Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer

3D printing or also known as additive manufacturing (AM) has been introduced to fabricate the prototypes in shorter time and cost-effective. AM also capable to fabricate complex part geometry without any additional tooling and jigs required. One of the most well-known techniques in AM is fused depos...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mazlan, Siti Nur Humaira
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2018
Subjects:	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/1/Improvement%20On%20Mechanical%20Properties%20And%20Study%20Of%20Manufacturability%20Of%20Printed%20Part%20Fabricated%20Via%20Open%20Source%203D%20Printer%20-%20Siti%20Nur%20Humaira%20Mazlan%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/2/Improvement%20on%20mechanical%20properties%20and%20study%20of%20manufacturability%20of%20printed%20part%20fabricated%20via%20open%20source%203D%20printer.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.23241
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Alkahari, Mohd Rizal
topic	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Mazlan, Siti Nur Humaira Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer
description	3D printing or also known as additive manufacturing (AM) has been introduced to fabricate the prototypes in shorter time and cost-effective. AM also capable to fabricate complex part geometry without any additional tooling and jigs required. One of the most well-known techniques in AM is fused deposition modeling (FDM). However, the main bottleneck of FDM is its design manufacturabillity and printed part quality in terms of surface roughness, tensile strength and dimensional accuracy. In this research, the 3D printing processing methods using FDM were discussed to study the effect of pre-process, in-process and post-processing technique on mechanical properties and manufacturability of open source 3D printed parts. As for pre-processing, Taguchi analysis was conducted to find the optimum printing parameter settings. Meanwhile, for in-processing method, inert gas assisted 3D printing was evaluated. Then, the post-processing method which involves improvement of fully completed printed part was analyzed. The laser post-treatment and blow cold acetone vapor is used for post-processing method. Based on the comparison made, inert gas assisted 3D printing technique was selected as the best improvement method because of its capability to improve the overall part’s quality including surface roughness, tensile strength and dimensional accuracy. In order to identify the design limitation for FDM, the manufacturability and design attributes were studied. The manufacturability study involves some of the difference features of overhang, bridges, wall thickness, small hole diameter and wire diameter. Based on the information, test model 1, 2 and 3 was fabricated using inert gas assisted 3D printer machine. The dimensional accuracy for the test model was compared to original 3D printing technique. In general, it was found that, the 3D printed part’s surface roughness was improved by 45% for inert gas assisted method, 63% for laser post-treatment and 94% for blow cold acetone vapor. For tensile strength, 36% improvement made using inert gas assisted method, while for the other post-processing method, the tensile strength is significantly reduces. The dimensional accuracy was also improved for the test model structure up to 39% improvement when using inert gas assisted method. The study has successfully identified the design limitation, and developed design guideline for open source 3D printer. The information can be useful to all 3D printer users to avoid the laborious and time consuming trials during manufacturing process of the prototype.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mazlan, Siti Nur Humaira
author_facet	Mazlan, Siti Nur Humaira
author_sort	Mazlan, Siti Nur Humaira
title	Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer
