Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection

In a general design process, development of criteria and brainstorming of ideas must be have applied before generating design concept. Then, the selection of best design concept will be conducted. Nevertheless, in real market situations, the contribution of failure product marketed increase due to d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamad Tar, Amira Farhana
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24657/1/Integration%20Of%20Analytical%20Network%20Process%20And%20Theory%20Of%20Inventive%20Problem%20Solving%20For%20Wheelchair%20Conceptual%20Design%20Selection.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24657/2/Integration%20Of%20Analytical%20Network%20Process%20And%20Theory%20Of%20Inventive%20Problem%20Solving%20For%20Wheelchair%20Conceptual%20Design%20Selection.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.24657
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
advisor Arep@Ariff, Hambali

topic TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
Mohamad Tar, Amira Farhana
Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection
description In a general design process, development of criteria and brainstorming of ideas must be have applied before generating design concept. Then, the selection of best design concept will be conducted. Nevertheless, in real market situations, the contribution of failure product marketed increase due to deficiency in design selection process. Thus, the research is aimed to develop a new framework for design selection at the conceptual design stage using the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). The TRIZ method is intended to regulate its limitation by integrating simultaneously with the ANP technique. The ANP consists of two dependence feedback; outer dependence and inner dependence which to measure the accuracy of the result. The TRIZ identifies specific problem and ANP set a goal for a research project. The system parameter will be identified and implement into the contradiction matrices. The inventive problem solving is then generate and develop ideas to be assessed through ANP judgement using Super Decision™ software. The simultaneous integration contributes in solving the contradict problem and selecting the best design concept at the early stage of a design process. This integration is verified by a case study of a manual wheelchair as it assists designers in selecting the most optimum design concept. A case study has been conducted at Rehabilitation Department, Serdang Hospital with assistance from 3 expertise in wheelchair manual handling and technique. Different types of injuries may need different types of manual wheelchair. The discussion includes the main criteria needed in a manual wheelchair, main issues of a manual wheelchair, the process of using a manual wheelchair and et cetera. Therefore, the case study of a manual wheelchair is applied into the simultaneous integration method and generates 4 design concepts of a manual wheelchair. The validation of the selected design concept is described in term of sensitivity analysis, which is to generate the highest value among 4 design concept of a manual wheelchair. The sensitivity analysis was performed respect to each design concept and respect to each criteria. Therefore, Design concept 3 is selected as the best design concept due to its higher value in the normal weight.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mohamad Tar, Amira Farhana
author_facet Mohamad Tar, Amira Farhana
author_sort Mohamad Tar, Amira Farhana
title Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection
title_short Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection
title_full Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection
title_fullStr Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection
title_full_unstemmed Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection
title_sort integration of analytical network process and theory of inventive problem solving for wheelchair conceptual design selection
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24657/1/Integration%20Of%20Analytical%20Network%20Process%20And%20Theory%20Of%20Inventive%20Problem%20Solving%20For%20Wheelchair%20Conceptual%20Design%20Selection.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24657/2/Integration%20Of%20Analytical%20Network%20Process%20And%20Theory%20Of%20Inventive%20Problem%20Solving%20For%20Wheelchair%20Conceptual%20Design%20Selection.pdf
_version_ 1747834080836190208
