Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study

Risk can be defined as a situation where there is a probability of both loss and gain. In order to realize the availability of risk, one should have enough awareness about losses and gains incurred. The higher the complexity in companies, the higher vulnerability in supply chain. Complexity and effi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mousa Algalos, Muthanna Ali
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2019
Subjects:	T Technology (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24927/1/Risk%20Management%20Of%20Yemen%E2%80%99s%20Beverage%20Manufacturing%20Industry%20Through%20Hazard%20Operability%20Study.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24927/2/Risk%20Management%20Of%20Yemen%E2%80%99s%20Beverage%20Manufacturing%20Industry%20Through%20Hazard%20Operability%20Study.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.24927
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Mohamad, Effendi
topic	T Technology (General)
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) Mousa Algalos, Muthanna Ali Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study
description	Risk can be defined as a situation where there is a probability of both loss and gain. In order to realize the availability of risk, one should have enough awareness about losses and gains incurred. The higher the complexity in companies, the higher vulnerability in supply chain. Complexity and efficiency in supply chain risks are two important drivers. If organizations and manufacturing companies as Beverage Company have problems and difficulties on how to manage their internal and external disruptions, this could cause many problems to supply chain and the quality of products. Satisfaction of customers is the target of all companies and it must not be influenced by an inefficient Risk Management (RM). There is a lack of implementation of RM in Yemen especially in the local company such as beverage companies. Because of the time consuming, this project will discuss only risks related to the supply and manufacturing processes. In addition, some risks related to supply chain will be excluded which are demand internal risks and external environmental issues. The project will focus on the production process risks starting from raw material to finished product. This project involve three objectives which will be discussed in three phases; identification of risks, analysis of risks, and avoidance strategies and the Risk Management Process (RMP) implementation. In the first stage, all risks related to the four areas which are suppliers, material, process and inventory will be identified. In the first stage a brain storming tool is used which is Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP). The second stage is the evaluation of all identified risks based on their likelihood and impacts in order to determine the critical risks via using risk matrix. The last phase is to carry out strategies to avoid and mitigate the critical risks and to give recommendations for ABC Beverage Company on the implementation of these reactive and proactive strategies. The real conditions, by which data collecting could be analyzed first hand, is examined by quantitative method. All interviews that were done during collecting data were performed qualitatively. This qualitative method was used for obtaining an overall image of the company and to do interviews by Skype and WhatsApp. Furthermore, a written questionnaire was sent to engineers in the company to be answered as a method of collecting data. The result for this project is a list of possible risks that could happen at the beverage company and their causes and consequences which is the first objective of the project. Moreover, the critical risks were specified and gathered into groups after doing risk analysis by risk matrixes. Furthermore, mitigation strategies and suggestions to avoid and mitigate risks are presented based on the interviews, questionnaires, and based on the best practices of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) method. Finally, a model for the risk management process implementation and its supporting tools is presented.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mousa Algalos, Muthanna Ali
author_facet	Mousa Algalos, Muthanna Ali
author_sort	Mousa Algalos, Muthanna Ali
title	Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study
title_short	Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study
title_full	Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study
title_fullStr	Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study
title_full_unstemmed	Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study
title_sort	risk management of yemen’s beverage manufacturing industry through hazard operability study
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate	2019
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24927/1/Risk%20Management%20Of%20Yemen%E2%80%99s%20Beverage%20Manufacturing%20Industry%20Through%20Hazard%20Operability%20Study.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24927/2/Risk%20Management%20Of%20Yemen%E2%80%99s%20Beverage%20Manufacturing%20Industry%20Through%20Hazard%20Operability%20Study.pdf
_version_	1747834098534055936
spelling	my-utem-ep.249272021-09-29T11:15:29Z Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study 2019 Mousa Algalos, Muthanna Ali T Technology (General) Risk can be defined as a situation where there is a probability of both loss and gain. In order to realize the availability of risk, one should have enough awareness about losses and gains incurred. The higher the complexity in companies, the higher vulnerability in supply chain. Complexity and efficiency in supply chain risks are two important drivers. If organizations and manufacturing companies as Beverage Company have problems and difficulties on how to manage their internal and external disruptions, this could cause many problems to supply chain and the quality of products. Satisfaction of customers is the target of all companies and it must not be influenced by an inefficient Risk Management (RM). There is a lack of implementation of RM in Yemen especially in the local company such as beverage companies. Because of the time consuming, this project will discuss only risks related to the supply and