title_short	Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer
title_full	Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer
title_fullStr	Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer
title_full_unstemmed	Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer
title_sort	improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3d printer
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate	2018
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/1/Improvement%20On%20Mechanical%20Properties%20And%20Study%20Of%20Manufacturability%20Of%20Printed%20Part%20Fabricated%20Via%20Open%20Source%203D%20Printer%20-%20Siti%20Nur%20Humaira%20Mazlan%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/2/Improvement%20on%20mechanical%20properties%20and%20study%20of%20manufacturability%20of%20printed%20part%20fabricated%20via%20open%20source%203D%20printer.pdf
_version_	1747834025884516352
spelling	my-utem-ep.232412022-06-09T15:52:43Z Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer 2018 Mazlan, Siti Nur Humaira T Technology (General) TS Manufactures 3D printing or also known as additive manufacturing (AM) has been introduced to fabricate the prototypes in shorter time and cost-effective. AM also capable to fabricate complex part geometry without any additional tooling and jigs required. One of the most well-known techniques in AM is fused deposition modeling (FDM). However, the main bottleneck of FDM is its design manufacturabillity and printed part quality in terms of surface roughness, tensile strength and dimensional accuracy. In this research, the 3D printing processing methods using FDM were discussed to study the effect of pre-process, in-process and post-processing technique on mechanical properties and manufacturability of open source 3D printed parts. As for pre-processing, Taguchi analysis was conducted to find the optimum printing parameter settings. Meanwhile, for in-processing method, inert gas assisted 3D printing was evaluated. Then, the post-processing method which involves improvement of fully completed printed part was analyzed. The laser post-treatment and blow cold acetone vapor is used for post-processing method. Based on the comparison made, inert gas assisted 3D printing technique was selected as the best improvement method because of its capability to improve the overall part’s quality including surface roughness, tensile strength and dimensional accuracy. In order to identify the design limitation for FDM, the manufacturability and design attributes were studied. The manufacturability study involves some of the difference features of overhang, bridges, wall thickness, small hole diameter and wire diameter. Based on the information, test model 1, 2 and 3 was fabricated using inert gas assisted 3D printer machine. The dimensional accuracy for the test model was compared to original 3D printing technique. In general, it was found that, the 3D printed part’s surface roughness was improved by 45% for inert gas assisted method, 63% for laser post-treatment and 94% for blow cold acetone vapor. For tensile strength, 36% improvement made using inert gas assisted method, while for the other post-processing method, the tensile strength is significantly reduces. The dimensional accuracy was also improved for the test model structure up to 39% improvement when using inert gas assisted method. The study has successfully identified the design limitation, and developed design guideline for open source 3D printer. The information can be useful to all 3D printer users to avoid the laborious and time consuming trials during manufacturing process of the prototype. UTeM 2018 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/1/Improvement%20On%20Mechanical%20Properties%20And%20Study%20Of%20Manufacturability%20Of%20Printed%20Part%20Fabricated%20Via%20Open%20Source%203D%20Printer%20-%20Siti%20Nur%20Humaira%20Mazlan%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23241/2/Improvement%20on%20mechanical%20properties%20and%20study%20of%20manufacturability%20of%20printed%20part%20fabricated%20via%20open%20source%203D%20printer.