterministic models for the EOQ and EPQ with partial backordering. European Journal of Operational Research 214(2), pp. 179–198. 92. Pentico, D.W. and Drake, M.J., 2009. The deterministic EOQ with partial backordering: A new approach. European Journal of Operational Research 194(1), pp. 102–113. 93. Plumb, a P., Rowe, R.C., York, P. and Brown, M., 2005. Optimization of the predictive ability of artificial neural network (ANN) models: a comparison of three ANN programs and four classes of training algorithm. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences 25(4-5), pp. 395–405. 94. Prekopcsak, Z., Henk, T. and Gaspar-Papanek, C. 2010. Cross-validation : The Illusion Of Reliable Performance Estimation. In RCOMM RapidMiner Community Meeting and Converence, pp. 1–6. 95. Razali, N. and Wah, Y., 2011. Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics 2(1), pp. 21–33. 96. Razmi, J., Rahnejat, H. and Khan, M.K., 1998. Use of analytic hierarchy process approach in classification of push, pull and hybrid push-pull systems for production planning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 18(11), pp. 1134–1151. 97. Res, C., Willmott, C.J. and Matsuura, K. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1), pp. 79–82. 98. Refaeilzadeh, P., Tang, L. and Liu, H., 2008. Cross-validation. In Encyclopedia of database systems (pp. 532-538). Springer US. 99. Rodrigues, B.D. and Stevenson, M.J., 2013. Takeover prediction using forecast combinations. International Journal of Forecasting 29(4), pp. 628–641. 100. Sagasti, F. and Mitroff, I., 1973. Operations research from the viewpoint of general systems theory. Omega, 1(6), 695-709. 101. Salameh, M.K. and Jaber, M.Y., 2000. Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. International Journal of Production Economics 64(1-3), pp. 59–64. 102. Samak-Kulkarni, S.M. and Rajhans, N.R., 2013. Determination of Optimum Inventory Model for Minimizing Total Inventory Cost. Procedia Engineering 51(NUiCONE 2012), pp. 803–809. 103. Sana, S.S. and Chaudhuri, K.S., 2008. A deterministic EOQ model with delays in payments and price-discount offers. European Journal of Operational Research 184(2), pp. 509–533. 104. Sanaye, S. and Asgari, H., 2013. Thermal modeling of gas engine driven air to water heat pump systems in heating mode using genetic algorithm and Artificial Neural Network methods. International Journal of Refrigeration 36(8), pp. 2262–2277. 105. Sarkar, B., 2012. An EOQ model with delay in payments and time varying deterioration rate. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 55(3-4), pp. 367–377. 106. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2007. Research Methods for Business Students. Fourth Edition. Pearson Education UK. 107. Schmitt, L.M., 2001. Theory of genetic algorithms. Theoretical Computer Science 259(1-2), pp. 1–61. 108. Şenyiğit, E. and Atici, U., 2012. Artificial neural network models for lot-sizing problem: a case study. Neural Computing and Applications 22(6), pp. 1039–1047. 109. Şenyiğit, E., Düğenci, M., Aydin, M.E. and Zeydan, M., 2013. Heuristic-based neural networks for stochastic dynamic lot sizing problem. Applied Soft Computing 13(3), pp. 1332–1339. 110. Shakya, S., Kern, M., Owusu, G. and Chin, C.M., 2012. Neural network demand models and evolutionary optimisers for dynamic pricing. Knowledge-Based Systems 29, pp. 44–53. 111. Shams-baragh, A., 2002. Formulating the Extended Josephus Problem. In National Computer Conference. 2(0), pp. 1–5. 112. Shen, C., Wang, L. and Li, Q., 2007. Optimization of injection molding process parameters using combination of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm method. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 183(2-3), pp. 412–418. 113. Soleimani, R., Shoushtari, N.A., Mirza, B. and Salahi, A., 2013. Experimental investigation, modeling and optimization of membrane separation using artificial neural network and multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 91(5), pp. 883–903. 114. Stergiou, C. What is a Neural Network? [Online]. Available at: http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~nd/surprise_96/journal/vol1/cs11/article1.html [Accessed: 5 May 2014]. 115. Sun, Y., Zeng, W., Ma, X., Xu, B., Liang, X. and Zhang, J., 2011. A hybrid approach for processing parameters optimization of Ti-22Al-25Nb alloy during hot deformation using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Intermetallics 19(7), pp. 1014–1019. 116. Taft, E.W., 1918. The most economical production lot. The Iron Age 101, pp. 1410–1412. 