Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove

Mangrove area is an important coastal ecosystem in a tropical region. Managing mangrove is challenging and complex. In order to balance between protection the ecosystem and providing the natural resources that benefits to human being. In addition traditional classification and identification of mang...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohd, Othman
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2015
Subjects:	T Technology (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16773/1/Hierarchical%20Image%20Classification%20Threshold%20On%20Mangrove.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16773/2/Hierarchical%20image%20classification%20threshold%20on%20mangrove.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.16773
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Nanna Suryanna Sahib@Sahibuddin, Shahrin
topic	T Technology (General) T Technology (General)
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) T Technology (General) Mohd, Othman Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove
description	Mangrove area is an important coastal ecosystem in a tropical region. Managing mangrove is challenging and complex. In order to balance between protection the ecosystem and providing the natural resources that benefits to human being. In addition traditional classification and identification of mangrove tree species require an expert inspector working manually. A demand for accurate and automatic of mangrove species estimation has arose especially for ecological, environmental and economical values. Economically, the knowledge of tree species information is important. In order to meet the mangrove forest planning requirements, the satellite remote sensing with high spatial resolution has been specifically designed for tree species classification to improve accuracy and able to locate preferred tree species. However the main issue in remote sensing is image classification that required to determine an appropriate threshold between species in producing accurate classification map. An image classification on satellite imagery is a complex process and requires consideration of accurate classification system. A pixel in the satellite image may possibly cover more than one object on the ground. A threshold has to be set to classify an overlap of two or more associated spectral properties. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the optimal threshold value for object classes to ensure the misclassification of image pixels kept as low as possible by analyzing the classification of satellite images at different hierarchical level. Then the optimal threshold will be proposed on satellite image classification for mangrove species with the help of expert inspector from the ground. An evaluation on the accuracy of the proposed threshold value in identifying mangrove shall be made. A hierarchical threshold is expected to significant improvement result on an image classification final map for mangrove species.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.)
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Mohd, Othman
author_facet	Mohd, Othman
author_sort	Mohd, Othman
title	Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove
title_short	Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove
title_full	Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove
title_fullStr	Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove
title_full_unstemmed	Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove
title_sort	hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.
granting_department	Faculty Of Information And Communication Technology
publishDate	2015
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16773/1/Hierarchical%20Image%20Classification%20Threshold%20On%20Mangrove.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16773/2/Hierarchical%20image%20classification%20threshold%20on%20mangrove.pdf
_version_	1747833892749967360
