Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis

This research is focused on the development of finger type tactile sensor with surface roughness analysis.Among various human sensations like hearing,sight,taste and smell,touch is a critical co-existing sensation required to interact with surrounding environment.Therefore,it is believed that a good...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abd Rashid, Shafiyah
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23337/1/Development%20Of%20Finger%20Type%20Tactile%20Sensor%20With%20Surface%20Roughness%20Analysis.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23337/2/Development%20Of%20Finger%20Type%20Tactile%20Sensor%20With%20Surface%20Roughness%20Analysis.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.23337
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
topic T Technology (General)
T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
T Technology (General)
Abd Rashid, Shafiyah
Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis
description This research is focused on the development of finger type tactile sensor with surface roughness analysis.Among various human sensations like hearing,sight,taste and smell,touch is a critical co-existing sensation required to interact with surrounding environment.Therefore,it is believed that a good understanding between the touch and surface roughness have potential benefits to the performance of the finger type tactile sensor robot.Even though there is a lot of tactile sensor’s type used in robotic application but there is much less on work has been done on load cell.As far as it is concerned,tactile sensor,vison and audio system is very expensive. Therefore,something cheaper which is load cell is used as a replace for other expensive tactile sensor,in order to modelling and develop a finger type tactile sensor.So,a knowledge study regarding on tactile sensor,touch and grasping are investigated in order to proceed the research.Next,the finger type tactile sensor is designed and developed in SolidWorks software for visual-aided all the view of prototype.To achieve the sensory performance and function of the human fingertips,the design of the fingertips sensor mimics the human fingertips in many aspects,including its size and shape.As objects slide across the structure of surface roughness of the finger type tactile sensor,it generates force that measure in ADC (Volt) that are detected by a loadcells inside the holder.By using Graphical User Interface (GUI),data logging for every extracted graph of each experiment is performed.The developed finger type tactile sensor needs to be tested in order to identify the performance capability of the sensor according to the designed function.A set of 3D printed objects with different values of roughness has been prepared as the sample for this test.Then,for performance validation,Experiment 1: Calibration (Mitutoyo Precision Reference Specimen) has been conducted between using manual robot (Z-arm) and auto robot (Comau Robot).Comau Robot has been chosen as the most suitable robot for the rest of the experiments, then the work is extended to Experiment 2 (Test using Needle File) and Experiment 3 (Test using Tile).The experiment results show that the functionality of the finger type tactile sensor has been successfully validated and proven acceptable for all set of experiment.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Abd Rashid, Shafiyah
author_facet Abd Rashid, Shafiyah
author_sort Abd Rashid, Shafiyah
title Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis
title_short Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis
title_full Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis
title_fullStr Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis
title_sort development of finger type tactile sensor with surface roughness analysis
granting_institution UTeM
granting_department Faculty Of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23337/1/Development%20Of%20Finger%20Type%20Tactile%20Sensor%20With%20Surface%20Roughness%20Analysis.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23337/2/Development%20Of%20Finger%20Type%20Tactile%20Sensor%20With%20Surface%20Roughness%20Analysis.pdf
_version_ 1747834038271344640