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=112771 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering Alkahari, Mohd Rizal 1. Agarwala, M.K., Jamalabad, V.R., Langrana, N.A., Safari A., Whalen, P.J. and Danforth, S.C., 1996. Structural Quality of Parts Processed by Fused Deposition. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2(4), pp. 4-19. 2. Arni, R. and Gupta, S. K., 2001. Manufacturability Analysis of Flatness Tolerances in Solid Freeform Fabrication. Journal of Mechanical Design, 123(1), pp.148–56. 3. Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., Radhakrishnan, P., 2001. Critical Parameters Influencing the Quality of Prototypes in Fused Deposition Modelling. Journal of Material Processes Technology, 118(1–3), pp. 385–388. 4. Ahn, S.H., Montero, M. and Odell, D., 2002. Anistropic Material Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 8(4), pp. 248-257. 5. Anthamatten, A., Letts, S.A. and Cook, R.C., 2004. Controlling Surface Roughness in Vapor-Deposited Poly (amic acid) Films by Solvent-Vapor Exposure. Langmuir, 20(15), pp. 6288-6296. 6. Ang, K.C., Leong K.F. and Chua, C.K., 2006. Investigation On The Mechanical Properties and Porosity Relationship in Fused Deposition Modeling-Fabricated Porous Structure. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 12(2), pp. 100-105. 7. Ahn, D., Kweon, J.H., Kwon, S., Song, J. And Lee, S., 2009. Representation of Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(15), pp. 5593-5600.191 8. Adam, G. A. O.and Zimmer, D., 2014. Design for Additive Manufacturing-Element Transitions and Aggregated Structures. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 7(1), pp. 20–28. 9. Alberto, B. and Luana, T., 2015. Surface Improvement of Fused Deposition Modeling Parts by Barrel Finishing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(6), pp. 686-696. 10. Blair, B.M., 1998. Post Build Processing of Stereolithography Molds, 1st ed., School of Mechanical Engineering: Georgia Institute of Technology. 11. Blom, H., Yeh, R., Wojnarowski, R. and Ling, M., 2006. Detection of Degradation of ABS Materials via DSC. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 83(1), pp. 113- 115. 12. Byun, H.S. and Lee, K.S., 2006. Determination of the Optimal Build Direction for Different Rapid Prototyping Processes Using Multi-Criterion Decision Making. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22(1), pp. 69-80. 13. Bakar, N.S.A., Alkahari, M.R. and Boejang, H., 2010. Analysis on Fused Deposition Modeling Performance, Journal of Zheijiang University-SCIENCE A, 11(12), pp. 972–977. 14. Baul, G.S. and Kumar, P., 2014. Methods to Improve Surface Finish of Parts Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling, Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(3), pp. 51-55. 15. Belter, J. T. and Dollar, A. M., 2015. Strengthening of 3D Printed Fused Deposition Manufactured Parts Using the Fill Compositing Technique. Plos One, 1-12, pp. 1–19.192 16. Childs. T. H. C. and Juster, N. P., 1994. Linear and Geometric Accuracies from Layer Manufacturing. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 43(1), pp. 163–166. 17. Choi, S. H. and Samavedam, S., 2002. Modeling and Optimization of Rapid Prototyping. Advance Modeling and Optimization of Manufacturing Processes, 47(1), pp. 39–53. 18. Cumin, J., Raos, P. and Grizelj, B., 2008. Impact Strength of ABS Parts Manufactured Using Fused Deposition Modeling Technology. Advance of Mechanical Technology and Automation, 7(2), pp. 40-42. 19. Clijsters, S., Craeghs, T., Moesen, M. and Kruth, J.P., 2012. Optimization of Thin Walls Structures in SLM. Proceedings of the Direct Digital Manufacturing Conference, Berlin, 14-15 March 2012. 20. Cohan, J.S. and Singh, R., 2017. Pre and Post Processing Techniques to Improve Surface Characteristics of FDM Parts : A State of the Art Review and Future Applications. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23(3), pp. 495-513. 