The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices

Increasing awareness and global concerns on sustainability issues are striving the firms to improve their sustainability performance in order to satisfy multiple stakeholders.Firms are facing growing pressure to become “greener” and more environmentally friendly. This pressure is increasingly felt b...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Omar, Salmah
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2018
Subjects:	H Social Sciences (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23352/1/The%20Effect%20Of%20Stakeholder%20Pressure%20On%20Sustainable%20Performance%20Mediated%20By%20Ecoinnovation%20Practices.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23352/2/The%20Effect%20Of%20Stakeholder%20Pressure%20On%20Sustainable%20Performance%20Mediated%20By%20Ecoinnovation%20Practices.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.23352
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Othman, Norfaridatul Akmaliah
topic	H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle	H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences (General) Omar, Salmah The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices
description	Increasing awareness and global concerns on sustainability issues are striving the firms to improve their sustainability performance in order to satisfy multiple stakeholders.Firms are facing growing pressure to become “greener” and more environmentally friendly. This pressure is increasingly felt by high polluting industry,such as chemical industry.In Malaysia,the chemical industry is one of the main contributors to the country’s pollution index.Stakeholder pressures (SHP) are believed will affect the firm’s activities that will in turns affect their business performance.Therefore,firms have had to review their production processes as a result of pressures from the multiple stakeholders.Eco-innovation is a promising approach that decreases environmental impact and helps firms to sustain their business and the environment. Eco-innovation plays an important role in the implementation of sustainable development.The overall objective of eco-innovation is to reduce impact on the environment,as well as to create new market opportunities,products,services or processes aimed at improving environmental performance.However,eco-innovation practices (EIP) are still less implemented by chemical firms in Malaysia since many are still not aware of its essential to improve their sustainable performance (SP).Thus,this study was conducted among chemical firms in Malaysia with the aims to investigate the extent of stakeholder pressure and the implementation of eco-innovation practices which believed will affect the sustainable performance of the firms.This study also sought to treat the eco-innovation practices as a mediating factor on the relationship between stakeholder pressure and sustainable performance.To meet these objectives,a series of research hypotheses underpinned by theoretical basis of Stakeholder Theory,Legitimacy Theory and Natural-Resources-Based View Theory (NRBV) were proposed to be tested.A mail survey was used for data collection and responses from 73 chemical companies have been used for data analysis using SmartPLS 3.0.The result reveals that SHP and EIP significantly and positively affected all the component of sustainable performance (SP).While EIP has partially mediated the relationship between SHP and SP.This study also revealed the level of SHP and EIP among chemical firms in Malaysia is moderate to a considerable extent.The result also demonstrated that social benefit has the highest score on embracing the EIP compared to financial and other factors.This study provides some implication in terms of theory advancements and practical applications that can help practitioners to better understand the issues and contextual elements related to stakeholder pressure,eco-innovation practices and sustainable performance of the firms which will enhance their competitive advantage.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.)
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Omar, Salmah
author_facet	Omar, Salmah
author_sort	Omar, Salmah
title	The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices
title_short	The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices
title_full	The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices
title_fullStr	The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices
title_full_unstemmed	The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices
title_sort	effect of stakeholder pressure on sustainable performance mediated by eco-innovation practices
granting_institution	UTeM
granting_department	Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship
publishDate	2018
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23352/1/The%20Effect%20Of%20Stakeholder%20Pressure%20On%20Sustainable%20Performance%20Mediated%20By%20Ecoinnovation%20Practices.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23352/2/The%20Effect%20Of%20Stakeholder%20Pressure%20On%20Sustainable%20Performance%20Mediated%20By%20Ecoinnovation%20Practices.pdf
_version_	1747834042098647040
spelling	my-utem-ep.233522022-03-17T16:26:44Z The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices 2018 Omar, Salmah H Social Sciences (General) HD28 Management. Industrial Management Increasing awareness and global concerns on sustainability issues are striving the firms to improve their sustainability performance in order to satisfy multiple stakeholders.Firms are facing growing pressure to become “greener” and more environmentally friendly. This pressure is increasingly felt by high polluting industry,such as chemical industry.In Malaysia,the chemical industry is one of the main contributors to the country’s pollution index.Stakeholder pressures (SHP) are believed will affect the firm’s activities that will in turns affect their business performance.Therefore,firms have had to review their production processes as a result of pressures from the multiple stakeholders.Eco-innovation is a promising approach that decreases environmental impact and helps firms to sustain their business and the environment. Eco-innovation plays an important role in the implementation of sustainable development.The overall objective of eco-innovation is to reduce impact on the environment,as well as to create new market opportunities,products,services or processes aimed at improving environmental performance.However,eco-innovation practices (EIP) are