Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework

Cloud computing, information and communication technologies (ICT), and Internet of Things (IoT) have evolved into key assets in a manufacturing firm, particularly as a medium in transmitting information to specific parties. Cloud manufacturing (CM), which has espoused both technologies, has rose to...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Jamalulil, Nur Halimah
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2016
Subjects:	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20773/1/Implementation%20Of%20Quick%20Response%20%28QR%29%20Code%20In%20Cloud%20Manufacturing%20%28CM%29%20Framework%20-%20Nur%20Halimah%20Jamalulil%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20773/2/Implementation%20Of%20Quick%20Response%20%28QR%29%20Code%20In%20Cloud%20Manufacturing%20%28CM%29%20Framework%20-%20Nur%20Halimah%20Jamalulil.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.20773
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Mohamad, Effendi
topic	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Jamalulil, Nur Halimah Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework
description	Cloud computing, information and communication technologies (ICT), and Internet of Things (IoT) have evolved into key assets in a manufacturing firm, particularly as a medium in transmitting information to specific parties. Cloud manufacturing (CM), which has espoused both technologies, has rose to prominence in terms of transforming the existing manufacturing practice in firms into a service-focused, customer-oriented, demand-powered, and extremely collaborative process. Thus, the deployment of CM in a shipbuilding firm aims to address multiple problems that had cropped up. The concerns faced by the shipbuilding firm are: (i) ever-evolving demands and expectations from consumers, (ii) insufficient inter-dependent mediums of communication, and (iii) wastage of material in manufacturing. To address these issues, this study intends to recommend a new framework which can envisage the CM assimilated with the work processes which are to be executed in the shipbuilding firm. The entire manufacturing process in the X boat model is examined for formulating the framework. For the framework to be worked out, the present workflow and customs of the shipbuilding firm for the creation of the X boat model are determined and structured. This helps identify the issues with the present framework as well as the crucial departments which require improvement. These departments are as follows: (i) production planning, (ii) engineering & design, and (iii) store. Enhancements are carried out on the identified issues of these departments for formulating the new framework. As the majority of the arising issues pertain to the communication system in transmitting information within departments, the CM concept is deployed across the cloud data storage. This storage is the place where information is stowed and then accessed through the Quick Respond (QR) code system organised for the firm. The assimilation of the QR code system and cloud data storage is envisaged in the recommended framework. This framework is then substantiated by implementation verification and is corroborated through the face validity method. Following the substantiation and corroboration of the new proposed framework, the execution of the QR code system which focuses on the CM concept and the feasibility of the system have been elucidated in detail. This, in turn, is able to enhance the production and communication workflow in the shipbuilding organisation.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Jamalulil, Nur Halimah
author_facet	Jamalulil, Nur Halimah
author_sort	Jamalulil, Nur Halimah
title	Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework
title_short	Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework
title_full	Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework
title_fullStr	Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework
title_full_unstemmed	Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework
title_sort	implementation of quick response (qr) code in cloud manufacturing (cm) framework
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate	2016
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20773/1/Implementation%20Of%20Quick%20Response%20%28QR%29%20Code%20In%20Cloud%20Manufacturing%20%28CM%29%20Framework%20-%20Nur%20Halimah%20Jamalulil%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20773/2/Implementation%20Of%20Quick%20Response%20%28QR%29%20Code%20In%20Cloud%20Manufacturing%20%28CM%29%20Framework%20-%20Nur%20Halimah%20Jamalulil.pdf
_version_	1747834002787532800
