A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology

Simulation software has been widely used nowadays. It is useful in the manufacturing sectors, especially in the fourth industrial revolution due to simulation software can provide ideas on how to model, simulate, analyse, and optimize the whole production systems without interrupting the real system...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ling, Yee Ni
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25353/1/A%20Layout%20Optimization%20Approach%20For%20Reconfigurable%20Conveyor%20System%20Using%20Simulation%20Technology.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25353/2/A%20Layout%20Optimization%20Approach%20For%20Reconfigurable%20Conveyor%20System%20Using%20Simulation%20Technology.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.25353
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
advisor Abdul Rahman, Azrul Azwan

topic T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
Ling, Yee Ni
A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology
description Simulation software has been widely used nowadays. It is useful in the manufacturing sectors, especially in the fourth industrial revolution due to simulation software can provide ideas on how to model, simulate, analyse, and optimize the whole production systems without interrupting the real system. There are lots of simulation software in the market and use in different areas with different functions. The software used in this paper is the Tecnomatix Simulation software. The main purpose of this study is to present a layout optimization approach for the reconfigurable conveyor system. The approach is presented in the form of the user interface and the user interfaces are built for the straight-line conveyor and the curve conveyor using the element of dialogue in the software. This dialogue is formed with the assist of the programing language in the simulation software. The layout of the reconfigurable conveyor system able to optimize by optimizing the results of the speed of the conveyor and the throughput of the conveyor. The results can be optimized with the help of the defined parameters of the conveyor which are the width of the conveyor, the length of the conveyor, the number of conveyors, the degree of angle for the curve conveyor, the time is taken from the input to the output station, the density of the materials placed on the conveyor, and the size of the materials. The user interfaces for the curve conveyor able to optimize the layout with the degree of angle in the range of larger than 0º but lesser or equal to 90º due to the sine function of the calculation in the SimTalk. The studies of attributes were carried out to declare the parameters needed for the layout of the conveyor system before implementing the parameters into the user interface. There are two main categories for the parameters which are the defined parameter and the driven parameters or named as dependent parameters. The speed of the conveyor and the throughput of the conveyor are categorized under the group of driven parameters which meant that they are depending on the defined parameters. Once the defined parameters changed, the values change of driven parameters will happen.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ling, Yee Ni
author_facet Ling, Yee Ni
author_sort Ling, Yee Ni
title A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology
title_short A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology
title_full A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology
title_fullStr A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology
title_full_unstemmed A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology
title_sort layout optimization approach for reconfigurable conveyor system using simulation technology
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25353/1/A%20Layout%20Optimization%20Approach%20For%20Reconfigurable%20Conveyor%20System%20Using%20Simulation%20Technology.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25353/2/A%20Layout%20Optimization%20Approach%20For%20Reconfigurable%20Conveyor%20System%20Using%20Simulation%20Technology.pdf
_version_ 1747834111342411776
