Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures

Structure-borne source which transmits vibration power to the supporting structure especially in buildings plays a major role in contributing structure-borne noise. The structureborne sources are also capable of causing damage to the receiver structures. In order to prevent noise radiation and struc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saari, Noor Fariza
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16879/1/Variability%20In%20Vibration%20Input%20Power%20From%20The%20Structure-Borne%20Sound%20Sorce%20On%20Plate%20And%20Beam%20Structures.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16879/2/Variability%20in%20vibration%20input%20power%20from%20the%20structure-borne%20sound%20source%20on%20plate%20and%20beam%20structures.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.16879
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
advisor Putra, Azma

topic T Technology (General)
T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
T Technology (General)
Saari, Noor Fariza
Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures
description Structure-borne source which transmits vibration power to the supporting structure especially in buildings plays a major role in contributing structure-borne noise. The structureborne sources are also capable of causing damage to the receiver structures. In order to prevent noise radiation and structural failure, it is important to characterise the structureborne sound source and to recognize its potential input power. However, the knowledge of the force excitation behaviors from the structure-borne source which creates variability in the input power is still lacking. To give an effective insight of the structural mechanism excited by the structure-borne source, some uncertainties such as the amplitude, excitation phase and location of the excitation force which create the variability in the input power are modelled in this study. Quantification of the uncertainties of the maximum-minimum bands, frequency-averaged mean and variance are obtained from the variability of input power in the infinite and finite structures. It is shown that the variability of the input power reduces as the frequency increases. It is also found that the quantifications of the variability from the finite structure can also be approached using the infinite structure. For characterisation of the structure-borne sound source, thin and thick reception structures are used for the velocity source and the force source assumptions in the reception plate test. It is shown that, the reception plate for the force source assumption, the averaging spatial response across the plate area having low modal density is found to be problematic due to high variability of the plate velocity. Therefore, to obtain a more representative spatially averaged mean-squared velocity, only response points closed to the contact points are taken into account in the calculation. The results show that the measured source mobility from the reception plate is improved. Characterisation using a beam structure is also found feasible in the ’reception structure technique’.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Saari, Noor Fariza
author_facet Saari, Noor Fariza
author_sort Saari, Noor Fariza
title Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures
title_short Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures
title_full Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures
title_fullStr Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures
title_full_unstemmed Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures
title_sort variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16879/1/Variability%20In%20Vibration%20Input%20Power%20From%20The%20Structure-Borne%20Sound%20Sorce%20On%20Plate%20And%20Beam%20Structures.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16879/2/Variability%20in%20vibration%20input%20power%20from%20the%20structure-borne%20sound%20source%20on%20plate%20and%20beam%20structures.pdf
_version_ 1747833906666668032
spelling my-utem-ep.168792022-06-10T15:30:47Z Variability in vibration input power from the structure-borne sound sorce on plate and beam structures 2015 Saari, Noor Fariza T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Structure-borne source which transmits vibration power to the supporting structure especially in buildings plays a major role in contributing structure-borne noise. The structureborne sources are also capable of causing damage to the receiver structures. In order to prevent noise radiation and structural failure, it is important to characterise the structureborne sound source and to recognize its potential input power. However, the knowledge of the force excitation behaviors from the structure-borne source which creates variability in the input power is still lacking. To give an effective insight