Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part

Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part

In competitive business world, organizations must be able to respond to changing market needs quickly, efficiently and responsively. Therefore, the shortcomings of the conventional approach that can contribute to inefficiency, time-consuming and not being able to provide the required performance sho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd Razikin, Mohd Azroy
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16818/1/Development%20Of%20An%20Integrated%20Failure%20Mode%20Effect%20And%20Criticality%20Analysis%20%28FMECA%29%20And%20Analytical%20Hierachy%20Process%20%28AHP%29%20For%20Automotive%20Stamping%20Part.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16818/2/Development%20of%20an%20integrated%20failure%20mode%20effect%20and%20criticality%20analysis%20%28FMECA%29%20and%20analytical%20hierachy%20process%20%28AHP%29%20for%20automotive%20stamping%20part.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.16818
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
topic T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
Mohd Razikin, Mohd Azroy
Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part
description In competitive business world, organizations must be able to respond to changing market needs quickly, efficiently and responsively. Therefore, the shortcomings of the conventional approach that can contribute to inefficiency, time-consuming and not being able to provide the required performance should be improved in order to respond to the current situation. Thus, the main objective of this research is to propose a new integration of the Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) so that can be used in the automotive stamping part (known as tie plate) manufacturing industry. A case study was performed in order to reduce the number of processes, time, and labour by implementing the proposed integration approach. FMECA was used to identify the failure in tie plate stamping process and four design concepts of packaging jig were proposed to eliminate and reduce the failure. AHP was used to determine the best design concept of the packaging jig as variety of aspects have to be considered in the selection such as performance, maintenance, development time, development cost, safety and potential cause of failure. Design concept 3 was selected as the best design concept with the highest score of 31.9%. The research shows that the proposed integration approach was used to generate and select the best design concept of packaging jig while the jig had reduced the number of stamping processes by 33.3% (from 6 to 4 processes), time by 50% (from 20 to 10 minutes for packaging per box) and labour by 50% (from 4 to 2 persons). This research presents the importance of considering the integrated approach in the design stage in order to improve the manufacturing process activities, especially in the automotive stamping parts industry.
format Thesis
qualification_name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mohd Razikin, Mohd Azroy
author_facet Mohd Razikin, Mohd Azroy
author_sort Mohd Razikin, Mohd Azroy
title Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part
title_short Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part
title_full Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part
title_fullStr Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part
title_full_unstemmed Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part
title_sort development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (fmeca) and analytical hierachy process (ahp) for automotive stamping part
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty Of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16818/1/Development%20Of%20An%20Integrated%20Failure%20Mode%20Effect%20And%20Criticality%20Analysis%20%28FMECA%29%20And%20Analytical%20Hierachy%20Process%20%28AHP%29%20For%20Automotive%20Stamping%20Part.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16818/2/Development%20of%20an%20integrated%20failure%20mode%20effect%20and%20criticality%20analysis%20%28FMECA%29%20and%20analytical%20hierachy%20process%20%28AHP%29%20for%20automotive%20stamping%20part.pdf
_version_ 1747833895816003584
spelling my-utem-ep.168182022-09-27T14:41:54Z Development of an integrated failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA) and analytical hierachy process (AHP) for automotive stamping part 2015 Mohd Razikin, Mohd Azroy T Technology (General) TS Manufactures In competitive business world, organizations must be able to respond to changing market needs quickly, efficiently and responsively. Therefore, the shortcomings of the conventional approach that can contribute to inefficiency, time-consuming and not being able to provide the required performance should be improved in order to respond to the current situation. Thus, the main objective of this research is to propose a new integration of the Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) so that can be used in the automotive stamping part (known as tie plate) manufacturing industry. A case study was performed in order to reduce the number of processes, time, and labour by implementing the proposed integration approach. FMECA was used to identify the failure in tie plate stamping process and four design concepts of packaging jig were proposed to eliminate and reduce the failure. AHP was used to determine the best design concept of the packaging jig as variety of aspects have to be considered in the selection such as performance, maintenance, development time, development cost, safety and potential cause of failure. Design concept 3 was selected as the best design concept with the highest score of 31.9%. The research shows that the proposed integration approach was used to generate and select the best design concept of packaging jig while the jig had reduced the number of stamping processes by 33.3% (from 6 to 4 processes), time by 50% (from 20 to 10 minutes for packaging per box) and labour by 50% (from 4 to 2 persons). This research presents the importance of considering the integrated approach in the design stage in order to improve the manufacturing process activities, especially in the automotive stamping parts industry. 