still less implemented by chemical firms in Malaysia since many are still not aware of its essential to improve their sustainable performance (SP).Thus,this study was conducted among chemical firms in Malaysia with the aims to investigate the extent of stakeholder pressure and the implementation of eco-innovation practices which believed will affect the sustainable performance of the firms.This study also sought to treat the eco-innovation practices as a mediating factor on the relationship between stakeholder pressure and sustainable performance.To meet these objectives,a series of research hypotheses underpinned by theoretical basis of Stakeholder Theory,Legitimacy Theory and Natural-Resources-Based View Theory (NRBV) were proposed to be tested.A mail survey was used for data collection and responses from 73 chemical companies have been used for data analysis using SmartPLS 3.0.The result reveals that SHP and EIP significantly and positively affected all the component of sustainable performance (SP).While EIP has partially mediated the relationship between SHP and SP.This study also revealed the level of SHP and EIP among chemical firms in Malaysia is moderate to a considerable extent.The result also demonstrated that social benefit has the highest score on embracing the EIP compared to financial and other factors.This study provides some implication in terms of theory advancements and practical applications that can help practitioners to better understand the issues and contextual elements related to stakeholder pressure,eco-innovation practices and sustainable performance of the firms which will enhance their competitive advantage. 2018 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23352/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23352/1/The%20Effect%20Of%20Stakeholder%20Pressure%20On%20Sustainable%20Performance%20Mediated%20By%20Ecoinnovation%20Practices.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/23352/2/The%20Effect%20Of%20Stakeholder%20Pressure%20On%20Sustainable%20Performance%20Mediated%20By%20Ecoinnovation%20Practices.pdf text en validuser http://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=112808 phd doctoral UTeM Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship Othman, Norfaridatul Akmaliah 1. Abdalla, Y.A. & A.K, S.-N., 2015. Pressures for sustainability practices in an oil and gas company: evidence from Sudan. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(3), pp.256.286. 2. Adams, C. & Zutshi, A., 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility: Why Business Should Act Responsibly and Be Accountable. Australian Accounting Review, 14(34), pp.31.39. 3. Adebambo, H.O. et al., 2013. Drivers of sustainable environmental manufacturing practices and financial performance among food and beverages companies in Malaysia. American Journal of Economics, 3(2), pp.127.131. 4. Ahmad, N.K.W. et al., 2017. An integrative framework for sustainable supply chain management practices in the oil and gas industry. , 0568. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1178105. 5. Ahmadi, P. et al., 2012. Using the balanced score card to design organizational comprehensive performance evaluation model. African Journal of Business Management, 6(6), pp.2267.2277. 6. Ali, S.H., 2014. Social and Environmental Impact of the Rare Earth Industries. , pp.123. 7. Ali, W. & Rizwan, M., 2013. Factors influencing corporate social and environmental disclosure (csed) practice in the developing countries: an institutional theoretical perspective. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(3), pp.590.609. 8. Alzawawi, M., 2013. Drivers and Obstacles for Creating Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Operations. , pp.1.8. 9. Ambec, S., Cohen, M.A., et al., 2013. The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), pp.2.22. 10. Anastas, P.T. & Lankey, R.L., 2000. Life cycle assessment and green chemistry: the yin and yang of industrial ecology. Green Chemistry, 2(6), pp.289.295. Available at: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2000/gc/b005650m#!divAbstract\nhttp://xlink. rsc.org/?DOI=b005650m\nhttp://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=b005650m [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 11. Andersen, M., 2008. Eco-innovation.towards a taxonomy and a theory. DRUID Conference Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Available at: http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/ viewpaper.php?id=3150&cf=29 [Accessed May 11, 2013]. 12. Andersen, M.M., 2006. Eco-innovation indicators. European Environment Agency. , (February). 13. Andreassen, T.W., 1994. Satisfaction, Loyalty and Reputation as Indicators of Customer Orientation in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(2), pp.16.34. 14. Ann, G.E., Zailani, S. & Wahid, N.A., 2006. A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms�f performance in Malaysia. 15. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(1), pp.73.93. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/14777830610639459 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 16. Aras, G., Aybars, A. & Kutlu, O., 2008. �gManaging corporate performance: Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets.�h International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,, 59(3), pp.229.254. 17. Armstrong, J.S. & Overton, T.S., 1977. Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), p.396. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3150783?origin=crossref. 18. Awan, U., Kraslawski, A. & Huiskonen, J., 2017. Understanding the Relationship between Stakeholder Pressure and Sustainability Performance in Manufacturing Firms in Pakistan. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(June), pp.768.777. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.178. 19. Bakhtina, V. a., 2011. Innovation and its potential in the context of the ecological component of sustainable development. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(2), pp.248.262. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/20408021 111185402 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 20. Bandeira-de-Mello, R., Marcon, R. & Alberton, A., 2011. Performance effects of stakeholder interaction in emerging economies: Evidence from Brazil. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 8(3), pp.329.350. 21. Bansal, P. & Clelland, I., 2004. Talking Trash : Legitimacy , Impression Management. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), pp.93.103. 