of the structural mechanism excited by the structure-borne source, some uncertainties such as the amplitude, excitation phase and location of the excitation force which create the variability in the input power are modelled in this study. Quantification of the uncertainties of the maximum-minimum bands, frequency-averaged mean and variance are obtained from the variability of input power in the infinite and finite structures. It is shown that the variability of the input power reduces as the frequency increases. It is also found that the quantifications of the variability from the finite structure can also be approached using the infinite structure. For characterisation of the structure-borne sound source, thin and thick reception structures are used for the velocity source and the force source assumptions in the reception plate test. It is shown that, the reception plate for the force source assumption, the averaging spatial response across the plate area having low modal density is found to be problematic due to high variability of the plate velocity. Therefore, to obtain a more representative spatially averaged mean-squared velocity, only response points closed to the contact points are taken into account in the calculation. The results show that the measured source mobility from the reception plate is improved. Characterisation using a beam structure is also found feasible in the ’reception structure technique’. 2015 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16879/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16879/1/Variability%20In%20Vibration%20Input%20Power%20From%20The%20Structure-Borne%20Sound%20Sorce%20On%20Plate%20And%20Beam%20Structures.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16879/2/Variability%20in%20vibration%20input%20power%20from%20the%20structure-borne%20sound%20source%20on%20plate%20and%20beam%20structures.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=96141 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering Putra, Azma 1. Bonhoff, H. A., 2011. Interface mobilities for low-design of structure-borne sound sources. 2. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Aalborg, Denmark. 3. Brennan, M. J. and Ferguson, N. S., 2005. Vibration control. In Advanced Applications in Acoustics, Noise and Vibration (Fahy, F. and Walker, J.), Part IV (Vibration), Chapter 12, pp. 552-554. New York : Spon Press. 4. Cookson, R. D. and Qi, N., 2006. A reception plate method of measurement of the free velocity of machines in buildings. Proceedings of The Thirteenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV13, Vienna, Austria. 5. Cotoni, V., Gardner, B., Carneal, J., and Fuller, C., 2007. Modeling methods for vibro- acoustic analysis of commercial aircrafts. Proceedings of The Fourteenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV14, Cairns, Australia. 6. Cremer, L., Heckl, M., and Petersson, B. A. T., 2005. Structure-borne sound: Structural vibrations and sound radiation at audio frequencies. 3rd ed., Berlin:Springer– Verlag. 7. Cremer, L., Heckl, M., and Ungar, E., 1988. Structure-Borne Sound, 2nd ed., Berlin:Springer–Verlag. 8. Elliot, A. and Moorhouse, A., 2008. Characterisation of structure-borne sound sources from measurement in-situ. Proceedings of Acoustics, Paris. 9. Elliot, A. and Moorhouse, A., 2009. Characterisation of vibration siources in-situ. Proceed- 10. ings of Noise and Vibration : Emerging Methods, (NOVEM 2009), Oxford. 11. Evans, T. A. and Moorhouse, A. T., 2008. Variance in predicted structure-borne sound power due to simplified characterisation of the source. Proceedings of Acoustics., Paris, pp. 2671-2675. 12. Evans, T. A. and Moorhouse, A. T., 2009. Mean and variance of injected structure borne sound power due to missing source activity phase data. Proceedings of Noise and Vibration 13. : Emerging Methods, (NOVEM 2009), Oxford. 14. Fahy, F. J. and Mohammed, A. D., 1992. A study of uncertainty in applications of sea to coupled beam and plate systems, part 1: Computational experiments. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 158(1), pp. 45-67. 15. Flindell, L. H. and Walker, J. G., 2005. Environmental noise management. In Advanced Applications in Acoustics, Noise and Vibration (Fahy, F. and Walker, J.), Part 3, Chapter 5, pp. 208-209. New York : Spon Press. 16. Fulford, R. A. and Gibbs, B. M., 1997. Structure-borne sound power and source characteri- sation in multi-point-connected systems. part 1: Case study for assumed force distributions. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 204(4), pp. 659-677. 17. Fulford, R. A. and Gibbs, B. M., 1999. Structure-borne sound power and source characterisa- tion in multi-point-connected systems. part 2: About mobility functions and free velocities. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 220(2), pp. 203-224. 