2015 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16818/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16818/1/Development%20Of%20An%20Integrated%20Failure%20Mode%20Effect%20And%20Criticality%20Analysis%20%28FMECA%29%20And%20Analytical%20Hierachy%20Process%20%28AHP%29%20For%20Automotive%20Stamping%20Part.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16818/2/Development%20of%20an%20integrated%20failure%20mode%20effect%20and%20criticality%20analysis%20%28FMECA%29%20and%20analytical%20hierachy%20process%20%28AHP%29%20for%20automotive%20stamping%20part.pdf text en validuser http://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=96102 phd masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty Of Manufacturing Engineering 1. Ahmad, R., Kamaruddin, S., Azid, I.A. and Almanar, I.P., 2012. Failure analysis of machinery component by considering external factors and multiple failure modes – A case study in the processing industry. Engineering Failure Analysis, 25., pp.182-192. 2. Ahsen V.A., 2008. Cost oriented failure mode and effect analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25 (5),pp.466-476. 3. Anonymous, 2006. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making. NOAA Fisheries.[online] 4. Available at: https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/sslmc/july- 06/AHPMainLecture.pdf [Acessed on 14 June 2014]. 5. Bhushan, N. and Rai K., 2004. Strategic Decision Making: Applying The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: Springer-Verlag. 6. Barkey, B.T., 2006. Integrated Project Management, New York : McGraw-Hill. 7. Barkey, B.T., 2008. Project Management : In New Product Development, New York : McGraw-Hill. 8. Braglia, M., 2000. MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17 (9), pp.1017-1033. 9. Breiing, A.J. and Kun, A.M., 2002. Critical Consideration And Improvement of the FMEA. Proceedings of the TMCE, pp.519-530. 10. Bertsche, B., 2008. FMEA- Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. Reliability in Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. VDI-Buch, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg. 11. Boonkanit P. and Apikajorsin, A., 2005. The Methodology for Selecting Product at Conceptual Design. 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, pp.242-243. 12. Borgovini, R., Pemberton, S. and Rossi, M., 1993. Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). New York: Reliability Analysis Center Griffins. 13. Cao, H. J., Liu, F., Li, C.B. and Liu, C., 2006. An Integrated Method for Product Material Selection Considering Environmental Factors and a Case Study. Materials Science Forum, 532., pp.1032-1035. 14. Carmignani, G., 2009. An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94 (4), pp.861-871. 15. Catelani, M., Ciani, L., Cristaldi, L., Faifer, M. and Lazzaroni, M., 2013. Electrical performances optimization of Photovoltaic Modules with FMECA approach. Measurement, 46 (10), pp.3898-3909. 16. Chan, F.T., Chan, H.K., Lau, H.C. and Ip, R.W., 2006 An AHP approach in benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13, pp.636-661. 17. Chang, C. W., Wu, C.R., Lin, C.T. and Chen, H. C., 2007. An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for select the best slicing machine. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52., pp.296–307. 18. Davidson, G. G. and Labib, A. W., 2003. Learning from failure: design improvements using multiple criteria decision making process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 217 (4), pp.207-216. 19. de Souza, R. V. B. and Carpinetti, L. C. R., 2014. A FMEA based approach to prioritize waste reduction in lean implementation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31 (4), pp.346-466. 20. Duran, O. and Aguilo, J., 2008. Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy- AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34 (3), pp.1787–1794. 21. Dweiri, F. and Al-Oqla, F.M., 2006. Material selection using analytical hierarchy process. 22. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 26 (4), pp.182–189. 23. El-Namrouty, K. A. and Abu Shaaban, M. S., 2013. Seven wastes elimination targeted by lean manufacturing case study “gaza strip manufacturing firms’’.International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 1 (2), pp.68-80. 24. Hajeeh, M. and Al-Othman, A., 2005. Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process in the Selection of Desalination Plants. Desalination, 174 (1), pp.97-108. 25. Hambali, A., Sapuan, S.M., Ismail, N. and Nukman, Y., 2008. Use of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Selecting the best Design Concept. Jurnal Teknologi, 49 (A),pp.1−18. 