22. Bansal, P. & Roth, K., 2000a. Why Companies Go Green : A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), pp.717.736. 23. Bansal, P. & Roth, K., 2000b. Why Companies Go Green : A Model of Ecological Responsiveness Author ( s ): Pratima Bansal and Kendall Roth Source : The Academy of Management Journal , Vol . 43 , No . 4 ( Aug ., 2000 ), pp . 717-736 Published by : Academy of Management Stable URL : http. The Academy of Management Review, 43(4), pp.717. 736. 24. Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D. a., 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173.1182. 25. Barsoumian, S. et al., 2011. Eco - innovation in cluster organisations in the chemical and textile �] clothing �] leather sectors. Greenovate! Europe EEIG European Cluster Observatory. 26. Berman, S.L. et al., 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), pp.488.506. 27. Bjorklund, M., Martinsen, U. & Abrahamsson, M., 2012. Performance measurements in the greening of supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(1), pp.29.39. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/13598541211212186. 28. Boesso, G. & Kumar, K., 2007. Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(2), pp.269.296. 29. Boons, F. et al., 2013. Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, pp.1.8. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013. 30. Brindley, C. & Oxborrow, L., 2014. Aligning the sustainable supply chain to green marketing needs: A case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), pp.45.55. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.08.003. 31. Brundtland, G.H., 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations Commission, 4(1), pp.1-300. 32. Brundtland, G.H., 1984. World Commission on Environment and Development. Environmental Policy and Law, 14(1), pp.26.30. 33. Brunklaus, B., Malmqvist, T. & Baumann, H., 2009. Managing Stakeholders or the Environment ? The Challenge of Relating Indicators in Practice �e S. , 37(November 2008), pp.27.37. 34. Burns, A.C. & Bush, R.F., 2014. Marketing Research 7th ed., Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York: Pearson. 35. Buysse, K. et al., 2010. Proactive Environmental Strategies : a Management Perspective Stakeholder. , 24(5), pp.453.470. 36. Buysse, K. & Verbeke, A., 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), pp.453.470. 37. Cainelli, G. et al., 2011. Environmental Innovations , Complementarity and Local/Global Cooperation. Quaderno n. 4/2011. 38. Centi, G. & Perathoner, S., 2009a. From Green to Sustainable Industrial Chemistry, Available at: https://www.wiley-vch.de/books/sample/3527315527_c01.pdf. 39. Centi, G. & Perathoner, S., 2009. From Green to Sustainable Industrial Chemistry. Sustainable Industrial Chemistry, (January 2001), pp.1.72. 40. Cheng, C.C.J., Yang, C.L. & Sheu, C., 2014. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, pp.81.90. 41. Chin, W.W., 1998. Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), pp. vii-xvi. 42. Christmann, P., 2000. Effects of �g Best Practices �h of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage : The Role of Complementary Assets Author ( s ): Petra Christmann Source : The Academy of Management Journal , Vol . 43 , No . 4 ( Aug ., 2000 ), pp . 663-680 Published by : Acade. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), pp.663.680. 43. CICM Malaysia, 2015. Key Highlights & Lessons Learnt : Warehouse Blast in Tianjin , China ( 12 August 2015 ). , (August). 44. Cluzel, F. et al., 2015. Eco-design vs . eco-innovation : an industrial survey To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-01144352 Eco-design vs . eco-innovation : an industrial survey. , (May 2014). 45. Cobb, G., 2011. Model for Sustainable Business Performance Measures for Supply Chain Integration. Available at: http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/f/Cobb, Glenda_2011_Thesis.pdf [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 46. Cohen, J., 1992. A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), pp.155-159. 47. Conding, J. & Habidin, N.F., 2012. The Structural Analysis of Green Innovation ( GI ) and Green Performance ( GP ) in Malaysian Automotive Industry. , 3(6), pp.172.179. 48. ConocoPhilips, 2006. 2006 Sustainable Development Report, Available at: http://www.conocophillips.com/sd/annualreport. 49. Cordano, M. & Frieze, I.H., 2000. Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen�fs Theory of Planned Behavior. Academy of Management, 43(4), pp.627.641. 50. Cramer, J., 2002. From financial to sustainable profit. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(2), pp.99.106. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/csr.12. 51. Creswell, J., 2009. Research Design. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), pp.1689.1699. 52. Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. & Dahlgaard, J.J., 2006. In Search of Excellence.Past, Present and Future. Kreativ und konsequent, 2(3), pp.57.84. Available at: http://www.iei.liu.se/q/filarkiv/phdcourses/1.119234/InSearchofExcellenceSMJJ_.pdf. 53. Dangelico, R.M. & Pujari, D., 2010. Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), pp.471. 486. 54. Darnall, N., 2009. Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy : The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size 1 Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy : The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size. , pp.1.41. 55. Darnall, N., Henriques, I. & Sadorsky, P., 2008. Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management, 14(4), pp.364.376. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1075425308000690 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 56. Debref, R., 2012. The Paradoxes of Environmental Innovations: The Case of Green Chemistry. Journal of Innovation Economics. Available at: http://www.cairn.info/resume.php?ID_ARTICLE=JIE_009_0083 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 57. Deegan, C., 2002. �gIntroduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures . a theoretical foundation.�h Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp.282.311. 58. Delmas, M. & Montiel, I., 2008. The diffusion of voluntary international management standards: Responsible Care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry. Policy Studies Journal. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1541- 0072.2007.00254.x/full [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 59. Delmas, M. & Toffel, M.W., 2004. STAKEHOLDERS AND. , 222, pp.209.222. 60. Delmas, M.A. & Toffel, M.W., 2008. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), pp.1027.1055. 61. Dias-Sardinha, I. & Reijnders, L., 2005. Evaluating environmental and social performance of large Portuguese companies: a balanced scorecard approach. Business Strategy and the 62. Environment, 14(2), pp.73.91. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/bse.421 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 63. Dillman, D.A. et al., 2008. Response rate and measurement in mixed mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response, and internet. Social Science Research, 38(1), pp.1.48. 64. Ding, M. & Jianmu, Y., 2015. Eco-Innovation Determination based on Structural Equation Modeling: Identifying the Mediation and Moderation Effect. International Journal of Managment Science and Business Administration, 1(3), pp.16.26. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Erika_Veras/publication/272944033_International_Jo urnal_of_Management_Science_and_Business_Administration_Volume_1_Issue_3/links/5 523e5620cf24f160943b307.pdf#page=17. 65. Dobre, O., 2013. Employee motivation and organizational performance. Review of applied socio-economic research, 5(1), pp.53.60. 66. Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E. & Preston, L.E.E.E., 1995. Stakeholder Theory: Concepts, Evidence, Corporations and its Implications. Management, 20(1), pp.65.91. 67. DOSH, 2016. Systemic Occupational Health Enhancement Level Programme . Enhancing Hygiene Industry. In Systemic Occupational Health Enhancement Level Programme . 68. Enhancing Hygiene Industry. Department Of Occupational Safety And Health Malaysia. 69. Egri, C.P.. & Herman, S., 2000. Leadership in the North American Environmental Sector : Values , Leadership Styles , and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and Their Organizations Author ( s ): Carolyn P . Egri and Susan Herman Source : The Academy of Management Journal , Vol . 43 , No . The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), pp.571.604. 70. Eiadat, Y. et al., 2008. Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), pp.131.145. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1090951607000892 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 71. Eltayeb, T.K., Zailani, S. & Ramayah, T., 2011. Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(5), pp.495.506. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.003. 72. Eng Ann, G., Zailani, S. & Abd Wahid, N., 2006. A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms�f performance in Malaysia. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(1), pp.73.93. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/14777830610639459. 73. EPU Malaysia, 2015. Eleventh (11th) Malaysia Plan (2016-2020). Available at http://www.EPU.gov.my. 74. Erickson, F., 1990. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. Research in Teaching and Learning: Vol. 2, (400), pp.119.161. 75. Ern, K. et al., 2015. A conceptual framework for the adoption and implementation of product stewardship in the chemical industries. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 30, pp.50.55. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.009. 76. ESCAP, 2015. Valuing Waste , Transforming Cities, United Nations publication. Available at: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Full Report .pdf. 77. Esquer-Peralta, J., Velazquez, L.E. & Munguia, N.E., 2007. Are Sustainability Management Systems (SMS) really promising? 1st International Workshop: Advances in Cleaner Production. 78. Fassin, Y., 2012. Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), pp.83.96. 79. Fauziah, S.H. & Periathamby, A., 2012. Trends in sustainable landfilling in Malaysia , a developing country. , (March). 80. Figge, F. et al., 2002. The sustainability balanced scorecard - Linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), pp.269. 284. Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0- 0036735890&partnerID=40&md5=3929204cede989389d5ca4bf97c2d3c6. 81. Foo, D.C.Y. & Eng, C., 2015. The Malaysian Chemicals Industry : From Commodities to Manufacturing. American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), (November), pp.48.52. 82. Freeman, R.E. et al., 2012. Stakeholder Theory(ies): Ethical Ideas and Managerial Action. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), pp.1.2. 83. Freeman, R.E. et al., 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State Of The Art, Available at: http://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Cooperatives/Multi-Stakeholder_Co-ops/Stakeholder Theory_ The State of the Art.pdf. 84. Freeman, R.E., 2004. The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. Zeitschrift fur Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), pp.228.241. 85. Freier, I., 2003. Environmental management from an ecological modernization and innovation perspective. Presentation for the Druid Winter Conference. Available at: http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/dw2003-702.pdf [Accessed October 22, 2012]. 86. Gefen, D., Rigdon, E.E. & Straub, D., 2011. An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), pp.A1.A7. Available at:http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=60461897&site=ehostlive. 87. Gonzalez-benito, J., 2004. The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices * The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices Abstract. , (1995). 88. Gonzalez-Benito, O. & Gonzalez-Benito, J., 2005. Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis. Omega, 33(1), pp.1.15. Available at: http://conricyt3.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELcQD 4CE-GaUgZQHHuma-CsJT6Bp03hDbIhHy3UuI5OaRk2K2Mv- 9t3ZTjsqQAjx4Kapr4ntu5wv9t3vGBP8IJ3u6AShXQZ6rm3lCm7xlaOWViprteZpbr1z4ed P4uRMnn7Nx9CY6GQZZ4Kg4b3ujr_M4tjOuqaZnZLgEjw6CSVhrlBUeaEJT. 89. Graham, S. & McAdam, R., 2016. The effects of pollution prevention on performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(10), pp.1333.1358. 90. Grekova, K. et al., 2013. The mediating role of environmental innovation in the relationship between environmental management and firm performance in a multi-stakeholder environment. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 13(2), pp.119.137. 91. Guba, E.G.E. & Lincoln, Y.S.Y., 1994. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. Handbook of qualitative research, pp.105.117. 92. Gunningham, N. et al., 2004. Social License and Environmental Protection : Why Businesses Go beyond Compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), pp.307.341. 93. Gupta, M., Paul, S. & Gupta, R., General aspects of 12 basic principles of green chemistry with applications. 