spelling my-utem-ep.253532021-10-05T13:51:24Z A Layout Optimization Approach For Reconfigurable Conveyor System Using Simulation Technology 2020 Ling, Yee Ni T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Simulation software has been widely used nowadays. It is useful in the manufacturing sectors, especially in the fourth industrial revolution due to simulation software can provide ideas on how to model, simulate, analyse, and optimize the whole production systems without interrupting the real system. There are lots of simulation software in the market and use in different areas with different functions. The software used in this paper is the Tecnomatix Simulation software. The main purpose of this study is to present a layout optimization approach for the reconfigurable conveyor system. The approach is presented in the form of the user interface and the user interfaces are built for the straight-line conveyor and the curve conveyor using the element of dialogue in the software. This dialogue is formed with the assist of the programing language in the simulation software. The layout of the reconfigurable conveyor system able to optimize by optimizing the results of the speed of the conveyor and the throughput of the conveyor. The results can be optimized with the help of the defined parameters of the conveyor which are the width of the conveyor, the length of the conveyor, the number of conveyors, the degree of angle for the curve conveyor, the time is taken from the input to the output station, the density of the materials placed on the conveyor, and the size of the materials. The user interfaces for the curve conveyor able to optimize the layout with the degree of angle in the range of larger than 0º but lesser or equal to 90º due to the sine function of the calculation in the SimTalk. The studies of attributes were carried out to declare the parameters needed for the layout of the conveyor system before implementing the parameters into the user interface. There are two main categories for the parameters which are the defined parameter and the driven parameters or named as dependent parameters. The speed of the conveyor and the throughput of the conveyor are categorized under the group of driven parameters which meant that they are depending on the defined parameters. Once the defined parameters changed, the values change of driven parameters will happen. 2020 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25353/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25353/1/A%20Layout%20Optimization%20Approach%20For%20Reconfigurable%20Conveyor%20System%20Using%20Simulation%20Technology.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25353/2/A%20Layout%20Optimization%20Approach%20For%20Reconfigurable%20Conveyor%20System%20Using%20Simulation%20Technology.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=119165 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Abdul Rahman, Azrul Azwan 1. Aboufazeli, N., 2011. Reconfigurable Machine Tools Design Methodologies and Measuring Reconfigurability for Design Evaluation, p. 62. 2. Agarwal, A., Huq, F. and Sarkis, J., 1995, Performance of manufacturing cells for GT: a parametric analysis in H. Parsaei, A. K. Kamrani and D. Liles (Eds.), Planning Design and Analysis of Cellular Manufacturing Systems, Elsevier, London, pp.167-180. 3. Agarwal, A. and Sarkis, J., 1998, A review and analysis of comparative performance studies on functional and cellular manufacturing layouts, Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 34, no. 1, pp.77-89. 4. Ailing, C., 2009. Facility Layout Improvement Using Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) And ARENA, Master Thesis. 5. Akright, W.T. and Kroll, D.E., 1998, Cell formation performance measures: determining when to change an existing layout, Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 34, no. 1, pp159-171. 6. Arimond, J. and Ayles, W.R., 1993, Phenolics Creep Up on Engine Applications, Advanced Materials and Processes, Vol. 143, No. 6, pp. 20. 7. Asari, M., 1993. Electron Beam Hardening System, Advanced Materials and Processes, Vol. 143, No. 6, pp. 30-31. 8. Bastani, A. S. 1988. Analytical solution of closed-loop conveyor systems with discrete and deterministic material flow. European journal of operational research, 35(2), 187-192. 9. Benjaafar, S., 1999, Queuing Effects in Design of Factory Layouts, Working Paper, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, MN. 10. Benjaafar, S, Heragu, S.S. and Irani, S.A., 2000, Next Generation Factory Layouts: Research Challenges and Recent Progress, DSES Technical Report No. 38-00-482, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. 11. Benjaafar, S. and Sheikhzadeh, M., 2000, Design of Flexible Plant Layouts, IIE Transactions, 32, 309-322. 12. Chen, J. C. et al., 2019. Solving a Sortation Conveyor Layout Design Problem with Simulation-optimization Approach, 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, ICIEA 2019. IEEE, pp. 551–555. DOI: 10.1109/IEA.2019.8715232. 13. College-Industry Council on Material handling Education 14. Cook, R., 1999. Facilities Management and Design for the 21st Century, March, Site Selection 15. Ćwikła G and Foit K, 2017. Problems of integration of a manufacturing system with the business area of a company on the example of the Integrated Manufacturing Systems Laboratory, MATEC Web Conf. 94 6004 16. Dematic, 2014. Conveyor systems-cost-effective conveyor systems that give years of reliable service. 17. Dindarloo, S. R., Osanloo, M. and Frimpong, S., 2015. A stochastic simulation framework for truck and shovel selection and sizing in open-pit mines, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 115(3), pp. 209–219. DOI: 10.17159/2411-9717/2015/v115n3a6. 