Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism

Airframe noise reduction is a topic being investigated for the well-being of people living close to airports. This type of noise can occur between the high-lift systems and main body of the airfoil. The proposed shape-changing mechanism is an alternative to reduce airframe noise by eliminating the g...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ismail, Mohammad Hazrin
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2018
Subjects:	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24853/1/Conversion%20Technique%20From%202d%20To%203d%20Model%20For%20A%20Shape-Changing%20Aircraft%20Slat%20Mechanism.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24853/2/Conversion%20Technique%20From%202d%20To%203d%20Model%20For%20A%20Shape-Changing%20Aircraft%20Slat%20Mechanism.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.24853
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Shamsudin, Shamsul Anuar
topic	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Ismail, Mohammad Hazrin Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism
description	Airframe noise reduction is a topic being investigated for the well-being of people living close to airports. This type of noise can occur between the high-lift systems and main body of the airfoil. The proposed shape-changing mechanism is an alternative to reduce airframe noise by eliminating the gap during deployment of the high-lift systems. This work presents a new design of the 30P30N wing, which focusses on installing a shape-changing slat into the systems. This work applies a chain of rigid body wing segments connected by revolute and prismatic joints that are capable of approximating a shape change defined by a set of morphed slat design profiles. The [C M q slat segment design was created as a result of optimised segmentation process using the Shapechanger software where C is a constant curvature segment that may change length, while M is a mean segment of fixed length. The XY data are exported into CATIA software through macros command. To achieve a single degree of freedom (DOF), a building-block approach is employed to mechanise the fixed-end shape-changing chain by using Geometric Constraint Programming as an effective method to design the mechanism. Lastly, a small scale threedimensional model is developed to mechanise the mechanism driven by a single actuator. Related results showed that the shape-changing airfoil that deploys without a gap between the slat and main body, has a pressure coefficient of around -2.0 whereas the conventional one with gap hovers at -1.0. In addition, the values of Sound Pressure Level (SPL) were improved by maintaining below 100 dB near the slat portion of the airfoil.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Ismail, Mohammad Hazrin
author_facet	Ismail, Mohammad Hazrin
author_sort	Ismail, Mohammad Hazrin
title	Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism
title_short	Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism
title_full	Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism
title_fullStr	Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism
title_full_unstemmed	Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism
title_sort	conversion technique from 2d to 3d model for a shape-changing aircraft slat mechanism
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate	2018
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24853/1/Conversion%20Technique%20From%202d%20To%203d%20Model%20For%20A%20Shape-Changing%20Aircraft%20Slat%20Mechanism.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24853/2/Conversion%20Technique%20From%202d%20To%203d%20Model%20For%20A%20Shape-Changing%20Aircraft%20Slat%20Mechanism.pdf
_version_	1747834096846897152
spelling	my-utem-ep.248532022-02-11T10:26:37Z Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism 2018 Ismail, Mohammad Hazrin T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Airframe noise reduction is a topic being investigated for the well-being of people living close to airports. This type of noise can occur between the high-lift systems and main body of the airfoil. The proposed shape-changing mechanism is an alternative to reduce airframe noise by eliminating the gap during deployment of the high-lift systems. This work presents a new design of the 30P30N wing, which focusses on installing a shape-changing slat into the systems. This work applies a chain of rigid body wing segments connected by revolute and prismatic joints that are capable of approximating a shape change defined by a set of morphed slat design profiles. The [C M q slat segment design was created as a result of optimised segmentation process using the Shapechanger software where C is a constant curvature