spelling	my-utem-ep.167732022-06-03T14:07:54Z Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove 2015 Mohd, Othman T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Mangrove area is an important coastal ecosystem in a tropical region. Managing mangrove is challenging and complex. In order to balance between protection the ecosystem and providing the natural resources that benefits to human being. In addition traditional classification and identification of mangrove tree species require an expert inspector working manually. A demand for accurate and automatic of mangrove species estimation has arose especially for ecological, environmental and economical values. Economically, the knowledge of tree species information is important. In order to meet the mangrove forest planning requirements, the satellite remote sensing with high spatial resolution has been specifically designed for tree species classification to improve accuracy and able to locate preferred tree species. However the main issue in remote sensing is image classification that required to determine an appropriate threshold between species in producing accurate classification map. An image classification on satellite imagery is a complex process and requires consideration of accurate classification system. A pixel in the satellite image may possibly cover more than one object on the ground. A threshold has to be set to classify an overlap of two or more associated spectral properties. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the optimal threshold value for object classes to ensure the misclassification of image pixels kept as low as possible by analyzing the classification of satellite images at different hierarchical level. Then the optimal threshold will be proposed on satellite image classification for mangrove species with the help of expert inspector from the ground. An evaluation on the accuracy of the proposed threshold value in identifying mangrove shall be made. A hierarchical threshold is expected to significant improvement result on an image classification final map for mangrove species. 2015 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16773/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16773/1/Hierarchical%20Image%20Classification%20Threshold%20On%20Mangrove.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16773/2/Hierarchical%20image%20classification%20threshold%20on%20mangrove.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=96200 phd doctoral Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka. Faculty Of Information And Communication Technology Nanna Suryanna Sahib@Sahibuddin, Shahrin 1. A., Muda, and Nik, M.S., (2009). A Working Plan for The Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Perak - Fifth Revision. Fifth. State Forestry Department of Perak Darul Ridzuan. 2. A.A.M. Al-Kubati, A.M.S. Jamil, A.Taher, and A. Murad, (2012). Evaluation of Canny and Otsu ImageSegmentation. International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer and Electronics Engineering, Dubai, 23–25. 3. A.R., Mahmud, S. Mansor, A.R. M. Shariff, and A.A., Nuruddin. (2004). Multi-Criteria Analysis for Identifying and Mapping Peat Swamp Forest Fire Hazard. Disaster Prevention and Management: 379–86. 4. Albert, T.H. (2002). Evaluation of Remote Sensing Techniques for Ice-Area Classification Applied to the Tropical Quelccaya Ice Cap, Peru. Polar Geography 26(3): 210–26. 5. Anderson, J.J, and Cobb, N.S., (2004). Tree Cover Discrimination in Panchromatic Aerial Imagery of Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 70(9): 1063–68. 6. Antunes, A.F.B., and Jorge A.S.L, Christel C. (2003). Object Oriented Analysis and Sementaic Network for High Resolution Image Classification. In Anais XI SBSR. Belo Horizonte, Brasil, 273–79. 7. Azlan, N.I, and Rozana O. (2009). Monitoring of Mangrove Area Using Remote Sensing Toward Shoreline Protection. Processing In GIS Ostrava 8. B. Pradhan. (2009). Effective Flood Monitoring System Using GIT Tools and Remote Sensing Data. Applied Geoinformatics for Society and Environment. 63–71. 9. C. Kuenzer, A. Bluemel, S. Gebhardt, T.V. Quoc and S. Dech, (2011). Remote Sensing of Mangrove Ecosystems: A Review. Journal of Remote Sensing 3(4): 878–928. 10. C.K., Akmar, I.M., Hasmadi, U. Norsaliza, and I., Kasawani, (2010). Comparison of Several Vegetation Indices for Mangrove Mapping Using Remotely Sensed Data. International Geoinformatics Research and Development Journal 1(3). 620-628 11. C. K. Wright. 2004. “Remote Sensing Of Wetlands In Yellowstone National Park.” Montana State Univeristy. 12. Campbell, J.B., and Wynne, R.H., (2011). Introduction to Remote Sensing. 5th ed. Guilford Press. 13. Carleer, A.P., Debeir O., and E. Wolff. (2005). Assessment of Very High Spatial Resolution Satellite Image Segmentations. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 71(11): 1285-1294. 14. Chaira, Tamalika, and A.K. Ray. 2004. Threshold Selection Using Fuzzy Set Theory. Pattern Recognition Letters Volume 25(8): 865–74. 15. Chen, C.H., and Pei-Gee P.H. (2008). Statistical Pattern Recognition in Remote Sensing. Pattern Recognition 41(9): 2731–2741. 