Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector

Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector

Healthcare sector one of the key economic driver and crucial sector in nation Gross Domestic Product (GDP) contribution. Healthcare sector in Malaysia consists with three main industries, Pharmaceutical, Medical device and Biotechnology. Malaysian government had segregates lumps of funds to evolve t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Subramaniam, Nalini
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
H Social Sciences (General)
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23349/1/Innovation%20Factors%20Toward%20Enhancing%20Organisation%20Performance%20-%20A%20Study%20On%20The%20Malaysian%20Healthcare%20Sector.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23349/2/Innovation%20Factors%20Toward%20Enhancing%20Organisation%20Performance%20-%20A%20Study%20On%20The%20Malaysian%20Healthcare%20Sector.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.23349
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
topic H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences (General)
Subramaniam, Nalini
Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector
description Healthcare sector one of the key economic driver and crucial sector in nation Gross Domestic Product (GDP) contribution. Healthcare sector in Malaysia consists with three main industries, Pharmaceutical, Medical device and Biotechnology. Malaysian government had segregates lumps of funds to evolve the healthcare industry in transition towards innovation economy by 2020. Currently Malaysian obtained capable infrastructure such as manufacturing plant and in house Research and Development (R&D). However, healthcare industry slow in modification and innovates business model which leads the healthcare industry left behind compare to other developing countries such as China and India. Moreover, most of major death caused in Malaysia were chronic diseases. Malaysia forced to export generic medicines from foreign market and government spend lump of funds on medicines and medical equipment export even on generic medicines. On the other side, Malaysia healthcare sector attract most of medical traveler with its traditional therapies and reasonable medical expenses. Malaysia have been as one of the medical hub in ASEAN countries, however the industry faces tough competition in terms of price and quality along with its neighbour countries. Recently a few scholar has has underlined factors that determined innovation in healthcare. However, there has limited empirical evidence proposing an innovation factors towards enhancing organization performance of healthcare in Malaysian context. Therefore, more research needed to address the antecedents of innovation practice in order to boost up an organization performance in healthcare sector. Limited studies on innovation factors in healthcare sector in Malaysian context leads the path to researcher to overview on innovation factors which could boost the organization performance in terms of profit, sales, market share, and export rate, number of patents and global entry of the firm. Hence, Healthcare industry have capability to increase innovation to the next level and simultaneously enhance the contribution of gross domestic product and export activity. This study have identifies top management support, market orientation and research and development (R&D) alliance as an innovation factors which tested over organization performance of the healthcare industry. This study has attempted to analyze the innovation activities in healthcare industry in order to understand the factors leading to innovation towards enhancing organization performance. A research model has been developed and empirically tested through survey with 330 companies as a sample size. This study obtained data from 95 companies and were analyzed through logistics and multiple regression using SPSS. The result of this study indicated top management support as a most significant factor which influence organization performance in the context of healthcare industry in Malaysia.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Subramaniam, Nalini
author_facet Subramaniam, Nalini
author_sort Subramaniam, Nalini
title Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector
title_short Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector
title_full Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector
title_fullStr Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector
title_full_unstemmed Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector
title_sort innovation factors toward enhancing organisation performance : a study on the malaysian healthcare sector
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty Of Technology Management And Technopreneurship
