Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning

Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are small slender fly species spreading the arbovirus from flavivirus vector through the feeding of the mammals’ blood. The early detection of this species is very important. Once this species turns into adult mosquitoes, the population control becomes more complicated. The...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohd Fuad, Mohamad Aqil
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2019
Subjects:	TA Engineering (General) Civil engineering (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24715/1/Aedes%20Aegypti%20Larvae%20Detection%20System%20Based%20On%20Convolution%20Neural%20Network%20Via%20Transfer%20Learning.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24715/2/Aedes%20Aegypti%20Larvae%20Detection%20System%20Based%20On%20Convolution%20Neural%20Network%20Via%20Transfer%20Learning.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.24715
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Ab. Ghani, Mohd Ruddin
topic	TA Engineering (General) Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle	TA Engineering (General) Civil engineering (General) Mohd Fuad, Mohamad Aqil Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning
description	Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are small slender fly species spreading the arbovirus from flavivirus vector through the feeding of the mammals’ blood. The early detection of this species is very important. Once this species turns into adult mosquitoes, the population control becomes more complicated. The situation even worse when difficult access places like a water storage tank became one of the favourite breeding places for the Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Therefore, a technological method is required to assist the operator in the field during the routine inspection of the Aedes aegypti larvae, especially at difficult access places as stated in the report of the World Health Organization (WHO). This research proposed a development of the Aedes aegypti larvae detection system based on the convolutional neural network via the transfer learning method. In this study, a database is created since there is no Aedes aegypti database available online. The database is developed by collecting the Aedes aegypti larvae images in in the same environment of water storage tank. 507 images are set for training dataset, 10 images for validation dataset and 30 images for test dataset. Two different convolutional architectures have been trained in this study, which are Faster-Region Convolutional Neural Network (Faster-RCNN) and Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD) that applying same region proposal techniques and base network of Inception-v2. Besides, the pre-trained model of the Common Object in the Context dataset has been applied in this training, where the hyper-parameter fine-tune configuration has been implemented in this study. The performance of the generated inference graphs is analysed based on three main aspects, which are the performance during training, validation and test. In order to estimate the generalization gap in the training phase, the cross-entropy loss of the training and the validation for both architectures are obtained so that the optimum capacity can be retrieved from the learning. Meanwhile, in the validation phase, the tracking-based metrics and the perimeter intrusion detection metrics are conducted for several specific learning steps in the validation dataset. The precision-recall curve (PR Curve) also has been implemented in the validation phase, where the curve at the right top angle is proposed as the best model in this study. In the test phase, the test dataset is tested with standard detection metrics. From the results obtained in the training, validation and test analyses, it is observed that the best architecture for the detection of the Aedes aegypti larvae is the Faster-RCNN. The results also indicated that the accuracy of the test results for the Faster-RCNN is 0.9213, while the SSD is 0.6966. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Faster-RCNN is the best model in the detection of the Aedes aegypti larvae. The impact of this study is the proposal of a new method with respect to vision technology, specifically for the Aedes Aegypti larvae prevention and outbreak as highlighted by WHO and sustainable development programme by United Nation.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mohd Fuad, Mohamad Aqil
author_facet	Mohd Fuad, Mohamad Aqil