spelling my-utem-ep.233372022-02-16T12:13:12Z Development Of Finger Type Tactile Sensor With Surface Roughness Analysis 2018 Abd Rashid, Shafiyah T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) This research is focused on the development of finger type tactile sensor with surface roughness analysis.Among various human sensations like hearing,sight,taste and smell,touch is a critical co-existing sensation required to interact with surrounding environment.Therefore,it is believed that a good understanding between the touch and surface roughness have potential benefits to the performance of the finger type tactile sensor robot.Even though there is a lot of tactile sensor’s type used in robotic application but there is much less on work has been done on load cell.As far as it is concerned,tactile sensor,vison and audio system is very expensive. Therefore,something cheaper which is load cell is used as a replace for other expensive tactile sensor,in order to modelling and develop a finger type tactile sensor.So,a knowledge study regarding on tactile sensor,touch and grasping are investigated in order to proceed the research.Next,the finger type tactile sensor is designed and developed in SolidWorks software for visual-aided all the view of prototype.To achieve the sensory performance and function of the human fingertips,the design of the fingertips sensor mimics the human fingertips in many aspects,including its size and shape.As objects slide across the structure of surface roughness of the finger type tactile sensor,it generates force that measure in ADC (Volt) that are detected by a loadcells inside the holder.By using Graphical User Interface (GUI),data logging for every extracted graph of each experiment is performed.The developed finger type tactile sensor needs to be tested in order to identify the performance capability of the sensor according to the designed function.A set of 3D printed objects with different values of roughness has been prepared as the sample for this test.Then,for performance validation,Experiment 1: Calibration (Mitutoyo Precision Reference Specimen) has been conducted between using manual robot (Z-arm) and auto robot (Comau Robot).Comau Robot has been chosen as the most suitable robot for the rest of the experiments, then the work is extended to Experiment 2 (Test using Needle File) and Experiment 3 (Test using Tile).The experiment results show that the functionality of the finger type tactile sensor has been successfully validated and proven acceptable for all set of experiment. 2018 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23337/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23337/1/Development%20Of%20Finger%20Type%20Tactile%20Sensor%20With%20Surface%20Roughness%20Analysis.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23337/2/Development%20Of%20Finger%20Type%20Tactile%20Sensor%20With%20Surface%20Roughness%20Analysis.pdf text en validuser http://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=112297 mphil masters UTeM Faculty Of Manufacturing Engineering 1. Aaron. B., 2011. How can robot get our attentions?. [online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Boc6xyQSGDU[Accessed on Dec 2013]. 2. ABB Robotics., 2014. High Speed Pancake Stucking with Flexpicker Robots. [online] Available at: https://malaysia.video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=ABB+IRB+360+%E2%80%9CFlex+picker%E2%80%9D&fr=yhsinvalid#id=10&vid=c75baf705afaff64c27154559f4aaca1&action=view[Accessed on 2014]. 3. Aldebaran., 2015. Nao Next Gen Humanoid Robot. [online] Available at: https://thehiphopdiaries.com/2011/12/18/video-nao-next-gen-humanoid-robot/[Accessed on Dec 2015]. 4. Arian, M.S., 2014. Using the BioTac as a tumor localization tool. IEEE Haptics Symposium, HAPTICS, pp.443-448. 5. Balakirsky, S., & Scrapper, C., 2007. USARSim: A robot simulator for research and education. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1400-1405. 6. Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P. E., Read, R., Wood, R., Cuayáhuitl, H., Kiefer, B., Humbert, R., 2012). Multimodal Child-Robot Interaction: Building Social Bonds. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(2), pp. 33-53. 7. Beran, T. N., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Kuzyk, R., Fior, M., & Nugent, S., 2011. Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in childrobot interaction. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(7–8), pp. 539-550. 8. Bierbaum, A., Rambow, M., Asfour, T., and Dillmann, R., 2008. A potential field approach to dexterous tactile exploration of unknown objects. 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference, pp. 360-366. 9. Bohg, J., Morales, A., Asfour, T., and Kragic, D., 2014. Data-driven grasp synthesisa survey, IEEE Trans, 30(2), pp. 289-309. 