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23349/1/Innovation%20Factors%20Toward%20Enhancing%20Organisation%20Performance%20-%20A%20Study%20On%20The%20Malaysian%20Healthcare%20Sector.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23349/2/Innovation%20Factors%20Toward%20Enhancing%20Organisation%20Performance%20-%20A%20Study%20On%20The%20Malaysian%20Healthcare%20Sector.pdf
_version_ 1747834041513541632
spelling my-utem-ep.233492022-02-22T11:12:06Z Innovation Factors Toward Enhancing Organisation Performance : A Study On The Malaysian Healthcare Sector 2018 Subramaniam, Nalini H Social Sciences (General) HD Industries. Land use. Labor Healthcare sector one of the key economic driver and crucial sector in nation Gross Domestic Product (GDP) contribution. Healthcare sector in Malaysia consists with three main industries, Pharmaceutical, Medical device and Biotechnology. Malaysian government had segregates lumps of funds to evolve the healthcare industry in transition towards innovation economy by 2020. Currently Malaysian obtained capable infrastructure such as manufacturing plant and in house Research and Development (R&D). However, healthcare industry slow in modification and innovates business model which leads the healthcare industry left behind compare to other developing countries such as China and India. Moreover, most of major death caused in Malaysia were chronic diseases. Malaysia forced to export generic medicines from foreign market and government spend lump of funds on medicines and medical equipment export even on generic medicines. On the other side, Malaysia healthcare sector attract most of medical traveler with its traditional therapies and reasonable medical expenses. Malaysia have been as one of the medical hub in ASEAN countries, however the industry faces tough competition in terms of price and quality along with its neighbour countries. Recently a few scholar has has underlined factors that determined innovation in healthcare. However, there has limited empirical evidence proposing an innovation factors towards enhancing organization performance of healthcare in Malaysian context. Therefore, more research needed to address the antecedents of innovation practice in order to boost up an organization performance in healthcare sector. Limited studies on innovation factors in healthcare sector in Malaysian context leads the path to researcher to overview on innovation factors which could boost the organization performance in terms of profit, sales, market share, and export rate, number of patents and global entry of the firm. Hence, Healthcare industry have capability to increase innovation to the next level and simultaneously enhance the contribution of gross domestic product and export activity. This study have identifies top management support, market orientation and research and development (R&D) alliance as an innovation factors which tested over organization performance of the healthcare industry. This study has attempted to analyze the innovation activities in healthcare industry in order to understand the factors leading to innovation towards enhancing organization performance. A research model has been developed and empirically tested through survey with 330 companies as a sample size. This study obtained data from 95 companies and were analyzed through logistics and multiple regression using SPSS. The result of this study indicated top management support as a most significant factor which influence organization performance in the context of healthcare industry in Malaysia. 2018 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23349/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23349/1/Innovation%20Factors%20Toward%20Enhancing%20Organisation%20Performance%20-%20A%20Study%20On%20The%20Malaysian%20Healthcare%20Sector.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23349/2/Innovation%20Factors%20Toward%20Enhancing%20Organisation%20Performance%20-%20A%20Study%20On%20The%20Malaysian%20Healthcare%20Sector.pdf text en validuser http://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=113301 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty Of Technology Management And Technopreneurship 1. Alshahry and Aimin, W..,2015. Market Orientation Impact on Radical and Incremental Marketing Innovation: A Study of Saudi Arabia Hospital Marketing Efforts. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 1(6), pp.101–117. 2. Abdellah, A., Mi, N., Khalifa, S.A.M., Zaki, R., Sulaiman, A.S., and Abedallah, A., 2016. Research and Reviews : Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences A Challenge Facing the Malaysian Pharmaceutical Sector : Quality and Affordability of the National Medications, 5 (3), pp.71–77. 3. Altuntaş, G., Semerciöz, F., and Eregez, H., 2013. Linking Strategic and Market Orientations to Organizational Performance: The Role of Innovation in Private Healthcare Organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, pp.413–419. 