16. Chun, B.B., Zubir M.J, and San, L.H. (2011). Mangrove Mapping in Penang Island by Using Artificial Neural Network Technique. In IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS), Langkawi: IEEE, 245–49. 17. D. F., Wanjura, and J. L., Hatfield. (1987). Sensitivity of Spectral Vegetative Indices to Crop Biomass. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 18. D. Lu, and Q. Weng. (2007). A Survey of Image Classification Methods and Techniques for Improving Classification Performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 8(5): 823–70. 19. E. P. Green et al. (1998). Remote Sensing Techniques for Mangrove Mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19(5): 935–56. 20. E.P., Green, P.J., Mumby, A.J., Edwards, and C.D., Clark. (2004). Remote Sensing Handbook for Tropical Coastal Management. ed. Alasdair J. Edwards. UNESCO. 21. E.N., Kaur, and E.R, Kaur. 2011. A Review on Various Methods of Image Thresholding. International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 3(10): 3441. 22. F. Blasco, T. Gauquelin, M. Rasolofoharinoro, J. Denis, M. Aizpuru and V. Caldairou, (1998). Recent Advances in Mangrove Studies Using Remote Sensing Data. Marine and Freshwater Research 49(4): 287–296.. 23. F. Dahdouh-Guebas. (2002). The Use of Remote Sensing and GIS in the Sustainable Management of Tropical Coastal Ecosystems. Environment, Development and Sustainability 4(2): 93–112. 24. Fu, K.S., and J.K., Mui. (1981). A Survey on Image Segmentation. Pattern Recognition. 13(1): 3–16. 25. G. Wang, J. Liu, and G. He, (2013). A Method of Spatial Mapping and Reclassification for High-Spatial-Resolution Remote Sensing Image Classification. The Scientific World Journal 2013: 1-7. 26. G.X., Ritter, and J.N. Wilson. (2001). Handbook of Computer Vision Algorithms in Image Algebra. London: CRC. 27. Gonzalez, R. C., Woods, R. E., & Eddins, S. L. (2011). Nature Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB. 2nd ed. USA: Gatesmark. 28. He. G., M.D., Desai, and X., Zhang. (1999). Minimum Component Eigen-Vector Based Classification Technique with Application to TM Images. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Phoenix, AZ, 3533–3536. 29. H.K., Low, H.T., Chuah, and H.T., Eweb. (1999). A Neural Network Landuse Classifier for SAR Images Using Textural and Fractal Information. Geocarto International 14(1): 66–73. 30. H. Zhao, and M. D. Desai. 2001. Adaptive Classification Method for Multispectral Remote Sensing Data. In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 31. Hasenauer, H., Petritsch R., Zhao M., Boisvenue C., and Running S. W., et al. (2012). Reconciling Satellite with Ground Data to Estimate Forest Productivity at National Scales. Forest Ecology and Management. 2(76), 196–208. 32. Hui-Fuang Ng. (2006). Automatic Thresholding for Defect Detection. Pattern Recognition Letters 27(14): 1644–49. 33. Huiping H., Bingfang W., and Jinlong F. (2003). Analysis to the Relationship of Classification Accuracy Segmentation Scale Image Resolution Accuracy Segmentation Scale Image Resolution. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing 6: 3671–73. 34. I.M., Hasmadi, H.Z., Pakhriazad, and K., Norlida. (2011). Remote Sensing for Mapping RAMSAR Heritage Site at Sungai Pulai Mangrove Forest Reserve, Johor, Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana 40(2): 83–88. 35. I.M., Hasmadi, Pakhriazad, and Shahrin. (2009). Evaluating Supervised and Unsupervised Techniques for Land Cover Mapping Using Remote Sensing Data. GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 5(1): 1–10. 36. I.M., Hasmadi, and K. Jusoff. (2008). Satellite Data Classification Accuracy Assessment Based from Reference Dataset. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering 2(6): 386-392 37. I. Nedeljkovic. (2004). Image Classification Based On Fuzzy Logic. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 34(6): 1723–1726. 38. I., Sulong, H.M., Lokman, K.M., Tarmizi, and A. Ismail. (2002). Mangrove Mapping Using Landsat Imagery and Aerial Photographs: Kemaman District, Terengganu, Malaysia. Environment, Development and Sustainability 4(2): 135–152. 39. I. Sulong, and I. Veddin. (1999). Mapping in the Coastal Area of Sabak Bernam, Kuala Selangor and Klang District with Emphasis on Mangrove Forest Using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems. Terengganu. 40. I. Sulong, and I. Hashim. (1990). Classification of Mangrove Forest by Using 1:40 000-Scale Aerial Photographs. Forest Ecology and Management 33-34(1): 583–592. 41. Intergraph Corporation. 2013. “Erdas Field Guide.” Intergraph Corporation. 