21. Daneshmand, S., Aghanajafi, C. and Nadooshan, A.A., 2010. The Effect of Chromium Coating in RP Technology for Airfoil Manufacturing. Sadhana, 3(5), pp. 569-584. 22. Daneshmand, S. and Aghanajafi, C., 2012. Description and Modeling of the Additive Manufacturing Technology for Aerodynamic Coefficients Measurement. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 58(2), pp. 125-133. 23. Darbar, R., and Patel, D.M., 2013. Process Parameters Optimization Of FDM Process And Application Of Taguchi Approach And ANN – The Review. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(1), pp. 743–746.193 24. Deepa, Y., 2014. Fused Deposition Modeling – A Rapid Prototyping Technique for Product Cycle Time Reduction Cost Effectively in Aerospace Applications. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, pp. 62-68. 25. Espalin, D., Medina, F., Arcaute, K., Zinniel, B., Hoppe, T. and Wicker, R., 2009. Effects of Vapor Smoothing on ABS Part Dimensions. Conferences and Exposition, RAPID, 2009. Schaumburg, II. 26. Fahad. M. and Hopkinson. N., 2012. A New Benchmarking Part for Evaluating the Accuracy and Repeatability of Additive Manufacturing (AM) Processes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mechanical, Production and Automobile Engineering (ICMPAE12), Singapore, 28-29 April 2012. 27. Felix, L., Frederick, M., Gabriella, P.B., Christian, K. and Eike, G.H., 2016. Improved Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Part by Fused Deposition Modeling Processed Under the Exclusion of Oxygen. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 1(1-2), pp. 3-7. 28. Galantucci, L.M., Lavecchia, F. and Percoco, G., 2009. Experimental Study Aiming to Enhance the Surface Finish of Fused Deposition Model Parts. Manufacturing Technology, 58(1) , pp. 189-192. 29. Galantucci, L.M., Lavecchia, F. and Percoco, G., 2010. Quantitative Analysis of a Chemical Treatment to Reduce Roughness of Parts Fabricated Using Fused Deposition Modeling. Manufacturing Technology, 59(1), pp. 247-250 30. Gorski, F., Kuczko, W.and Wichniarek, R., 2013. Influences of Process Parameters on Dimensional Accuracy of Parts Manufactured Using Fused Deposition Modeling Technology. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 7(19), pp. 27–35.194 31. Gaynor, T., Meisel, A., Williams, N.A. and Guest, J.K., 2014. Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing: Considering Maximum Overhang Constraint. Journal Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 54(5), pp. 1157-1172. 32. Gorski, F., Kuczko, W. and Wichniarek, R., 2014. Impact Strength of ABS Parts Manufactured Using Fused Deposition Modelling Technology. Archieves of Mechanical Technology and Automation, 34(1), pp.3-12. 33. Galantucci, L.M., Dassisti, M., Lavecchia, F. and Percoco, G., 2014. Improvement of Fused Deposition Modelled Surfaces Through Milling and Physical Vapor Deposition, 2, pp.99. Translated from English. Rusia: Gangemi Editore spa. 34. Gurrala, P.K. and Regalla, S.P., 2014. DOE Based Parametric Study of Volumetric Change of FDM Parts. Material Sciences, 6, pp. 354 – 360. 35. Gornet, T., 2014. History of Additive Manufacturing Introduction of Non-SL Systems Introduction of Low-Cost 3D Printers, Wohlers Report, pp. 1–34. 36. Galantucci, L.M., Bodi, I., Kacani. and Laavecchia, J.,2015. Analysis of Dimensional Performance for a 3D Open Source Based on Fused Deposition Modeling Technique. Procedia CIRP,28,pp. 82-87. 37. Galeta, T., Simunovic, G. and Mazurek, M., 2015. Impact of Strengthening Fluids on Roughness of 3D Printed Models. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 54(1), pp.231-234. 38. Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A. and Batish, A., 2016. On Surface Finish and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Parts after Cold Vapor Treatment. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 31(4), pp. 522-529.195 39. Horvath, D., Noorani, R. and Mendelson, M., 2007. Improvement of Surface Roughness on ABS 400 Polymer Using Design Of Experiments (DOE). Material Science Forum, 561- 565, pp. 2389-2392. 