94. Hair, J.F. et al., 2003. Business Research Methods second., New York: M.E.Sharpe. 95. Hair, J.F. et al., 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), pp.106.121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128. 96. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M., 2013. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), pp.1.12. 97. Hallowwell, R., 1996. The relationships of customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and profitability: an empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7(4), pp.27.42. 98. Hameed, A. et al., 2014. Antecedents And Outcome Of Sustainable Environmental Manufacturing Practices. International Journal of Management and Sustainability journal, 99. 3(3), pp.147.159. 100. Hami, N., Muhamad, M.R. & Ebrahim, Z., 2016. The Impact of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices on Sustainability. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 1, pp.139.152. 101. Hamilton, K. et al., 2006. Where is the Wealth of Nations?, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEEI/214578- 1110886258964/20748034/All.pdf. 102. Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J., 1984. Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), pp.149.164. 103. Harangozo, G. & Zilahy, G., 2015. Cooperation between business and non-governmental organizations to promote sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 89(February 2015), pp.18.31. 104. Hart, S., 1994. Does it pay to be green? , 5(1996), pp.30.37. Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:DOES+IT+PAY+TO+B E+GREEN+?+AN#8 [Accessed February 21, 2013]. 105. Hart, S.L., 1995. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), pp.986.1014. 106. Hart, S.L., 1997. Beyond Greening : Strategies for a Sustainable World Beyond Greening : Harvard Business Review. 107. Hart, S.L. & Ahuja, G., 1996. Does it Pay to Be Green? An Emperical Examination of The Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, pp.30.37. Available at: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2923484. 108. Hart, S.L. & Dowell, G., 2011. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After. Journal of Management, (December 2010). 109. Hart, S.L. & Dowell, G., 2010. Invited Editorial: A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After. Journal of Management, 37(5), pp.1464.1479. Available at: http://jom.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0149206310390219 [Accessed October 5, 2012]. 110. Hassan, M.G., Nordin, N. & Ashari, H., 2015. Sustainable manufacturing practices implementation in Malaysia industries. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(4), pp.49.56. Available at: http://www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my/index.php/jurnalteknologi/article/view/6042/4032. 111. Henriques, I. & Sadorsky, P., 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsible firm: an empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, pp.381.395. 112. Henriques, I. & Sadorsky, P., 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), pp.87.99. 113. Henseler, J., Hubona, G. & Ray, P.A., 2016. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), pp.2.20. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382. 114. Higgins, B.K.L., 2013. Economic growth and sustainability . are they mutually exclusive ? Striking a balance between unbounded economic growth and sustainability requires a new mindset Voices of sustainability rise toward a crescendo Limitless economic growth counters sustainability. , pp.1.9. 115. Higgins, C., 2010. Is a Responsive Business also a Responsible Business? Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 5(3), pp.23.32. Available at: http://www.jbsge.vu.edu.au/issues/vol05no3/JBSGE-05-3.pdf#page=23 [Accessed May 11, 2013]. 116. Hockerts, K., 1999. Eco-efficient service innovation: increasing business-ecological efficiency of products and services. Greener Marketing Practice, Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing, (October), pp.95.108. 117. Holt, D. & Ghobadian, A., 2009. An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 118. 20(7), pp.933.956. 119. Huang, Y.-C., Ding, H.-B. & Kao, M.-R., 2009. S alient stakeholder voices : Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), pp.309.326. 120. Hubbard, G., 2009. Measuring Organizational Performance : Beyond the Triple Bottom Line. , 191(December 2006), pp.177.191. 121. Hulland, J., 1999. Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(Feb.), pp.195.204. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094025. 122. Idemudia, U., 2011. Corporate social responsibility and developing countries: Moving the critical CSR research agenda in Africa forward. Progress in Development Studies, 11(1), pp.1.18. 123. Iles, A., 2008. Shifting to green chemistry: The need for innovations in sustainability marketing. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, pp.524.535. 124. Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G., 2010. What Drives Corporate Social Performance?: International Evidence from Social, Environmental and Governance Sources, Available at: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication Files/11-016.pdf [Accessed May 11, 2013]. 125. Jafartayari, S., 2010. Awareness of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in Malaysian Manufacturers. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 126. Jarvis, B.C., Mackenzie, S.B. & Podsakoff, P.M., 2003. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), pp.199.218. 127. Jones, R.R., Pryde, M. & Cresser, M., 2005. An evaluation of current environmental management systems as indicators of environmental performance". Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 16(3), pp.211.219. 128. Kagan, R.A., Thornton, D. & Gunningham, N., 2003. Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance : How Does Regulation Matter ? Law & Society Review, 37(1), pp.51.90. 129. Kanisen, J. & Rohafiz, S., 2012. Green Logistics Practices Among Logistics Service Provider In Malaysia. In Prosiding Simposium Pengurusan Teknologi, Operasi & Logistik, (SIPTIK III) 11-12 Disember 2012, Universiti Utara Malaysia. pp. 11.12. 130. Kaplan, R.S., 2008. Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 3, pp.1253.1269. 131. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P., 1992. the Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard business review TA -, 70(1), pp.71-79. 132. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P., 1996. Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, 25(3), pp.243.256. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-7908-2762-0. 133. Kassinis, G. & Vafeas, N., 2002. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), pp.399.415. 134. Kemp, R. & Pontoglio, S., 2011. The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological Economics, 72, pp.28.36. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014. 135. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D. & Bolger, N., 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. Handbook of social psychology, pp.233.265. Available at: http://data.psych.udel.edu/jplworkshop/2009 UMass Diary and Dyadic Data Workshop/Reference Material/KennyKashyBolger1998-Data_analysis.pdf. 136. Kim, S.-T., 2012. Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental logistics practices: Is eco-oriented culture a missing link? International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 23(2), pp.238.258. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/ 09574091211265378 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 137. King, A. & Lenox, M., 2002. Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction. Management Science, 48(2), pp.289.299. Available at: http://mansci.journal.informs.org/cgi/doi/10.1287/mnsc.48.2.289.258. 138. Klassen, R.D., 2001. Plant-Level Environmental Management Orientation: the Influence of Management Views and Plant Characteristics. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), pp.257.275. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00374. 139. Klassen, R.D. & Mclaughlin, C.P., 1996. The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Management Science, 42(8), pp.1199.1214. 140. Klassen, R.D. & Whybark, D.C., 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), pp.599.615. Available at: http://amj.aom.org/content/42/6/599.full. 141. Kolk, A., 1999. Evaluating corporate environmental reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(4), pp.225.237. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099- 0836(199907/08)8:4<225::AID-BSE206>3.0.CO;2-4. 142. Kolk, A. & Mauser, A., 2002. The evolution of environmental management : from stage models to performance evaluation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(1), pp.14.31. 143. Krajnc, D. & Glavi., P., 2005. How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics, 55(4), pp.551.563. 144. Krivokapic, Z. & Jovanovic, J., 2009. Using Balanced Scorecard to Improve Environmental Management System. Strojniski Vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 55(4), pp.262. 271. 145. Kumar Piaralal, S. et al., 2015. An Integrated Model of the Likelihood and Extent of Adoption of Green Practices in Small and Medium Sized Logistics Firms. American Journal of Economics, 5(2), pp.251.258. 146. Labuschagne, C., Brent, A.C. & van Erck, R.P.G., 2005. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(4), pp.373.385. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652603001811 [Accessed October 5, 2012]. 147. Lai, K. hung, Wong, C.W.Y. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. Ecological modernisation of Chinese export manufacturing via green logistics management and its regional implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(4), pp.766.770. 148. Lee, K.-H., 2009. Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations?:The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 47(7), pp.1101.1121. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00251740910978322 [Accessed October 5, 2012]. 149. Lee, S.-Y. & Klassen, R.D., 2008. Drivers and Enablers That Foster Environmental Management Capabilities in Small- and Medium-Sized Suppliers in Supply Chains. Production and Operations Management, 17(6), pp.573.586. Available at: http://www.atypon-link.com/POMS/doi/abs/10.3401/poms.1080.0063. 150. Li, X.R., Wang, Y. & Wang, Y., 2015. Examining the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Resident Attitude Formation : A Missing Link ? In 2015 ttra International Conference. 151. Lin, R., Chen, R.-H. & Ho, T.-M., 2013. Market Demand , Green Innovation , And Firm Performance : Evidence From Hybrid Vehicle Industry. In Proceeding of 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management, Phuket, Thailand. pp. 194.209. 152. Litten, L., 2005. Measuring and Reporting Institutional Sustainability (Draft). , pp.1.23. 153. Lo, C., Fryxell, G. & Tang, S., Environmental Impact, Stakeholder Pressures, and Corporate Environmental Management in China. 210.13.127.229, (002). 154. Lopez, F.J.D., 2008. A tailored method for eco-innovation strategies and drivers ( in the. , pp.1.49. 155. Machiba, T., 2010. Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: Development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. International Economics and Economic Policy, 7(2), pp.357.370. 156. Maletic, M. & Dahlgaard, J., 2014. The relationship between sustainability-oriented innovation practices and organizational performance : empirical evidence from Slovenian organizations The Relationship between Sustainability . Oriented Innovation Practices and Organizational Performance : , 47(1), pp.3.13. 157. Marcus, A. a. & Nichols, M.L., 1999. On the Edge: Heeding the Warnings of Unusual Events. Organization Science, 10(4), pp.482.499. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2640367\nhttp://www.jstor.org.libproxy.mit.edu/stable/pdfplus/ 2640367.pdf?acceptTC=true. 158. Marquet-Pondeville, S., Swaen, V. & Ronge, Y. De, 2007. the impact of external environment, stakeholders�f pressures and environmental strategy on environmental management control systems. , pp.1.57. Available at: http://www.management.free.fr/recherche/contenucongres/AFC/p93.pdf [Accessed May 19, 2013]. 159. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S. & Wright, P.M., 2006. Guest Editors�f Introduction Corporate 160. Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(January),pp.1.18. 161. Mihelis, G. et al., 2001. Customer Satisfaction Measurement in the Private Bank Sector. , (1), pp.1.16. Available at: http://www.unipi.gr/faculty/ysiskos/files/paper6.pdf. 162. MITI, 2012. Ministry of International Trade and Industry Report 2012. Ministry of International Trade and Industry, pp.1-104. 163. Moffet, J., Bregha, F. & Middelkoop, M.J., 2004. Chapter 6 Responsible Care : A Case Study of a Voluntary Environmental Initiative. , pp.177.208. 