spelling	my-utem-ep.207732021-10-08T16:54:37Z Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework 2016 Jamalulil, Nur Halimah T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Cloud computing, information and communication technologies (ICT), and Internet of Things (IoT) have evolved into key assets in a manufacturing firm, particularly as a medium in transmitting information to specific parties. Cloud manufacturing (CM), which has espoused both technologies, has rose to prominence in terms of transforming the existing manufacturing practice in firms into a service-focused, customer-oriented, demand-powered, and extremely collaborative process. Thus, the deployment of CM in a shipbuilding firm aims to address multiple problems that had cropped up. The concerns faced by the shipbuilding firm are: (i) ever-evolving demands and expectations from consumers, (ii) insufficient inter-dependent mediums of communication, and (iii) wastage of material in manufacturing. To address these issues, this study intends to recommend a new framework which can envisage the CM assimilated with the work processes which are to be executed in the shipbuilding firm. The entire manufacturing process in the X boat model is examined for formulating the framework. For the framework to be worked out, the present workflow and customs of the shipbuilding firm for the creation of the X boat model are determined and structured. This helps identify the issues with the present framework as well as the crucial departments which require improvement. These departments are as follows: (i) production planning, (ii) engineering & design, and (iii) store. Enhancements are carried out on the identified issues of these departments for formulating the new framework. As the majority of the arising issues pertain to the communication system in transmitting information within departments, the CM concept is deployed across the cloud data storage. This storage is the place where information is stowed and then accessed through the Quick Respond (QR) code system organised for the firm. The assimilation of the QR code system and cloud data storage is envisaged in the recommended framework. This framework is then substantiated by implementation verification and is corroborated through the face validity method. Following the substantiation and corroboration of the new proposed framework, the execution of the QR code system which focuses on the CM concept and the feasibility of the system have been elucidated in detail. This, in turn, is able to enhance the production and communication workflow in the shipbuilding organisation. 2016 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20773/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20773/1/Implementation%20Of%20Quick%20Response%20%28QR%29%20Code%20In%20Cloud%20Manufacturing%20%28CM%29%20Framework%20-%20Nur%20Halimah%20Jamalulil%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20773/2/Implementation%20Of%20Quick%20Response%20%28QR%29%20Code%20In%20Cloud%20Manufacturing%20%28CM%29%20Framework%20-%20Nur%20Halimah%20Jamalulil.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=104903 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Mohamad, Effendi 1. AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics), 1998. Guide Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations. AIAA G-077. 2. Anderson, C.M., and Long, E.S., 2002. Use of a Structured Descriptive Assessment Methodology to Identify Variables Affecting Problem Behaviour. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 35(2), pp. 137–154. 3. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., and RH, 2009. Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing. Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley Technical, (UCB/EECS-2009-28). 4. ASME, 2006. Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, (March), pp. 1–53. 5. Boitshwarelo, B., 2011. Proposing an Integrated Research Framework for Theoretical Synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2005), pp. 161–179. 6. Bradley, E.H., Curry, L.A., and Devers, K.J., 2007. Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), pp. 1758–1772. 7. Bughin, J., Chui, M., and Manyika, J., 2010. Clouds, Big Data, and Smart Assets: Ten Tech-Enabled Business Trends to Watch. McKinsey Quarterly, Aug., pp. 75–86. 8. Burgess, n.d. Design Verification. Design Assurance for Engineers and Managers, pp. 1–10. 9. Buyya, R., Yeo, C.S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., and Brandic, I., 2009. Cloud Computing and Emerging IT Platforms: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering Computing As the 5th Utility. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 25(6), pp. 599–616. 10. Cartman, 2015. Asset Tracking: RFIDs, Barcodes or QR Codes. [online] Available at: https://www.webcheckout.net/blog/rfid-asset-tracking/ [Accessed on 8 March 2016]. 11. CNET, 2016. OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive and Box: Which Cloud Storage Service Is Right for You [online] Available at: http://www.cnet.com/how-to/onedrive-dropbox-google-drive-and-box-which-cloud-storage-service-is-right-for-you/ [Accessed on 10 April 2016]. 12. Coelho, R., Kulesza, U., von Staa, A., and Lucena, C., 2006. Unit Testing in Multi-Agent Systems Using Mock Agents and Aspects. Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems - SELMAS ’06, pp. 83–89. 13. Coetzee, L., and Eksteen, J., 2011. The Internet of Things – Promise for the Future? An Introduction. In: IST-Africa 2011 Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–9. 14. Davis, J., Edgar, T., Porter, J., Bernaden, J., and Sarli, M., 2012. Smart Manufacturing, Manufacturing Intelligence and Demand-Dynamic Performance. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, pp. 145–156. 15. Delbecq A. L. and VandeVen A. H, 1971. A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning. Journal Of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), pp. 466–492. 