spelling my-utem-ep.246572021-10-05T12:15:01Z Integration Of Analytical Network Process And Theory Of Inventive Problem Solving For Wheelchair Conceptual Design Selection 2019 Mohamad Tar, Amira Farhana TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) In a general design process, development of criteria and brainstorming of ideas must be have applied before generating design concept. Then, the selection of best design concept will be conducted. Nevertheless, in real market situations, the contribution of failure product marketed increase due to deficiency in design selection process. Thus, the research is aimed to develop a new framework for design selection at the conceptual design stage using the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). The TRIZ method is intended to regulate its limitation by integrating simultaneously with the ANP technique. The ANP consists of two dependence feedback; outer dependence and inner dependence which to measure the accuracy of the result. The TRIZ identifies specific problem and ANP set a goal for a research project. The system parameter will be identified and implement into the contradiction matrices. The inventive problem solving is then generate and develop ideas to be assessed through ANP judgement using Super Decision™ software. The simultaneous integration contributes in solving the contradict problem and selecting the best design concept at the early stage of a design process. This integration is verified by a case study of a manual wheelchair as it assists designers in selecting the most optimum design concept. A case study has been conducted at Rehabilitation Department, Serdang Hospital with assistance from 3 expertise in wheelchair manual handling and technique. Different types of injuries may need different types of manual wheelchair. The discussion includes the main criteria needed in a manual wheelchair, main issues of a manual wheelchair, the process of using a manual wheelchair and et cetera. Therefore, the case study of a manual wheelchair is applied into the simultaneous integration method and generates 4 design concepts of a manual wheelchair. The validation of the selected design concept is described in term of sensitivity analysis, which is to generate the highest value among 4 design concept of a manual wheelchair. The sensitivity analysis was performed respect to each design concept and respect to each criteria. Therefore, Design concept 3 is selected as the best design concept due to its higher value in the normal weight. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24657/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24657/1/Integration%20Of%20Analytical%20Network%20Process%20And%20Theory%20Of%20Inventive%20Problem%20Solving%20For%20Wheelchair%20Conceptual%20Design%20Selection.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24657/2/Integration%20Of%20Analytical%20Network%20Process%20And%20Theory%20Of%20Inventive%20Problem%20Solving%20For%20Wheelchair%20Conceptual%20Design%20Selection.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=116918 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Arep@Ariff, Hambali 1. Atmaca, E., Basar, H. B., 2012. Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP). Energy, 44(1): 555-63. 2. Azammi, A. N., Sapuan, S., Ishak, M., and Sultan, M. T., 2018. Conceptual design of automobile engine rubber mounting composite using TRIZ-Morphological chart-analytic network process technique. Defence Technology. http://doi:10.1016/j.dt.2018.05.009 3. Banar, M., Özkan, A., and Kulac, A., 2010. Choosing a recycling system using ANP and ELECTRE III techniques. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 34(3), pp. 145-154. 4. Bharat Book Breau., 2018. [on-line] Available at: https://www.bharatbook.com/MarketReports/wheelchair-malaysia/201815 [Accessed on 27 May 2018] 5. Bobylev, N., 2011. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process. Automation in Construction, 20(8):1030-40. 6. Buyukozkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., and Ruan, D., 2004. Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 19, pp. 443-461. 7. Cascini, G., and Rissone, P., 2007. Plastics design: Integrating TRIZ creativity and semantic knowledge portals. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(4), pp. 405-424. http://doi:10.1080/09544820410001697208 8. Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., and Zanni. C., 2010. Initial situation analysis through problem graph, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(4), pp. 310-317. 9. Chang, T. R., Wang, C. C., and Wang, C. S., 2015. A Systematic Innovation and Patent Design Around for Wheelchair in Health Care. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Computer Science and Engineering (IJASCSE), 4(9). 10. Chechurin, L., and Borgianni, Y., 2016. Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications. Computers in Industry,82, pp. 119-134. http://doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.06.002 11. Chen, Z., Li, H., Chung, J. K. H., Shen, G. Q. P., and Clements-Croome, D. J., 2006. A triz based value management process for selecting façade solutions. In Inaugural Asia Pacific Value Convention 2006: The World of Innovation - Incorporating the 8th HKIVM International Conference and the 11th Biennial Conference of IVMA, pp. 288-295. 12. Das, S., and Chakraborty, S., 2011. Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process. Journal of Manufacturing System, 26(7):1999-2014 13. Ena, A. T., Verbitsky, M., Devonio, I., and Ikovenko, S., 2002. TechOptimizer(tm) Fundamentals, Invention Machine Educational Services, Boston, MA. 14. Grady, C. A., He, X., and Peeta, S., 2015. Integrating social network analysis with analytic network process for international development project selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(12), pp. 5128-5138. http://doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.039 15. Heish, K. T., 2012. Establishing an Integrated TRIZ and ANP Methods for Innovative Product Development Concepts Selection – Using Rear view Camera as an Example (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tamkang University. 16. Ho. W., 2007. Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Applications – A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research; 186:211-28. https://doi.org110.1016/j.ejor.01.004 17. Hong-cai, S., Guan-yao, and X., Ping, T., 2007. Evaluation of the design alternatives of emergency bridge by applying analytic network process (ANP). Chinese Journal of System Engineering – Theory Practice, 27(3), pp. 63-70. 18. Howard, T. J., Culley, S., Dekoninck, E. A., 2011. Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design, Journal of Engineering Design, 22(8), pp. 562-565. 19. Ilevbare, I. M., Probet, D., Phaal, R., 2013. A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice, Technovation, 33(2/3), pp. 30-37. 20. Iranmanesh, H., and Tabrizi , B. H., 2009. An Integrated framework for customer-oriented web design using QFD, Kano Model and ANP. Computers and Industrial Engineering, International Conference, pp. 1674-1679. 21. Kahraman, C., 2008. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making:Theory and Applications with Recent Developments. New York. Springer. 22. Karsak, E., Sozer, S., and Alptekin, E. S., 2002. Product Planning in QFD using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44(1), pp. 171-190. 23. Kyffin, S., and Gardien, P., 2009. Navigating the innovation matrix: An approach to design-led innovation. International Journal of Design, 3(1), pp. 57-69. 24. Li, T., 2014. Retraction Note: Applying TRIZ and AHP to develop innovative design for automated assembly systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(9-12), pp. 2289-2289. http://doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6609-6 25. Majumder, M., 2015. Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Climatic Aberrations. Singapore. Springer, pp. 35-47. 26. Mansor, M., Sapuan, S., Zainudin, E., Nuraini, A., and Hambali, A., 2014. Conceptual design of kenaf fiber polymer composite automotive parking brake lever using integrated TRIZ–Morphological Chart–Analytic Hierarchy Process method. Materials & Design (1980-2015), 54, pp. 473-482. http://doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.064 27. McKeough, D. M., 2001. [On-line] Available at: http://www.wheelchairnet.org/WCN_WCU/SlideLectures/McKeough/MckeoughWCAnat.html [Accessed on 15 June 2017] 28. Meade, L., and Presley, A., 2002. R&D project selection using ANP...the analytic network process. IEEE Potentials, 21(2(415)2), pp. 22-28. http://doi:10.1109/45.998087 29. Milani, A. S., Shanian, A., Lynam, C., and Scarinci, T., 2013. An application of the analytic network process in multiple criteria material selection. Material Design, 44:622-32. 30. Olga, K. J. E., Marcel, P. W. M., Annet, D. J., Floris, V. A. W. A., and Lucas, V. D. W. H.V., 2005. Relationship between manual wheelchair skill performance and participation of persons with spinal cord injuries 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 42(3), pp. 65-74. Supplement 1. http://doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.08.0093 31. Partovi, F. Y., and Corredoira, R. A., 2002. Quality deployment for the good of soccer. European Journal of Production Economics, 105, pp. 213-227. 32. Pierce, L. L., 1998. Barriers to access: Frustration of people who use a wheelchair for full-time mobility. Rehabilitation Nursing, 23(3):120-25. 33. Raharjo, H., Brombacher, A. C., and Xie, M., 2008. Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: A systematic approach to exploit Quality Function Deployment potentials. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), pp. 253-278. http://doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.012 34. Raie, R., and Jahromi, M. B., 2012. Portfolio optimization using a hybrid od fuzzy ANP. VIKOR and TOPSIS, Manage Sci Lett, 2(7):2473-84. 35. Rese, A., and Baier, D., 2012. What methods and instruments do innovation networks use? Findin from a survey, in: K. Fitcher, S. Beuker (Eds.), Hands-On Methods for Developing Innovation Communities, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 270-276 (Chapter 5) 36. Saaty, T. L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1). 37. Saaty, T. L., 2003. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), pp. 85-91. http://doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00227-8 38. Saaty, T. L., 1999. Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, pp. 1-14. 39. Saaty, T. L., 1998. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGrawHill. 40. Sakao, T., 2007. A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design , International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), pp. 4143-4162. 41. Sakthivel, G., Ilangkumaran, M., and Aditya, G., 2014. A hybrid multi criteria decision modeling approach for the best biodiesel blend selection based on ANP-TOPSIS analysis. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6, pp. 239-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.08.003 42. San, Y. T., Jin, Y. T., and Li, S. C., 2009. TRIZ: Systematic innovation in manufacturing. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Firstfruits Sdn. Bhd. 43. Shaobo, L., Yuqin, M., Guanci, Y., and Yaqing, L., 2009. An Integrated Mode Research of QFD and TRIZ and Its Applications. 2009. Second International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering. http://doi:10.1109/wcse.2009.729 44. Shih, H. S., and Chen, S. H., 2013. A Conceptual Design of a Mobile Healthcare Device-An Application of Three-stage QFD with ANP and TRIZ. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), pp. 80-91. 45. Spinal Outreach Team and School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Queensland., 2017, Manual Wheelchairs. [on-line] Available at: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/_data/assests/pdf_file/0026/429911/manual-wheelchairs.pdf {Accessed on January 2018] 46. Steward, D., 2002, MobilityBasics.ca. [on-line] Available at: https://mobilitybasics.ca/wheelchairs/manualcomp [Accessed on January 2018] 47. Tavana, M., Damghani, K. K., and Abtahi, A. R., 2013. A hybrid fuzzy group decision support framework for advanced-technology prioritization at NASA. Expert System Application, 40(2):480-91. 48. Tsai, W., Leu, J., Lin, J., Lin, S., and Shaw, M., 2010. A MCDM approach for sourcing strategy mix decision in IT projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), pp. 3870-3886. 49. Tuzkaya, G., Onut, S., Tuzkaya, U. R., and Gulsun, B., 2008. An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Environment Management, 88(4):970-83. 50. Velasquez, Mark., and Hester, P. T., 2013. An analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), pp. 56-66. 51. Vinodh, S., Kamala, V., and Jayakrishna, K., 2014. Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ, and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(11-12), pp. 2758-2770. http://doi:10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.057 52. Wu, C., Lin, C., and Lee, C., 2010. Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1), pp. 190-196. http://doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.05.013 53. Yamashina, H., Ito, T., and Kawada, H., 2002. Innovative Product Development Process by Integrating QFD with TRIZ. Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 66(11), pp. 1705-1710. http://doi:10.2493/jjspe.66.1705 54. Yang, C. J., and Chen, J. L., 2011. Accelerating preliminary eco-innovation design for products that integrates case-based reasoning and TRIZ method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9-10), pp. 998-1006. http:// doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.014 55. Yeh, C. H., Huang, J. C., and Yu, C. K., 2010. Integration of four-phase QFD and TRIZ in product R&D: A notebook case study. Research in Engineering Design, 22(3), pp. 125-141. http://doi:10.1007/s00163-010-0099-9 56. Yeh, C. Y., 2012. Implementing an Integrated TRIZ and ANP Method for Innovative Product Concepts Evaluation and Development Using Wireless Mouse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tamkang University. 57. Zhao, X., 2005. Integrated TRIZ and Six Sigma theories for service/process innovation. Proceedings of ICSSSM 05. International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management 2005. http://doi:10.1109/icsssm.2005.1499529