manufacturing processes. In addition, some risks related to supply chain will be excluded which are demand internal risks and external environmental issues. The project will focus on the production process risks starting from raw material to finished product. This project involve three objectives which will be discussed in three phases; identification of risks, analysis of risks, and avoidance strategies and the Risk Management Process (RMP) implementation. In the first stage, all risks related to the four areas which are suppliers, material, process and inventory will be identified. In the first stage a brain storming tool is used which is Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP). The second stage is the evaluation of all identified risks based on their likelihood and impacts in order to determine the critical risks via using risk matrix. The last phase is to carry out strategies to avoid and mitigate the critical risks and to give recommendations for ABC Beverage Company on the implementation of these reactive and proactive strategies. The real conditions, by which data collecting could be analyzed first hand, is examined by quantitative method. All interviews that were done during collecting data were performed qualitatively. This qualitative method was used for obtaining an overall image of the company and to do interviews by Skype and WhatsApp. Furthermore, a written questionnaire was sent to engineers in the company to be answered as a method of collecting data. The result for this project is a list of possible risks that could happen at the beverage company and their causes and consequences which is the first objective of the project. Moreover, the critical risks were specified and gathered into groups after doing risk analysis by risk matrixes. Furthermore, mitigation strategies and suggestions to avoid and mitigate risks are presented based on the interviews, questionnaires, and based on the best practices of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) method. Finally, a model for the risk management process implementation and its supporting tools is presented. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24927/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24927/1/Risk%20Management%20Of%20Yemen%E2%80%99s%20Beverage%20Manufacturing%20Industry%20Through%20Hazard%20Operability%20Study.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24927/2/Risk%20Management%20Of%20Yemen%E2%80%99s%20Beverage%20Manufacturing%20Industry%20Through%20Hazard%20Operability%20Study.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=118160 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Mohamad, Effendi 1. Adhitya, A., Srinivasan, R. and Karimi, I. A., 2009. Supply chain risk identification using a HAZOP‐based approach. AIChE journal, 55(6), pp. 1447–1463. 2. Alexa, I.V. and Simona-Valeria, T., 2011. Different Categories of Business Risk. Annals of Dunărea de Jos University. Fascicle I: Economics and Applied Informatics, 1(2), pp. 109–114. 3. Altabbakh, H., 2014. STAMP–Holistic system safety approach or just another risk model. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 32, pp. 109–119. 4. Andersen, T. J. and Terp, A., 2006. Perspectives on strategic risk management. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, 32, pp. 69–85. 5. Andersson, H., 2007. Willingness to pay for road safety and estimates of the risk of death: Evidence from a Swedish contingent valuation study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(4), pp. 853–865. 6. Bahr, N. J., 2014. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach. CRC Press. 7. Berg, P. and Skoogh, C., 2012. Enterprise Risk Management. Hur använder svenska företag ERM. 8. Bhamra, R., Dani, S. and Burnard, K., 2011. Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), pp. 5375–5393. 9. Biswal, G. R., Maheshwari, R. P. and Dewal, M. L., 2010. Fault tree analysis and process instrumentation of S2WRS based hydrogen cooling system. in 2010 IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition, EnergyCon 2010, pp. 379–384. 10. Blecker, T. and Kersten, W., 2006. Managing risks in supply chains: How to build reliable collaboration in logistics. Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co KG. 11. Chopra, S. and Sodhi, M. S., 2004. Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan management review, 46(1), pp. 53–61. 12. Christopher, M. and Peck, H., 2004. Building the resilient supply chain. The international journal of logistics management, 15(2), pp. 1–14. 13. Cockshott, J. E., 2005. Probability bow-ties: a transparent risk management tool. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 83(4), pp. 307–316. 14. Craighead, C. W., 2007. The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), pp. 131–156. 15. Dani, S., 2009. Predicting and managing supply chain risks. Supply Chain Risk, pp. 53–66. 16. Deacon, T., Amyotte, P. R. and Khan, F. I., 2010. Human error risk analysis in offshore emergencies. Safety science, 48(6), pp. 803–818. 17. Dhillon, B. S., 2003. Engineering safety: fundamentals, techniques, and applications. World Scientific Publishing Company. 18. De Dianous, V. and Fievez, C., 2006. ARAMIS project: A more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow–tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130(3), pp. 220–233. 19. Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A., 1982. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of environmental and technological dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press Google Scholar. 20. Dunjó, J., 2010. Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. Journal of hazardous materials. 173(3), pp. 19–32. 21. Falasca, M., Zobel, C. W. and Cook, D., 2008. A decision support framework to assess supply chain resilience. Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, pp. 596–605. 22. Gallagher, R. B., 1956. Risk management-new phase of cost control. Harvard Business Review.34(5), pp. 75–86. 23. Geum, Y., 2009. Application of fault tree analysis to the service process. Journal of Service Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 20(4), pp. 433–454. 24. Ghodrati, B., Akersten, P.A. and Kumar, U. 2007. Spare parts estimation and risk assessment conducted at Choghart Iron Ore Mine: A case study. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 13(4), pp. 353–363. 