26. Hambali, A., Sapuan, S.M., Ismail, N. and Nukman, Y., 2009a. Application of analytical hierarchy process in the design concept selection of automotive composite bumper beam during the conceptual design stage. Scientific Research and Essay, 4 (4), pp.198-211. 27. Hambali, A., Sapuan, S.M, Ismail, N. and Nukman, Y., 2009b. Composite manufacturing process selection using analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 4 (1), pp.49 -61. 28. Henderson, R.D and Dutta, S.P., 1992. Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Ergonomic Analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 9 (4), pp.275-282. 29. Ho, W., 2007. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186 (1), pp.211-228. 30. Hurst, K. S., 1999. Engineering Design Principle. New York : John Wiley and Son Inc. 31. Hsiao, S.W., 2002. Concurrent design method for developing a new product. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29 (1), pp.41–55. 32. Jafarian, M. and Vahdat, S.E., 2011. A fuzzy multi-attribute approach to select the welding process at high pressure vessel manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 14 (3), pp.250–256. 33. Kwong, C.K, and Bai, H., 2003. Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions, 35 (7), pp.619-626. 34. Lee, T.H, Shiba,S., and Wood, R.C., 1999. Integrated Management Systems - A Practical Approach to Transforming Organizations, New York : John Wiley & Sons Inc. 35. Lin, M.C., Wang, C.C, Chen, M.S. and Chang, C.A., 2008. Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry, 59 (1), pp. 17–31. 36. Liu, H. C., Liu, L. and Liu, N., 2013. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert System with Application, 40 (2), pp.828-838. 37. Maleque, M.A., Dyuti, S. and Rahman, M.M., 2010. Material selection method in design of automotive brake disk. Proceeding of the world congress on engineering, 3., pp.1196- 1201. 38. Mansor, M.R., Sapuan, S.M., Zainudin, E.S., Nuraini, A.A. and Hambali, A., 2013. Hybrid natural and glass fibers reinforced polymer composites material selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process for automotive brake lever design. Material and Design. 51., pp.484- 492. 39. Mayyas, A., Shen, Q., Mayyas, A., Shan, D., Qattawi, A. and Omar, M., 2011. Using Quality Function Deployment and Analytical Hierarchy Process for material selection of Body-In-White. Materials and Design, 32 (5), pp.2771–2782. 40. McDermott, R. E., Mikulak, R. J. and Beauregard, M. R., 2009. The basic of FMEA. 2nd Edition. New York: Taylor and Francis Group. 41. Naagarazan, R. S. and Arivalagar, A.A., 2005. Total quality management. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd. 42. Nagahanumaiah, Subburaj, K. and Ravi, B., 2007. Computer aided rapid tooling process selection and manufacturability evaluation for injection mold development. Computers in Industry,59 (2), pp.262-276. 43. Paliska, G., Pavletic, D. and Sokovic, M., 2008. Application of quality engineering tools in process industry. Advanced Engineering, 2 (1), pp.73-86. 44. Puente, J., Pino, R., Priore, P. and de la Fouente, D., 2002. A Decision Support System for Applying Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19 (2), pp.137-150. 45. Ravid, R., Bashkansky, E. and Dror, S., 2011. Integrating AHP in FMECA framework to ranking Down syndrome tests. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 1 (2), pp.91–100. 46. Ravisankar,V., Balasubramanian,V. and Muralidharan, C., 2004. Selection of welding process to fabricate butt joints of high strength aluminium alloys using analytic hierarchic process. Materials and Design, 27 (5), pp.373–380. 47. Rohith, B.J., Venkataramaiah, P. and MohanaReddy, P., 2012. Material selection for solar flat plate collectors using AHP. Research and Application, 2 (2), pp.1181-1185. 48. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw Hill. RWS. 49. Sapuan, S.M., Osman, M.R. and Nukman, Y., 2006. State of the art of the concurrent techniques in the automotive industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 17 (2), pp.143-157. 50. Sarfaraz, A. and Jenab, K., 2012. A Fuzzy Conceptual Design Selection Model Considering Conflict Resolution. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4 (1). 51. Schilling, M.A and Hill, W.L., 1998. Managing the New Product Development Process : 52. Strategic Imperatives. Academy of Management Executive, 12 (3). 53. Sridkharakeshava, K.B. and Ramesh, K., 2013. An advanced Treatise on Jigs and Fixture Design. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2 (8), pp.284. 54. Stevenson, J.W., 2002. Operation management,7th edition, Boston: The McGraw Hill Companies. 55. Stevenson, J.W. and Chuong ,S.C., 2010. Operation management an Asian Prespective,Singapore: The McGraw Hill Companies. 56. Tummala, V.M.R., Chin, K.S. and Ho, S.H., 1997. Assessing success factors for implementing concurrent engineering a case study in Hong Kong electronics industry by analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 49 (3), pp.265-283. 57. Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S.D., 2008. Product design and development, 4th ed., New York: The McGraw Hill Companies. 58. Yang, C.Q. and Lin, T.S., 1997. Developing an Integrated Framework for Feature-Based Early Manufacturing Cost Estimation. Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 13 (6), pp.618-629. 59. Yurdakul, M., 2004. AHP as a strategic decision making tool to justify machine tool selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146 (3), pp.365–376. 60. Zirger, B. J. and Hartley, J.L., 1996. The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43 (2), pp.143-152.

Similar Items