author_sort	Mohd Fuad, Mohamad Aqil
title	Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning
title_short	Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning
title_full	Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning
title_fullStr	Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning
title_full_unstemmed	Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning
title_sort	aedes aegypti larvae detection system based on convolution neural network via transfer learning
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Electrical Engineering
publishDate	2019
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24715/1/Aedes%20Aegypti%20Larvae%20Detection%20System%20Based%20On%20Convolution%20Neural%20Network%20Via%20Transfer%20Learning.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24715/2/Aedes%20Aegypti%20Larvae%20Detection%20System%20Based%20On%20Convolution%20Neural%20Network%20Via%20Transfer%20Learning.pdf
_version_	1747834093979041792
spelling	my-utem-ep.247152021-10-05T12:47:04Z Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning 2019 Mohd Fuad, Mohamad Aqil TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are small slender fly species spreading the arbovirus from flavivirus vector through the feeding of the mammals’ blood. The early detection of this species is very important. Once this species turns into adult mosquitoes, the population control becomes more complicated. The situation even worse when difficult access places like a water storage tank became one of the favourite breeding places for the Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Therefore, a technological method is required to assist the operator in the field during the routine inspection of the Aedes aegypti larvae, especially at difficult access places as stated in the report of the World Health Organization (WHO). This research proposed a development of the Aedes aegypti larvae detection system based on the convolutional neural network via the transfer learning method. In this study, a database is created since there is no Aedes aegypti database available online. The database is developed by collecting the Aedes aegypti larvae images in in the same environment of water storage tank. 507 images are set for training dataset, 10 images for validation dataset and 30 images for test dataset. Two different convolutional architectures have been trained in this study, which are Faster-Region Convolutional Neural Network (Faster-RCNN) and Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD) that applying same region proposal techniques and base network of Inception-v2. Besides, the pre-trained model of the Common Object in the Context dataset has been applied in this training, where the hyper-parameter fine-tune configuration has been implemented in this study. The performance of the generated inference graphs is analysed based on three main aspects, which are the performance during training, validation and test. In order to estimate the generalization gap in the training phase, the cross-entropy loss of the training and the validation for both architectures are obtained so that the optimum capacity can be retrieved from the learning. Meanwhile, in the validation phase, the tracking-based metrics and the perimeter intrusion detection metrics are conducted for several specific learning steps in the validation dataset. The precision-recall curve (PR Curve) also has been implemented in the validation phase, where the curve at the right top angle is proposed as the best model in this study. In the test phase, the test dataset is tested with standard detection metrics. From the results obtained in the training, validation and test analyses, it is observed that the best architecture for the detection of the Aedes aegypti larvae is the Faster-RCNN. The results also indicated that the accuracy of the test results for the Faster-RCNN is 0.9213, while the SSD is 0.6966. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Faster-RCNN is the best model in the detection of the Aedes aegypti larvae. The impact of this study is the proposal of a new method with respect to vision technology, specifically for the Aedes Aegypti larvae prevention and outbreak as highlighted by WHO and sustainable development programme by United Nation. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24715/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24715/1/Aedes%20Aegypti%20Larvae%20Detection%20System%20Based%20On%20Convolution%20Neural%20Network%20Via%20Transfer%20Learning.