117. Tan, M., He, G., Nie, F., Zhang, L. and Hu, L., 2013. Optimization of ultrafiltration membrane fabrication using backpropagation neural network and genetic algorithm. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, pp. 4–11. 118. Tanthatemee, T. and Phruksaphanrat, B., 2012. Fuzzy inventory control system for uncertain demand and supply. In Proceedings of the international multi-conference of engineers and computer scientists (pp. 1224-1229). 119. Tersine, R.J., 1994. Principles of inventory and materials management. PTR Prentice-Hall, Saddle River 120. Varberg, D., Purcell, E.J. and Steven, S.E., 2007. Calculus, 9th. Pearson Education 121. Wahono, R.S. and Suryana, N., 2013. Combining Particle Swarm Optimization based Feature Selection and Bagging Technique for Software Defect Prediction. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications 7(5), pp. 153–166. 122. Wang, J., Sun, Z., Dai, Y. and Ma, S., 2010. Parametric optimization design for supercritical CO2 power cycle using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network. Applied Energy 87(4), pp. 1317–1324. 123. Wang, B., Ma, J.H. and Wu, Y.P., 2013. Application of artificial neural network in prediction of abrasion of rubber composites. Materials & Design 49, pp. 802–807. 124. Wang, H.S., Wang, Y.N. and Wang, Y.C., 2013. Cost estimation of plastic injection molding parts through integration of PSO and BP neural network. Expert Systems with Applications 40(2), pp. 418–428. 125. Wang, L., Zeng, Y., Gui, C. and Wang, H., 2007. Application of Artificial Neural Network Supported by BP and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Evaluating the Criticality Class of Spare Parts. Third International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC 2007) (Icnc), pp. 528–532. 126. Wang, X., Ma, L., Wang, B. and Wang, T., 2013. A hybrid optimization-based recurrent neural network for real-time data prediction. Neurocomputing 120, pp. 547–559. 127. Wazed, M., Ahmed, S. and Nukman, Y., 2009. Uncertainty factors in real manufacturing environment. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 342-351. 128. Wee, H., Huang, Y., Wang, W. and Cheng, Y., 2014. An EPQ model with partial backorders considering two backordering costs. Applied Mathematics and Computation 232, pp. 898–907. 129. Wee, H.-M. and Wang, W.-T., 2012. A supplement to the EPQ with partial backordering and phase-dependent backordering rate. Omega 40(3), pp. 264–266. 130. Witten, I.H., Frank, E. and Hall, M.A., 2011. Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Elsevier Inc. 131. Wu, G., Ren, Y., Li, Y., Kwak, H. and Jang, S., 2009. Research on Parameter Optimization of Neural Network. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 81–90. 132. Yaghini, M., Khoshraftar, M.M. and Fallahi, M., 2013. A hybrid algorithm for artificial neural network training. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26(1), pp. 293–301. 133. Yetilmezsoy, K. and Demirel, S., 2008. Artificial neural network (ANN) approach for modeling of Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by Antep pistachio (Pistacia Vera L.) shells. Journal of hazardous materials 153(3), pp. 1288–300. 134. Yildirim, M.B., Cakar, T., Doguc, U. and Meza, J.C., 2006. Machine number, priority rule, and due date determination in flexible manufacturing systems using artificial neural networks. Computers & Industrial Engineering 50(1-2), pp. 185–194. 135. Yin, F., Mao, H. and Hua, L., 2011. A hybrid of back propagation neural network and genetic algorithm for optimization of injection molding process parameters. Materials & Design 32(6), pp. 3457–3464. 136. Zhang, H.-C. and Huang, S.H., 1995. Applications of neural networks in manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. The International Journal of Production Research 33(3), pp. 705–728. 137. Zhang, J.-R., Zhang, J., Lok, T.-M. and Lyu, M.R., 2007. A hybrid particle swarm optimization–back-propagation algorithm for feed forward neural network training. Applied Mathematics and Computation 185(2), pp. 1026–1037. 138. Zhang, Q. and Wang, C., 2008. Using Genetic Algorithm to Optimize Artificial Neural Network: A Case Study on Earthquake Prediction. Second International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, pp. 128–131. 139. Zhang, R., Kaku, I. and Xiao, Y., 2011. Deterministic EOQ with partial backordering and correlated demand caused by cross selling. European Journal of Operational Research 210(3), pp. 537–551. 140. Zhi-fu, Y., Jun-wu, L. and Kai, L., 2012. Radar Emitter Recognition Based on PSO-BP Network. AASRI Procedia 1, pp. 213–219.