42. J. Gao. (1998). A Hybrid Method toward Accurate Mapping of Mangroves in a Marginal Habitat from SPOT Multispectral Data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19(10): 1887–1889. 43. J.K., Ghosh, P.N., Godbole, and S.,K., Ghosh. (2000). Mapping of Tea Gardens from Satellite Images -A Fuzzy Knowledge-Based Image Interpretation System. The International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Amsterdam, 460–67. 44. James H. Horne. (2003). A Tasseled Cap Transformation For Ikonos Images. In ASPRS, Anchorage, Alaska. 45. Jeliazkova, N., Ruseva, S., and Boyanov, K. (2006). Application of Nonparametric Baysian Classifier to Remote Sensing Data. Information Technologies and Control. 46. Jeremy, T.K, Marsha O. (2003). From Space to Species: Ecological Applications for Remote Sensing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18(6): 299–305. 47. J. Sonika, and J. Gurpreet. (2007). Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Approach for Satellite Image Classification: A Review. In Committee on Information Technology 2007. 48. K. Jusoff. (2006). Individual Mangrove Species Identification and Mapping in Port Klang Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imaging. Journal of Sustainability and Management 1(2): 27–36. 49. K. Jusoff. (2008). Geospatial Information Technology for Conservation of Coastal Forest and Mangroves Environment in Malaysia. Computer and Information Science 1(2): 129–34. 50. K. Jusoff. (2009a). Airborne Hyperspectral Sensor for Individual Species Counting and Mapping of Karas (Aquilaria Malaccensis) in Bukit Nanas F.R, Malaysia. World Applied 51. K. Jusoff. (2009b.) Land Use and Cover Mapping with Airborne Hyperspectral Imager in Setiu, Malaysia. Journal of Agricultural Science 1(2): 120–31. 52. K. Jusoff, and D. Taha. (2008). Managing Sustainable Mangrove Forests in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development 1(1): 88–96. 53. K. Jusoff, and K. Ibrahim. (2007). Spectral Signatures of Some Mangrove Species in Malaysia. In World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society Transactions on Biology and Biomedicine, 54. K. Sato, M. Nakajima, and T. Hoshi. (1999). Threshold Operation for Extraction of Mangrove Forest with TM Data of Landsat 5. ACRS 1999, Geospatial World. 55. Kanniah, K.D., Wai, N.S., Alvin, L.M.S. and Rasib, A,W,. (2007). Per-Pixel and Sub-Pixel Classifications of High-Resolution Satellite Data for Mangrove Species Mapping. Applied GIS 3(8): 1–22. 56. Kumar, A., Ghosh, S.K., and Dadhwal V.K. (2014). Full Fuzzy Land Cover Mapping Using Remote Sensing Data Based on Fuzzy c-Means and Density Estimation. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 33(2): 81–87. 57. L. Genc, H. Turhan, B. Asar, and S.E. Smith. (2009). Comparison of Spectral Indices Derived from QUICKBIRD and Ground Based Hyper-Spectral Data for Winter Wheat. Journal World Applied Sciences Journal 7(6): 756–62. 58. L, Kannan, T.T. Ajith Kumar, and A.Duraisamy. (1999). Remote Sensing for Mangrove Forest Management. Geospatialmedia and Communication. 59. Le Wang, W.P. Sousab, P.Gong, and G.S. Biging. (2004). Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird Images for Mapping Mangrove Species on the Caribbean Coast of Panama. Remote Sensing of Environment 91(3-4): 432–40. 60. Li, Zuoyong, and Chuancai Liu. (2009). An Image Thresholding Method Based on Standard Deviation. IEEE Computer Society. 835–38. 61. Liu, H., and K.C. Jezek., (2004). Automated Extraction of Coastline from Satellite Imagery by Integrating Canny Edge Detection and Locally Adaptive Thresholding Methods. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(5): 937–58. 62. Liu, Z., Li, J., Lim, B., Seng, C., Inbaraj, S. Sun Z., (2008). Local Spatial Statistics for Remotely Sensed Image Classification of Mangrove. In The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 719–723. 63. M. Al-Bayati, and A. El-Zaart. (2013). Mammogram Images Thresholding for Breast Cancer Detection Using Different Thresholding Methods. Open Access 2(3): 72–77. 64. M.A., Wulder, R.J., Hall, N.C., Coops, and S.E., Franklin. (2004). High Spatial Resolution Remotely Sensed Data for Ecosystem Characterization. American Institute of Biological Sciences 54(6): 511–21. 65. M.E., Hodgson, J.R., Jensen, Ja.A., Tullis, K.D., Riordan, and C.M., Archer, (2003). Synergistic Use of Lidar and Color Aerial Photography for Mapping Urban Parcel Imperviousness. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 8 69(9): 973–980. 66. M. Spalding, F. Blasco, and C. Field. 