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24715/2/Aedes%20Aegypti%20Larvae%20Detection%20System%20Based%20On%20Convolution%20Neural%20Network%20Via%20Transfer%20Learning.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=116893 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Electrical Engineering Ab. Ghani, Mohd Ruddin 1. Aburas, H.M., Cetiner, B.G., and Sari, M., 2010. Dengue confirmed-cases prediction: A neural network model. Expert Systems with Applications, Elsevier Ltd, 37(6), pp. 4256–4260. 2. Amarasinghe, A., Suduwella, C., Niroshan, L., Elvitigala, C., De Zoysa, K., and Keppetiyagama, C., 2018. Suppressing Dengue via a Drone System. 17th International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions, ICTer 2017, pp. 202–208. 3. Bar, A., and Andrew, J., 2013. Morphology and Morphometry of Aedes aegypti Larvae. Annual Review and Research in Biology, 3(1), pp. 1–21. 4. Bojarski, M., Del Testa, D., Dworakowski, D., Firner, B., Flepp, B., Goyal, P., Jackel, L. D., Monfort, M., Muller, U., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, J., and Zieba, K., 2016. End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1604.07316. 5. Cai, W., Li, J., Xie, Z., Zhao, T., and Lu, K., 2018. Street Object Detection based on Faster R-CNN. 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference, Technical Committee on Control Theory, Chinese Association of Automation, pp. 9500–9503. 6. Cecílio, S.G., Júnior, W.F.S., Tótola, A.H., De Brito Magalhães, C.L., Ferreira, J.M.S., and De Magalhães, J.C., 2015. Dengue Virus Detection in Aedes Aegypti Larvae from Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Vector Ecology, 40(1), pp. 71–74. 7. Cetiner, B.G., Sari, M., and Aburas, H.M., 2009. Recognition of Dengue Disease Patterns Using Artificial. 5th International Advanced Technologies Symposium, pp. 359–362. 8. Chahyati, D., Fanany, M.I., and Arymurthy, A.M., 2017. Man Woman Detection in Surveillance Images. 2017 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology, ICoIC7 2017, pp. 1–4. 9. Chan, Y.C., Chan, K.L., and Ho, B.C., 1971. Aedes Aegypti (L.) and Aedes Albopictus (Skuse) in Singapore City. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 44(5), pp. 617–627. 10. Chareonviriyaphap, T., Akratanakul, P., Nettanomsak, S., and Huntamai, S., 2003. Larval Habitats and Distribution Patterns of Aedes Aegypti (Linnaeus) and Aedes Albopictus (Skuse), in Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 34(3), pp. 529–535. 11. Chen, C. D., Seleena, B., Nazni, W.A., Lee, H.L., Masri, S.M., Chiang, Y.F., and Sofian-Azirun, M., 2006. Dengue Vectors Surveillance in Endemic Areas in Kuala Lumpur City Centre and Selangor State, Malaysia. Dengue Bulletin, 30, pp. 197–203. 12. Cheong, W.H., 1967. Preferred Aedes Aegypti Larval Habitats in Urban Areas. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 36(4), pp. 586–589. 13. Dasgupta, S., 1999. Learning Mixtures of Gaussians. 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1999., pp. 634–644. 14. De Los Reyes, A.M.M., Reyes, A.C.A., Torres, J.L., Padilla, D.A., and Villaverde, J., 2017. Detection of Aedes Aegypti Mosquito by Digital Image Processing Tedechniques and Support Vector Machine. 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), pp. 2342–2345. 15. Dubitzky, W., Wolkenhauer, O., Yokota, H., and Cho, K.H., 2013. Encyclopedia of Systems Biology, available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7. 16. Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C.K.I., Winn, J., and Zisserman, A., 2010. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes ( VOC ) Challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 88(2), pp. 303–338. 17. Fuchida, M., Pathmakumar, T., Mohan, R., Tan, N., and Nakamura, A., 2017. Vision-Based Perception and Classification of Mosquitoes Using Support Vector Machine. Applied Sciences, 7(1), pp. 51-63. 18. Girshick, R., 2015. Fast R-CNN. The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 1440–1448. 19. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J., 2014. Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 580–587. 20. Godil, A., Bostelman, R., Shackleford, W., Hong, T., and Shneier, M., 2014. Performance Metrics for Evaluating Object and Human Detection and Tracking Systems. [online] Available at:https: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d051/ba0a904e4b4c45a2af145aa29b84 90bbbc5c.pdf [Accessed on 15 Mac 2018]. 21. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A., 2016. Deep Learning. 22. Guan, S., and Loew, M., 2017. Breast Cancer Detection Using Transfer Learning in Convolutional Neural Networks. 