4. Acar,A. Z. and Acar, P., 2012a. The Effects of Organizational Culture and Innovativeness on Business Performance in Healthcare Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58 (0), pp.683–692. 5. Acar, A.Z. and Acar, P., 2012b. The Effects of Organizational Culture and Innovativeness on Business Performance in Healthcare Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, pp.683–692. 6. Achilladelis, B. and Antonakis, N., 2001. The dynamics of technological innovation: the case of the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30 (4), pp.535–588. 7. Adis, A. A., and Jublee, E.,2010. Market orientation and new product performance : The 8. mediating role of product advantage, 2(August), pp.91–100. 9. Agarwal, S., Erramilli, M. K., & Dev, C. S. ,2003. Market orientation and performance in service firms: role of innovation. Journal of services marketing, 17(1), pp.68-82 10. Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Lynn, G. S., and Keskin, H. 2007. Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects. Technovation, 27(10), pp. 628–639. 11. Al-alak, B. A. 2012. Bridging the Gap Between R and D- Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry In Malaysia, 1(2), pp.74–85. 12. Al-alak, B.A. and Tarabieh, S., 2011. Gaining Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance Through Customer Orientation, Innovation Differentiation and Market Differentiation. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1 (5), pp.80–91. 13. Alam, M., Mohammadi, D., Noor, M., and Ali, A.,2015. Human Resource Management Orientation and Market Orientation Effect on Perceived Organizational Performance Mediated by Innovation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 23(9), pp.2155–2165. 14. Al-Mamary, Y.H., Shamsuddin, A., and Aziati, N., 2015. The Pilot Test Study of Relationship Between Management Information Systems Success Factors and organizational performance at Sabafon Company in Yemen. International Journal of U-and E-Service, Science and Technology, 8 (2), pp.337–346. 15. Altuntaş, G., Semerciöz, F., and Eregez, H. 2013. Linking Strategic and Market Orientations to Organizational Performance: The Role of Innovation in Private Healthcare Organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, pp.413–419. 16. Alexiev, A.S., Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F. a. J., and Volberda, H.W., 2010. Top Management Team Advice Seeking and Exploratory Innovation: The Moderating Role of TMT Heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, (November). 17. Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., and Sarvan, F., 2013. The Relationship between Innovation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Turkish Automotive Supplier Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, pp.226–235. 18. Avlonitis, G. J., & Gounaris, S. P.,1997. Marketing orientation and company performance: industrial vs. consumer goods companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(5), pp.385-402. 19. Auh, S. and Menguc, B., 2005. Top management team diversity and innovativeness : The moderating role of interfunctional coordination, 34, pp.249–261. 20. Azizi, A. and Adis, A., 2009. Factors Affecting New Product Development in Malaysian Manufacturing Industry, 4 (4). 21. Barczak, G., Griffin, A., and Kahn, K.B., 2009. PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study *. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26 (1), pp.3–23. 22. Barney, J., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp.99–120. 23. Barney, J.B., 2001. Is the Resource-Based View A Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review. 24. Barney, J.B., Ketchen, D.J., and Wright, M., 2011. The Future of Resource-Based Theory: Revitalization or Decline? Journal of Management, 37 (5), pp.1299–1315. 25. Bers, J.A., Dismukes, J.P., Miller, L.K., and Dubrovensky, A., 2009. Accelerated radical innovation: Theory and application. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (1), pp.165–177. 26. Bozic, N. and Olsson, B.K., 2013. Culture for Radical Innovation : What can business learn from creative processes of contemporary dancers ? Culture for Radical Innovation : What can business learn from creative processes of, 2 (1), pp.59–83. 27. Buschgens, T., Bausch, A., and Balkin, D.B., 2013. Organizational culture and innovation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (4), pp.763–781. 28. Carsrud, A. 2009. Study of Young Biotechnology Ventures in the United States and in Scandinavia, 47(3),pp.331–369. 29. Caruana, A., Pitt, L., & Ewing, M. 2003. The market orientation-performance link: the role of service reliability. The Service Industries Journal, 23(4),pp.25-41 30. Chen, L., 2012. A Mixed Methods Study Investigating Intangibles in the Banking Sector. University of Glasgow. 31. Chong, A.Y.L., Chan, F.T.S., Ooi, K.B., and Sim, J.J., 2011. Can Malaysian firms improve organizational/innovation performance via SCM? Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111 (3), pp.410–431. 32. Chowdhury, M. M. H. 2011. Ethical issues as competitive advantage for bank management. Humanomics, 27(2),pp.109-120 33. Coccia, M., 2012a. Driving forces of technological change in medicine: Radical innovations induced by side effects and their impact on society and healthcare. Technology in Society, 34 (4), pp.271–283. 34. Coccia, M., 2012b. Driving forces of technological change in medicine: Radical innovations induced by side effects and their impact on society and healthcare. Technology in Society, 34 (4), pp.271–283. 35. Cooper, R.G. and Edgett, S.J., 2008. Benchmarking Best Practices Performance Results and the Role of Senior Management. Product Management, 3 (1), pp.1–7. 36. Cromer, C.T. and Craig, J.B., 2011. A Study of Schumpterian ( Radical ) vs . Kirznerian ( Incremental ) Innovations in Knowledge Intensive Industries Clay Dibrell, 7 (1973), pp.28–42. 37. Danzon, P.M., Nicholson, S., and Pereira, N.S., 2005. Productivity in pharmaceutical-biotechnology RandD: the role of experience and alliances. Journal of health economics, 24 (2), pp.317–339. 38. Deshpandé, R. and Farley, J. U.,1998a. Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis. Journal of Market-Focused Management 2,pp.213-232 39. De Tienne, D. and Mallette, P., 2012. Antecedents and Outcomes of Innovation-Oriented Cultures. International Journal of Business and Management, 7 (18), pp.1–11. 40. Didonet, S.R., Maria, A., and Toaldo, M., 2015. Market Orientation and Sources of Knowledge for Innovation in SMEs : a firm level study, 11 (3), pp.1–15. 41. Dubickis, M. and Gaile-Sarkane, E., 2015. Perspectives on Innovation and Technology Transfer. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp.965–970. 42. Essén, A. and Lindblad, S., 2013. Innovation as emergence in healthcare: unpacking change from within. Social science & medicine (1982), 93, pp.203–211. 43. Fatokun, O., Ibrahim, M.I., and Hassali, M. a., 2013. Factors determining the post-patent entry of generic medicines in Malaysia: A survey of the Malaysian generic pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector, 10 (1), pp.22–33. 44. Farrell, M. A., Oczkowski, E., & Kharabsheh, R. 2008. Market orientation, learning orientation and organisational performance in international joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(3), pp.289-308 45. Felekoglu, B. and Moultrie, J., 2014. Top management involvement in new product development: A review and synthesis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (1), pp.159–175. 46. Fierro-Jesus Cambra, 2011. Inter-firm market orientation as antecedent of knowledge transfer , innovation and value creation in networks. 47. Gault, F., 2016. Defining and Measuring Innovation in all Sectors of the Economy: Policy Relevance. OECD Blue Sky Forum III, (September 2016), pp.1–22. 48. Gavronski, I., Klassen, R.D., Vachon, S., and Nascimento, L.F.M. Do, 2011. A Resource-Based View of Green Supply Management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47 (6), pp.872–885. 49. Gie Yong, A., and Pearce, S.,2013. A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2),pp.79–94. 50. Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., and Alpkan, L., 2011. Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133 (2), pp.662–676. 51. Glor, E.D., 2014. Studying the impact of innovation on organizations, organizational populations and organizational communities: A framework for research. Innovation Journal, 19 (3), pp.1–20. 52. Greenley, G. E.,1995. Forms of market orientation in UK companies. Journal of Management Studies, 32(1), pp 47-66 53. Habidin, N.F., 2016. The impact of lean healthcare practice on healthcare performance : the mediating role of supply chain innovation in Malaysian healthcare industry Nurul Fadly Habidin * Nurul Aifaa Shazali , Naimah Ali and Nur Afni Khaidir Osman Jusoh, 8 (1), pp.79–93. 54. Hami, N., 2015. Sustainable Manufacturing Practice and Sustainability Performance Mediated by Innovation Performance. Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka. 55. Han, J. K., Kim, N., and Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Orientation Performance : Organizational Is Innovation a Missing Link ? Market. Journal of Marketing, 62,pp.30–45. 56. Hannon, A. and Callaghan, E.G., 2011. Definitions and organizational practice of sustainability in the for-profit sector of Nova Scotia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19 (8), pp.877–884. 57. Harmancioglu, N., Grinstein, A., and Goldman, A., 2010. Innovation and performance outcomes of market information collection efforts: The role of top management team involvement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (1), pp.33–43. 58. Hendy, J. and Barlow, J., 2013. Adoption in practice: The relationship between managerial interpretations of evidence and the adoption of a healthcare innovation. Health Policy and Technology, 2 (4), pp.216–221. 