40. Hietikko, E., 2014. Design for Additive Manufacturing-DFAM. Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(12), pp. 2319-1805. 41. Ibrahim, D., Ding, S. and Sun, S., 2014. Roughness Prediction for FDM Produced Surfaces. Proceedings of International Conference Recent Trends in Engineering & Technology (ICRET’2014), Batam, Indonesia, 13-14 Februari 2014. 42. Impens, D. and Urbanic, R.J., 2016. A Comprehensive Assessment on the Impact of PostProcessing Variables on Tensile, Compressive and Bending Characteristics for 3D Printed Components. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 22(3), pp. 591-608. 43. Jain, P. and Kuthe, A.M., 2013. Feasibility Study of Manufacturing Using Rapid Prototyping: FDM Approach. Procedia Engineering, 63, pp. 4–11. 44. Johnson, W.M., Rowell, M., Deason, B. and Eubanks, M., 2014. Comparative Evaluation of An Open Source FDM system. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 20(3), pp. 205-2014 45. Jun, D., Zhengying, W., Xin, W., Jijie, W. and Zhen, C., 2016. An Improved Fused Deposition Modeling Process for Forming Large-Size Thin-Walled Parts. Journal of Material and Processing Technology, 234, pp. 332–341. 46. Jaspreet, S., Rupinder, S. And Harwinder, S., 2017. Investigations for Improving the Surface Finish of FDM Based ABS Replicas by Chemical Vapor Smoothing Process : A Case Study. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 37(1), pp.13-21.196 47. Kruth, J.P., 1991. Material Incress Manufacturing by Rapid Prototyping Techniques. Manufacturing Technology, 40(2), pp. 603-614. 48. Kattethota, G. and Henderson, M., 1999. A Visual Tool to Improve Layered Manufacturing Part Quality. Translated from English. United State: Arizona State University. 49. Kulkarni, P. and Dutta, D., 2000. On the Integration of Layered Manufacturing and Material Removal Process. International Journal of Machining Science and Engineering, 122(1), pp. 100-108. 50. Kumar, G.P. and Regalla, S.P., 2012. Optimization of Support Material And Build Time in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Applied Mechanics Material, 110-116, pp. 2245-2251. 51. Kuo, C. C. and Su, S. J., 2013. A Simple Method for Improving Surface Quality of Rapid Prototype. International Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 2(6), pp. 465–470. 52. Klahn, C., Leutenecker, B. and Meboldt, M., 2014. Design for Additive ManufacturingSupporting the Substitution of Components in Series Products. Procedia CIRP, 21, pp. 138–143. 53. Kranz, J., Herzog. D. and Emmelmann, C., 2015. Design Guidelines for Laser Additive Manufacturing of Lightweight Structures in TiA16V4. Journal of Laser Applications, 27(1).197 54. Lee, B. H., Abdullah, J. and Kham, Z., 2005. Optimization of Rapid Prototyping Parameters for Production of Flexible ABS Object. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169(1), pp. 54-61. 55. Laeng, J., Khan, Z.A. and Khu, S.Y., 2006. Optimizing Flexible Behaviour of Bow Prototype Using Taguchi Approach. Journal of Applied Science, 6(3), pp.622-630. 56. Luzanin, O., Movrin, D. and Plancak, M., 2013. Experimental Investigation of Extrusion Speed and Temperature Effects on Arithmetic Mean Surface Roughness in FDM built Specimens. Journal for Technology of Plasticity, 38(2), pp. 179-190. 57. Luzanin,O., Movrin, D. and Plan, M., 2014. Effect of Layer Thickness, Deposition Angle, and Infill Density on Maximum Flexural Force in FDM-Built Specimens. Journal of Technology Plastic, 39(1), pp.49-58 58. Langelaar, M., 2016. Topology Optimization of 3D Self-Supporting Structures for Additive Manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 12 (Part A), pp. 60–70. 59. Malaika, A.S., 2003. Oxidative Degradation and Stabilisation of Polymers. Journal of International Material and Reviews, 48(3), pp. 165-185. 60. Mahesh, M., Wong, Y.S., Fuh, J. Y. H. and Loh, H. T., 2004. Benchmarking for Comparative Evaluation of RP Systems and Processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal 10(2), pp. 123–135. 