2017 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR), pp. 1–8. 23. Guo, X., Polania, L., and Barner, K., 2018. Smile detection in the wild based on transfer learning. Proceedings - 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, FG 2018, pp. 679–686. 24. Gusmão, G., Machado, S.C.S., Rodrigues, M.A.B., Portela, N.M., Mello, C.A.B., Dos Santos, W.P., and Candeias, A.L.B., 2009. A New Algorithm for Segmenting and Counting Aedes Aegypti Eggs in Ovitraps. Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine, EMBC 2009, pp. 6714–6717. 25. Hancock, P.A., Ritchie, S.A., Koenraadt, C.J., Scott, T.W., Hoffmann, A.A., and Godfray, H.C.J., 2019. Predicting the spatial dynamics of Wolbachia infections in Aedes aegypti arbovirus vector populations in heterogeneous landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(7), pp. 1674–1686. 26. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J., 2016. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778. 27. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J., 2015. Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 37(9), pp. 1904–1916. 28. Hearst, M.A., Dumais, S.T., Osuna, E., Platt, J., and Scholkopf, B., 1998. Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 13(4), pp. 18–28. 29. Hon, M., and Mefraz Khan, N., 2017. Towards Alzheimer’s Disease Classification through Transfer Learning. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 1166–1169. 30. Hosang, J., and May, C.V., 2017. Learning non-maximum suppression. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1705.02950. 31. Isaacs, N., 2006. Measuring Inter Epidemic Risk in a Dengue Endemic Rural Area Using Aedes Larval Indices. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 31(3), pp. 187–188. 32. Kay, B., 1999. Dengue Vector Surveillance and Control. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 12(5), pp. 425–432. 33. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Geoffrey E.H., 2012. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (NIPS2012), pp. 1–9. 34. Lachenbruch, P.A., and Goldstein, M., 1979. Discriminant analysis. Biometrics, pp. 69–85. 35. Lan, W., Dang, J., Wang, Y., and Wang, S., 2018. Pedestrian Detection Based on YOLO Network Model. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), IEEE, pp. 1547–1551. 36. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., and Haffner, P., 1998. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 2278–2324. 37. Lee, H., Rohani, A., Khadri, M., Nazni, W., Rozilawati, H., Nurulhusna, A., AH, N.A., Roziah, A., Rosilawati, R., and Teh, C., 2015. Dengue Vector Control in Malaysia- Challenges and Recent Advances. The International Medical Journal of Malaysia, 14(1), pp. 11–16. 38. Lee, S.J., Kim, J.H., and Lee, S.C., 2018. Effects of Oil-Film Layer and Surfactant on the Siphonal Respiration and Survivorship in the Fourth Instar Larvae of Aedes Togoi Mosquito in Laboratory Conditions. Scientific Reports, Springer US, 8(1), pp. 5694–5701. 39. Lempitsky, V., Kohli, P., Rother, C., and Sharp, T., 2009. Image Segmentation with a Bounding Box Prior. International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 277–284. 40. Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Bourdev, L., Girshick, R., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Zitnick, C.L., and Doll´ar, P., 2015. Microsoft COCO : Common Objects in Context. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 740–755. 41. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C., and Berg, A.C., 2016. SSD : Single Shot MultiBox Detector. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 21–37. 42. Mello, C.A.B., Dos Santos, W.P., Rodrigues, M.A.B, Candeias, A.L., Guasmao, C.M.G., and Portela, N.M., 2009. Automatic Counting of Aedes Aegypti Eggs in Image of Ovitraps. Recent Advances in Biomedical Engineering, (11), pp. 211–221. 43. Messina, J.P., Brady, O.J., Scott, T.W., Zou, C., Pigott, D.M., Duda, K.A., Bhatt, S., Katzelnick, L., Howes, R.E., Battle, K. E., Simmons, C.P., and Hay, S.I., 2014. Global Spread of Dengue Virus Types: Mapping the 70 Year History. Trends in Microbiology, Elsevier Ltd, 22(3), pp. 138–146. 44. Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation. 2017. Dengue Cases in Malaysia Year 1995 – 2017. IDengue Untuk Komuniti [online] Available at: idengue.remotesensing.gov.my/ idengue/content/statistik [Accessed on 8 Janary 2019]. 45. Mohd Fuad, M.A., Ab Ghani, M.R., Ghazali, R., Izzuddin, T.A., Sulaima, M.F., Jano, Z., and Sutikno, T., 2018. Training of Convolutional Neural Network using Transfer Learning for Aedes Aegypti Larvae. TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 16(4), pp. 1894–1900. 