10. Brave S. and Dahley., 1997. A. inTouch: A Medium for Haptic Interpersonal Communication. Proceedings of CHI ’97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing System, pp. 363-364. 11. Campos, M. and Bajcsy, R., 1991. A robotic haptic system architecture. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 338-343. 12. Chaudhuri, A., 2011. Fundamentals of Sensory Perception. Oxford University Press. 13. Connolly, C., 2007. ABB high-speed picking robots establish themselves in food packaging. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 34(4), pp. 281-4. 14. Drimus, A., 2014. Design of a flexible tactile sensor for classification of rigid and deformable objects. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 62(1), pp.3-15. 15. Fasse, E. D. and Neville H., 1994. Quantitative Measurement of Haptic Perception. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 4, pp. 3199-3204. 16. Fishel, J.A. and Loeb, G.E., 2012. Sensing tactile microvibrations with the BioTac Comparison with human sensitivity. Proceedings of IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp.1122-1127. 17. Fishel, J.A., Santos, V.J. and Loeb, G.E., 2008. A robust micro-vibration sensor for biomimetic fingertips. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2008, 6106, pp.659-663. 18. Geoffrey A., 2006. Design of a Social Mobile Robot Using Emotion-Based Decision Mechanisms. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference Oct, pp.3093-3098. 19. Gohil, V.J., 2013. Robotics Arm Control Using Haptic Technology., 2(2), pp.98-102. 20. Gouaillier, D., Collette, C. and Kilner, C., 2010. Omni-directional closed-loop walk 93 for NAO. 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Humanoids, pp. 448-454. 21. Gouaillier, D., Hugel, V., Blazevic, P., Kilner, C., Monceaux, J., Lafourcade, P., Maisonnier, B., 2009. Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 769-774. 22. Goyal, M., 2013. Haptics: Technology Based on Touch. International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology, pp.468-471. 23. Guo, D., 2017. Robotic grasping using visual and tactile sensing. Information Sciences, 417, pp.274-286. 24. Haibin, Y., 2018. Modeling of grasping force for a soft robotic gripper with variable stiffness. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 128, pp.254-274. 25. Hannaford, B., Wood, L., McAffee, D. and Zak, H., 1991. Performance Evaluation of a Six-axis Generalized Forcereflecting Tele-operator. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(3), pp. 620-633. 26. Hashimoto, T., Hitramatsu, S., Tsuji, T. and Kobayashi, H., 2006. Development of the face robot SAYA for rich facial expressions. International Joint Conference of SICE-ICASE, pp. 5423-5428. 27. He, B., 2018. Sensors and Actuators A : Physical A multi-layered touch-pressure sensing ionogel material suitable for sensing integrated actuations of soft robots. Sensors & Actuators: A. Physical, 272, pp.341-348. 28. Healy, A. H., Proctor R. W., 2003. Experimental Psychology Wiley. Handbook of Psychology. New York. 29. Hu, H., 2014. A Finger-Shaped Tactile Sensor for Fabric Surfaces Evaluation by 2-Dimensional Active Sliding Touch. PMC Journal, 14(3). 30. Ichikawa, H., Chandrasiri, N. P. and Harashima., 2003. The effect of congruent facial expression on counterpart’s facial response. Technical Report of IEICE, PRMU2002-210, pp.59-64. 31. Jones, L.A. and Lederman, S.J., 2006. Human Hand Function. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 32. Kandel, J. H., 2000. Principles of Neural Science (4ͭ ͪ ed.), McGraw-Hill Medical, New York. 33. Kawamura, K. and Wilkes, D., 1996. Humanoids: Future robots for home and factory. Humanoid Robots, pp.53-62. 34. Kaspar., 2009. New Robot with Artificial Skin to Improve Human Communication. [online] Available at:. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090430065818.htm/[Accessed on 9 May 2009]. 35. Kim, S. H., Engel J., Liu C. and Jones D. L., 2005. Texture classification using a polymer-based MEMS tactile sensor. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering.15(5). 36. Kim, S. S., Sripati, A. P., Vogelstein, R. J., Armiger, R. S., Russell, A. F., and Bensmaia S. J., 2009. Conveying tactile feedback in sensorized hand neuroprostheses using a biofidelic model of mechanotransduction. IEEE Trans. Biomed, pp. 398-404. 37. Kitamura, S., 2005. Recognition and Cutting System of Sweet Pepper for Picking Robot in Greenhouse Horticulture. International Joint Conference on SICE-ICASE, pp.1807-1812. 