1997. World Mangrove Atlas. Paris: International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems. 67. M.,Seetha, I.V., Muralikrishna, B.L., Deekshatulu, B.L.,Malleswari, Nagaratna, P., Hegde. (2008). Artificial Neural Networks and Other Methods Of Image Classification. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology: 1039–1053. 68. M.Seetha, I.V. MuraliKrishna, and B.L. Deekshatulu. (2007). Comparison of Advanced Techniques of Image Classification. In Map World Forum. 69. M. Sezgin, and B. Sankur. (2004). Survey over Image Thresholding Techniques and Quantitative Performance Evaluation. Journal of Electronic Imaging 13(1): 146–65. 70. Manandhar R. (2008). Land Cover Classification from Remote Sensing Imagery: Revisiting and Reevaluating Classification Accuracy. Map India 2008 Organized by GIS Development, Noida, India. 71. Muller, E. (1997). Mapping riparian vegetation along rivers: old concepts and new methods. Journal of Aquatic Botany, 58(3-4): 411-437. 72. N. Suryana, N. M.Rasip, and Othman M. (2007). Data Mining and Neural Network Approaches in Handling Mixed Problems Associated Within Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Analysis. 73. N. Suryanna, and Othman M. (2007). The Quantifiction and The Representation Quality Parameters for Inductive Environmental Model in Geographical Information System. In Paper Presented at the 2nd Regional Conference on Ecological Modelling (ECOMOD), Penang, Malaysia. 74. N., Kamaruddin, S. Fujii & B.R. Shivakoti, (2015). Applicability of Satellite Monitoring on Mangrove Forests in Malaysia: A Review of Potential Benefits and Challenges 75. International Journal of Research. 2(2):185-204 76. Nilanjan, R., and Baidya, N.S. (2007). Edge Sensitive Variational Image Thresholding. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. 37–40. 77. M. Nugroho, (2006). [PHD, Thesis] Integration of Multi Remotely Sensed Data and Geodatabases for Forestry Management in Indonesia. Wageningen Universiteit. 78. Othman Mohd, Suryanna, N., Shahrin S., M.F., Abdollah , S.R., Selamat. (2012). Thresholding and Fuzzy Rule-Based Classification Approaches in Handling Mangrove Forest Mixed Pixel Problems Associated with in QuickBird Remote Sensing Image Analysis. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2(6): 300–306. 79. Otsu, Nobuyuki. (1979). A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Transaction On Sysytems Man and Cyberneticstems Man and Cybernetics SMC-9(1): 62–66. 80. Puttonen, E., P., Litkey, and Hyyppä J., (2010). Individual Tree Species Classification by Illuminated, Shaded Area Separation. 2(1): 19–35. 81. Qingqiang, Y., and Wenxiong, K. (2009). General Research on Image Segmentation Algorithms. International Journal Image, Graphics and Signal Processing 1(1): 1–8. 82. R.K. Singh. (2005). [PHD, Thesis] Pattern Recognition in Remote-Sensing Imagery Using Data Mining and Statistical Techniques. Purdue University. 83. Rajeshwar D., Priyanka, and Swapna, D., (2012). “Image Segmentation Techniques.” International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology 3(1): 66–70. 84. R. Sugumaran. (2001). Forest Land Cover Classification Using Statistical and Artificial Neural Network Approaches Applied to IRS LISS - III Sensor. Geocarto International 16(2): 39–44. 85. Rekik, A., Zribi, M., Hamida, A.B., and Benjelloun, M., (2007). Review of Stellite Image Segmentation for an Otimal Fusion System Based on The Edge and Region Approaches. International Journal of Computer Scienc and Network Security 7(10). 86. S., Nasiman, and I., Sulong. (1988). Remote Sensing Application to Environmental Sensitivity Index Mapping Environmental Sensitivity Index Mapping of the Cukai to Penor Coastline. 21–34. 87. S., Abbas, F.M., Qamer, N., Hussain, R., Saleem, K.T., Nitin. (2011). National Level Assessment of Mangrove Forest Cover in Pakistan. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XXXVIII-8/: 187–92. 88. S. Prabhu and D. Tensing, (2013). Adapted Normalized Graph Cut Segmentation with Boundary Fuzzy Classifier Object Indexing On RoadSatellite Images. International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 89. S. Hemachander, A. Verma, S. Arora, and P. K.Panigrahi. (2007). Locally Adaptive Block Thresholding Method with Continuity Constraint. Pattern Recognition Letters 28(1): 119–24. 90. S.Mansor, T.C., Chuang, A.R.M. Shariff, and N. Ahmad. 2002. Multi-Threshold Technique for Segmentation of Satellite Imagery for Feature Extraction. Map Asia. 91. S.R. Safavian, and D. Landgrebe. (1991). A Survey of Decision Tree Classifier Methodology. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics 21(3): 660–74. 