46. Moore, A., 1991. Artificial Neural Network Trained to Identify Mosquitos in Flight. Journal of Insect Behavior, 4(3), pp. 391–396. 47. Nyamah, M., Sulaiman, S., and Omar, B., 2010. Categorization of Potential Breeding Sites of Dengue Vectors in Johor, Malaysia. Tropical Biomedicine, 27(1), pp. 33–40. 48. Pang, E. L., and Loh, H.S., 2016. Current Perspectives on Dengue Episode in Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, Elsevier B.V., 9(4), pp. 395–401. 49. Pistori, H., Viana Aguiar Odakura, V.V., Oliveira Monteiro, J.B., Gonçalves, W.N., Roel, A.R., De Andrade Silva, J., and Machado, B.B., 2010. Mice and Larvae Tracking Using a Particle Filter with an Auto-adjustable Observation Model. Pattern Recognition Letters, Elsevier B.V., 31(4), pp. 337–346. 50. Powell, J.R., and Tabachnick, W.J., 2013. History of Domestication and Spread of Aedes Aegypti - A Review. Memorias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 108(1), pp. 11–17. 51. Prechelt, L., 1998. Early stopping - But when? Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, pp. 55–69. 52. Qian, N., 1999. On the momentum term in gradient descent learning algorithms. Neural Networks, 12(1), pp. 145–151. 53. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A., 2016. You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 779–788. 54. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., and Sun, J., 2015. Faster R-CNN : Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 91–99. 55. Rohani, A., Suzilah, I., Malinda, M., Anuar, I., Mohd Mazlan, I., Maszaitun, M.S., Topek, O., Tanrang, Y., Ooi, S.C., Rozilawati, H., and Lee, H.L., 2011. Aedes larval population dynamics and risk for dengue epidemics in Malaysia. Tropical Biomedicine, 28(2), pp. 237–248. 56. Rothe, R., Guillaumin, M., and Van Gool, L., 2014. Non-Maximum Suppression for Object Detection by Passing Messages between Windows. Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 290–306. 57. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., and Williams, R.J., 1986. Learning Representations by Back-Propagating Errors. Nature, 323(6088), pp. 533–536. 58. Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., C.Berg, A., and Fei-Fei, L., 2015. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 115(3), pp. 211–252. 59. Saleeza, S.N.R., Norma-Rashid, Y., and Azirun, M.S., 2011. Mosquitoes Larval Breeding Habitat in Urban and Suburban Areas , Peninsular Malaysia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 58(10), pp. 569–573. 60. Sam, S.S., Omar, S.F.S., Teoh, B.T., Abd-Jamil, J., and AbuBakar, S., 2013. Review of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever Fatal Cases Seen Among Adults: A Retrospective Study. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 7(5), pp. 1–7. 61. Sanchez-Ortiz, A., Fierro-Radilla, A., Arista-Jalife, A., Cedillo-Hernandez, M., Nakano-Miyatake, M., Robles-Camarillo, D., and Cuatepotzo-Jiménez, V., 2017. Mosquito Larva Classification Method Based on Convolutional Neural Networks. 2017 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers, CONIELECOMP 2017, pp. 4–9. 62. Sánchez, J., and Perronnin, F., 2011. High-Dimensional Signature Compression for Large-Sscale Image Classification. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1665–1672. 63. Schaper, S., and Hernández-Chavarría, F., 2006. Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Four Larval Instars of the Dengue Fever Vector Aedes Aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Revista de Biología Tropical, 54(3), pp. 847–852. 64. Scott, G.J., England, M.R., Starms, W.A., Marcum, R.A., and Davis, C.H., 2017. Training Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Land–Cover Classification of High-Resolution Imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(4), pp. 549–553. 65. Sermanet, P., Eigen, D., Zhang, X., Mathieu, M., Fergus, R., and LeCun, Y., 2013. OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Networks. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1312.6229, available at:https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299176. 66. Shepard, D.S., Lees, R., Ng, C.W., Undurraga, E.A., Halasa, Y., and Lum, L., 2013. Burden of Dengue in Malaysia . Report from a Collaboration between Universities and the Ministry of Health of Malaysia. 67. Shijie, J., Peiyi, J., Siping, H., and Haibo, S.L., 2017. Automatic Detection of Tomato Diseases and Pests Based on Leaf Images. 2017 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2017, pp. 3507–3510. 