38. Kokorro. C., 2013. UCSD’s robot baby Diego san appears on video for the first time. [online] Available at: http://newatlas.com/ucsd-robot-baby-diego-san/25681[Accessed on Jan 201]. 39. Lederman, S.J. and Klatzky, R.L., 1987. Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive psychology, 19, pp. 342-368. 40. Lee, Y. J., 2010. The Roles of Haptic Perception in Visual Arts, pp.49-60. 41. Lee S. and Yamanaka T., 2007. On Kansei and Kansei Design a Description of Japanese Design Approach. IaSDR07 International Association of Societies of Design Research, pp. 1-18. 42. Lévy, P., 2007. Beyond Kansei Engineering : The Emancipation of Kansei. , 7(2), pp.83-94. 43. Lin, C.H. et al., 2009. Signal processing and fabrication of a biomimetic tactile sensor array with thermal, force and microvibration modalities. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2009, pp.129-134. 44. Liu, X., 2013. Department of Mechanical Engineering Understanding the effect of skin mechanical properties on the friction of human finger- pads. 45. Loeb, G.E., 2009. Taking control of prosthetic arms. JAMA : journal of the American Medical Association, 301(6), pp.670-671. 46. Loeb, G.E. et al., 2011. Understanding haptics by evolving mechatronic systems. Progress in Brain Research, 192, pp.129-144. 47. Loomis, J. N., and Lederman S. J., 1986. Cognitive Processes and Performance. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. 48. Maria, G. De, Natale, C., and Pirozzi, S., 2012. Sensors and Actuators A : Physical Force / tactile sensor for robotic applications. Sensors & Actuators: A. Physical, 175, pp.60-72. 49. Matulevich, B., Loeb, G.E., and Fishel, J.A., 2013. Utility of contact detection reflexes in prosthetic hand control. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (Figure 2), pp.4741-4746. 50. Mcmahon, I., 2012. Robotic Learning of Haptic Adjectives Through Physical Interaction. In: Science Direct, 63(3), pp. 279-292. 51. Moisio, S., 2013. Model of tactile sensors using soft contacts and its application in robot grasping simulation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(1), pp.1-12. 52. Muhammad, H.B., 2011. Development Of A Bio - Inspired Mems Based Tactile Sensor Array. 53. M. Lee., 2000. Tactile sensing: new directions, new challenges. International Journal of Robotics Research, 19(7), pp. 636-643. 54. Naish, M. D., Patel, R. V. A., Trejos, L. and M. T. Perri., 2011. Robotic Techniques for Minimally Invasive Tumor Localization. Surgical Robotics, City of Publisher, USA: Springer US, 20, pp. 469-496. 55. Naya, F., Yamato, J. and Shinozawa, K., 1936. Recognizing Human Touching Behaviors using a Haptic Interface for a Pet-robot Touching behaviors and experiment. IEEE SMC ’99, pp.3-7. 56. Now, J.C., 2005.Developing Robots for Daily Life., pp.1-4. 57. Ohka, M., Miyaoka, T. and Yussof, H., 2012. Grasping Strategy and Control Algorithm of Two Robotic Fingers Equipped with Optical Three-Axis Tactile Sensors. IRIS 2012, pp.1573-1579. 58. Ohka, M., Miyaoka, T. and Yussof, H., 2008. A robotic finger equipped with an optical three-axis tactile sensor. International Conference on Robotics and Automation.74(740), pp. 3425-3430. 59. Okada, K., Kojima, M., Sagawa, Y., Ichino, T., Sato, K. and Inaba, M., 2006. Vision based behavior verification system of humanoid robot for daily environment tasks. Proceedings of the 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, HUMANOIDS, pp. 7-12. 60. Osada, J., Ohnaka, S. and Sato, M., 2006. The scenario and design process of childcare robot, PaPeRo. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology - ACE ‟06, pp. 80-84. 61. Parkdeen., 2012. The World Through our Sense. [online] Available at: https://parkdee.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/microsoft-word-chapter-%201-the-world-through-our-senses-doc.pdf[Accessed on 2012]. 62. Payeur, P. et al., 2005. Intelligent Haptic Sensor System. Proceeding of IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 54(4), pp.1583-1592. 63. Pepper., 2015. The Humanoid Robot. Softbank Robotics. [online] Available at: https://www.ald.softbankrobotics.com/en/about-us[Accessed on 2015]. 64. Power, E., 2004. In: Kansei Engineering Seminar , Venue : B6605, FSE Conference Room, City University of Hong Kong, Wednesday, 3rd March 2004. 65. Qin, L. and Zhang, Y., 2018. Sensors and Actuators A : Physical Roughness discrimination with bio-inspired tactile sensor manually sliding on polished surfaces. Sensors & Actuators: A. Physical, 279, pp.433-441. 