164. Moh, Y. & Manaf, L.A., 2016. Solid waste management transformation and future challenges of source separation and recycling practice in Malaysia Resources , Conservation and Recycling Solid waste management transformation and future challenges of source separation and recycling practice in Malaysia. , (November 2017). 165. Mohammad, N., 2011. Environmental Law and Policy Practices in Malaysia : An Empirical Study. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9), pp.1248.1260. 166. Moldan, B., Janou.kova, S. & Hak, T., 2012. How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, pp.4.13. 167. Moller, A. & Schaltegger, S., 2005. The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard as a Framework for Eco-efficiency Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), pp.73.83. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247927. 168. Montiel, I., 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization and Environment, 21(3), pp.245.269. 169. Murillo-Luna, J.L., Garces-Ayerbe, C. & Rivera-Torres, P., 2008. Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders�f pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), pp.1225.1240. 170. Nehrt, C., 1996. Timing and Intensity Effects of Environmental Investments Author ( s ): Chad Nehrt Published by : Wiley Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486731 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : You may need to log in to JSTOR. Stretegic Management Journal, 17(7), pp.535.547. 171. O�fDonovan, G., 2002. Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp.344.371. Available at: , https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435870. 172. O�fDwyer, B. & Unerman, J., 2007. "From functional to social accountability: Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non�]governmental development organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), pp.446.471. 173. OECD, 2002. Annual Report 2002, pp.1-99. 174. OECD, 2001. OECD Environmental Strategy for the First Decade of the 21 Century. , (May), pp.1.22. 175. OECD, 2009. Sustainable Manufacturing and Eco-innovation: Towards a Green Economy, Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3445274&tool =pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. 176. Oeyono, J., Samy, M. & Bampton, R., 2011. �gAn examination of corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A study of the top 50 Indonesian listed corporations.�h Journal of Global Responsibility, 2(1), pp.100.112. 177. Omar, S. & Othman, N.A., 2016. The Effects of Stakeholder Pressure on Eco- Innovation Practices in Malaysian Chemical Industry. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 10(7), pp.34.40. 178. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L. & Rynes, S.L., 2003. Corporate Social and Financial Performance : Organization Studies, 24(3), pp.403.441. 179. Parmigiani, A., Klassen, R.D. & Russo, M. V, 2011. Efficiency meets accountability : Performance implications of supply chain configuration , control , and capabilities .. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), pp.212.223. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.01.001. 180. Pearson, P. & Rene Kemp, 2007. Final report MEI project about measuring eco- innovation, Available at: http://www.merit.unu.edu/MEI 2. 181. Perrini, F. & Tencati, A., 2006. Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), pp.296.308. 182. Persaud, I., 2012. Field Study. In N. J. Salkind, ed. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc, pp. 1.7. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288. 183. Petter, Straub & Rai, 2007. Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), p.623. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/25148814. 184. Podsakoff, P.M. et al., 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879.903. 185. Porter, M.E. & Linde, C. van der, 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment- Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), pp.97.118. Available at: http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/jep.9.4.97. 186. Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. & Sachs, S., 2002. Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, 45(1), pp.6.28. 187. Qi, G.Y. et al., 2011. Diffusion of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in China: 188. Rethinking on stakeholders�f roles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), pp.1250.1256. 189. Radu, M., 2012. Empirical Study on the Indicators of Sustainable Performance . the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard ,. Sustainability and Organizational Change, XIV(32), pp.451.469. 190. Ramanathan, R., Poomkaew, B. & Nath, P., 2014. The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms. Business Ethics, 23(2), pp.1.31. 191. Ramus, C.A.. & Steger, U., 2000. The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee �g Ecoinitiatives �h at Leading-Edge European Companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), pp.605.626. 192. Rao, P. & Holt, D., 2005. �gDo green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?�h International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), pp.898.916. 193. Rasi, R.Z.R.M., Abdekhodaee, A. & Nagarajah, R., 2014. Stakeholders�f involvements in the implementation of proactive environmental practices: Linking environmental practices and environmental performances in SMEs. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 25(2), pp.132.149. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/MEQ-11-2011-0054. 194. Remenyi, D., 2002. Research Strategies . Beyond the Differences (Dan Remenyi (2002)). Research Strategies . Beyond the Differences, 1(1), pp.38.41. Available at: http://www.ejbrm.com/vol1/v1-i1/issue1-art6-remenyi.pdf. 195. Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation . eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), pp.319.332. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800999001123. 196. Rueda-Manzanares, A., Aragon-Correa, J.A. & Sharma, S., 2008. The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. British Journal of Management. 197. Saha, N. & Gregar, A., 2012. Human Resource Management: As a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(SPL.ISS1), pp.1.5. 198. Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N. & Muhamad, R., 2011. Looking for evidence of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in an emerging market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 3(2), pp.165.190. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/17574321111169849. 199. Sarkar, A.N., 2013. Promotion of eco-innovation to leverage sustainable development of eco-industry and green growth. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 25(2), pp.71.104. 200. Sawani, Y. et al., 2010. Preliminary insights on sustainability reporting and assurance practices in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), pp.627.645. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/17471111011083482 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 201. Scandura, T. a. & Williams, E. a., 2000. Research Methodology in Management: Current Practices, Trends, and Implications for Future Research. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), pp.1248.1264. 202. Schaltegger, S. & Burritt, R.L., 2010. Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business, 45(4), pp.375.384. 203. Schiederig, T., Tietze, F. & Herstatt, C., 2011. What is Green Innovation ? . A quantitative literature review. In The XXII ISPIM Conference 2011. 204. Sekaran, U., 2013. Research methods for business Fourth., United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 205. Sharma, J., 2000. Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), pp.681.697. 206. Sharma, S. & Vredenburg, H., 1998. Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), pp.729.753. 207. Shen, M., 2009. Corproate environmental strategy and practices: Antecedence and consequences. Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11134/ [Accessed May 11, 2013]. 208. Singh, K. a/l J., 2017. Eco-Innovation In The Chemical Manufacturing Industry : Status And Its Determinants. University of Malaya. 209. Smith, L. & Ball, P., 2012. Int . J . Production Economics Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material , energy and waste flows. Intern. Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), pp.227.238. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.036. 210. Sulaiman, M. & Mokhtar, N., 2012. Ensuring Sustainability : A Preliminary Study of Environmental Management Accounting in. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 5(2), pp.85.102. 211. Thoradeniya, P. & Burritt, R., 2008. Drivers of sustainability accounting in the public sector. , pp.701.725. 212. Tseng, M.L. et al., 2008. An exploration of relationships between environmental practice and manufacturing performance using the PLS path modeling. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 4(6), pp.487.502. 213. Waddock, S. & Graves, S., 1997. The corporate social performance- financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), pp.303.319. 214. Wagner, M., 2011. Corporate performance implications of extended stakeholder management: New insights on mediation and moderation effects. Ecological Economics, (1991). Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbdv.200490137/abstract [Accessed February 24, 2013]. 215. Wagner, M., 2007. Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation : Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 66, pp.392.402. 216. Wagner, M., 2008. Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 66(2-3), pp.392.402. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800907005010 [Accessed October 21, 2012]. 217. Weng, H.-H., Chen, J.-S. & Chen, P.-C., 2015. Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective. Sustainability, 7(5), pp.4997.5026. Available at: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/5/4997/. 218. Wing, C., Lo, H. & Fryxell, G.E., Environmental Impact , Stakeholder Pressures , and Corporate Environmental Management in China. 210.13.127.229, (002). Available at: http://210.13.127.229/bmt/images/20090409/16118.pdf [Accessed May 19, 2013]. 219. Wolf, J., 2014. The Relationship Between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), pp.317.328. 220. Wong, K.K., 2013. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ) Techniques Using SmartPLS. , (2005). 221. Wood, D.J., 1991. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Mamagement Review, 16(4), pp.691.718.WWF, 2005. The Ecological Footprint, Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:EUROPE+2005+The+E cological+Footprint#0. 222. Yu, W. & Ramanathan, R., 2014. An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures , green operations practices and environmental performance. , (May 2015), pp.37.41. 223. Yu, W. & Ramanathan, R., 2015a. An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), pp.6390.6407. 224. Yu, W. & Ramanathan, R., 2015b. Environmental management practices and environmental performance: The roles of operations and marketing capabilities. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(6), pp.1201.1222. 225. Zailani, S. et al., 2015. Green Innovation Adoption in Automotive Supply Chain: The Malaysian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp.1115.1122. 226. Zailani, S. et al., 2012. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), pp.330.340. 227. Zhang, J. et al., 2010. Crafting integrated multichannel retailing strategies. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(2), pp.168.180. 228. Zhu, Q., Cordeiro, J. & Sarkis, J., 2013. Institutional pressures , dynamic capabilities and environmental management systems : Investigating the ISO 9000 e Environmental management system implementation linkage. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, pp.232.242. 229. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. & Geng, Y., 2005. Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), pp.449.468. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/ 01443570510593148 [Accessed March 6, 2013]. 230. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. & Lai, K. hung, 2008. Green supply chain management implications for �gclosing the loop.�h Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), pp.1.18. 231. Zilahy, G., Szechy, a. & Szechy, a., 2010. Eco-Innovations in the Chemical Industry: Motivation Factors and Barriers. Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation ERSCP-EMSU Conference, pp.1.20. 232. Zunker, T., 2011. Determinants of the voluntary disclosure of employee information in annual reports: an application of stakeholder theory. , (March). Available at: http://works.bepress.com/tamara_zunker/1/ [Accessed May 11, 2013]. 233. Zutshi, A. & Sohal, A.S., 2004. Adoption and maintenance of environmental management systems: critical success factors. Management of environmental quality, 15(4), pp.399.419. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30002763\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 14777830410540144 [Accessed October 19, 2012].

The Effect Of Stakeholder Pressure On Sustainable Performance Mediated By Eco-Innovation Practices

Similar Items