92. S.S., Al-amri, N.V., Kalyankar, and Khamitkar, S.D., (2010). A Comparative Study of Removal Noise from Remote Sensing Image. International Journal of Computer Science 7(1): 32–38. 93. S.Xavierarockiaraj, K.Nithya, and R.Maruni Devi. (2012). Brain Tumor Detection Using ModifiedHistogram Thresholding-QuadrantApproach. Journal of Computer Applications V(1): 21–25. 94. Sandberg Gustaf. 2008. Use of MatLab For Radar Remote Sensing of Forests. 95. Satyanarayana, B., Mohamad, K.A., Idris, F.A., Husain, M.L. and Farid, D.G., (2011). Assessment of Mangrove Vegetation Based on Remote Sensing and Groun-Truth Measurement at Tumput, Kelantan Delta, East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32(6): 1635–1650. 96. Schiewe, J.Z. (2002). Segmentation of High-Resolution Remotely Sensed Data-Concepts, Applications and Problems. Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applictions. 97. Shaharudin, M.I., Azhar, M., and A. Latif (2004). Matang Mangroves - A Century of Sustainable Management. 2nd ed. Perak, Malaysia: Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia. 98. Shailesh Nayak. (2004). Role of Remote Sensing to Integrated Coastal Zone Management. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing XXXV, Istanbul, Turki. 99. Steele, Brian M. (2001). Combining Multiple Classifiers: An Application Using Spatial and Remotely Sensed Information for Land Cover Type Mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment 74(3): 545–56. 100. T., Kannan, T. Ajith Kumar, and A. Duraisamy. (2008). Remote Sensing for Mangrove Forest Management. In CAS in Marine Biology, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu 101. T. Lillesand, R.W. Kiefer, and J. Chipman. (2015). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 7th ed. Wiley. 102. T. Upanoi, and N.K. Tripathi. (2003). A Satellite Based Monitoring of Changes in Mangroves in Krabi, Thailand. Map Asia, Kuala Lumpur., MAP ASIA. 103. Taskin Kavzoglu, Emrehan Kutlug Sahin and Ismail. (2012). Lanslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines and logistic regression. Spring-Verlag Landslides: (425-439. 104. Tomlinson. 1995. The Botany of Mangroves. ed. Cambridg. Cambridge University Press. 105. V., Vijayaraj, N.H., Younan, and C.G., O’Hara. (2006). Quantitative Analysis of Pansharpened Images. IEEE: 85–88. 106. Vaiphasa, C., Ongsomwang, S., Vaiphasad, T., and Andrew K. S. (2005). Tropical Mangrove Species Discrimination Using Hyperspectral Data: A Laboratory Study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65(1-2): 371–79. 107. W.H., Bakker, K. Tempfli, G.C. Huurneman, N. Kerle, and L.L.F. Janssen, (2009). Principles of Remote Sensing: An Introductory Textbook. eds.. Netherlands: Enschede: International Institute for Geoniformation Scienceand Earth Observation. 108. W. Long, and S.Srihar. (2004). Land Cover Classification of SSC Image: Unsupervised and Supervised Classification Using ERDAS Imagine. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2707–2712. 109. Wang, L., W.P., Sousa, and P. Gong. (2004). Integration of Object-Based and Pixel-Based Classification for Mapping Mangroves with IKONOS Imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(24): 5655–68. 110. Wulder, M. A., J.C. White, K.O. Niemann, and T. Nelson. (2004). Comparison of Airborne and Satellite High Spatial Resolution Data for the Identification of Individual Trees with Local Maxima Filtering. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 25pp: 2225–32. 111. Yan, Hong. (1996). Unified Formulation of a Class of Image Thresholding Techniques. Pattern Recognition 29(12): 2025–2032. 112. Ye Du. (2008). Verification of Tsunami Reconstruction Projects by Object-Oriented Building Extraction from High Resolution Satellite Imagery. Enschede, Netherlands. 113. Y. Her, and C. Heatwole, (2007). Land Use Classification in Zambia Using Quickbird and Landsat Imagery. ASABE Annual International Meeting, 1–11. 114. Yousif, A.H., Mahfud, M.Z., and Michael, W. (1999). Monitoring Mangrove Forests Using Remote Sensing and GIS. In ACRS,. 115. Y. B. Chen, and O.T.C. Chen. (2009). Image Segmentation Method Using Thresholds Automatically Determined from Picture Contents. Journal on Image and Video Processing 1. 116. Y. Zhang, D. Lu, B.Yang, C. Sun and M.Sun, (2011). Coastal Wetland Vegetation Classification with a Landsat Thematic Mapper Image. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32(2): 545–61. 117. Z., Huang, and B.G., Lees. (2004). Combining Non-Parametric Models for Multisource Predictive Forest Mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 70(4): 415–425.

Hierarchical image classification threshold on mangrove

Similar Items