66. Rich, C., Ponsler, B., Holroyd, A. and Sidner, C. L., 2010. Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010 5th ACM/IEEE, pp. 375-382. 67. Repperger, D. W., Phillips, C. A., and Chelette, T. L., 1995. A Study on Spatially Induced Virtual Force with an Information Theoretic Investigation of Human Performance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 25(10), pp. 1392-1404. 68. Russel, J. A., 1980. A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), pp.1161-1178. 69. Sentis L., 2013. Robot Dreamer. [online] Available at: https://news.utexas.edu/2013/10/25/robot-dreamer-more-than-just-a-pretty-face[Accessed on Oct 2013]. 70. Shiizuka. H., 2014. Theoretical and Practical Aspects on Kansei / Affective Engineering. In: iEECON 2014. The 2014 International Electrical Engineering Congress, March 2014; Pattaya City, Thailand. 71. Shri A., 2014. Haptic Technology. [online] Available at: http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/bhaishriakash2123202-haptic-technology/[Accessed on Feb 2014]. 72. Sinapov, J., Sukhoy, V., and Stoytchev, A., 2011. Vibrotactile recognition and categorization of surfaces by a humanoid robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 27( 3), pp. 488-497. 73. Sivaraj. A., 2012. Haptic Technology. [online] Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/arunsiv/haptic-technology-ppt[Accessed on 2 August 2012]. 74. Sofge. E., 2013. The Sensitive Robot: How Haptic Technology is Closing The Mechanical Gap. [online] Available at: http://www.popsci.com/trp-sponsored-article-haptics[Accessed on March 2013]. 75. Sommer, N. and Billard, A., 2016. Multi-contact haptic exploration and grasping with tactile sensors. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 85, pp.48-61. 76. Su, Z. et al., 2012. Use of tactile feedback to control exploratory movements to characterize object compliance. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, pp.1-9. 77. Tiwana, M. I., Redmond, S. J., and Lovell, N. H., 2012. A review of tactile sensing technologies with applications in biomedical engineering. Scopus, 179, pp. 17-31. 78. T. Shibata, et aI., 1996. Spontaneous Behavior of Robots for Cooperation Emotionally Intelligent Robot System, Proceeding of IEEE ICRA'96, pp. 2426-2431. 79. Usui, T. et al., 2008. A Robotic Kansei Communication System Based on Emotional Synchronization. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems Acropolis Convention Center, Nice, France, Sept 2008, pp.22-26. 80. Volkov, S. and Vance, J.M., 2001. Effectiveness of Haptic Sensation for the Evaluation of Virtual Prototypes. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 1(2). 81. Wettels, N. and Loeb, G.E., 2011. Haptic Feature Extraction from a Biomimetic Tactile Sensor, pp.2471-2478. 82. Wettels, N., 2008. Biomimetic Tactile Sensor Array. Advanced Robotics, 22(8), pp.829-849. 83. Wettels, N., Fishel, J. a., et al., 2009. Multi-modal synergistic tactile sensing. Proceeding of IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robotics, 105(2), pp.2-4. 84. Wettels, N., Fishel, J.A., and Loeb, G.E., 2014. Multimodal tactile sensor. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, pp.405-405. 85. Wettels, N., Parnandi, A.R., et al., 2009. Grip control using biomimetic tactile sensing systems. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 14(6), pp.718-723. 86. Wettels, N., Santos, V.J., et al., 2008. Biomimetic Tactile Sensor Array. Advanced Robotics, 22(8), pp.829-849. 87. Wettels, N., Smith, L.M., et al., 2008. Deformable skin design to enhance response of a biomimetic tactile sensor. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp.132-137. 88. Yi, Z., Zhang, Y. and Peters, J., 2017. Sensors and Actuators A : Physical Bioinspired tactile sensor for surface roughness discrimination. Sensors & Actuators: A. Physical, 255, pp.46-53. 89. Yohanan S. and Maclean K.E. 2008., The Haptic Creature Project : Social Human-Robot Interaction through Affective Touch. Proceeding of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’09), Boston, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 1-5. 90. Yousef, H., Nikolovski, J. and Martincic, E., 2011. Flexible 3D Force Tactile Sensor for Artificial Skin for Anthropomorphic Robotic Hand. Procedia Engineering, 25, pp.128-131. 91. Zaidi, L., 2017. Model-based strategy for grasping 3 D deformable objects using a multi-fingered robotic hand. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 95, pp.196-206.