16. Delgado, R., 2015. What’s the Difference between VPN and Cloud Computing?. [online] Available at: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/whats-difference-vpn-cloud-computing/ [Accessed on 7 March 2016]. 17. Dereli, T., and Durmusoglu, A., 2010. An Integrated Framework for New Product Development Using Who-When-Where-Why-What-How (5W1H), Theory of Inventive Problem Solving and Patent Information &ndash; a Case Study. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 5(3), pp. 354–359. 18. Dowlatshahi, S., and Cao, Q., 2006. The Relationships among Virtual Enterprise , Information Technology , and Business Performance in Agile Manufacturing : An Industry Perspective. 174, pp. 835–860. 19. Elo, S., and Kyngäs, H., 2008. The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), pp. 107–115. 20. Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., and Lu, S., 2008. Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared. Grid Computing Environments Workshop 2008 (GCE ’08), pp. 1–10. 21. Ganapathi, A., Chen, Y., Armando, F., Katz, R., and Patterson, D., 2009. Statistics-Driven Workload Modeling for the Cloud. Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley Technical, (UCB/EECS-2009-160). 22. Garbarino, S., and Holland, J., 2009. Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results. Issue Paper: Governance and Social Resource Council, (March), pp. 1–51. 23. Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., and Buyya, R., 2012. A Framework for Ranking of Cloud Computing Services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(4), pp. 1012–1023. 24. Hajibaba, M., and Gorgin, S., 2014. A Review on Modern Distributed Computing Paradigms : Cloud Computing , Jungle Computing. Journal Of Computing & Information Technology, 22(2), pp. 69–84. 25. Hosseini, S., Nasiri, R., and Shabgahi, G., 2015. A New Framework for Cloud Based Application Testing. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS), 1(3), pp. 112–118. 26. ISO/IEC 18004, 2006. International Standard ISO/IEC 18004 - Information Technology - Automatic Identification and Data Capture Techniques - Bar Code Symbology - QR Code. ISO/IEC, 2000(June), p. 122. 27. Jackson, K.R., Ramakrishnan, L., Muriki, K., Canon, S., Cholia, S., Shalf, J., Wasserman, H.J., and Wright, N.J., 2010. Performance Analysis of High Performance Computing Applications on the Amazon Web Services Cloud. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, pp. 159–168. 28. Jafari Navimipour, N., Rahmani, A.M., Navin, A.H., and Hosseinzadeh, M., 2015. Expert Cloud: A Cloud-Based Framework to Share the Knowledge and Skills of Human Resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, pp. 57–74. 29. Kahanwal, B., 2012. The Distributed Computing Paradigms : P2P , Grid , Cluster , Cloud , and Jungle. 1(2), pp. 183–187. 30. Kaur, E.R., 2015. A Review of Computing Technologies : Distributed , Utility , Cluster , Grid and Cloud Computing. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 5(2), pp. 144–148. 31. Kaur, K., and Rai, A.K., 2014. A Comparative Analysis : Grid, Cluster and Cloud Computing. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 3(3), pp. 5730–5734. 32. Khan, N., Noraziah, A., Deris, M.M., and Ismail, E.I., 2011. Cloud Computing: Comparison of Various Features. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 194 CCIS, pp. 243–254. 33. Lee, J., Yang, S., Lapira, E., Kao, H., and Yen, N., 2013. Methodology and Framework of a Cloud-Based Prognostics and Health Management System for Manufacturing Industry. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 33, pp. 205–210. 34. Li, B., Zhang, L., Ren, L., Chai, X., Tao, F., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Yin, C., Huang, G., and Zhao, X., 2011. Further Discussion on Cloud Manufacturing. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems CIMS, 17(3), pp. 449–457. 35. Lin, C.S., and Lee, I.T., 2010. Applying Multiple Description Coding to Enhance the Streaming Scalability on CDN-P2P Network. International Journal of Communication Systems, 23(5), pp. 553–568. 36. Luna, S., Lopes, A., Tao, H.Y.S., Zapata, F., and Pineda, R., 2013. Integration, Verification, Validation, Test, and Evaluation (IVVT&E) Framework for System of Systems (SoS). Procedia Computer Science, 20(2005), pp. 298–305. 37. Macal, C.M., Carson, J.S.J.S., Macal, C.M., and Carson, J.S.J.S., 2002. Concepts of Model Verification and Validation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 1, pp. 52–58. 38. Mao, B., He, J., Cao, J., Bigger, S.W., and Vasiljevic, T., 2015. A Framework for Food Traceability Information Extraction Based on a Video Surveillance System. Procedia Computer Science, 55, pp. 1285–1292. 39. Maropoulos, P.G., and Ceglarek, D., 2010. Design Verification and Validation in Product Lifecycle. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 59(2), pp. 740–759. 40. Mauricio-Moreno, H., Miranda, J., Chavarria, D., Ramirez-Cadena, M., and Molina, A., 2015. Design S3-RF (Sustainable X Smart X Sensing - Reference Framework) for the Future Manufacturing Enterprise. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 48(3), pp. 58–63. 41. MITRE, 2014. MITRE Systems Engineering Guide (SEG), Bedford: The MITRE Corporation. 