68. Shyam, D., Kot, A., and Athalye, C., 2018. Abandoned Object Detection Using Pixel-Based Finite State Machine and Single Shot Multibox Detector. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), IEEE, pp. 1–6. 69. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A., 2014. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1409.1556, available at:https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170251. 70. Song-Quan., 2016. Dengue Vector Control in Malaysia: A Review for Current and Alternative Strategies. Sains Malaysiana, 45(5), pp. 777–785. 71. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R., 2014. Dropout: a Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, pp. 1929–1958. 72. Sum, J.S., Lee, W.C., Amir, A., Braima, K.A., Jeffery, J., Abdul-Aziz, N.M., Fong, M.Y., and Lau, Y.L., 2014. Phylogenetic study of six species of Anopheles mosquitoes in Peninsular Malaysia based on inter-transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) of ribosomal DNA. Parasites and Vectors, 7(1), pp. 1–8. 73. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A., 2015. Going Deeper with Convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–9. 74. Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Erhan, D., Anguelov, D., and Ioffe, S., 2014. Scalable, High-Quality Object Detection. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1412.1441, available at:https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.33.002737. 75. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z., 2016. Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2818–2826. 76. Talukdar, J., Gupta, S., Rajpura, P.S., and Hegde, R.S., 2018. Transfer Learning for Object Detection using State- of-the-Art Deep Neural Networks. 2018 5th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), pp. 78–83. 77. Torrey, L., and Shavlik, J., 2010. Transfer learning. Handbook of Research on Machine Learning Applications and Trends: Algorithms, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 242–264. 78. Veasna, D., Dussart, P., and Buchy, P., 2017. Zika virus in Asia. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, The Author(s), 54, pp. 121–128. 79. Wang, E., Ni, H., Xu, R., Barrett, A.D.T., Watowich, S.J., Gubler, D.J., and Weaver, S.C., 2000. Evolutionary Relationships of Endemic / Epidemic and Sylvatic Dengue Viruses. Journal of Virology, 74(7), pp. 3227–3234. 80. Wang, Y., Wang, C., and Zhang, H., 2018. Combining Single Shot Multibox Detector with Transfer Learning for Ship Detection using Sentinel-1 SAR Images. Remote Sensing Letters, 9(8), pp. 780–788. 81. Wang, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, C., and Fu, Q., 2017. Combining Single Shot Multibox Detector with Transfer Learning for Ship Detection using Chinese Gaofen-3 Images. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium, pp. 712–716. 82. Wang, Z., Du, L., Mao, J., Liu, B., and Yang, D., 2018. SAR Target Detection Based on SSD With Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, pp. 1–5. 83. Wei, L., Runge, L., and Xiaolei, L., 2018. Traffic Sign Detection and Recognition via Transfer Learning. IEEE Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2018, pp. 5884–5887. 84. WHO., 2012. Global strategy for dengue prevention and control 2012-2020. Geneva: World Health Organization. [online] Available at:https://www.who.int/denguecontrol/978924150 4034/en/ [Accesed on 8 January 2017]. 85. WHO., 2011. Comprehensive Guideline for Prevention and Control of Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. [online] Available at:https://apps.searo.who.int/pds_docs/B4751.pdf [Accesed on 16 February 2017]. 86. William, T., and Menon, J., 2014. A review of substance abuse research in malaysia. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 69(8), pp. 82–87. 87. Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., and Lipson, H., 2014. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Proceeding in Advances in neural information processing systems. pp. 3320-3328. 88. Zeiler, M. D., and Fergus, R., 2014. Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 818–833. 89. Zhao, X., Li, W., Zhang, Y., Gulliver, T.A., Chang, S., and Feng, Z., 2016. A Faster RCNN-Based Pedestrian Detection System. 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1–5. 90. Zitnick, C.L., and Dollár, P., 2014. Edge Boxes: Locating Object Proposals from Edges. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 391–405.

Aedes Aegypti Larvae Detection System Based On Convolution Neural Network Via Transfer Learning

Similar Items