59. Hidayah Jamaludin, N., Habidin, N.F., Shazali, N.A., Ali, N., and Khaidir, N.A., 2013. Exploring Sustainable Healthcare Service and Sustainable Healthcare Performance: Based on Malaysian Healthcare Industry, 3 (1), pp.14–26. 60. Hughs, M., Schultz, K., Sheu, J., and Tschopp, D.,2007. The Innovation Gap in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery and New Models for R and D Success, pp.36-40. 61. Hsieh, M. H., Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. R. 2008. The moderating effects of market orientation and launch proficiency on the product advantage–performance relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(5), pp. 580-592 62. Ifinedo, P. 2008. Impacts of business vision, top management support, and external expertise on ERP success. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4),pp. 551–568. 63. “Innovating for a Healthier, Economically Vibrant Nation”, 2012, Pharmaceutical Association of Malaysia (PhAMA), Industry Fact Book. 64. Jabar, J. and Soosay, C., 2011. Organisational learning as an antecedent of technology transfer and new product development A study of manufacturing firms in Malaysia, 22 (1), pp.25–45. 65. John.W.Cresswell .,2012. Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Bostan. Pearson 66. Juma, C., 2014. Complexity, Innovation, and Development: Schumpeter Revisited. Journal of Policy and Complex Systems, 1 (1), pp.4–21. 67. Khaidir, N.A., Habidin, N.F., Ali, N., Shazali, N.A., and Jamaludin, N.H., 2013. Six Sigma Practices and Organizational Performance in Malaysian Healthcare Industry, 6 (5), pp.29–37. 68. K. Digalwar, A., R. Tagalpallewar, A., and K. Sunnapwar, V. 2013. Green manufacturing performance measures: an empirical investigation from Indian manufacturing industries. Measuring Business Excellence, 17(4), pp.59–75. 69. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J.,1990. Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 54(2),pp.1-18 70. Kumar, R..,2011. Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. Los Angeles, SAGE. 71. Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., and Leone, R. P, 2011. Is Market Orientation a Source of or Simply the Cost of Competing ?, 75(January), pp.16–30. 72. Kotler, P. 2010. Principles of Marketing: A South Asian Perspective, 13/E: Pearson Education India 73. Kowang, T.O. and Rasli, A., 2011. New product development in multi-location R and D organization : A concurrent engineering approach. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (6), pp.2264–2275. 74. Kowang, T.O., 2012. Framework for New product development performance for research and development companies in Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 75. Kowang, T.O., Rasli, A., and Long, C.S., 2014. Jurnal Teknologi Full paper New Product Development in Malaysia : Does Organizational Background, 3, pp.113–117. 76. Latib, M.Roh.B.A., 2011. Critical Success Factors In New Product Development : A Survey In Malaysian Manufacturing Industry Graduate School of Business Universiti Utara Malaysia. 77. Langerak, F., 2004. The Impact of Market Orientation, Product Advantage, and Launch Proficiency on New Product Performance and Organizational Performance, 21 (2), pp.79–94 78. . 79. Lewrick, M., Omar, M., and Williams, R. L.,2011. Management and Innovation Market Orientation and Innovators ’ Success : an Exploration of the Influence of Customer and Competitor Orientation. Journal of Technology Manangement * Innovation, 6(3). 80. Liao, S.-H., Chang, W.-J., Wu, C.-C., and Katrichis, J.M., 2011. A survey of market orientation research (1995–2008). Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (2), pp.301–310 81. Li, J. J., & Zhou, K. Z.,2010. How foreign firms achieve competitive advantage in the Chinese emerging economy: Managerial ties and market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), pp.856-862 82. Lin, C., Wu, Y.-J., Chang, C., Wang, W., and Lee, C.-Y., 2012. The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances—the absorptive capacity perspective. Technovation, 32 (5), pp.282–292. 83. Liu, K., Li, J., Hesterly, W., and Cannella, A., 2012. Top management team tenure and technological inventions at post-IPO biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Research, 65 (9), pp.1349–1356. 84. Liu, Y.-M., Yang, Y.-H.K., and Hsieh, C.-R., 2011. The determinants of the adoption of pharmaceutical innovation: evidence from Taiwan. Social science and medicine (1982), 72 (6), pp.919–27. 85. Lonial, S. C., Tarim, M., Tatoglu, E., Zaim, S., & Zaim, H.,2008. The impact of market orientation on NSD and financial performance of hospital industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(6), pp.794-811. 86. López-Nicolás, C. and Meroño-Cerdán, Á.L., 2011. Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31 (6), pp.502–509. 