segment that may change length, while M is a mean segment of fixed length. The XY data are exported into CATIA software through macros command. To achieve a single degree of freedom (DOF), a building-block approach is employed to mechanise the fixed-end shape-changing chain by using Geometric Constraint Programming as an effective method to design the mechanism. Lastly, a small scale threedimensional model is developed to mechanise the mechanism driven by a single actuator. Related results showed that the shape-changing airfoil that deploys without a gap between the slat and main body, has a pressure coefficient of around -2.0 whereas the conventional one with gap hovers at -1.0. In addition, the values of Sound Pressure Level (SPL) were improved by maintaining below 100 dB near the slat portion of the airfoil. 2018 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24853/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24853/1/Conversion%20Technique%20From%202d%20To%203d%20Model%20For%20A%20Shape-Changing%20Aircraft%20Slat%20Mechanism.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24853/2/Conversion%20Technique%20From%202d%20To%203d%20Model%20For%20A%20Shape-Changing%20Aircraft%20Slat%20Mechanism.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=117007 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering Shamsudin, Shamsul Anuar 1. Ambike, S.S. and Schmiedeler, J.P., 2007. Application of Geometric Constraint Programming to the Kinematic Design of Three-Point Hitches. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 23 (I), pp. 13-21. 2. Ameduri, S., Brindisi, A,, Tiseo, B., Concilio, A., and Pecora, R., 2012. Optimization and integration of shape memory alloy (SMA)-based elastic actuators within a morphing flap architecture. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 3. Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R.M., Friswell, M.I., and Inrnan, D.J., 201 1. A Review of Morphing Aircraft. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22 (9), pp.823- 877. 4. Barbarino, S., Dettmer, W.G., and Friswell, M.I., 2010. Morphing trailing edges with shape memory alloy rods. 21st International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies 201 0, ICAST 201 0. 5. Barlas, T.K. and van Kuik, G.A.M., 2010. Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 46 (I), pp.1-27. 6. Billo, E.J., 201 1. Programming with VBA. Excel for Chemists@, 9, pp.503-542. 7. Calestani, D., Villani, M., Culiolo, M., Delmonte, D., Coppede, N., and Zappettini, A., 2017. Smart composites materials: A new idea to add gas-sensing properties to commercial carbon-fibers by functionalization with ZnO nanowires. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical. 8. Castillo-Acero, M.A., Cuerno-Rejado, C., and G6mez-Tierno, M.A., 2016. Morphing structure for a rudder. Aeronautical Journal. 9. Cesnik, C.E.S. and Shin, S., 2001. On the modeling of integrally actuated helicopter blades. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 38 (10-13), pp.1765-1789. 10. Chapra, S.C., 2009. Introduction to VBA for Excel. 2nd Editio. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall. 11. Chase, T.R., Kinzel, G.L., and Erdman, A.G., 2013. Computer Aided Mechanism Synthesis: A Historical Perspective. In: V. Kurnar, J. Schrniedeler, and S. V. Sreenivasan, eds. Adv. in Mech., Rob. & Des. Educ. & Res., MMS 14. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 17-33. 12. Chee, A., 2017. Electromagnetic Actuation for a Dragonfly Inspired Flapping-Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle. University of Toronto. 13. Chua, C.K., Leong, K.F., and Lim, C.S., 2010. Rapid protofyping: principles and applications. 3rd ed. Singapore: World Scientific. 14. Dam, C.P., 2002. The aerodynamic design of multi-element high-lift systems for transport airplanes. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 15. Dobrzynski, W., 2010. Almost 40 Years of Airframe Noise Research: What Did We Achieve? Journal ofAircraft, 47 (2), pp.353-367. 16. Dobrzynski, W., Chow, L.C., Guion, P., and Shiells, D., 2002. Research into landing gear airframe noise reduction. In: 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference Paper 2002-2409. pp.1-10. 17. Erdman, A., Sandor, G., and Kota, S., 2001a. Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 18. Erdman, A., Sandor, G., and Kota, S., 2001b. Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis. 4th Ed. New York: Prentice-Hall. 19. Fang, L., 2011. Suppression of Stall on High-Chamber Flap using Upper-Surface Flow. Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom. 20. Frank, G.J., Joo, J.J., Sanders, B., Gamer, D.M., and Murray, A.P., 2008. Mechanization of a High Aspect Ratio Wing for Aerodynamic Control. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 19 (9), pp.1101-1112. 