25. Global, S. A. I., Iso, F. and License, C. 2000. Analysis techniques for system reliability procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). National Standards Authority of Ireland, 44(0), pp. 0–9. 26. Gonzalez-Benito, J., 2007. A theory of purchasing’s contribution to business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), pp. 901–917. 27. Guide, I. S. O. and Page, V., 2009. TMB Technical Management Board ISO Guide 73 : 2009. Risk Management, p. 2. 28. Hahn, G. J. and Kuhn, H., 2012. Value-based performance and risk management in supply chains: A robust optimization approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), pp. 135–144. 29. Harland, C., Brenchley, R. and Walker, H., 2003. Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply management, 9(2), pp. 51–62. 30. Hopkin, P., 2017. Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers. 31. IRM, 2002. A Risk Management Standard. Institute of Risk Management. Available at: www.theirm.org. 32. Islam, M. A. and Tedford, D., 2012. Implementation of risk management in manufacturing industry-an empirical investigation. people. Citeseer, 2(3). 33. ISO (2009). ISO 31000 - Risk management - Principles and guidelines. ISO 31000:2009 - Risk Management, p. 1. doi: 10.1080/07366981.2012.682494. 34. ISO (2018). ISO 31000 - Risk management. ISO 31000:2018 - Risk Management, p. 1. doi: 10.1080/07366981.2012.682494. 35. Jacinto, C. and Silva, C., 2010. A semi-quantitative assessment of occupational risks using bow-tie representation. Safety Science, 48(8), pp. 973–979. 36. Janic, M., 2000. An assessment of risk and safety in civil aviation, Journal of Air Transport Management, 6(1), pp. 43–50. 37. Jüttner, U. and Maklan, S., 2011. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), pp. 246–259. 38. Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B. J., 1981. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk analysis, 1(1), pp. 11–27. 39. Khan, O. and Zsidisin, G. A., 2011. Handbook for Supply Chain Risk Management: Case Studies, Effective Practices, and Emerging Trends. J. Ross publishing. 40. Kim, J., 2007. A study of the specilized FMEA procedure for the railroad vehicle. 37th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering 2007. 41. Kirchsteiger, C., 2002. Review of international industrial safety management frameworks. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 80(5), pp. 235–244. 42. Knechel, W. R., 2007. The business risk audit: Origins, obstacles and opportunities, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4–5), pp. 383–408. 43. Labodová, A., 2004. Implementing integrated management systems using a risk analysis based approach. Journal of cleaner production, 12(6), pp. 571–580. 44. Mullai, A., 2008. Risk Management System: A handbook of assessement, management and performance. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. 45. Narvaez, B. and Hyman, W. A., 2010. Prospective Risk Management: Analysis Evaluation and Control’, Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare, 7(5), pp. 34–36. 46. Petruska, D. J., 2009. MODU Risk-Moored MODU Risk Assessment. Offshore Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference. 47. Pitt, M. J., 1994. Hazard and operability studies: a tool for management analysis. Facilities. MCB UP Ltd, 12(13), pp. 5–8. 48. Rossing, N. L., 2010. A functional HAZOP methodology. Computers & chemical engineering, 34(2), pp. 244–253. 49. Roy, P. K., Bhatt, A. and Rajagopal, C., 2003. Quantitative risk assessment for accidental release of titanium tetrachloride in a titanium sponge production plant. Journal of hazardous materials, 102(2–3), pp. 167–186. 50. Seastrom, J. W., 2004. Risk management in international manned space program operations. Acta astronautica, 54(4), pp. 273–279. 51. Simpleman, L. (2003) Risk Management Guide for DOD Acquisition, (Version 2.0). DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIV FT BELVOIR VA. 52. Slack, N., Chambers, S. and Johnston, R., 2009. Operations and process management: principles and practice for strategic impact. Pearson Education. 53. Smallman, C. and Smith, D., 2003. Patterns of managerial risk perceptions: exploring the dimensions of managers’ accepted risks. Risk Management, 5(1), pp. 7–32. 54. Speier, C., 2011. Global supply chain design considerations: Mitigating product safety and security risks. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7–8), pp. 721–736. 55. Stiff, J., 2003. Comparative risk analysis of two FPSO mooring configurations. Offshore Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference. 56. Stoner, J. A. F., 1968. Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(4), pp. 442–459. 57. Ström, M., Koivisto, R. and Andersson, D., 2013. UML modelling concepts of HAZOP to enhance the ability to identify emerging risks. Journal of Risk Research, 16(3–4), pp. 421–432. 58. Strupczewski, A., 2003. Accident risks in nuclear-power plants. Applied Energy, 75(1–2), pp. 79–86. 59. Tang, C. and Tomlin, B., 2009. How much flexibility does it take to mitigate supply chain risks. Supply chain risk, pp. 155–174. 60. Targoutzidis, A., 2010. Incorporating human factors into a simplified “bow-tie” approach for workplace risk assessment. Safety science, 48(2), pp. 145–156. 61. Thun, J.-H. and Hoenig, D., 2011. An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International journal of production economics, 131(1), pp. 242–249. 62. Toma, S.V., Alexa, I.V. and Şarpe, D., 2012. The Risks and the Governments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, pp. 275–279. 63. Uher, T. E. and Toakley, A. R., 1999. Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project. International Journal of Project Management, 17(3), pp. 161–169. 64. Venkatasubramanian, V., Zhao, J. and Viswanathan, S., 2000. Intelligent systems for HAZOP analysis of complex process plants. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24(9–10), pp. 2291–2302. 65. Visser, R. C., 1993. Offshore Platform Accidents, Regulations and Industry Standards. Offshore Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference. 66. White, D. 1995. Application of systems thinking to risk management: a review of the literature. Management Decision, 33(10), pp. 35–45.

Risk Management Of Yemen’s Beverage Manufacturing Industry Through Hazard Operability Study

Similar Items