87. Lynn, G. S., Abel, K. D., Valentine, W. S., and Wright, R. C. 1999. Key Factors in Increasing Speed to Market and Improving New Product Success Rates. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(4), pp. 319–326. 88. Lynn, G. S., Skov, R. B., and Abel, K. D. 1999. Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success, 6782(98). 89. Mahmoud, M. A., 2011. Market Orientation and Business Performance among SMEs in Ghana. International Business Research, 4(1), pp. 241-251. 90. Martín-Consuegra, D., & Esteban, Á.,2007. Market orientation and business performance: An empirical investigation in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(6), pp. 383-386 91. Merlo, O. and Auh, S., 2009. The effects of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and marketing subunit influence on firm performance. Marketing Letters, 20 (3), pp.295–311. 92. Muhammad, S., and Iqbal, J.,015. Moderating Effect of Top Management Support on Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Project Success Moderating Effect of Top Management Support on Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Project Success, 9(January), pp. 540–567. 93. Naidoo, V., 2010. Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (8), pp.1311–1320. 94. Narayanan, S. and Hosseini, M.P., 2014. Drivers of Innovation in the Malaysian Services Sector: An Analysis Based on Firm-Level Data. Institutions and Economies, 6 (1), pp.95–118. 95. Ndubisi, N.O., 2012. Mindfulness, reliability, pre-emptive conflict handling, customer orientation and outcomes in Malaysia’s healthcare sector. Journal of Business Research, 65 (4), pp.537–546. 96. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F.,1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal ofMarketing, 45(4), pp. 20-35. 97. O'Cass, A., & Ngo, L. V.,2007. Balancing external adaptation and internal effectiveness: Achieving better brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), pp.11-20 98. Panigyrakis, G. G., & Theodoridis, P. K.,2007. Market orientation and performance: An empirical investigation in the retail industry in Greece. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(2), pp.137-149 99. Peteraf, M.A., 1993. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), pp.179–191. 100. Pulendran, S. Speed, R. and Widing II, R.E.,2000. The Antecedents and Consequences of Market Orientation inAustralia. Australian Journal Of Management.,Vol. 25. No. 2. pp.119-143. 101. Quintana-garcia, C., 2010. Accessing Technological Knowledge Through R and D Alliances : Consequences For Radical And Incremental Innovation. 102. Ramayah, T., Samat, N., & Lo, M. C.,2011. Market orientation, service quality and organizational performance in service organizations in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 3(1), pp.8-27. 103. Racela, O.C., 2014. Customer Orientation, Innovation Competencies, and Firm Performance: A Proposed Conceptual Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, pp.16–23. 104. Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L.S., Schillewaert, N., and Baker, T.L., 2012. The differing effects of technology on inside vs. outside sales forces to facilitate enhanced customer orientation and interfunctional coordination. Journal of Business Research, 65 (7), pp.929–936. 105. Rapp, A., Trainor, K.J., and Agnihotri, R., 2010. Performance implications of customer-linking capabilities: Examining the complementary role of customer orientation and CRM technology. Journal of Business Research, 63 (11), pp.1229–1236. 106. Rashid, L., Yahya, S., Shamee, S.A., Jabar, J., Sedek, M., and Halim, S., 2014. Eco Product Innovation in Search of Meaning : Incremental and Radical Practice for Sustainability Development, 10 (13), pp.78–88. 107. Ray, G., Barney, J.B., and Muhanna, W.A., 2004. Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (1), pp.23–37. 108. Richard, P.J., Devinney, T.M., Yip, G.S., and Johnson, G., 2009. Measuring Organizational Performance :, (February). 109. Reinholdt, K., Hansen, N., and Science, M., 2010. New Product Introduction in the Pharmaceutical Industry, pp.2005. 110. Richard, P.J. et al., 2009. Measuring Organizational Performance, (February). 111. Robinson, S.M., 2008. Understanding the Resource-Based View: Implications of Methodological Choice and New Creative Content. Queensland University of Technology. 112. Ruey-Gwo, C., & Chieh-Ling, L. 2007. The relationship between leadership behavior and organizational performance in non-profit organizations, using social welfare charity foundations as an example. Journal of American Academy of Business, 12(1), pp. 83-88 113. Said, M.F., Adham, K.A., Abdullah, N.A., Sarkam, S.F., Quoquab, F., and Hänninen, S., 2013. Innovation and firm creation strategies in the emerging biotechnology industries. International Journal of Economics and Management, 7 (2), pp.348–375. 114. Sandvik, I. L., and Sandvik, K.,2003. The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(4), pp. 355–376. 