The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces

Solid liquid (S-L) interface had been widely used in various industries. Many previous researcher had study the effect of thermal energy transfer across solid-liquid interface. However the effect of difference thickness of thin liquid film and thermal energy transfer had not been study in detail yet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Jannatul Al-Qashah
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25172/1/The%20Influence%20Of%20Liquid%20Film%20Thickness%20On%20The%20Heat%20Transfer%20At%20Solid-Liquid%20Interfaces.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25172/2/The%20Influence%20Of%20Liquid%20Film%20Thickness%20On%20The%20Heat%20Transfer%20At%20Solid-Liquid%20Interfaces.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.25172
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
advisor Saleman, Abdul Rafeq

topic Q Science (General)
QD Chemistry
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
QD Chemistry
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Jannatul Al-Qashah
The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces
description Solid liquid (S-L) interface had been widely used in various industries. Many previous researcher had study the effect of thermal energy transfer across solid-liquid interface. However the effect of difference thickness of thin liquid film and thermal energy transfer had not been study in detail yet. Hence the objective of this report is to investigate the influence of difference liquid film thickness on the thermal energy transfer at solid-liquid interface by using molecular dynamic (MD) simulation. In this report the solid gold (Au) had been choose as two parallel solid walls where liquid methane (〖"CH" 〗_"4" ) will be place between them. The simulation test is focusing on the effect of (110) crystal plane only to the thermal energy transfer across the simulation system. The model consists of solid wall and liquid film will be described after the study had been made. The heat flux will be applied constantly from the centre to the both left and right side of the system. The structural quantities such as density distribution, temperature distribution and heat flux will be calculated during this test. The thermal boundary resistance (TBR) will be used to describe the characteristic of thermal energy transfer at S-L interface of the simulation system. The result show that the value of TBR decrease when the thickness of think film increase. Besides, the number of molecule will also affect the TBR value. When the number of molecule decrease the value of TBR will be decrease which will lead to increasing the amount of thermal energy transfer
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Jannatul Al-Qashah
author_facet Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Jannatul Al-Qashah
author_sort Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Jannatul Al-Qashah
title The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces
title_short The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces
title_full The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces
title_fullStr The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces
title_full_unstemmed The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces
title_sort influence of liquid film thickness on the heat transfer at solid-liquid interfaces
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25172/1/The%20Influence%20Of%20Liquid%20Film%20Thickness%20On%20The%20Heat%20Transfer%20At%20Solid-Liquid%20Interfaces.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25172/2/The%20Influence%20Of%20Liquid%20Film%20Thickness%20On%20The%20Heat%20Transfer%20At%20Solid-Liquid%20Interfaces.pdf
_version_ 1747834110838046720
spelling my-utem-ep.251722021-09-29T11:53:26Z The Influence Of Liquid Film Thickness On The Heat Transfer At Solid-Liquid Interfaces 2020 Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Jannatul Al-Qashah Q Science (General) QD Chemistry Solid liquid (S-L) interface had been widely used in various industries. Many previous researcher had study the effect of thermal energy transfer across solid-liquid interface. However the effect of difference thickness of thin liquid film and thermal energy transfer had not been study in detail yet. Hence the objective of this report is to investigate the influence of difference liquid film thickness on the thermal energy transfer at solid-liquid interface by using molecular dynamic (MD) simulation. In this report the solid gold (Au) had been choose as two parallel solid walls where liquid methane (〖"CH" 〗_"4" ) will be place between them. The simulation test is focusing on the effect of (110) crystal plane only to the thermal energy transfer across the simulation system. The model consists of solid wall and liquid film will be described after the study had been made. The heat flux will be applied constantly from the centre to the both left and right side of the system. The structural quantities such as density distribution, temperature distribution and heat flux will be calculated during this test. The thermal boundary resistance (TBR) will be used to describe the characteristic of thermal energy transfer at S-L interface of the simulation system. The result show that the value of TBR decrease when the thickness of think film increase. Besides, the number of molecule will also affect the TBR value. When the number of molecule decrease the value of TBR will be decrease which will lead to increasing the amount of thermal energy transfer 2020 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25172/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25172/1/The%20Influence%20Of%20Liquid%20Film%20Thickness%20On%20The%20Heat%20Transfer%20At%20Solid-Liquid%20Interfaces.