18. Editor, 1996. Norstar Custom Telephones Rely on Flexible Conveyor Systems, Assembly Magazine Online. 19. Farrington, P.A. and Nazemetz, J.W., 1998, Evaluation of the performance domain of cellular and functional layouts, Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 91-101. 20. Fedtke, S., & Boysen, N., 2014. Layout planning of sortation conveyors in parcel distribution centres. Transportation Science, 51(1), 3-18. 21. Flynn, B.B. and Jacobs, F.R., 1986, A simulation comparison of group technology with traditional job shop manufacturing, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 24, pp.1171-1192. 22. Grabowik, C. et al., 2018. A computer simulation as a tool for a production system analysis and optimization, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 400(2). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/400/2/022033. 23. Heragu, S.S. and Kochhar, J.S., 1994. Material Handling Issues in Adaptive Manufacturing Systems, The Materials Handling Engineering Division 75th Anniversary Commemorative Volume, ASME, New York, NY. 24. Hong, S., Johnson, A. L., Carlo, H. J., Nazzal, D., & Jimenez, J. A., 2011. Optimising the location of crossovers in conveyor-based automated material handling systems in semiconductor wafer fabs. International Journal of Production Research, 49(20), 6199-6226. 25. Hopp, W. E. and Spearman, M.L., 2000, Factory Physics, Irwin/Mc-Graw Hill, New York, NY. 26. Ikegaya, A., 2000, Highly Productive And Reconfigurable Manufacturing System, Technical Project Report, Intelligent Manufacturing Systems Initiative, www.ims.org. 27. Joglekar, G., 2017. Using Simulation for Scheduling and Rescheduling of Batch Processes. Processes, 5, 66. 28. Lonkwic P., Rozylo P., and Debski H., 2015, Numerical and experimental analysis of the progressive gear body with the use of the finite-element method. Eksploatacja I Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 17(4), 544-550. 29. Keller, 2015. Single Row Layout Models. 30. Klos, S.; Trebuna, P., 2015. Using Computer Simulation Method to Improve Throughput of Production Systems by Buffers and Workers Allocation. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev., 6, 60–69. 31. Koren, Y., Gu, X. and Guo, W., 2017. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems : Principles, design, and future trends. 32. Material Handling Systems, Hong Kong University of Science and technology 33. Mohamad, N. R. et al., 2018. Architecture of reconfigurable conveyor system in manufacturing system, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 12(1 Special Issue 2), pp. 117–128. 34. National Research Council, 1998. Visionary Manufacturing Challenges for 2020, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 35. Parker, Ottaway., 2006. Criteria for the selection of a programming language for introductory courses. 36. Prof. A.V. Gaur, Prof. Dr M.S. Pawar, 2016. AGV Based Material Handling System: A Literature Review, Volume III, Issue IA, January 2016 IJRSI ISSN 2321 – 2705 37. Shayan, E., & Chittilappilly, A., 2004. A genetic algorithm for facilities layout problems based on slicing tree structure. International Journal of Production Research, 42(19), 4055-4067. 38. Shambu, G. and Suresh, N.C., 2000, Performance of hybrid cellular manufacturing systems: A computer simulation investigation, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 120, pp. 436-458. 39. SIDERSKA, J., 2016. Application Of Tecnomatix Plant Simulation For Modeling Production And Logistics Processes, Business, Management, and Education. DOI: 10.3846/bme.2016.316. 40. Sonderman, D. 1982. An analytical model for recirculating conveyors with stochastic inputs and outputs. International Journal of Production Research, 20, 591–605. 41. Subramanian, A.S.R.; Gundersen, T.; Adams, T.A., 2018. II. Modelling and Simulation of Energy Systems: A Review Processes, 6, 238. 42. Technology, P. and Fluke, J. T., 2015. Implementing an Automated Sorting System. 43. Trebuna, P.; Kliment, M.; Edl, M.; Petrik, M., 2014. Creation of Simulation Model of Expansion of Production in Manufacturing Companies. Procedia Eng., 96, 477–482. 44. Trebuna, P.; Pekarcikova, M.; Edl, M., 2019. Digital Value Stream Mapping Using the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Software. Int. J. Simul. Model., 18, 19–32. 45. Wang, Y., & Zhou, C., 2010. A model and an analytical method for conveyor systems in distribution centres. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 19(4), 408-429. 46. Werners, B., & Wülfing, T., 2010. Robust optimization of internal transports at a parcel sorting centre operated by Deutsche Post World Net. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 419-426. 47. Youssef, A. M. A., and Elmaraghy, H. A., 2000. System Configuration Selection for Rms, (June), pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.1224.0323.