18. Gardonio, P. and Brennan, M., 2005. Mobility and impedance methods in structural dynam- ics. In Advanced Applications in Acoustics, Noise and Vibration (Fahy, F. and Walker, J.), Part 4, Chapter 9, pp. 389-447. New York : Spon Press. 19. Geetere, L. D., Ingelaere, ., and P., 2008. Uncertainties and repeatability of the reception plate method. Proceedings of Acoustics, Paris. 20. Gerretsen, E., 1993. Estimation of air-borne and structure-borne sound transmission from machinery in buildings. Applied Acoustics, 40, pp. 255-265. 21. Gibbs, B., 2007. Experimental study of the activity and mobility of structure-borne sound sources by a reception plate method. Proceedings of 19th International Congress on Acous- tics, ICA2007, Madrid. 22. Gibbs, B., Cookson, R., and Qi, N., 2008. Vibration activity and mobility of structure-borne sound sources by a reception plate method. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), pp. 4199-4209. 23. Gibbs, B. and Mayr, A. R., 2008. Structure-borne sound from machens in lightweight build- ings. Proceedings of 15th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Daejeon, Korea. 24. Gibbs, B. M., 1997. Machine bases as structure-borne sound sources. Proceedings of Fifth International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Adelaide, South Australia. 25. Gibbs, B. M., 2013. Uncertainties in predicting structure-borne power input into building. 26. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 133, 2678(2013). 27. Gibbs, B. M. and Petersson, B. A. T., 1992. Structure-borne sound source characterisation; part 1: Multi-point coupling. International Congress on Acoustics, 14:F9-1, Beijing, China. 28. Hixson, E. L., 1976. Mechanical impedance. In Shock and Vibration Handbook (Harris, 29. C. M. and Crede, C. E.), Chapter 10-1. McGraw-Hill. 30. Janssess, M. H. A. and Verheij, J. W., 2000. A pseudo forces methodology to be used in characterization of structure-borne sound sources. Applied Acoustics, 61, pp. 285-308. 31. Janssess, M. H. A., Verheij, J. W., and Loyau, T., 2002. Experimental example of the pseudo- forces method used in characterisation of a structure-borne sound source. Applied Acoustics, 63, pp. 9-34. 32. Ji, L., Mace, B. R., and Pinnington, R. J., 2003. Estimation of power transmission to a flexible receiver from a stiff source using a power mode approach. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 268(2003), pp. 525-542. 33. Jianxin, S., Moorhouse, A. T., and Gibbs, B. M., 1995. Towards a practical characteriza- tion for structure-borne sound sources based on mobility techniques. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 185(4), pp. 737-741. 34. Langley, R. S. and Fahy, F. J., 2005. High-frequency structural vibration. In Advanced Applications in Acoustics, Noise and Vibration (Fahy, F. and Walker, J.), volume ., Part IV (Vibration), Chapter 11, pp. 501. New York : Spon Press. 35. Larsson, K. and Simmons, C., 2008. A measurement method for determination of structure- borne noise source for building service equipment. Proceedings of Joint Baltic-Nordic Acoustics Meeting 2008, Reykjavik, Iceland. 36. Mayr, A. R. and Gibbs, B., 2007. On the use of a single equivalent receiver mobility in lightweight buildings. Proceedings of 19th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA2007 Madrid. 37. Mondot, J. M. and Petterson, B., 1987. Characterisation of structure-borne sound sources: The source descriptor and the coupling function. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 114(3), pp. 507-518. 38. Moorhouse, A. T., 2001. On the characteristic power of structure-borne sound sources. 39. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 248(3), pp. 441-459. 40. Moorhouse, A. T., 2007. Simplified calculation of structure-borne sound from an active ma- chine component on a suppporting substructure. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 302(2007), pp. 67-87. 41. Moorhouse, A. T., Elliot, A. S., and Evans, T. A., 2009. In situ measurement of the blocked force of structure-borne sound sources. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 325, pp. 679-685. 42. Moorhouse, A. T. and Gibbs, B. M., 1993a. Measurement of structure borne sound emission from resiliently mounted machines in situ. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 180(1), pp. 143-161. 43. Moorhouse, A. T. and Gibbs, B. M., 1993b. Prediction of the structure-borne noise emission of machines: Development of a methodology. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 167, pp. 223-237. 44. Moorhouse, A. T. and Gibbs, B. M., 1995. Structure-borne sound power emission from resiliently mounted fans: Case studies and diagnosis. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 186, pp. 781-803. 45. Ohlrich, M., 1995. Terminal source power for predicting structureborne sound transmission from a main gearbox to a helicopter fuselage. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 95, The Interna- tional Conference on Noise Control Engineering. 