42. Okazaki, S., Li, H., and Hirose, M., 2012. Benchmarking the Use of QR Code in Mobile Promotion: Three Studies in Japan. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), pp. 102–117. 43. Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K.L., 1993. Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations UC Irvine. 44. Qian, J.P., Yang, X.T., Wu, X.M., Zhao, L., Fan, B.L., and Xing, B., 2012. A Traceability System Incorporating 2D Barcode and RFID Technology for Wheat Flour Mills. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 89, pp. 76–85. 45. Quick, D., and Choo, K.K.R., 2013. Dropbox Analysis: Data Remnants on User Machines. Digital Investigation, 10(1), pp. 3–18. 46. Ren, L., Zhang, L., Wang, L., Tao, F., and Chai, X., 2014. Cloud Manufacturing: Key Characteristics and Applications. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, pp. 1–15. 47. Sargent, R.G., 2013. Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. Journal of Simulation, 7, pp. 12–24. 48. Schulte, S., Hoenisch, P., Hochreiner, C., Dustdar, S., Klusch, M., and Schuller, D., 2014. Towards Process Support for Cloud Manufacturing. In: 2014 IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Towards, pp. 142–149. 49. Seiger, R., Keller, C., Niebling, F., and Schlegel, T., 2015. Modelling Complex and Flexible Processes for Smart Cyber-Physical Environments. Journal of Computational Science, 10, pp. 137–148. 50. Seine, K., Kuwabara, S., Mikami, S., Takahashi, Y., Yoshikawa, M., Narumi, H., Koganezaki, K., Wakabayashi, T., and Nagano, A., 2004. Development of the Traceability System Which Secures the Safety of Fishery Products Using the QR Code and a Digital Signature. Oceans ’04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean '04 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37600), pp. 476–481. 51. Shin, D., 2014. A Socio-Technical Framework for Internet-of-Things Design: A Human-Centered Design for the Internet of Things. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), pp. 519–531. 52. Silvestre, J., 1987. Economies and Diseconomies of Scale. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 53. Simonton, D.K., 2003. Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Historical Data. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, pp. 617–40. 54. Soon, T.J., 2008. QR Code. Synthesis Journal, pp. 59–78. 55. Srinivasan, A., Abdul, Q.M., and Vijayakumar, V., 2015. Era of Cloud Computing: A New Insight to Hybrid Cloud. Procedia Computer Science, 50, pp. 42–51. 56. Tao, F., Zhang, L., Venkatesh, V.C., Luo, Y., and Cheng, Y., 2011. Cloud Manufacturing: A Computing and Service-Oriented Manufacturing Model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225, pp. 1969–1976. 57. Tarjan, L., Šenk, I., Tegeltija, S., Stankovski, S., and Ostojic, G., 2014. A Readability Analysis for QR Code Application in a Traceability System. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 109, pp. 1–11. 58. Thiyagarajan, M., and Dinesh Kumar, K., 2012. QR Code Authentication for Product Using Cloud Computing. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, 3(2), pp. 5–8. 59. Thomas, D.R., 2006. Method Notes A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), pp. 237–246. 60. Wang, C., Ren, K., Lou, W., and Li, J., 2010. Toward Publicly Auditable Secure Cloud Data Storage Services. IEEE Network, 24(4), pp. 19–24. 61. Wang, C.W.C., Wang, Q.W.Q., Ren, K.R.K., and Lou, W.L.W., 2009. Ensuring Data Storage Security in Cloud Computing. 2009 17th International Workshop on Quality of Service, pp. 1–9. 62. Wang, X.V., Wang, L., and Gao, L., 2013. From Cloud Manufacturing to Cloud Remanufacturing: A Cloud-Based Approach for WEEE. 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on E-Business Engineering, pp. 399–406. 63. Wang, X.V., and Xu, X.W., 2013. An Interoperable Solution for Cloud Manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29(4), pp. 232–247. 64. Wei, Y., and Blake, M.B., 2010. Service-Oriented Computing and Cloud Computing: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(6), pp. 72–75. 65. Wu, D., Greer, M.J., Rosen, D.W., and Schaefer, D., 2013a. Cloud Manufacturing: Strategic Vision and State-of-the-Art. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(4), pp. 564–579. 66. Wu, D., Thames, J.L., Rosen, D.W., and Schaefer, D., 2013b. Enhancing the Product Realization Process With Cloud-Based Design and Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 13(4), pp. 1–14. 67. Xing, T., 2015. A General Framework for Verification and Validation of Large Eddy Simulations. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 27(2), pp. 163–175. 68. Xu, X., 2012. From Cloud Computing to Cloud Manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 28(1), pp. 75–86. 69. Yang, G., Yu, J., Shen, W., Su, Q., Fu, Z., and Hao, R., 2015. Enabling Public Auditing for Shared Data in Cloud Storage Supporting Identoty Provacy and Traceability. The Journal of Systems & Software. Elsevier Inc. 70. Zimmerman, D., 2000. Model Validation and Verification of Large and Complex Space Structures. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 8(2), pp. 93–118. 71. Zuehlke, D., 2010. SmartFactory-Towards a Factory-of-Things. Annual Reviews in Control, 34(1), pp. 129–138.

Implementation Of Quick Response (QR) Code In Cloud Manufacturing (CM) Framework

Similar Items