21. Freudenstein, F., 1973. Kinematics: Past, Present and Future. Mecha~ism and Machine Theory, 8. 22. Freudenstein, F. and Sandor, G.N., 1959. Synthesis of Path Generating Mechanisms by Means of a Programmed Digital Computer. ASME .J Eng., 8lB (2), pp.159-168. 23. Gamer, L.J., Wilson, L.N., Lagoudas, D.C., and Rediniotis, O.K., 2000. Development of a shape memory alloy actuated biomimetic vehicle. Smart Materials and Structures, 9 (S), pp.673-683. 24. Gaunaa, M., 2010. Unsteady two-dimensional potential-flow model for thin variable geometry airfoils. Wind Energy, 13 (2-3), pp. 167-192. 25. Gillmer, T.C., 1975. Modern Ship Design. 2nd ed. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. 26. Grohmann, B., Maucher, C., and Janker, P., 2006. Actuation Concepts for Morphing Helicopter Rotor Blades. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. pp.1-10. 27. Han, M.W., Rodrigue, H., Cho, S., Song, S.H., Wang, W., Chu, W.S., and Ahn, S.H., 2016. Woven type smart soft composite for soft morphing car spoiler. Composites Part B: Engineering. 28. Ismail, M.H., Shamsudin, S.A., and Sudin, M.N., 2015. Design And Analysis Of Rigid- Body Shape-Change Mechanism For Aircraft Wings. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(21). 29. T i e r , P., Claeyssen, F., Leletty, R., Sosniki, O., Pages, A,, Magnac, G., and Christmann, M., 2008. New Actuators for Aircraft , Space and Military Applications. ACTUATOR 201 0, 12th International Conference on New Actuators, (June), pp.346-354. Jennings, R.L., 1991. A Flap Assembly. 30. Karagiannis, D., Stamatelos, D., Spathopoulos, T., Solomou, A,, Machairas, T., Chrysohoidis, N., Saravanos, D., and Kappatos, V., 2014. Airfoil morphing based on SMA actuation technology. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology. 31. Kaufman, R.E. and Maurer, W.G., 1971. Interactive Linkage Synthesis on a Small Computer. In: ACMNational Conference. New York, USA. 32. Khorrami, M.R., 2003. Understanding Slat Noise Sources. In Proc EUROMECH Colloquium 1/49 Computational Aeroacoustics Froin Acoustic Sources Modeling to FarField Radiated Noise Prediction Chamonix France, pp.4-7. 33. Kim, S.I. and Kim, Y.Y., 2014. Topology optimization of planar linkage mechanisms, (February), pp.265-286. 34. Kinzel, E.C., Schmiedeler, J.P., and Pennock, G.R., 2006. Kinematic Synthesis for Finitely Separated Positions Using Geometric Constraint Programming. Journal of Mechanical Design, (5), pp.1070-1079. 35. Kinzel, G.L. and Chang, C., 1984. The Analysis of Planar Linkages Using a Modular Approach. Mech. Mach. Theory, 19 (I), pp.165-172. 36. Konig, D., Koh, S.R., Schroder, W., and Meinke, M., 2009. Slat Noise Source Identification. 15th A I M E A S Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIM Aeroacoustics Conference). 37. Kota, S., Hetrick, J., and Osborn, R., 2003a. Design and application of compliant mechanisms for morphing. 24 Smart Structures and Materials 2003:, 5054 (734), pp.24- 33. 38. Kota, S. and Hetrick, J.A., 2008. Adaptive Compliant Wing and Rotor System. 39. Kota, S., Hetrick, J.A., Osbom, R., Paul, D., Pendleton, E., Flick, P., and Tilmann, C., 2003b. Design and application of compliant mechanisms for morphing aircraft structures. Proc. SPIE, 5054 (November), pp.24-33. 40. Kota, S., Osbom, R., Ervin, G., Maric, D., Flick, P., and Paul, D., 2006. Mission Adaptive Compliant Wing - Design , Fabrication and Flight Test Mission Adaptive Compliant Wing. Rtompavt, pp. 1-1 9. 41. Krishnan, G., Kim, C., and Kota, S., 201 1. An Intrinsic Geometric Framework for the Building Block Synthesis of Single Point Compliant Mechanisms. ASME J. Mech. Rob., 3 (I), pp.011001-011009. 42. Lambie, B., 201 1. Aeroelastic Investigation of a Wind Turbine Airfoil with Self-Adaptive Camber. Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Denmark. 43. Maheri, A., Noroozi, S., and Vinney, J., 2007. Application of combined analyticalJFEA coupled aero-structure simulation in design of wind turbine adaptive blades. Renewable 44. Molland, A.F., 201 1. The Maritime Engineering Reference Book: A Guide to Ship Design, Construction and Operation. Elsevier. 45. Murayama, M., Nakakita, K., Yamamoto, K., Ura, H., and Ito, Y., 2014. Experimental Study of Slat Noise fiom 30P30N Three-Element High-Lift Airfoil in JAXA Hard-Wall Low-Speed Wind Tunnel. 20th AIAAfCEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. 46. Murray, A.P., Schmiedeler, J.P., and Korte, B.M., 2008. Kinematic Synthesis of Planar, Shape-Changing Rigid-Body Mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design, 130 (3), pp.1- 10. 47. Myszka, D.H., 2012. Machines And Mechanisms Applied Kinematic Analysis. 4th ed. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Hall. 48. Myszka, D.H., Murray, A.P., and Schmiedeler, J.P., 2009. Singularity Analysis of an Extensible Kinematic Architecture: Assur Class N, Order N-1. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 1 (I), pp.011009-011015. 49. Neville, A.B. and Sanderson, A.C., 1996. Tetrobot family tree: modular synthesis of kinematic structures forparallel robotics. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96,2. 50. Pascioni, K., Cattafesta, L.N., and Choudhari, M.M., 2014. An Experimental Investigation of the 30P30N Multi-Element High-Lift Airfoil. In: 20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. 51. Pechlivanoglou, G., Nayeri, C.N., and Paschereit, C.O., 2012. Performance Optimization of Wind Turbine Rotors with Active Flow Control - Part 2. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Corlference and Exposition. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp.915-927. 52. Perkiis, D.A. and Murray, A.P., 201 1. Synthesis Of Coupler-Drivers For Four Position Planar Synthesis Tasks. In: ASME 2011 international Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and information in Engineering Conference. Washington, DC, USA, pp.427-434. 53. Persinger, J.A., Schmiedeler, J.P., and Murray, A.P., 2009. Synthesis of Planar Rigid-Body Mechanisms Approximating Shape Changes Defined by Closed Curves. Journal of Mechanical Design, 13 1 (7), pp.071006-071012. 54. Plantenberg, K., 2009. Introduction to CATZA V5 Release 19. Kansas: SDC Publications. 55. Prock, B.C., Weisshaar, T.A., and Crossley, W.A., 2002. Morphing airfoil shape change optimization with minimum actuator energy as an objective. A M Paper, 5401 (September), pp.46. 56. Ramrakhyani, D.S., Lesieutre, G. a., Frecker, M.I., and Bharti, S., 2005. Aircraft Structural Morphing using Tendon-Actuated Compliant Cellular Trusses. Journal of Aircraft, 42 (6), pp.1614-1620. 57. Rodriguez, A.R., 2007. Morphing Aircraft Technology Survey. Europe, (January), pp.1- 16. 58. Roman, S. and Roman, B.S., 2002. Writing Excel macros with VBA. Cognition. 59. Rudolph, P.K.C., 1996. High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners. NASA Contractor Report 4746. 60. Rumsey, C.L. and Ying, S.X., 2002. Prediction of high lift: Review of present CFD capability. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 61. Sakurai, S., James, M.W., Stephen, J.F., and Sharon, X.C., 2014. Aircraft Flap Mechanism Having Compact Large Fowler Motion Providing Multiple Cruise Positions. 62. Schneekluth, H. and Bertram, V., 1998. Ship Design for Efficiency and Economy. Ship Design for ESJiency and Economy, pp.149-179. 63. Shamsudin, S.A., 2013. Kinematic Synthesis Of Planar, Shape-Changing Rigid Body Mechanisms For Design Profiles With Significant Differences In Arc Length. University of Dayton. 64. Shamsudin, S.A., Murray, A.P., Myszka, D.H., and Schrniedeler, J.P., 2013. Kinematic synthesis of planar, shape-changing, rigid body mechanisms for design profiles with significant differences in arc length. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 70, pp.425440. 65. Shili, L., Wenjie, G., and Shujun, L., 2008. Optimal Design of Compliant Trailing Edge for Shape Changing. Chinese Journal ofAeronautics, 21 (2), pp.187-192. 66. Waldron, K.J. and Kinzel, G.L., 2003. Kinematics, Dynamics, and Design of Machinery. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Wiley Publisher. 67. Waldron, K.J. and Kinzel, G.L., 2004. Kinematics, Dynamics, and Design of Machinery. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Son. 68. Walkenbach, J. and Walkenbach, J., 2001. Excel 2002 Power Programming with VBA. Quality Engineering. 69. Warwick, G., 2010. Sikorsky Spins Up Adaptive Rotor Work [online]. Aviation week. Available at: http://www.aviationweek.com/ [Accessed 11 May 20151. 70. Weisshaar, T., 2006. Morphing aircraft technology-new shapes for aircraft design. Multijiunctional Structures / Integration of Sensors and Antennas, pp.01-1- 01-20. 71. Wiggins, L.D., Stubbs, M.D., Johnston, C.O., Robertshaw, H.H., Reinholtz, C.F., and Inman, D.J., 2004. A design and analysis of a morphing Hyper-Elliptic Cambered Span (HECS) wing. Collection of Technical Papers - AWASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 5 (April), pp.3979-3988. 72. Zamani, N.G. and Weaver, J.M., 2012. CATIA V5 Tutorials Mechanism Design and Animation Release 21. Kansas: SDC Publications. 73. Zhao, K., Schmiedeler, J.P., and Murray, A.P., 2012. Design of Planar, Shape-Changing Rigid-Body Mechanisms for Morphing Aircraft Wings. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 4 (4), pp.041007-041016. 74. Zhou, Y. and Huang, W.M., 2015. Shape Memory Effect in Polymeric Materials: Mechanisms and Optimization. In: Procedia IUTAM.

Conversion Technique From 2D To 3D Model For A Shape-Changing Aircraft Slat Mechanism

Similar Items