46. Ohlrich, M., 1996. The use of surface power for characterisation of structure-borne sound sources of low modal density. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 96, The International Conference on Noise Control Engineering. 47. Ohlrich, M. and Larsen, C., 1994. Surface and terminal source power for characterization of vibration sources at audible frequencies. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 94, The International Conference on Noise Control Engineering. 48. Petersson, B. and Plunt, J., 2000. On effective mobilities in the prediction of structure-borne sound transmission between a source structure and a receiving structure, part 2: Procedures for the estimation of mobilities. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 82(4), pp. 531-540. 49. Petersson, B. A. T., 2009. Approaches for structure-borne sound source characterisation. Proceedings of The Sixteenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration,, ICSV 16, Krakow, Poland. 50. Petersson, B. A. T. and Gibbs, B. M., 1993. Use of the source descriptor concept in studies of multi-point and multi-directional vibrational sources. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 186, pp. 157-167. 51. Petersson, B. A. T. and Gibbs, B. M., 2000. Towards s structure-borne sound source charac- terization. Applied Acoustics, 61(2000), pp. 325-343. 52. Petterson, B. and J.Plunt, 1982. On effective mobilities in the prediction of structure-borne sound transmission between a source structure and a receiving structure. part 2: Procedures for the estimation of mobilities. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 82(4), pp. 531-540. 53. Putra, A. and Mace, B. R., 2013. The effect of uncertainty in the excitation on the vibration input power to a structure. Advances in Acoustics and Vibration, 2013. 54. Putra, A., Saari, N. F., Bakri, H., and Dan, R. M., 2013. Characterisation of structure-borne sound source using reception plate method. The Scientific World Journal, 2013. 55. Qi, N. and Gibbs, B. M., 2005. Structure-borne power from machines in building: Predic- tion of installed power from laboratory measurements. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Budapest, pp. 1901-1905. 56. Scheck, J., Fischer, H. M., Gibbs, B., and Drechsler, A., 2005. Approach for the char- acterisation of wooden staircases as structure-borne sound sources. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Budapest, pp. 1943-1948. 57. Schevenels, P., Geebelen, N., and Vermeir, G., 2007. A comparison between the structure- borne sound generated by a low-frequency vibrating plate mounted on a light-weight struc- ture and on a heavy-weight structure. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2007, The Intenational Conference on Noise Control Engineering. 58. Schevenels, P., van der Linden, P. J. G., and Vermeir, G., 2010. Estimation of the injected structure-borne sound power using inversely measured contact forces. Proceedings of ISMA 2010 Including USD 2010, pp. 2090-2102. 59. Spah, M., Fischer, H. M., and Gibbs, B., 2005. New laboratory for the measurement of structure-borne sound power of sanitary installations. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Budapest. 60. Spah, M. and Gibbs, B., 2009a. Reception plate method for characterisation of structure- borne sound sources in buildings: Assumptions and application. Applied Acoustics, 70(2009), pp. 361-368. 61. Spah, M. M. and Gibbs, B. M., 2009b. Reception plate method for characterisation of structure-borne sound source in building: Installed power and sound pressure from labora- tory data. Applied Acoustics, 70(2009), pp. 1431-1439. 62. Spehr, C. and Petterson, B., 2002. Characterisation of a servo streering pump as a source of structure-borne sound. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum. 63. Ungar, E. and Dietrich, C., 1966. High-frequency vibration isolation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 4(2), pp. 224-241. 64. Vercammen, M. L. S. and Heringa, P. H., 1989. Characterising structure-borne sound from domestic appliances. Applied Acoustics, 28, pp. 105-117. 65. Verheij, J. W., Janssess, M. H. A., and Charlier, P. J. G., 1995. Using pseudo-forces for characterization of structure-borne sound sources. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 95, The Inter- national Conference on Noise Control Engineering, Newport Beach CA, USA, pp. 559–562. 66. Villot, M. and Jean, P. A. H., 2008. Prediction method for structure-borne noise generated in buildings by tools such as drillls. Proceedings of Acoustics, Paris. 67. Wang, X., 2010. Vehicle noise and vibration refinement. pp. 353. Woodhead Publishing in Mechanical Engineering. 68. You, J., Li, H. G., and Meng, G., 2011. Validity investigation of random energy flow analysis for beam structures. Journal of Shock and Vibration, 18(2011), pp. 269-280.