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25172/2/The%20Influence%20Of%20Liquid%20Film%20Thickness%20On%20The%20Heat%20Transfer%20At%20Solid-Liquid%20Interfaces.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=118368 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty Of Mechanical Engineering Saleman, Abdul Rafeq 1. A.Rahman. (2000). Perspective on “correlations in the motion of atoms in liquid argon.” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 103(3–4), 263–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002149900020 2. Abolala, M., Peyvandi, K., Varaminian, F., & Hashemianzadeh, S. M. (2020). Thermodynamic properties of the Lennard-Jones FCC solid: perturbation theory parameterisation and Monte Carlo simulation. Molecular Physics, 118(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2019.1582813 3. Aduloju, S. C., & Truster, T. J. (2020). A primal formulation for imposing periodic boundary conditions on conforming and nonconforming meshes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 359, 112663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112663 4. Alder, B. J., & Wainwright, T. E. (1959). Studies in molecular dynamics. I. General method. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 31(2), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1730376 5. Andersen, H. C. (1983). Rattle: A “velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. Journal of Computational Physics, 52(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(83)90014-1 6. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Van Gunsteren, W. F., Dinola, A., & Haak, J. R. (1984). Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 81(8), 3684–3690. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448118 7. Berne, B. J. (1999). Molecular Dynamics in Systems with Multiple Time Scales: Reference System Propagator Algorithms. 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58360-5_16 8. Cahill, D. G., Ford, W. K., Goodson, K. E., Mahan, G. D., Majumdar, A., Maris, H. J., … Phillpot, S. R. (2003). Nanoscale thermal transport. Journal of Applied Physics, 93(2), 793–818. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1524305 9. Chen, S., Lee, I. Y. S., Tolbert, W. A., Wen, X., & Dlott, D. D. (1992). Applications of ultrafast temperature jump spectroscopy to condensed phase molecular dynamics. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 96(18), 7178–7186. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100197a012 10. Deringer, V. L., & Csányi, G. (2017). Machine learning based interatomic potential for amorphous carbon. Physical Review B, 95(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094203 11. Geng, X., Yu, M., Zhang, W., Liu, Q., Yu, X., & Lu, Y. (2019). Slip length and structure of liquid water flowing past atomistic smooth charged walls. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55491-2 12. Hoover, W. G. (1985). Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Physical Review A, Vol. 31, p. 1695. 13. Hopkins, P. E., Salaway, R. N., Stevens, R. J., & Norris, P. M. (2007). Temperature-dependent thermal boundary conductance at Al/Al 2O 3 and Pt/Al 2O 3 interfaces. International Journal of Thermophysics, 28(3), 947–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-007-0236-5 14. Hospital, A., Goñi, J. R., Orozco, M., & Gelpí, J. L. (2015). Molecular dynamics simulations: Advances and applications. Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry, 8(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.2147/AABC.S70333 15. Jones, J. E., & A, P. R. S. L. (1924). On the determination of molecular fields. —II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 106(738), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1924.0082 16. Kim, B. (2012). Thermal resistance at a liquid – solid interface dependent on the ratio of thermal oscillation frequencies. Chemical Physics Letters, 554, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2012.10.022 17. Koelman, J. M. V. A., & Hoogerbrugge, P. J. (1993). Dynamic simulations of hard-sphere suspensions under steady shear. Epl, 21(3), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/21/3/018 18. Leeuw, S. W. De, Perram, J. W., & Smith, E. R. (1980). Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. I. Lattice sums and dielectric constants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 373(1752), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1980.0135 19. Li, M., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Ren, J., & Li, B. (2015). Thermal boundary conductance across metal-nonmetal interfaces: effects of electron-phonon coupling both in metal and at interface. European Physical Journal B, 88(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2015-50771-8 20. Liu, X., Wang, L., & Xue, Q. (2011). DLC-based solid-liquid synergetic lubricating coatings for improving tribological behavior of boundary lubricated surfaces under high vacuum condition. Wear, 271(5–6), 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.03.021 21. Lyeo, H. K., & Cahill, D. G. (2006). Thermal conductance of interfaces between highly dissimilar materials. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 73(14), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.144301 22. Martys, N. S., & Mountain, R. D. (1999). Velocity Verlet algorithm for dissipative-particle-dynamics-based models of suspensions. Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, 59(3), 3733–3736. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.59.3733 23. Maruyama, S., & Kimura, T. (1999). A Study on Thermal Resistance over a Solid-Liquid Interface by the Molecular Dynamics Method. Thermal Science & Engineering, 7(1), 63–68. 24. Masella, M. (2006). The multiple time step r-RESPA procedure and polarizable potentials based on induced dipole moments. Molecular Physics, 104(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970500404414 25. Mazur, A. K. (1997). Common molecular dynamics algorithms revisited: Accuracy and optimal time steps of Störmer-Leapfrog integrators. Journal of Computational Physics, 136(2), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1997.5740 26. Milanese, M., Iacobazzi, F., Colangelo, G., & de Risi, A. (2016). An investigation of layering phenomenon at the liquid–solid interface in Cu and CuO based nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 103, 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.07.082 27. Mudawar, I. (2001). Assessment of high-heat-flux thermal management schemes. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 24(2), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/6144.926375 28. Nosé, S. (1984). A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 81(1), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447334 29. Nosé, S. (1991). Molecular Dynamics Simulations at Constant Temperature and Pressure. Computer Simulation in Materials Science, 2384(1980), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3546-7_2 30. P. L. Kapitza. (1975). Heat Transfer and Storage. Solar Energy, 1, 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-019817-0.50031-8 31. Park, S. J., & Seo, M. K. (2011). Solid-Liquid Interface. In Interface Science and Technology (Vol. 18). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375049-5.00003-7 32. Parrinello, M., & Rahman, A. (1981). Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. Journal of Applied Physics, 52(12), 7182–7190. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328693 33. Peng, Y., Zarringhalam, M., Barzinjy, A. A., Toghraie, D., & Afrand, M. (2020). Effects of surface roughness with the spherical shape on the fluid flow of argon atoms flowing into the microchannel, under boiling condition using molecular dynamic simulation. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 297, 111650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111650 34. Peterson, R. E., & Anderson, A. C. (1972). Acoustic-mismatch model of the Kaptiza resistance. Physics Letters A, 40(4), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(72)90589-0 35. Phys, J. (1999). Contact us My IOPscience The embedded-atom model applied to vacancy formation in bulk aluminium and lithium The embedded-atom model applied to vacancy formation in bulk aluminium and lithium. 3663. 36. Rafeq, A., Saleman, B., Munir, F. A., Fadzli, M., Abdollah, B., Kikugawa, G., & Ohara, T. (2018). Comparison of the characteristic of heat transport between non-shear and shear systems at solid-liquid ( S-L ) interfaces. (May), 270–272. 37. Ran, X., & Wang, M. (2020). Abnormal thermal boundary resistance of thin films with heat source. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 147, 118941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118941 38. Ryckaert, J. P., Ciccotti, G., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1977). Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. Journal of Computational Physics, 23(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 39. Saleman, A. R. bin, Chilukoti, H. K., Kikugawa, G., Shibahara, M., & Ohara, T. (2017a). A molecular dynamics study on the thermal energy transfer and momentum transfer at the solid-liquid interfaces between gold and sheared liquid alkanes. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 120, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2017.06.014 40. Saleman, A. R. bin, Chilukoti, H. K., Kikugawa, G., Shibahara, M., & Ohara, T. (2017b). A molecular dynamics study on the thermal transport properties and the structure of the solid–liquid interfaces between face centered cubic (FCC) crystal planes of gold in contact with linear alkane liquids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 105, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.09.069 41. Shuichi Nosé. (1980). Molecular Physics: An International Journal at the Interface Between Chemistry and Physics. (January 2014), 37–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268978300102851 42. Svobodova-Sedlackova, A., Barreneche, C., Alonso, G., Fernandez, A. I., & Gamallo, P. (2020). Effect of nanoparticles in molten salts – MD simulations and experimental study. Renewable Energy, 152, 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.046 43. Swartz, E. T., & Pohl, R. O. (1989). Thermal boundary resistance. Reviews of Modern Physics, 61(3), 605–668. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.61.605 44. Taniker, S., & Yilmaz, C. (2013). Phononic gaps induced by inertial amplification in BCC and FCC lattices. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 377(31–33), 1930–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.05.022 45. Tao, Y., Xue, Q., Liu, Z., Shan, M., Ling, C., Wu, T., & Li, X. (2014). Tunable hydrogen separation in porous graphene membrane: First-principle and molecular dynamic simulation. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 6(11), 8048–8058. https://doi.org/10.1021/am4058887 46. Torii, D., Ohara, T., & Ishida, K. (2010). Molecular-scale mechanism of thermal resistance at the solid-liquid interfaces: Influence of interaction parameters between solid and liquid molecules. Journal of Heat Transfer, 132(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3211856 47. Vo, T. Q., & Kim, B. H. (2015). Interface thermal resistance between liquid water and various metallic surfaces. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16(7), 1341–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0176-0 48. Volz, S. G., & Chen, G. (1999). Molecular dynamics simulation of thermal conductivity of silicon nanowires. Applied Physics Letters, 75(14), 2056–2058. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.124914 49. Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Shi, R., Chandrashekar, B. N., Shen, N., Song, H., … Cheng, C. (2020). Impact of Nanoscale Roughness on Heat Transport across the Solid–Solid Interface. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 7(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201901582 50. Wang, X., Venerus, D., Puri, I. K., & Murad, S. (2020). On using the anisotropy in the thermal resistance of solid–fluid interfaces to more effectively cool nano-electronics. Molecular Simulation, 46(2), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2019.1684488 51. Wassenaar, T. A., Ingólfsson, H. I., Böckmann, R. A., Tieleman, D. P., & Marrink, S. J. (2015). Computational lipidomics with insane: A versatile tool for generating custom membranes for molecular simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 11(5), 2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00209 52. Xue, L., Keblinski, P., Phillpot, S. R., Choi, S. U. S., & Eastman, J. A. (2003). Two regimes of thermal resistance at a liquid-solid interface. Journal of Chemical Physics, 118(1), 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1525806 53. Yoo, D., & Joshi, Y. (2002). Energy efficient thermal management of electronic components using solid liquid phase change materials. InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, ITHERM, 2002-Janua(4), 800–807. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHERM.2002.1012536 54. Yuan, C., Duan, B., Li, L., Shang, B., & Luo, X. (2015). An improved model for predicting thermal contact resistance at liquid-solid interface. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 80, 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.09.048 55. Zasetsky, A. Y., Remorov, R., & Svishchev, I. M. (2007). Evidence of enhanced local order and clustering in supercooled water near liquid-vapor interface: Molecular dynamic simulations. Chemical Physics Letters, 435(1–3), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.12.043 56. Zhang, M., Guo, X., Zhang, S., & Hou, J. (2014). Synergistic effect of fluorination on molecular energy level modulation in highly efficient photovoltaic polymers. Advanced Materials, 26(7), 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304427 57. Zhang, Y., Ma, D., Zang, Y., Wang, X., & Yang, N. (2018). A modified theoretical model to accurately account for interfacial roughness in predicting the interfacial thermal conductance. Frontiers in Energy Research, 6(JUN), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00048 58. Zhao, J. J., Huang, M., Min, Q., Christopher, D. M., & Duan, Y. Y. (2011). Near-wall liquid layering, velocity slip, and solid-liquid interfacial thermal resistance for thin-film evaporation in microchannels. Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, 15(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567265.2011.560927