115. Santos-Vijande, M. L., Sanzo-Perez, M. J., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., & Vazquez-Casielles, R. 2005. Organizational learning and market orientation: interface and effects on performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(3), pp. 187-202 116. Shaar, E.M. AL, Khattab, S.A., Alkaied, R.N., and Manna, A.Q., 2015. The Effect of Top Management Support on Innovation: the Mediating Role of Synergy Between Organizational Structure and Information Technology. International Review of Management and Business Research, 4 (2), pp.499–513. 117. Stankus, A., 2012. Managerial and Organizational Issues in R & D collaborations : a Literature Review. Social Sciences. 118. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2009. Research methods for business students. [e-book] Harlow: FT Prentice Hall. Available at: Google Books [Accessed 19 February 2016]. 119. Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C., 2000. The Positive Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Business Research, 48 (1), pp.69–73. 120. Sampson, R. C. (2007). R and D Alliances And Firm Performance : The Impact Of Technological Diversity And Alliance Organization On Innovation, 50(2), pp. 364–386. 121. Sekaran, U.,2003. Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. New York, John Wiley and Sons. 122. Smirnova, M., Naude, P., Henneberg, S. C., Mouzas, S., and Kouchtch, S. P. 2011. The impact of market orientation on the development of relational capabilities and performance outcomes: The case of Russian industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), pp. 44–53. 123. Shaar, E.M.A.L. et al., 2015. The Effect of Top Management Support on Innovation: the Mediating Role of Synergy between Organizational Structure and Information Technology. , pp.499–513. 124. Symeonidis, G., 1996. Innovation, Firm Size And Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses And Some New Themes. 125. Tajudin, M.M., Musa, O. and Musa, N.C., 2012. Effects of organizational culture, Market Orientation, and Innovativeness towards new product performance amongst (December), pp.24–48. 126. Tajuddin, M.Z.M., Iberahim, H., and Ismail, N., 2015. Relationship between Innovation and Organizational Performance in Construction Industry in Malaysia. Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3 (4), pp.87–99. 127. Tang, J., Pee, L.G., and Iijima, J., 2013. Investigating the effects of business process orientation on organizational innovation performance. Information & Management, 50 (8), pp.650–660. 128. Tan, O.K., 2012. Framework for New product development performance for research and development companies in Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 129. Tay, L. and Morgan, N.A.,2002.Antecedents and consequences of market orientation in chartered surveying firm. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 331-341. 130. Thakur, R., Hsu, S.H.Y., and Fontenot, G., 2012. Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends. Journal of Business Research, 65 (4), pp.562–569. 131. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pp.509–533. 132. Thakur, R., Hsu, S.H.Y., and Fontenot, G., 2012. Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends. Journal of Business Research, 65 (4), pp.562–569. 133. The Tenth Malaysia Plan, 2010. PUTRAJAYA. 134. The Evelenth Malaysia Plan, 2016. PUTRAJAYA. 135. Tiwari, R. and Herstatt, C., 2014. Developing Countries and Innovation. 136. Ulgen, F., 2015. Schumpeterian innovations, financial innovations and instability: An institutional perspective. Cuadernos de Economia, 38 (106), pp.46–53. 137. Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., and Kale, D., 2014. National Innovation Systems, Developing Countries, and the Role of Intermediaries: a Critical Review of the Literature. Innovation Knowledge Development, (1), pp.24. 138. Witell, L., Snyder, H., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., and Kristensson, P., 2016. Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 69 (8), pp.2863–2872. 139. Young, R. and Poon, S., 2013. ScienceDirect Top management support — almost always necessary and sometimes suf fi cient for success : Findings from a fuzzy set analysis. JPMA, 31 (7), pp.943–957. 140. Zakaria, N., 2013. Enhancing Organizational Performance of Malaysia SMES Through Human Resource Management ( HRM ) Practices and Organizational. International Conference on Management, 5 (June), pp.326–351. 141. Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C., and Mangematin, V. (2007). Technological knowledge base, RandD organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 36(4), pp. 515–528. 142. Zhou, K. Z., Brown, J. R., & Dev, C. S.,2009. Market orientation, competitive advantage, and performance: A demand-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, 62(11),pp.1063-1070.

Similar Items