61. Mireles, J., Adame, A., Espalin, D., Medina, F., Winker, R., Hoppe, T., Zinniel, B. and Wicker, R., 2011. Analysis of Sealing Methods for FDM-Fabricated Parts. Proceedings of 22nd Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 11-12 March 2011. Solid freefrom fabrication.198 62. Marcincin, J.N., Marcincinova, L.N., Barna, J. and Janak, M., 2012. Application of FDM Rapid Prototyping Technology in Experimental Gearbox Development Process Technical Gazette. Journals of Croatia, 19(3), pp. 689-694. 63. McCullough, E.J. and Yadavalli, V.K., 2013. Surface Modification of Fused Deposition Modeling ABS to enable Rapid Prototyping of Biomedical Microdevices. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 213(6), pp. 947-954. 64. Mendonsa,C., Naveen,K.V., Upadhyaya, P. and Shenoy, V.D., 2015. Influence of FDM Process Parameters on Build Time Using Taguchi and ANOVA Approach. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(2), pp. 2013–2016. 65. Maidin, S. and Muhamad, M. K., 2015. Ultrasonic Assisted Fuse Deposition Modeling to Improve Parts Surface Finish. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(9), pp. 105–108. 66. Mohamed, O.A., Masood, S.H. and Bhowmik, J.L., 2015. Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters : A Review of Current Research and Future Prospects. Advance Manufacturing, 3(1), pp.42-35. 67. Minetola, P., Iuliano, L. and Marchiandi, G., 2016. Benchmarking of FDM Machines through Part Quality Using IT Grades. Procedia CIRP, 41, pp. 1027–1032. 68. Majid, S.N.A, Alkahari, M.R., Maidin, S. and Fai, T.C., 2017. Influence of Integrated Pressing During Fused Filament Fabrication on Tensile Strength and Porosity. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 3, pp. 185-197.199 69. Mohamed, A. S., Maidin, S., Wong, J. H. U., Arif, N.M., and Mohamed, S. B., 2017. Effect of Ultrasonic of Vacuum System Assisted Mid-End Fused Deposition Modeling to Improve Printed Parts Surface Finish. Proceedings of Innovative Research and Industrial Dialoque’16, Melaka, Malaysia, May 2017. Advance Manufacturing Centre. 70. Maidin, S., Wong, J. H. U., Mohamed, A. S. and Mohamed, S. B., 2017. Effect of Vacuum Assisted Fused Deposition Modeling on 3D Printed ABS Microstructure. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(15), pp. 4877–4881. 71. Nancharaiah, T., Raju, D.R. and Raju, V.R., 2010. An Experimental Investigation on Surface Quality and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Components. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 1(2), pp. 106-111. 72. Nancharaiah, T., 2011. Optimization of Process Parameters in FDM Process Using Design of Experiments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies, 2(1), pp. 100–102. 73. Noriega, A., Blanco, D. Alvarez, B.J. and Garcia, A., 2013. Dimensional Accuracy Improvement of FDM Square Cross-Section Parts Using Artificial Neural Networks and an Optimization Algorithm. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69 (9-12), pp. 2301–2313. 74. Neff, C., Trapuzzano, M. and Crane, N. B., 2016. Impact of Vapor Polishing on Surface Roughness and Mechanical Properties for 3D Printed ABS. Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference, May 2016. 75. Omar, A.M., 2015. Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Paramaters: A Review of Current Research and Future Prospect. Advances in Manufacturing, 3(1), pp.42-53.200 76. Pham, D. and Gault, R., 1998. A Comparison of Rapid Prototyping Technologies. International Journals of Mechanical and Manufacturing Design, 38(10-11), pp. 1257–1287. 77. Peterson, J.D., Vyazovkin, S. and Wight, C.A., 2001. Kinetics of the Thermal and ThermoOxidative Degradation of Polystyrene, Polyethylene and Poly (propylene). Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 202 (6), pp.775-784. 78. Penga, L., Shengqinb, J., Xiaoyanb, Z., Qianwub, H. and Weihaoc, Z., 2007. Direct Laser Fabrication of Thin-Walled Metal Parts Under Open-Loop Control. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47(6), pp. 996–1002. 79. Paul, R. and Anand, S., 2011. Optimal Part Orientation in Rapid Manufacturing Process for Achieving Geometric Tolerances. Journal of Manufacturing System, 30(4), pp. 214– 222. 80. Patel, J.P., Patel, C.P. and Patel, U.J., 2012. A Review on Various Approach for Process Parameter Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process and Taguchi Approach for Optimization. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(2), pp. 361-365. 81. Priedeman, W.R. and Smith, D.T., 2012. Smoothing Method for Layer Manufacturing Process. Canada. Pat. 81, 239, 99B2. 82. Percoco, G., Lavecchia, F. and Galantucci L.M., 2012. Compressive Properties of FDM Rapid Prototypes Treated with a Low Cost Chemical Finishing Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(19), pp. 3838-3842.201 83. Paul, R., Anand, S. and Gerner, F., 2014. Effect of Thermal Deformation on Part Errors in Metal Powder Based Additive Manufacturing Processes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 136(3). pp. 1-12. 84. Ponche, R., Kerbrat, O., Mognol, P. and Hascoet, J.-Y., 2014. A Novel Methodology of Design for Additive Manufacturing Applied to Additive Laser Manufacturing Process. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 30(4), pp. 389–398. 85. Reeves, P.E. and Cobb, R.C., 1997. Reducing the Surface Deviation of Stereolithography Using In-Process Techniques. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 3(1), pp. 20-31. 86. Rattanawong, W., Masood S.H. and Iovenitti, P., 2001. A Volumetric Approach to Part build Orientations in Rapid Prototyping. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 119(1-3), pp. 348-353. 87. Reddy, B.V., Reddy, N.V. and Ghosh, A., 2007. Fused Deposition Modelling Using Direct Extrusion, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2(1), pp. 51-60. 88. Raju, T. N. D. R. and Raju, V. R., 2010. An Experimental Investigation on Surface Quality and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Components, Internation Journal on Emerging Technologies, 1(2), pp. 106–111. 89. Rao, A. S., Dharap, M.A., Venkatesh, J. V. L. and Ojha, D., 2012. Investigation of Post Processing Techniques to Reduce The Surface Roughness Of Fused Deposition Modeled Parts. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 3(3), pp. 531-544.202 90. Ranjan, R., Samant,R. and Anand. S., 2017. Integration of Design for Manufacturing Methods With Topology Optimization in Additive Manufacturing, 91. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 139(6), pp. 1–14. Stratasys., 1992. Rapid Prototyping Using FDM : A Fast, Precise , Safe Technology, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Washington, 3-5 August 1992. Stratasys, Inc. 92. Spencer, J.D., Cobb, R.C. and Dickens, P.M., 1993a. Vibratory Finishing of Stereolithography Parts. Proceedings of 4th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Nottingham, UK, 1993. Manufacturing Engineering and Operations Management. 93. Spencer, J.D., Cobb, R.C., and Dickens, P.M., 1993b. Surface Finishing Techniques for Rapid Prototyping. Technical Paper PE93-169, Rapid Prototyping Conference Dearborn, Michigan, USA, 11-13 May 1993. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 94. Stratasys., 1997. Application Manual 3.0. [online] Available at: http://3d4u.org/MyFDM/wcontent/uploads/2010/12/2000APPL.pdf [Accessed on 26 November 2016). 95. Schmid, M., Simon, C. and Levy, G.N., 2009. Finishing Of SLS-Parts For Rapid Manufacturing (RM) – A Comprehensive Approach. Proceedings of 20th SolidFreeform Fabrication Symposium, Gallen, Switzerland, 15 September 2009. Institute for Rapid Product Development. 96. Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K. and Mahapatra, S.S., 2010. Parametric Appraisal of Mechanical Property of Fused Deposition Modeling Processed Parts. Materials & Design, 31(1), pp. 287-295.203 97. Sood, A.K., Mahapatra, S.S. and Ohdar, RK., 2011. Weighted Principal Component Approach for Improving Surface Finish of ABS Plastic Parts Built Through Fused Deposition Modelling Process. International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing, 2(1-2), pp. 4-27. 98. Sreedhar, P., Manikandan, C.M. and Jothi, G., 2012. Experimental Investigation of Surface Roughness for Fused Deposition Modeled Part with Different Angular Orientation. International Journal of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology, 5(3), pp. 21-28. 99. Seepersad, C. C., Govett, T., Kim, K., Lundin, M. and Pinero, D., 2012. A Designer’s Guide for Dimensioning and Tolerancing SLS Parts, 23rd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas, Austin, 2012. Department of Mechanical Engineering. 100. Sahu, R.K., Mahapatra, S. and Sood, A.K., 2013. A Study on Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processed Parts Using Fuzzy Logic, Journal for Manufacturing Science and Production, 13(3), pp. 183–197. 101. Singh, R., Singh, S., Preet, I., Fabbrocino, F. and Fraternali, F., 2017. Investigation for Surface Finish Improvement of FDM Parts by Vapor Smoothing Process. Composite. Part B.Engineering, 111, pp. 228–234. 102. Tiganis, B. E., Burn, L. S., Davis, P. and Hill, A. J., 2002. Thermal Degradation of Acrylonitrile – Butadiene – Styrene (ABS ) Blends. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 76(3), pp. 425–434.204 103. Thrimurthulu, K., Pandey, P.M. and Reddy, N.V., 2004. Optimum Part Deposition Orientation in Fused Deposition Modeling, International Journal of Machine Tools And Manufacture, 44(6), pp. 585–594. 104. Tymrak, B. M., Kreiger, M. and Pearce, J. M., 2014. Mechanical Properties of Components Fabricated with Open-Source 3-D Printers Under Realistic Environmental Conditions, Material & Design, 58, pp. 242–246. 105. Takagishi, K. and Umezu, S.,2017. Development of the Improving Process for the 3D Printed Structure, Sci, doi:10.1038/srep39852. 106. Vasudevarao, B., Natarajan, D.P. and Henderson, M., 2000. Sensitivity of RP Surface Finish to Process Parameter Variation, Proceedings of 11th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Arizona State University, Tempe, 2000, Department of Industrial Engineering. 107. Vijay, P., Danaiah, P. and Rajesh, K. V. D., 2011.Critical Parameters Effecting the Rapid Prototyping Surface Finish, Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, 1(1), pp. 17-20. 108. Wong, Y. S., Fuh, Y. H., Loh, H. T. and Mahesh, M., 2002. Rapid prototyping and Manufacturing Benchmarking, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 1, pp. 57–94. 109. Williams, R.E. and Melton, V.L., 1998. Abrasive Flow Finishing of Stereolithography Prototypes, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 4(2), pp. 56-67. 110. Wang, C.C., Lin, T.W and Hu, S.S., 2007. Optimizing the Rapid Prototyping Process by Integrating the Taguchi Method with the Gray Relational Analysis, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(5), pp. 304–315.205 111. Wilbert, D., Behrens, B., Zymla, C., Dambon, O. and Klocke, F., 2015. Robotic Finishing Process-An Extrusion Die Case Study. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 11, pp. 45-52. 112. Yasa, E., Deckers, J. and Kruth, J., 2011. The Investigation of the Influence of Laser Re-Melting on Density, Surface Quality and Microstructure of Selective Laser Melting Parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 17(5), pp.312-327. 113. Yousif, E. and Haddad. R., 2013. Photodegradation and Photostabilization of Polymer Especially Polystyrene : Review. SpringerPlus, 2(398), pp. 1-32. 114. Zazawati, M., 2003. Quality Assesment of Hollow Rapid Prototyping Model. Translated from English. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia: UTM Press. 115. Zhang, Y. and Chou, K., 2008. A Parametric Study of Part Distortions in Fused Deposition Modeling Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Part B, 222 (8), pp. 959-968. 116. Zinniel, R.L. 2008. Surface Treatment Method for Rapid-Manufacture Three-Dimensional Objects. United States Patent US0169585A1.

Improvement on mechanical properties and study of manufacturability of printed part fabricated via open source 3D printer

Similar Items